New wallpaper confirmed
Gran Turismo Sport - Europe cars so far
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBmlVXreiyo
Gran Turismo Sport - Asia cars so far
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qjszLeTBGk
I know this is incomplete, but good god they're missing so many staples, and not really compensating them with nice quirky choices. It's like they looked at people making fun of there being 520534 skylines in early GTs and said "hey, how about we include 3 versions of every car to save time and resources?" Aside from the VGT stuff there are some fairly uninspired choices here, most of that being the motorsport focus, but even then there are glaring omissions or their choice of disciplines to focus on creates glaring omissions. Also heavy focus on new with few classics. This is looking really bad unless all the cars they have left to to announce are made before this millenium, that'd take it to mediocre. How could any fan of cars OR racing be satisfied with this? Thanks, FIA.
That Pikes Peak Quattro model tho hnnnghghhhhhh
Where's the custom race mode info? It's the only hope of saving this cutdown rejigged GT6 PS4 shitfest for me. It better have a shit load of options from the bog standard stuff to tweaking individual AI, it also needs save/shareable single races and championships free from PSplus.
What's funny is, if they're doing this for PR sake, and do have a GT7 in the works, and want people to buy GT Sport instead of waiting for that GT7 title, this may not accomplish what they hope to accomplish. It may actually have a negative effect.
Let me see if I get this correctly?
GT6 was released in 2013, and the complaints where "why doesn't it do anything different? Its the same old GT", "why does it have antiquated car models?", "why is the multiplayer a little rubbish?".
Polyphony decides to scrap everything and build a new platform for the future of the franchise, a new rendering and physics engine, new and absurdly detailed car models, new tracks. A brand new and solid multiplayer structure - beta tested for months, no less - blessed by the FIA of all organizations. All in just over 3 years, for a relatively small studio.
If you like this series you should be ecstatic about the direction. It's running on a x86 platform - a much simpler platform to iterate for. Polyphony has an outstanding track record for DLC releases, it will come without a doubt. It looks spectacular. Drives just as well.
It may not be what you wanted, it certainly isn't traditional GT7 ( I like collecting my rally cars and Subarus just as the next person), but I believe Polyphony made the best possible choice to modernize and setup for the future.
Or maybe I'm too pragmatic eh?
Let me see if I get this correctly?
GT6 was released in 2013, and the complaints where "why doesn't it do anything different? Its the same old GT", "why does it have antiquated car models?", "why is the multiplayer a little rubbish?".
Polyphony decides to scrap everything and build a new platform for the future of the franchise, a new rendering and physics engine, new and absurdly detailed car models, new tracks. A brand new and solid multiplayer structure - beta tested for months, no less - blessed by the FIA of all organizations. All in just over 3 years, for a relatively small studio.
If you like this series you should be ecstatic about the direction. It's running on a x86 platform - a much simpler platform to iterate for. Polyphony has an outstanding track record for DLC releases, it will come without a doubt. It looks spectacular. Drives just as well.
It may not be what you wanted, it certainly isn't traditional GT7 ( I like collecting my rally cars and Subarus just as the next person), but I believe Polyphony made the best possible choice to modernize and setup for the future.
Or maybe I'm too pragmatic eh?
Let me see if I get this correctly?
GT6 was released in 2013, and the complaints where "why doesn't it do anything different? Its the same old GT", "why does it have antiquated car models?", "why is the multiplayer a little rubbish?".
Polyphony decides to scrap everything and build a new platform for the future of the franchise, a new rendering and physics engine, new and absurdly detailed car models, new tracks. A brand new and solid multiplayer structure - beta tested for months, no less - blessed by the FIA of all organizations. All in just over 3 years, for a relatively small studio.
If you like this series you should be ecstatic about the direction. It's running on a x86 platform - a much simpler platform to iterate for. Polyphony has an outstanding track record for DLC releases, it will come without a doubt. It looks spectacular. Drives just as well.
It may not be what you wanted, it certainly isn't traditional GT7 ( I like collecting my rally cars and Subarus just as the next person), but I believe Polyphony made the best possible choice to modernize and setup for the future.
Or maybe I'm too pragmatic eh?
I truly welcome the new direction and really enjoyed earning cars randomly by racing in the beta, but the car list shown in the previews is a really odd and disappointing piece of news. I truly hope more cars make it for release.
Let me see if I get this correctly?
GT6 was released in 2013, and the complaints where "why doesn't it do anything different? Its the same old GT", "why does it have antiquated car models?", "why is the multiplayer a little rubbish?".
Polyphony decides to scrap everything and build a new platform for the future of the franchise, a new rendering and physics engine, new and absurdly detailed car models, new tracks. A brand new and solid multiplayer structure - beta tested for months, no less - blessed by the FIA of all organizations. All in just over 3 years, for a relatively small studio.
If you like this series you should be ecstatic about the direction. It's running on a x86 platform - a much simpler platform to iterate for. Polyphony has an outstanding track record for DLC releases, it will come without a doubt. It looks spectacular. Drives just as well.
It may not be what you wanted, it certainly isn't traditional GT7 ( I like collecting my rally cars and Subarus just as the next person), but I believe Polyphony made the best possible choice to modernize and setup for the future.
Or maybe I'm too pragmatic eh?
What's the source of your quotes?Let me see if I get this correctly?
GT6 was released in 2013, and the complaints where "why doesn't it do anything different? Its the same old GT", "why does it have antiquated car models?", "why is the multiplayer a little rubbish?".
Polyphony decides to scrap everything and build a new platform for the future of the franchise, a new rendering and physics engine, new and absurdly detailed car models, new tracks. A brand new and solid multiplayer structure - beta tested for months, no less - blessed by the FIA of all organizations. All in just over 3 years, for a relatively small studio.
If you like this series you should be ecstatic about the direction. It's running on a x86 platform - a much simpler platform to iterate for. Polyphony has an outstanding track record for DLC releases, it will come without a doubt. It looks spectacular. Drives just as well.
It may not be what you wanted, it certainly isn't traditional GT7 ( I like collecting my rally cars and Subarus just as the next person), but I believe Polyphony made the best possible choice to modernize and setup for the future.
Or maybe I'm too pragmatic eh?
Unless you can find actual examples of the same people calling the formula stale when gt6 came out and those same people now being all up in arms about this new direction gt sport is taking, stop with this stupid "but you wanted change and now that they're giving it to you you have a problem" crap.
It's okay if you like the new direction, but stop making up shit to somehow try to prove that anyone who doesn't like it is in the wrong.
If you like this series you should be ecstatic about the direction. It's running on a x86 platform - a much simpler platform to iterate for. Polyphony has an outstanding track record for DLC releases, it will come without a doubt. It looks spectacular. Drives just as well.
It may not be what you wanted, it certainly isn't traditional GT7 ( I like collecting my rally cars and Subarus just as the next person), but I believe Polyphony made the best possible choice to modernize and setup for the future.
Or maybe I'm too pragmatic eh?
Gran Turismo Sport - Europe cars so far
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBmlVXreiyo
Gran Turismo Sport - Asia cars so far
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qjszLeTBGk
Where's the custom race mode info? It's the only hope of saving this cutdown rejigged GT6 PS4 shitfest for me. It better have a shit load of options from the bog standard stuff to tweaking individual AI, it also needs save/shareable single races and championships free from PSplus.
Let me see if I get this correctly?
GT6 was released in 2013, and the complaints where "why doesn't it do anything different? Its the same old GT", "why does it have antiquated car models?", "why is the multiplayer a little rubbish?".
Polyphony decides to scrap everything and build a new platform for the future of the franchise, a new rendering and physics engine, new and absurdly detailed car models, new tracks. A brand new and solid multiplayer structure - beta tested for months, no less - blessed by the FIA of all organizations. All in just over 3 years, for a relatively small studio.
If you like this series you should be ecstatic about the direction. It's running on a x86 platform - a much simpler platform to iterate for. Polyphony has an outstanding track record for DLC releases, it will come without a doubt. It looks spectacular. Drives just as well.
It may not be what you wanted, it certainly isn't traditional GT7 ( I like collecting my rally cars and Subarus just as the next person), but I believe Polyphony made the best possible choice to modernize and setup for the future.
Or maybe I'm too pragmatic eh?
I LOVE GT series and if I want to make a list of my favorite game series, GT will be in top 3. But career mode was one of the reasons that made me a GT fan. (alongside great collection of old and new cars, nice tracks, amazing gamplay and graphics)If you like this series you should be ecstatic about the direction.
Is this classified as full-priced game? If it doesn't have the content we expect, why should we pay full price, and has anyone thought about how the game will review?
Is this classified as full-priced game? If it doesn't have the content we expect, why should we pay full price, and has anyone thought about how the game will review?
Is this classified as full-priced game? If it doesn't have the content we expect, why should we pay full price, and has anyone thought about how the game will review?
They aren't a small studio though. They're 200 strong and that's the core staff.
Agreed.What's funny is, if they're doing this for PR sake, and do have a GT7 in the works, and want people to buy GT Sport instead of waiting for that GT7 title, this may not accomplish what they hope to accomplish. It may actually have a negative effect.
Like me, for instance, if they confirmed that a GT7 with a full campaign would be on the way later with enhanced features and what not, and this is a GT5 Prologue to GT5 situation in regards to release timeframe, I'd buy this game day 1. Just to show support because I think the experience a proper GT game provides is unmatched.
With the stance they've been taking since this E3 marketing went into place, I'm legitimately looking into Forza 7 right now and keeping an eye how that's turning out, despite not liking the way the cars handle and the presentation nearly as much as I do with GT.
So you think it's the same people who complained about the previous GT's career mode that are now complaining that there is no career mode?People can't see all the good stuff because PD took away their precious Sunday Cup, pretty sad that people are like that and so against change, even though they complain about things when they don't change too.
So you think it's the same people who complained about the previous GT's career mode that are now complaining that there is no career mode?
That's obviously not the case. Those who loved GT are likely those who complains now, because they're the ones getting screwed here, if I can word it that way.
Personally I'm just surprised about the whole thing. Millions of people love GT, it has sold better than most other racers since the very start, the driving has always been great but for many it's the upgrading, career mode and car collecting that has defined GT. And I just feel like PD has changed the wrong things here, which the reactions clearly shows. So if they don't know why people has loved the serie for 20 year then maybe next time they could try to add new things and improve things already there instead of removing things.
And just take a few seconds and think about what we're debating here. I for one honestly don't understand the defense force here. I would NEVER defend the removal of online just because I don't play online. That would be dumb and just plain mean. So why are those who love online gaming defending the removal of the single player career mode? Don't we want more people to play and enjoy the game?
The fact that everything that's there is super-polished only makes it worse for me, because the potential is better than ever and I know I'll only get to taste a small fraction of what's there this time since I'm only offline.I enjoyed that stuff too in the older games but I'm also not against change. I actually like the fact they are taking a risk and trying something different. Now of course it's not guaranteed to pay off but every other aspect of the game is looking extremely polished now, so I have a feeling it will still be a great GT game, just for different reasons than the old GT games.
People should give it a try before writing it off before playing, just because it's different.
The fact that everything that's there is super-polished only makes it worse for me, because the potential is better than ever and I know I'll only get to taste a small fraction of what's there this time since I'm only offline.
But yeah I'll be there day 1 just like most of us here, I'm just not as hyped as I used to be. I'm sure it'll sell in millions as usual because it's GT and because there is nothing else there. I still have hope for single player career DLC though. I'm sure they're listening.
PS Access 1 on 1 racing with PS VR (rally stage), ha, that race ending!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmfYMmt1JbI
From a very much non-VR guy, it looks impressive, wasn't aware VR was a stand alone mode though, must have missed that.
PS Access 1 on 1 racing with PS VR (rally stage), ha, that race ending!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmfYMmt1JbI
From a very much non-VR guy, it looks impressive, wasn't aware VR was a stand alone mode though, must have missed that.
as stripped back as VR is, it's one of the primary reasons i'm buying the game. because it hasn't had as many visual cutbacks as say, driveclub, its apparently an awesome experience, even if you're only racing 1 car.
Yeah, it looks really good, and if you've already got a PSVR, it's a no brainer, not sure if it's a system seller addition though, if it was more supported in the game I'd be tempted, but I am fairly VR skeptic.
i think some of us are just willing to give the changes a chance and tired of the constant negativity, it's the bulk of GAF threads tbh.So
And just take a few seconds and think about what we're debating here. I for one honestly don't understand the defense force here. I would NEVER defend the removal of online just because I don't play online. That would be dumb and just plain mean. So why are those who love online gaming defending the removal of the single player career mode? Don't we want more people to play and enjoy the game?
i think some of us are just willing to give the changes a chance and tired of the constant negativity