Here's my issue, the law considers them the equivalent of an actual firearm if you were to let's say commit an armed robbery with a replica or an air soft gun that looked like a real gun and does not have an orange tip.
Thus, they should be regulated in the same way as actual firearms.
I understand it's about the perception of threat on the victims of the robbery, but if they found out after the fact the gun was unloaded, using blanks, or a replica, I would think most victims would not take the stance that the weapon should be treated as an actual firearm for the purposes of punishment.
You are actually making a conscious decision to mininimize potential damage by not using an actual gun, and that should have some weight as far as charges/sentencing.
So yeah it shouldn't be a weird double standard, either regulate them in the same way as actual firearms or don't treat them as actual firearms when they are used in a crime.