It isn't unbelievable that Sony is breaking even or even making a slight loss/profit on the hardware. The Vita's components aren't some semi-proprietary tech that took building new fab plants and years of R&D (see PS3). If you believe Sony, the Vita's R&D started in earnest only in 2008 and they already had, like, 95% final hardware in early 2011. And I'm sure Sony is likely getting some discounts from parts suppliers.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Shuhei Yoshida on Vita profitability, development budgets, Wii U & more
- Thread starter gofreak
- Start date
StealthGoblin
Banned
Even if they make a slight loss on hardware in the US, the UK and EU pricing will eliminate that.
I hope we see a lot more fully fleshed out original games from 3rd parties that are excellent portable games. Capcom found a goldmine with Monster Hunter. Surely there has to be a publisher out there looking for a Western equivalent.
I hope we see a lot more fully fleshed out original games from 3rd parties that are excellent portable games. Capcom found a goldmine with Monster Hunter. Surely there has to be a publisher out there looking for a Western equivalent.
pharmboy044
Member
Speaking the truth here.Jeels said:
BoboBrazil
Member
I think the Vita is a great value when you look at something like a touch ipod that people gladly shell out $250 for. This can do everything that can do and more.
I don't see why it's crazy to think they are breaking even on the hardware. $250 is a lot of money to make a product like that. Chances are Yoshida was directly speaking about the hardware, and that Hirai was talking about the operation as a whole, perhaps including the R&D, to make the whole Vita venture a profitable operation.
To give a little more information on the subject from my previous post, the media company Nihon Keizai Shimbun (日本経済新聞
, or Nikkei Inc., reported (days after MoCell's own report I referenced previously) the information of SAMSUNG Mobile Devices (SMD) producing the OLED screen panels to be assembled on the PSVITA system, and various news outlets ran with it, but since then, the Nikkei Inc. website seems to have moved or deleted the original article, only to be found now on a cached version made by Google Web Search:
Apparently, and something that Nikkei Inc. doesn't mention in the report but other news outlet like Mainichi Shimbun's (毎日新聞 news website '毎日jp' does (http://mainichi.jp/life/money/kabu/nsj/news/20110601258435.html), is that the source of the information about SMD upcoming OLED panels production schedule is a representative of Hodogaya Chemical Co., Ltd. (保土谷化学工業, provider of fundamental organic compounds in the production of the emissive electroluminescent layer for various OLED panel manufacturers.
, or Nikkei Inc., reported (days after MoCell's own report I referenced previously) the information of SAMSUNG Mobile Devices (SMD) producing the OLED screen panels to be assembled on the PSVITA system, and various news outlets ran with it, but since then, the Nikkei Inc. website seems to have moved or deleted the original article, only to be found now on a cached version made by Google Web Search:http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...cd=4&hl=es&ct=clnk&gl=es&source=www.google.es韓国・サムスン、有機ＥＬ・増産ラインを２カ月前倒し稼働　　：日本経済新聞 said:
Apparently, and something that Nikkei Inc. doesn't mention in the report but other news outlet like Mainichi Shimbun's (毎日新聞
news website '毎日jp' does (http://mainichi.jp/life/money/kabu/nsj/news/20110601258435.html), is that the source of the information about SMD upcoming OLED panels production schedule is a representative of Hodogaya Chemical Co., Ltd. (保土谷化学工業, provider of fundamental organic compounds in the production of the emissive electroluminescent layer for various OLED panel manufacturers.Transitioning from a university research project to a business, gathering venture capital across multiple rounds of funding, DMP may have been targeting a console design win, but they've got business outside of Nintendo and definitely weren't some expensive custom job for the 3DS.
As for Sony's costs, this has all been covered again and again before:
"Using a graphics architecture which employs SRAM for tile buffers instead of eDRAM and also minimizes costly memory access patterns, reducing the need for exotic bandwidth/bus solutions, gives Vita's design fabrication friendliness, reliability for yields, and dependability for production scheduling and for hitting its power targets, all of which lead to lower costs for Sony.
Of course Vita was going to be affordable. Of course it wasn't going to be behind schedule for release. Of course the battery life was going to be respectable."
As for Sony's costs, this has all been covered again and again before:
"Using a graphics architecture which employs SRAM for tile buffers instead of eDRAM and also minimizes costly memory access patterns, reducing the need for exotic bandwidth/bus solutions, gives Vita's design fabrication friendliness, reliability for yields, and dependability for production scheduling and for hitting its power targets, all of which lead to lower costs for Sony.
Of course Vita was going to be affordable. Of course it wasn't going to be behind schedule for release. Of course the battery life was going to be respectable."