• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Scientists find normal penis size - NeoGAF members statistical anomaly

Status
Not open for further replies.

thomaser

Member
David Veale and his colleagues from King's College in London have done a meta-analysis of 17 studies that in total measured over 15000 penises from all over the world (with an overweight of white ones, admittedly), and found these results:

Length:
2362898.jpg


Girth:
2362899.jpg


So the "normal" penis size when erect is 13 cm (5.11 inches) in length and 11,5 cm (4.5 inches) around.

I honestly thought most men would have been bigger
I'm in the 99th percentile, boo-yah!
 

Lamel

Banned
The more surprising part is how small the range is, disregarding outliers. Society makes such a big deal out of nothing.

17 cm is at 95 percent of what?

17 cm means your penis is longer than 95% of the population.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
They also found no correlation between race and penis size, although the sample size of non-Caucasians and non-African-Americans was relatively small. There is probably bias towards larger penises in the study too, given more confident men are more likely to be involved in volunteering such information.
 

alr1ght

bish gets all the credit :)
http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2015/03/how-big-average-penis

[joke deleted. sorry]

sn-penisdimensions-REV.png


A graph of the size distribution shows that outliers are rare. A 16-cm (6.3-inch) erect penis falls into the 95th percentile: Out of 100 men, only five would have a penis larger than 16 cm. Conversely, an erect penis measuring 10 cm (3.94 inches) falls into the 5th percentile: Only five out of 100 men would have a penis smaller than 10 cm.
 

Lamel

Banned
I seriously doubt this is true. The chart seems skewed toward the tiny.

Maybe Internet porn and nudes have destroyed any realistic conception of penis size for me.

Okay, only 15% over 6 inches? Nah, I don't think so.



Only correct way is a ruler on top of it starting from the base.

Porn is a hell of a drug.


Well are we talking tip to balls or tip to pelvis? That's the missing info.

It's a meta-analysis of multiple studies so yeah.
 

SPCTRE

Member
There is probably bias towards larger penises in the study too, given more confident men are more likely to be involved in volunteering such information.
Well, the OT makes it sound like the studies in question actually actively took measurements instead of asking participants (?).

Edit: Went and checked, and yeah, they actually did take measurements.
 

glaurung

Member
In this thread: everybody is really smug about having a massive shaft that they need to wrap around their waist in order to walk around.

FML
 

Saiyar

Unconfirmed Member
They also found no correlation between race and penis size, although the sample size of non-Caucasians and non-African-Americans was relatively small. There is probably bias towards larger penises in the study too, given more confident men are more likely to be involved in volunteering such information.

That has been know for a while, diet and lifestyle are the most important factors when determining size.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom