lunchwithyuzo
Banned
They already have. Eighting used it for MVC3.Criminal Upper said:Capcom Japan will NOT hand over MT Framework to any outside game developer.
Not even Capcom Vancouver.
They already have. Eighting used it for MVC3.Criminal Upper said:Capcom Japan will NOT hand over MT Framework to any outside game developer.
Not even Capcom Vancouver.
Amir0x said:ezekial45 likes Ninja Theory.
These individuals actually have confidence that they can crank out a product that isn't festering dog shit, so the perspective they hold is fundamentally different.
Let us hope that once Ninja Theory fucks up DmC as we all know they will, that they'll once and for all be locked out of any major franchise in this industry. Minimize the damage with one sacrifice.
lunchwithyuzo said:They already have. Eighting used it for MVC3.
haha well. opinions are a funny thingAmir0x said:ezekial45 likes Ninja Theory.
These individuals actually have confidence that they can crank out a product that isn't festering dog shit, so the perspective they hold is fundamentally different.
Let us hope that once Ninja Theory fucks up DmC as we all know they will, that they'll once and for all be locked out of any major franchise in this industry. Minimize the damage with one sacrifice.
your reply was about how the ninja theory apologists had the right to wait for more media. and they do. but it's one thing to wait for more media and another to try to damage control the situation and be constantly telling people they don't have the right to shit on the game. my post was about the latter.It's fine to dislike it, but personally i think it's a bit extreme to already resign the game to failure.
Also, backpedaling from what? I was responding to your original post. Then you edited in a few other sentences afterwards.
Green Biker Dude said:i also gave examples of games where people "should've been thankful" for whenever they were mentioned. but anyway, this discussion is meaningless. for someone who was acting all smart, you sure don't understand anything, or are just playing dumb to not concede the points. no point continuing the discussion from here if you're just gonna be like that. and you liked ninja theory's previous games, so...
ezekial45 said:And you're fine to think that. I find this hate for NT to be terribly over the top. I profoundly disagree with you, and i think you're sort of full of it (no offense), but i respect your stance. I don't respect the malice i see in this thread though. Anyway, even IF DmC doesn't turn out well, then that's that. I still believe i'm right in giving them a chance first.
I'll leave it there.
nckillthegrimace said:To be clear, I'm not saying this is good, but DmC could most definitely be a success from Capcom's point of view. If you want classic DMC back, then pray this is a "test" that we fail.
Yes, just like they co-developed SF4 with Dimps and TVC with 8ing. It's still an outside studio who was given access to MTF. K2 is another one, though Capcom ended up buying them out.ezekial45 said:Not entirely. Capcom co-developed the game with them. Also, that's a studio within range of the main dev offices.
Amir0x said:Sorry GreyFox if you're just going to whine about your ban because you're incapable of telling the obvious difference here the conversation is over. Go to PM if you're going to whine, but the answer is the same.
Personal insults = not allowed
Substantive Criticism = allowed.
capcom said they were rebooting dmc because they wanted it to sell 5 million copies. keep in mind dmc4 sold 2 million+, and they weren't satisfied. just sayin'.nckillthegrimace said:I can envision a future where DmC is both commercially and critically successful while still being an abject failure in the eyes of the fans. I mean they clearly did something in Enslaved that really appealed to reviewers; the metacritic average is fairly high at 82. I think they'll continue to do things to the game that are en vogue with reviewers: the game will be extremely linear; the combat will be more "accessible" (in this context relatively depthless); there will be sections to break-up the combat with mini-games, traversal, vehicles sections, or something similar; and the narrative will be at the forefront. Couple the relatively positive review scores with some intense marketing efforts, and, well, it might be a success. For example, see the success of Dragon Age II despite the online hatred expressed before and after its release.
To be clear, I'm not saying this is good, but DmC could most definitely be a success from Capcom's point of view. If you want classic DMC back, then pray this is a "test" that we fail.
GrayFoxPL said:
Amir0x said:When I spent more than $100 on a companies games and so far have been met with products I can barely call functional, let alone good, that's where the malice steps in.
I start feeling like it's a personal mission to spread the word about how bad someone is, so that others can avoid the same mistake I made.
That said, in the case of Ninja Theory most people know they're shit. So I don't have to do much proselytizing. I do it anyway because they're that awful, but they sully their own reputation plenty enough without my help.
lunchwithyuzo said:Yes, just like they co-developed SF4 with Dimps and TVC with 8ing. It's still an outside studio who was given access to MTF. K2 is another one, though Capcom ended up buying them out.
ezekial45 said:That's really over the top, but fine. There's no point in arguing about it any further.
We'll see what happens at E3, or whenever they show it off.
Green Biker Dude said:capcom said they were rebooting dmc because they wanted it to sell 5 million copies. keep in mind dmc4 sold 2 million+, and they weren't satisfied. just sayin'.
i suspect they'll come out and claim this game "successful" even if it sells 200k, just to pretend they actually did the right thing - capcom hates listening to the fans. but they'll be doing some revisionism there. their original target before the fiasco was 5 million, even if they deny it later on.
I didn't say it did, but it was also developed during a period where Capcom wasn't sharing the engine and toolsets. Same deal with TVC, but they changed their stance and decided to hand it over to 8ing for MVC3. Niitsuma even talked about it being a shift in strategy for them.ezekial45 said:SF4 didn't use MT Framework.
and NR had some trouble making MK games run 60. With experience they made it work with MK9 and MKvDC to some extent.Relaxed Muscle said:well MK it's only 2 characters on screen + the background, a DmC game has a lot more going on screen.
nckillthegrimace said:I can envision a future where DmC is both commercially and critically successful while still being an abject failure in the eyes of the fans. I mean they clearly did something in Enslaved that really appealed to reviewers; the metacritic average is fairly high at 82. I think they'll continue to do things to the game that are en vogue with reviewers: the game will be extremely linear; the combat will be more "accessible" (in this context relatively depthless); there will be sections to break-up the combat with mini-games, traversal, vehicles sections, or something similar; and the narrative will be at the forefront. Couple the relatively positive review scores with some intense marketing efforts, and, well, it might be a success. For example, see the success of Dragon Age II despite the online hatred expressed before and after its release.
To be clear, I'm not saying this is good, but DmC could most definitely be a success from Capcom's point of view. If you want classic DMC back, then pray this is a "test" that we fail.
zomgbbqftw said:I don't see why they picked Ninja Theory then. They will achieve neither of these stated goals. Should have left it in the capable hands of Itsuno and Tanaka, better yet they could have gone to Platinum Games and begged Kamiya to do it. The latter would achieve better ratings and similar sales to the new DmC reboot, but at least we know we would get a good game out of it.
Father_Brain said:Supposedly, one of Capcom USA's producers was/is particularly buddy-buddy with Ninja Theory, and convinced Inafune to greenlight it when he was in one of his peak Westaboo moods.
Anth0ny said:Resident Evil 6
Super MVC3
A bunch of awesome shit for Cafe
Let's goooooo
So Mr. Svennson, when is Darkstalkers 4 coming out?Criminal Upper said:Svennson reads GAF pretty frequently.
Believe me, I know.
That's also what I heard. But in reality, it's utterly BS reason to not share the engine with their western counterparts.Nirolak said:On the MT Framework note, I don't think there's any English documentation, hence the issue.
How much did Devil May Cry 4 sell?sleepykyo said:...Though 5 million is a bit high, I assume that internally they must be expecting somewhere between 1 and 2 million. Basically a Bayonetta scenario where the game sells 1 million or so and was (relatively) cheap to make so it's still profitable.
2.7 million including the PC version according to the same article where they implied their 5 million ambitions.Tron 2.0 said:How much did Devil May Cry 4 sell?
The whole point of giving their franchises over to Western developers was to expand the fan base to people who might be turned off by Japanese game design.
So I can't imagine they expect it to sell less than DMC4.
Amir0x said:i never understand why people think stuff like this is over the top. You spend a lot of money on games, they're terrible, so you want to try to ensure other people don't waste their money and time. It seems only logical to me.
As a note, they expect the game the Devil May Cry team went to work on, Dragon's Dogma, to only sell 1.5 million copies.Tron 2.0 said:Thanks.
Nirolak said:
Capcom wanted to make new IPs, but all the new IPs they made in the West bombed.sleepykyo said:Wait, Dragon's Dogma is by the DMC team? What happened?
Nirolak said:Capcom wanted to make new IPs, but all the new IPs they made in the West bombed.
As such, they farmed out almost all of their major IPs to unproven Western studios while their Japanese teams worked on building new IPs like Lost Planet and Dragon's Dogma.
ezekial45 said:http://www.capcom-europe.com/blog/2011/05/vote-for-capcom-and-help-us-win-an-important-award/
It's pretty safe to say that DmC WILL be at E3 this year.
Lonely1 said:What happened to the Lost Planet film?
It's driving me crazy that I can't remember any of the IPs from either scenario besides DmC and the new RE game.Nirolak said:Capcom wanted to make new IPs, but all the new IPs they made in the West bombed.
As such, they farmed out almost all of their major IPs to unproven Western studios while their Japanese teams worked on building new IPs like Lost Planet and Dragon's Dogma.