30yearsofhurt
Member
Because she has hips? Gtfo
People gotta be outraged about sumtin'. War, poverty, famine - nah. Silhouettes of imaginary girl? Hell yeah!
Because she has hips? Gtfo
The way her hips are pushed to the side could easily be seen as sexually provocative.
I heard there were starving children in Africa to so wtf have YOU done about any of those things. Note, this wasn't the result of some outrage SJW boogeyman, this was an internal decision.People gotta be outraged about sumtin'. War, poverty, famine - nah. Silhouettes of imaginary girl? Hell yeah!
They didn't reduce her hips. They just made it look like a normal person standing instead of a silhouette for a strip club.They didn't have to reduce her hips, just make her, like... not stand like she's using an invisible hula hoop?
It harms my fragile male insecurity when things aren't directly marketed towards me specifically. :<Oh come on. One looks like something you'd airbrush on the side of a van, the other looks like someone standing there. It's harmless to tone it down a little bit away from the former direction.
People gotta be outraged about sumtin'. War, poverty, famine - nah. Silhouettes of imaginary girl? Hell yeah!
Fallacy of relative privation ("not as bad as") – dismissing an argument or complaint due to the existence of more important problems in the world, regardless of whether those problems bear relevance to the initial argument.
.T H I C C
I heard there were starving children in Africa to so wtf have YOU done about any of those things. Note, this wasn't the result of some outrage SJW boogeyman, this was an internal decision.
Looks like censorship to me, better start a boycott and terrorize any women affiliated with the developer or publisher, regardless of any actual affiliation and have her be fired by the developer / publisher for arbitrary reasons.
No idea what they were thinking with the old one, she either had comically huge hips or was standing in the most awkward way possible to emphasize her hips
Please be joking.Damn, may as well have had her swinging around a pole before
They didn't reduce her hips. They just made it look like a normal person standing instead of a silhouette for a strip club.
When people are referring to "outrage." They're typically referring to a non-existent boogeyman that scares poor game devs into representing women as equals instead of like objects whether it's with overt things like Cindy in FFXV or Quiet in MGSV or the normalization of ridiculous illustration tropes. Poses such as the original version of this image being one such example. There was no outrage about this pose specifically, the designers while touching up this image for the app decided that it'd be best not to make a silhouette that looks similar to the following.:You're projecting just a little too much. I don't recall mentioning any "SJW boogeyman".
Read the text above before dying on this hill bro. And while you die on your hill take your "womenirltoo™" sign with you. And concerning the bolded.Because women with big/curvy hips like that don't exist? If you have a problem with a cartoon silhouette with curves, then it seems you have a very strong bias for women with skinny frames.
Please be joking.
A woman standing with her hips arched, exaggerated or not, equals strip club? Come on. Do you have women friends in social media? Have you seen the totally innocuous manner that women pose alone and with their friends when taking silly, fun pics? Are they all strippers now just because you have weirdly conservative expectations?
FYI, I don't care that it was changed. Either is fine. I just think it's crazy and immature to say "they got rid of the stripper."
etc. it'd be best not to alienate half your fanbase with things even remotely like the above.
Read the text above before dying on this hill bro.
You're literally missing the point of the change and absolutely cannot deny the similarity between that original pose and the ones I posted, the main difference is literally the hand holding a phone. Those are literally all silhouettes from the entrances of strip clubs. ಠ_ಠI'm not "dying" on any hill. If a woman takes pics like that regularly, do you think she would appreciate the likes of us calling her a stripper? I don't think you understand half of the fanbase if you regard all of those poses, most of which are pretty mundane, as "stripper poses."
Some of those poses are innocuous though, outside of the heels.You're literally missing the point of the change and absolutely cannot deny the similarity between that original pose and the ones I posted, the main difference is literally the hand holding a phone. Those are literally all silhouettes from the entrances of strip clubs. ಠ_ಠ
Some of those poses are innocuous though, outside of the heels.
You're literally missing the point of the change and absolutely cannot deny the similarity between that original pose and the ones I posted, the main difference is literally the hand holding a phone. Those are literally all silhouettes from the entrances of strip clubs. ಠ_ಠ
Apparently if you don't like the original pose you just have an inherent bias towards skinny women. And the silhouettes of strip club entrances bearing a reasonable at worst resemblance to the original pose means nothing. Women irl pose like that everyday didn't you know? /s Dude probably thinks women walk like Bayonetta too. >_>So... just a good change, right? I mean, the original image looked pretty out of place. I wonder how many people will lose their mind anyway...
You're literally missing the point of the change and absolutely cannot deny the similarity between that original pose and the ones I posted, the main difference is literally the hand holding a phone.
No idea what they were thinking with the old one, she either had comically huge hips or was standing in the most awkward way possible to emphasize her hips, either way, this is an improvement, reminds me of this ME:A concept art with a similar nonsensical pose.
Cool, show me the art that has the male trainer pulling the same pose.TIL leaning back to take a photo of a large object = stripper.
It was a similar art style to what they did to the male trainer and his neck. It was all warped. I figured it would just due to style. Makes sense people would freak out though and demand something more realistic, just kinda lame because I preferred the old art style. I didn't even think anything was wrong until I read the reactions here.The previous pose is outright laughable lol
You can't be serious? It was obviously just a style thing. If you felt offended by it that's your problem and what you're projecting on the image. It was a silhouette of a trainer taking a picture. It was pretty obvious what was intended and it's sad that it's been misinterpreted and had to be changed.Cool, show me the art that has the male trainer pulling the same pose.
I think censorship is something stupid, like from the middle age. I don't understand how can someone can see something wrong in this original image to the point they asked someone to change it. They must have a super twisted mind to see something bad there.
The version in that original pose absolutely looks contorted, what even is that pose? Stand up from your chair and/or bed and try to stand exactly like that original pose, see how awkward it feels.I literally did not miss anything, bro. I think you're approaching this from a narrowly framed personal POV of what is or isn't acceptable for a woman's pose and calling it a stripper's pose. I fully understand what your meaning is and I strongly disagree on account of the fact that any ordinal girl or woman can be found posing like that IRL. Don't come at me with this "womenirl lol" remark as if it's not legitimate. No one made you the arbiter of what is or isn't in good taste for the visual personification of women. At best, you're incredibly conservative. At worse, you're displaying an level of condescension on what is/isn't acceptable and conflating it with the far more absurd examples one may find in like a comic book cover where a woman is contorted to hell in unrealistic sexy poses.
You do the same.TIL leaning back to take a photo of a large object = stripper.
Cool, show me the art that has the male trainer pulling the same pose.
The version in that original pose absolutely looks contorted, what even is that pose? Stand up from your chair and/or bed and try to stand exactly like that original pose, see how awkward it feels.