Oh shit,next ep?Discord
Just as Spike is about to be gobbled up by hungry Timberwolves, he is saved by Applejack; Spike feels the need to repay Applejack and is soon offering a little too much assistance on the farm in order to fulfill the "Noble Dragon Code."
No, "Spike At Your Service" is this week. Then there's a 3 week delay until "Keep Calm and Flutter on"
Pairing Spike up with the Pony that hates him most, should be interesting.
I thought Pinkie hated him most. Don't recall Applejack doing anything to Spike unless using him as a lighter counts.
Watch the end to "Applebuck season". All the ponies and spike come to help AJ at the end. AJ only gets drinks for the other 5 ponies, and specifially mentions tha tonly the ponies are her friends, and Spike is right there. Pinkie still hates him, never inviting him to parties and all, but in the same scene Pinkie gives Spike this "What are YOU doing here" look.
Watch the end to "Applebuck season". All the ponies and spike come to help AJ at the end. AJ only gets drinks for the other 5 ponies, and specifially mentions that only the ponies are her friends, and Spike is right there. Pinkie still hates him, never inviting him to parties and all, but in the same scene Pinkie gives Spike this "What are YOU doing here" look.
I'll give you that AJ only mentioned the 5 of them but I'm pretty sure Pinkie was just looking at the muffins Spike dug out of the trash
I have a theory about that, actually: the writers overlook Spike and keep creating these situations which support silly theories about Pinkie hating dragons or something. I dunno, maybe I'm overthinking it.Regarding Pinkie and Applejack supposedly hating Spike, I have a personal theory to answer that: Earth Ponies simply don't like dragons, AND to a certain extent, Dragons (not including Spike) don't care from them either, perhaps as an old rivalry or forbidden relationship angle?
Without going fan-fictiony on everyone, I shall use the theory that I assume that Draconequus/Kirins/Longmas or other pony/dragon mixes are probably uncommon to very rare in the MLP world (exception being Discord obviously). Such mixing, to the... god this will come off wrong, but the simple Earth Ponies would be seen as bad. After all, Discord was bad, who is to say another mix wouldn't also be bad. Perhaps, this was unconsciously carried down family lines from the capture of Discord. Who knows, for sure though (I certainly don't!)
That said, it is neither here nor there trying to make sense WHY Applejack or Pinkie are particularly mean to the dragon "son" and/or "brother" of their supposedly best friend, Twilight Sparkle. Then again, I hate Pinkie BECAUSE of this hypocrisy (and many, MANY other things!), and Applejack, while on a better level than that pink devil, isn't scoring points based on her treatment of Spike at times.
Isn't the easier explanation for Spike's crush on Rarity that he's spent literally his entire life at Celestia's X-Pony school surrounded by Canterlot unicorns? Surely he's just internalized the prevailing standards of attractiveness. And the show keeps telling us that Rarity is an exceptional example of a Canterlot-style unicorn. You'd sort of have expected a Trixie crush if he were drawn to Twilight surrogates (magic, dark coloration, distant, and borderline abusive).
I have a theory about that, actually: the writers overlook Spike and keep creating these situations which support silly theories about Pinkie hating dragons or something. I dunno, maybe I'm over-thinking it.
Episode 12: "Just For Sidekicks"
Spike finds himself in over his head after convincing Twilight and her friends to let him pet-sit all of their critters in exchange for a few gems.
What's interesting is that we've had two part finales since season 1, and this doesn't really sound like a set up for a second part epic finale.
Could we be getting a Pony Cliffhanger?
Hopefully they're not trying to Doctor Who this and pack a whole finale into one episode.Episode 12: "Just For Sidekicks"
Spike finds himself in over his head after convincing Twilight and her friends to let him pet-sit all of their critters in exchange for a few gems.
What's interesting is that we've had two part finales since season 1, and this doesn't really sound like a set up for a second part epic finale.
Could we be getting a Pony Cliffhanger?
I have a theory about that, actually: the writers overlook Spike and keep creating these situations which support silly theories about Pinkie hating dragons or something. I dunno, maybe I'm overthinking it.
People keep forgetting that this is a show for little girls and that the adult fandom is basically a complete accident. There's way more meaning being applied to this series than is really warranted sometimes.
I was thinkingSo basically a rehash ofStare Master?
Hopefully they're not trying to Doctor Who this and pack a whole finale into one episode.
Post
Really, it's sort of this Watsonian (in-universe explanation) vs. Doylist (real-world explanation) faceoff. Both are fun to dabble in, but I tend to err Doylist more often than not.Counterpost
Episode 12: "Just For Sidekicks"
Spike finds himself in over his head after convincing Twilight and her friends to let him pet-sit all of their critters in exchange for a few gems.
What's interesting is that we've had two part finales since season 1, and this doesn't really sound like a set up for a second part epic finale.
Could we be getting a Pony Cliffhanger?
Episode 12: "Just For Sidekicks"
Spike finds himself in over his head after convincing Twilight and her friends to let him pet-sit all of their critters in exchange for a few gems.
People keep forgetting that this is a show for little girls and that the adult fandom is basically a complete accident. There's way more meaning being applied to this series than is really warranted sometimes.
Episode 12: "Just For Sidekicks"
Spike finds himself in over his head after convincing Twilight and her friends to let him pet-sit all of their critters in exchange for a few gems.
What's interesting is that we've had two part finales since season 1, and this doesn't really sound like a set up for a second part epic finale.
Could we be getting a Pony Cliffhanger?
(Also I liked "Dragon Quest" :I)
How can anyone like Dragon Quest? That's impossible.
I'm guessing it will actually be a CMC episode. We haven't this shot from the promo yet:http://www.derpibooru.org/151503
...Applejack killed three timberwolves...is this the first time we've seen anything die on this show?
...Applejack killed three timberwolves...is this the first time we've seen anything die on this show?
...Applejack killed three timberwolves...is this the first time we've seen anything die on this show?
...Applejack killed three timberwolves...is this the first time we've seen anything die on this show?
It is the only episode that has the best character (Cousin Krackle) in it.
How have you already seen it? Unless I can't read it comes on in ten minutes. Unless it came on earlier. (I usually watch it on YT.)Heh, I was right.
Pretty average episode, nothing really stood out. Better than last week's though.
Speaking only for myself, there's no forgetting going on. It's just a fun show to read stuff into. It's not as if this is an unusual way to consume fiction; lots of people like to say: "Ok, let's pretend this is a completely accurate depiction of (in some sense) actual events. What could be going on when the cameras aren't turned on that explains the stuff the cameras /do/ see?" A lot of the fun is exactly in taking things that the writers just keep doing subconsciously or accidentally and assuming that, rather than being real-world oversights, they instead reveal something interesting about the fictional world. Harry Potter is also fun to look at this way. I imagine you're getting tripped up by the lack of any one plausibly-authoritative right answer here, in the absence of some fleshed-out backstory in the minds of the writers which hasn't been revealed to us, but I don't see that that kind of intentionality is necessary. Lots of people had a lot of fun with Lost even after it became pretty clear that the writers had no more idea than anyone else where they were going with it.
You can go even deeper and treat the work of fiction the way you might an obviously fictionalized record of history. If you're trying to read the Bible for what it says about history, you're going to go wrong if you assume it's entirely fictional or entirely accurate. If something doesn't quite fit, maybe you can throw it out as a transcription error. But if something does fit, then it makes sense to ask what the implications are for real history beyond what's explicitly stated in the text. There's an ongoing process of figuring out what bits of quasi-historical texts best cohere with what we think we know of history and what bits are ahistorical and should be ignored (for now). Applied to fictional worlds, maybe you only appeal to continuity errors or writer flubs when you have to.
Yeah, it's not as if the writers actually have a pony Silmarillion all laid out. But the question is - what would we expect to be in it, if it did exist?