Jubenhimer
Member
The Nintendo Switch is looking to have a very strong first year. Kicking off with a bang in the form of The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild, followed by at least one major first party release nearly each month. But it's not just the Switch that's getting lots of content. The 6 year old Nintendo 3DS also has a surprisingly busy lineup this year. We've already gotten an enhanced port of Yoshi's Woolly World and Tank Troopers, but also Fire Emblem Echoes, Bye Bye Box Boy, Hey Pikmin, Ever Oasis, the US release of Miitopia, a new Kirby Multiplayer game (plus 2 other digital Kirbys), a leaked remake of Mario and Luigi Superstar Saga and even a new entry in the latest Pokemon generation titled Ultra Sun and Ultra Moon, and that's not even touching on the 3rd party games for 2017.
You'd think this would be a good thing, but many people are annoyed that Nintendo is continuing to support the 3DS even when their new console-handheld 2-in-1 has released. People want the 3DS to die so that Nintendo moves everything to the Switch and has a completely unified platform. But why is it a bad thing the 3DS still gets support for a little longer after its release? I mean, this isn't even the first time Nintendo's done this. Even after the DS released, the Game Boy Advance continued to get a steady stream of first party games for 2005. Granted, the DS was backwards compatible, but other than that, it's the same situation here. Nintendo's going to continue to support the 3DS for the remainder of 2017, and even early 2018.
I don't see why people are so against a successful platform continuing to get support. Nobody was complaining about the PS2 getting games even after the PS3 released, So I think you can deal with 240p for at least another year. Nintendo putting 99% their software development and production resources towards the Switch will happen, just not this year, and Nintendo would be making a mistake killing the 3DS now.
Besides, I'd rather the 3DS go out gracefully and with a bang, rather than come to a screeching, anti-climactic halt like the Wii U.
You'd think this would be a good thing, but many people are annoyed that Nintendo is continuing to support the 3DS even when their new console-handheld 2-in-1 has released. People want the 3DS to die so that Nintendo moves everything to the Switch and has a completely unified platform. But why is it a bad thing the 3DS still gets support for a little longer after its release? I mean, this isn't even the first time Nintendo's done this. Even after the DS released, the Game Boy Advance continued to get a steady stream of first party games for 2005. Granted, the DS was backwards compatible, but other than that, it's the same situation here. Nintendo's going to continue to support the 3DS for the remainder of 2017, and even early 2018.
I don't see why people are so against a successful platform continuing to get support. Nobody was complaining about the PS2 getting games even after the PS3 released, So I think you can deal with 240p for at least another year. Nintendo putting 99% their software development and production resources towards the Switch will happen, just not this year, and Nintendo would be making a mistake killing the 3DS now.
Besides, I'd rather the 3DS go out gracefully and with a bang, rather than come to a screeching, anti-climactic halt like the Wii U.