I've been keeping up with the movie watching, but not with the posting and participating. To avoid a huge info dump, then, I'm just going to post write-ups for the movies I watched up through last weekend, and catch up tomorrow.
Day #3 Society (Dir, Brian Yuzna; 1989)
After a few artier, more meditative movies, I felt the need for some low-brow sleaze, and Brian Yuzna always comes through in that department. I was 11 or 12 when this came out on video, so it would have been near the tail-end of my obsession with perusing video cassette cases of movies I wouldnt be allowed to watch, but it was one that certainly stuck out: white lettering on a solid black background with just a picture of the butthead above in the center. As I grew older, I heard more and more about the movies famously slimy climax, but as an adult assumed that it, like many of the other video cassette horrors I finally watched, would fail to live up to my imagination.
Having finally watched
Society, I am pleased to report that the climax is just as bizarre and disgusting as I had hoped. It is body horror at its best, perhaps slightly outmatched by James Gunns version in
Slither, but still very effective for its time.
That said, it really is the only redeeming the feature of the movie, which follows a pretty rote conspiracy plot. It focuses on Bill Whitney (Billy Warlock), a handsome and rich member of an upper-class Beverly Hills family who worries about fitting in. As his parents and therapist urge him to grow up and join society, he and his equally nerdy friends learn the disgusting truth about the wealthy people who surround them. As the cover suggests, the movie heavily foreshadows the Society reveal, which means that each scene is just set-up for the climax with no real purpose in and of itself. No real set-pieces or character development or (successful) jokes just steps toward the battle between Bill and Society.
Even worse, the movies satire is fairly weak and obvious: the rich are inhuman. And what effect it would have had is further muted by the fact that Bill, our outsider, is himself a handsome, popular, rich white male. This isnt
Street Trash or
They Live, or even
C.H.U.D. Its about filthy rich people preying on other, slightly less popular, rich people.
But
Society isnt really about the satire or the plot or anything else. Its about that climax, and the climax is something to behold.
GRADE: C+
Day #4 The Bride of Frankenstein (Dir, James Whale; 1935)
I did not originally plan on watching
Bride, but it recently occurred to me that I had never actually seen the entire movie, just bits and pieces here and there. Utterly embarrassed, I decided to add it to the list immediately.
During the first 1/3 of the runtime, I worried that I had been misled. Like its predecessor,
Bride is undeniably beautiful to look at, and Karloffs monster is even more brutal here while Ernest Thesigers Doctor Pretorius brings a delicious evil to supplement Colin Clives more (initially) restrained performance as Doctor Frankenstein. But the opening vignette, in which Lord Byron raves to Mary Shelly Wollstonecraft about her novel while Percy quietly looks on, is kind of silly (particularly because many of the things Byron loves so much about Frankenstein were in the movie, not in the book).
Even worse is Una OConnors performance as Minnie the Maid. I completely understand that she is there to be a bit of necessary comic relief to defuse the tension for the original audience, who from what I understand found the movie too unbearable. As a fan of Stuart Gordon and Sam Raimi, I also understand how the funny bone is directly tied to tingling spine, that tastes and performance norms change over time. But man, does it suck to see the Monster brutally kill an innocent old woman and then have Minnie shriek and mug all over the screen.
That said, the second half of the movie is amazing. The scene between the Monster and the blind man is fantastic (once I stopped giggling about the
Young Frankenstein version), and Karloffs line readings give the creature a great deal of pathos. And while Ive certainly scene the Brides scream countless times, I did not expect to be so unsettled by Elsa Lanchesters twitchy movements. How many times have we seen modern directors try to give the same mannerisms to their creepy ghost girls to a much lesser effect?
In short: its great, and I was stupid to have waited so long to watch it.
GRADE: A
Day #5 In the Mouth of Madness (Dir, John Carpenter; 1994)
Like most people, I consider
In the Mouth of Madness to be a mid-tier Carpenter flick better than
Ghosts of Mars or (shudder)
The Ward, but not up there with
The Thing and
Halloween but I have much more fondness for it and
Prince of Darkness than that description suggests. The story is about an insurance investigator (Sam Neill) hired to track down Stephen King homage Sutter Cane (Jürgen Prochnow), who has disappeared at the same time his readers are caught in an apocalyptic furor. Metatextual wackiness ensues.
The first time I watched
Mouth, I was in the perfect headspace and everything landed. I was thoroughly creeped out by the time Sam Neils character John Trent enters the movie theatre, and could not go to sleep for hours afterward. This time, my third viewing, the goofier elements stand out more, especially the hammy performances by Neill, Prochnow, and John Glover; when Charlton Heston, wasted in a bit part as the publisher who hires Neill, is the most unassuming person on screen, you know youre in prime scenery-chewing territory.
That said,
Mouth, much like
Prince of Darkness, is crazy enough to work, and the scares are still pretty effective. As long as you dont go in expecting the perfection of
The Thing, its still great Carpenter and much better than your average horror flick.
GRADE: B+
Day #6 The Hole (Dir, Joe Dante; 2009)
I really dont know what to make of this one. Im not the biggest Joe Dante fan in the world I love his manic energy, but character isnt his strong suit and so his movies stumble in between set-pieces. That said, I did expect more from The Hole. It seems like prime Dante territory: a bunch of suburban kids discover a gateway to Hell in their basement, summoning a monster that manifests as their deepest fears. And while PG-13 horror generally sucks, Dante usually brings a child-like love of scary stuff that works well for that rating level.
But
The Hole is just so dull. The characters sullen teenager, hot girl next door, snotty little brother are all one-note, which would be fine in Dantes usual cartoon world, but the cartoons arent that great. Theres a kind of scary ghost girl, a kind of scary clown, and a kind of scary big guy, and thats it. Outside of a nifty-looking set at the climax, theres nothing worth noting. Even Dante staple Dick Miller only shows up for a moment, and gets no lines.
That said, I do think its probably good for a 10-12 year old (though, I admit, I did not watch it with my 12 year old I will soon). It works on the level of a
Goosebumps episode, in terms of scares, plot, and character development. I was just the wrong audience.
GRADE: C