• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

G. Kamitani replies to J. Schreier's Kotaku article on Dragon's Crown (slightly NSFW)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fusebox

Banned
Yeah, I'm trying and failing to think of an interpretation in which this isn't homophobic.

If drawing a picture of three burly men snuggling is homophobic, then I should take a photo of me with another mans cock in my mouth, that'll really stick it to the gays!
 
It's more the homoerotic depiction in particular rather than the design that has people questioning the intent.

Do we know for certain the men pictured are only appealing to homosexuals? If a woman finds that image attractive wouldn't that also suggest the artist is implying he can make images for "immature" women?
 

Igo

Member
And their own text:

"It seems that Mr. JASON SCHREIER of kotaku is pleased also with neither sorceress nor amazon.
The art of the direction which he likes was prepared."

They are clearly calling him gay.
Perhaps, but even then I don't see it as an insult.

You don't like our buxom women? Maybe some burly men would tickle your fancy instead.
 
Personally, I agree with Kotaku. Maybe the way they put it was rather off the cuff, but otherwise I am in agreement with the premise. I find the designs for the female characters to be rather off-putting, and it certainly seems (to my untrained eye) to be aimed at a more juvenile audience. Perhaps it's because I consume a rather large amount of Japanese media, but a certain trend has definitely been seen by me, that overt sexualisation is used in media aimed at male teenagers, compared to the different styles used is female aimed, or more adult aimed products.
 

cj_iwakura

Member
I see it more as 'well, if you find sexy women offensive, here's something that should make you feel better'.

It's been said that the guys in DC are just as exaggerated as the women. And it's Kamitami's style, it's not like this is somehow new to Dragon's Crown. People suddenly notice a style that's been around for years = controversy.


And that article in the OP is terrible.
 
This place can be really tiring at times.

Now he's a homophobe?

geezus.

I'm just gonna ignore any thread about any ism. It will make life a lot better.

Games should be about how fun they are or not. Not any ethical issues and such. It really shouldn't be this big of a deal.
Why can't we just let people enjoy what they enjoy without looking down on them for doing so? This hurts no one. This is a niche ass game. It's success or failure will mean nothing in the long run. There will be "sexist' imagetry no matter what happens. No more or no less will be made thanks to the sucess or failure of it. So why is there such a big ass stink about it? Why insult those who do like it? Why should something they like go away? Because you say so? Because YOU deem it offensive?

This is what I don't get at all. We get so pissed when stuff is kept from us or dudes seek to ban videogames...and yet....we seemingly wish to do the same? Why?

You guys could take the fun out of everything. I wonder fi you go around constantly overthinking everything. It can't be fun.

Gaming-Age is crazy depressing some days. It's frustrating to see how much people just constantly find something to be angry and argue about...about goddam videogames. I know it can;t all be sunshine and lollipops..but the negativity from people really really sucks. I know "bu-but stay out of the threads" or "your whining is just as bad" but it's spilling over into every thread almost.

Can't we all get along? It's okay to dissagree but the holier than thou or perhaps unintended smugness really makes that dissagreement more of an insult that perhaps intended.

Rant Over...needed to get that off my chest.

sorry
 

Ohnonono

Member
I typically like Jason's writing and stuff, but of all the wrong art to pick on holy shit. There is so much stuff that actually would apply to an article like that, but DC has amazing art. EVERYONE is exaggerated in it!
 

Replicant

Member
The thing is that it seems you're drawing the line WAY off from where most people would, at least in the case of Oswald. In the artwork shown for him most often he doesn't actually look out of line relative to many other teenage protagonists, whereas the problem I'm assuming you have is more with stuff like Disgaea or Neptunia. Plus the "it's not binary" goes here too, there's definitely works that make me go "uhhh, what?" or designs that come off as way too young and not handled in a way that's really innocuous, but Oswald's really, really damn far from those, and if he isn't then practically every anime or game with an anime visual style ends up straddling the line by default .

I didn't even mentioned Oswald in the first place but was brought up by someone else. And that person asked if Oswald looks like teen. And I said no. The problem with Oswald is that even though his body was drawn in adult or at least teen manner, his face betrays it. Thus, the awkwardness for me.
 

Usobuko

Banned
Wow! What a thing to wake up to. I am gonna head to the office, and then I guess I'll respond to this situation in a bit.

I respect both sides of the argument in this threads but be gracious, it's an easy way out of this situation. You took a shot at him and he retaliate, lest it becomes a never-ending vicious cycle.
 

badgenome

Member
Wow! What a thing to wake up to. I am gonna head to the office, and then I guess I'll respond to this situation in a bit.

tumblr_lkwfxm8ZEL1qbeko0o1_500.jpg
 

erpg

GAF parliamentarian
Wow! What a thing to wake up to. I am gonna head to the office, and then I guess I'll respond to this situation in a bit.
Do yourself a favour and don't bring your ego into the equation. And don't go to your friends on twitter for a little boost in esteem either.

Though you did post a really shitty article, the issue isn't about you.
 

Metrotab

Banned
What is it about the Sorceress' art design that it fuels so much discussion and condescension? If you like it you're a juvenile immature pervert, if you don't you're a stuck up prude etc. All because of some big tits.

I simply don't understand. Especially because she's just a part of a triumvirate of diverse female body design.
 

jgmo870

Banned
I typically like Jason's writing and stuff, but of all the wrong art to pick on holy shit. There is so much stuff that actually would apply to an article like that, but DC has amazing art. EVERYONE is exaggerated in it!

The Elf and Wizard don't have exaggerated proportions. But selecting a piece to represent the whole is just one of the issues in that blurb. It's just full of wrong.
 

freddy

Banned
Wow! What a thing to wake up to. I am gonna head to the office, and then I guess I'll respond to this situation in a bit.

Yea, I had to stop for a fap when I saw the dwarves as well. I recovered in time to post in here before too many replies went through, so you should be fine. Take a shower though.
 

Dead Man

Member
Aren't a lot of his designs drawing from that homoerotic depiction? Judging by a quick Tumblr search he has done quite a wide range of styles.

It's the combined effect . Here, I drew a picture you may like better *naked men cuddling*

It's not classy. I don't think it is homophobic necessarily, but it amounts to 'If you don't like this, have some gay stuff since you like gay stuff'.

If JS is openly gay, it is probably harmless and not offensive in the slightest. If he is not, it is in pretty poor taste.

Do we know for certain the men pictured are only appealing to homosexuals? If a woman finds that image attractive wouldn't that also suggest the artist is implying he can make images for "immature" women?

It's not about who they appeal to, they are cuddling.

I didn't see the depiction as homoerotic but fair enough.

to me, it seems people are way too sensitive to chests, male and female.

Again, naked (implied) men cuddling.
 
I can't wait until the game is out and the haters can move onto the next storm in a teacup.

Seeing all these threads about Dragon's Crown and none of them talking about the actual game is equal parts infuriating and depressing.
 

V_Arnold

Member
There is nothing sexy about these women. Huge(huge(huge(huge(huge(insanely huge))))) boobs does not make someone sexy, especially not like this. Same goes for men, their heart would have dropped like a rock if it had to live with these proportions.

It is not offensive, imho, but it clearly is a big joke. A self-conscious joke, maybe, but still a joke nevertheless.
 

OTIX

Member
I can't wait until the game is out and the haters can move onto the next storm in a teacup.

Seeing all these threads about Dragon's Crown and none of them talking about the actual game is equal parts infuriating and depressing.

I'm sure Kamitani is quite happy about all this attention for his small niche game. And Schreier got plenty of hits out of it as well. Win-win situation really.
 
Is it less offensive to mock anyone who finds breasts attractive? It's "juvenile" if you like any erotic art now. Somehow it's become perfectly fine to mock people's sexuality and sexual expression if they're straight males. It's actually considered progressive.

Holy shit.
 

QisTopTier

XisBannedTier
I want to know where your locker room is... for reasons. :)
Uh, you are aware that some people in general specially friends that have grown up together dont tend to give a shit about a situation like that right?

Guys can feel comfortable around other guys that are naked without it being gay.

What you call cuddling as well, I call the top guy teasing or just being annoying to the middle one. Read the faces.

To top it off, this is medieval fantasy the whole eww icky burly men together hanging out acting buddy buddy is gay! Thing wasn't really a thing.
 

dude

dude
I have a feeling this argument is reaching ridiculous levels. If we accept this premise, what is our recourse? Not having attractive female characters in games at all?

(FWIW, I'm personally not a fan of Kamitani's art, but he seems like an equal opportunity exaggerator of proportions)

We cannot ignore the gender gap. The recourse is thinking about how we design female characters in game, what it means, how it affects the game and what it says about the character and world. It means developers have to be extra careful when designing these characters, especially when they decide to play up their sexuality, because they do not exist in a void. Sexualization in and of itself is not the problem, the problem is the objectification that it causes.

For example, In the P:E kickstarter a design with breast armor was posted, fans reaction made them changed it into a much better regular armor. Fans should encourage developers to think harder on how they treat women, especially considering how few there are in he industry.

As for criticizing - I'm saying these designs are problematic, and that we as gamers should encourage developers to think of us as more than hopeless sacks of hormones. If I said that I don't like auto-heal in FPSs, does that mean I think Call of Duty shouldn't exist? Come on.

So this thread is turning into privileged heterosexual males deluding themselves? Alright then.
 

Fusebox

Banned
We cannot ignore the gender gap. The recourse is thinking about how we design female characters in game, what it means, how it affects the game and what it says about the character and world. It means developers have to be extra careful when designing these characters, especially when they decide to play up their sexuality, because they do not exist in a void. Sexualization in and of itself is not the problem, the problem is the objectification that it causes.

As for criticizing - I'm saying these designs are problematic, and that we as gamers should encourage developers to think of us as more than hopeless sacks of hormones. If I said that I don't like auto-heal in FPSs, does that mean I think Call of Duty shouldn't exist? Come on.

So this thread is turning into privileged heterosexual males deluding themselves? Alright then.

Why can't you just be content in your knowledge that you aren't the target market for this game and leave it at that. Trying to draw some tenuous link between the overly large breasts of a fantasy Sorceress character and the objectification of women in the real world seems weak at best, unless you have any actual evidence to the contrary.

To expand on your Call of Duty example, do you go into every FPS thread and start rallying against violence in games because it glorifies violence in the real world? Or is this the faux outrage du jour?
 

patapuf

Member
We cannot ignore the gender gap. The recourse is thinking about how we design female characters in game, what it means, how it affects the game and what it says about the character and world. It means developers have to be extra careful when designing these characters, especially when they decide to play up their sexuality, because they do not exist in a void. Sexualization in and of itself is not the problem, the problem is the objectification that it causes.

For example, In the P:E kickstarter a design with breast armor was posted, fans reaction made them changed it into a much better regular armor. Fans should encourage developers to think harder on how they treat women, especially considering how few there are in he industry.

As for criticizing - I'm saying these designs are problematic, and that we as gamers should encourage developers to think of us as more than hopeless sacks of hormones. If I said that I don't like auto-heal in FPSs, does that mean I think Call of Duty shouldn't exist? Come on.

So this thread is turning into privileged heterosexual males deluding themselves? Alright then.

How about you look at the art of the game as a whole instead of this desing in particular.
 

SmokyDave

Member
We cannot ignore the gender gap. The recourse is thinking about how we design female characters in game, what it means, how it affects the game and what it says about the character and world. It means developers have to be extra careful when designing these characters, especially when they decide to play up their sexuality, because they do not exist in a void. Sexualization in and of itself is not the problem, the problem is the objectification that it causes.

As for criticizing - I'm saying these designs are problematic, and that we as gamers should encourage developers to think of us as more than hopeless sacks of hormones. If I said that I don't like auto-heal in FPSs, does that mean I think Call of Duty shouldn't exist? Come on.
Again, if you don't want the content modified or censored, what do you want?

It seems as though you just want to flaunt your 'awareness' or something.


So this thread is turning into privileged heterosexual males deluding themselves? Alright then.
All heterosexual males are privileged. All males are privileged. All heterosexuals are privileged. Basically, I wonder why you felt the need to mention their privilege.
 

7Th

Member
How many people actually know that Kamitani, character designer and art director for Dragon's Crown, is the PRESIDENT of Vanillaware?
 

LiK

Member
C'mon Jason. Leave Dragon's Crown alone. Criticizing the cheesecake art is just unnecessary.

Btw, great response from Kamitani.
 

Dead Man

Member
Uh, you are aware that some people in general specially friends that have grown up together dont tend to give a shit about a situation like that right?

Guys can feel comfortable around other guys that are naked without it being gay.


What you call cuddling as well, I call the top guy teasing or just being annoying to the middle one. Read the faces.

No shit :/

If you don't feel it is intentionally homoerotic, that's fine. We disagree.
 

Zaventem

Member
I can't wait until the game is out and the haters can move onto the next storm in a teacup.

Seeing all these threads about Dragon's Crown and none of them talking about the actual game is equal parts infuriating and depressing.

Next game they'll be going for is killer is dead.
 
We cannot ignore the gender gap. The recourse is thinking about how we design female characters in game, what it means, how it affects the game and what it says about the character and world. It means developers have to be extra careful when designing these characters, especially when they decide to play up their sexuality, because they do not exist in a void. Sexualization in and of itself is not the problem, the problem is the objectification that it causes.

For example, In the P:E kickstarter a design with breast armor was posted, fans reaction made them changed it into a much better regular armor. Fans should encourage developers to think harder on how they treat women, especially considering how few there are in he industry.

As for criticizing - I'm saying these designs are problematic, and that we as gamers should encourage developers to think of us as more than hopeless sacks of hormones. If I said that I don't like auto-heal in FPSs, does that mean I think Call of Duty shouldn't exist? Come on.

So this thread is turning into privileged heterosexual males deluding themselves? Alright then.

The problem i have with this is you feel that fans or males can speak for women .
I show some of my female friends Dragon's Crown and all they did was laugh at it none of them found it offense or cared either way .
This whole idea that we need white knights to defend females in video games is becoming a joke when there is no context to it .
 
We cannot ignore the gender gap. The recourse is thinking about how we design female characters in game, what it means, how it affects the game and what it says about the character and world. It means developers have to be extra careful when designing these characters, especially when they decide to play up their sexuality, because they do not exist in a void. Sexualization in and of itself is not the problem, the problem is the objectification that it causes.

For example, In the P:E kickstarter a design with breast armor was posted, fans reaction made them changed it into a much better regular armor. Fans should encourage developers to think harder on how they treat women, especially considering how few there are in he industry.

As for criticizing - I'm saying these designs are problematic, and that we as gamers should encourage developers to think of us as more than hopeless sacks of hormones. If I said that I don't like auto-heal in FPSs, does that mean I think Call of Duty shouldn't exist? Come on.

So this thread is turning into privileged heterosexual males deluding themselves? Alright then.

dude. I think you're overthinking this one bro. This is a fantasy game, all the characters are exaggerated in one way or another.
The Dwarf is a mountain of meat.
The Amazon is a mountain of meat.
The fighter has a chest the size of a literal chest.

The only two playable characters that are even slightly normal are the Elf and Wizard.

And then you have the NPCs you meet along the way, all with exaggerated and completely unrealistic proportions. Its this game's artstyle, and its been consistent in every piece of media shown.

Theres no sexism or misogyny going on here. Its a game with an artstyle that takes inspirations from old school D&D, throws in a little animu, and cranks everything up to 11.

There ought to be room for this sort of thing within the gaming industry.
 

HaRyu

Unconfirmed Member
Wow! What a thing to wake up to. I am gonna head to the office, and then I guess I'll respond to this situation in a bit.

Regardless of what anyone thinks of the art, this is already going downhill. Any additional response to this will just make the trip to the bottom faster.
 

User Tron

Member
As much as I hate to do it I have to agree with Jason. Nothing against a sexy character but she is just repelling imo. The answer picture basically confirms Jason's point. Design like a teenager respond like a teenager.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom