Support NeoGAF

statham · Sep 6, 2015

The study found that high-end gaming systems are the fastest growing type of gaming platform around, even outpacing sales of next-gen consoles from Microsoft and Sony. So much for PC gaming dying, eh?

The study further discovered that gaming PCs collectively consumed 75 terawatt-hours of electricity ($10 billion) in 2012. Thats roughly 20 percent of the total PC, notebook and console energy use despite the fact that gaming PCs made up just 2.5 percent of global installed PC equipment. At the current pace, researchers believe consumption could more than double by 2020.

On average, the study estimates that the typical gaming computer consumes roughly 1,400kWh of energy per year. Thats equivalent to the energy consumed by 10 consoles, six standard PCs or three refrigerators. Whats more, hardcore gamers could easily consume double that amount or more.

My GPU uses 130 watts, I'm energy efficient
more here
http://www.techspot.com/news/62009-...ridiculous-amount-energy-consumed-gaming.html

CeePhour · Sep 6, 2015

All those P's require a lot of W's.

Dennis · Sep 6, 2015

Now we are cooking.

akachan ningen · Sep 6, 2015

There you go. If you choose PC gaming over console, you're destroying the world.

DocSeuss · Sep 6, 2015

This is why it always baffles me when someone says consoles can be on par with PC graphics. Like... console wattage can only get you so far, y'know? At some point, three graphics card sucking up like 750 watts or something is just going to outperform.

Gnome · Sep 6, 2015

Yeah but how many LiteCoins of energy are we talking about?

Lautaro · Sep 6, 2015

akachan ningen said:
There you go. If you choose PC gaming over console, you're destroying the world.

Worth it.

gogojira · Sep 6, 2015

One Titan X only goes so far.

Brewster's Wallet · Sep 6, 2015

This seems right, although console gamers make up for it in the energy they waste to constantly bitch in system wars on forums

Zolf · Sep 6, 2015

I need to pick up another R9 290 for Crossfire but my power supply isn't in the megawatt range.

Ogimachi · Sep 6, 2015

It's not "wasted energy" at all, so there's absolutely no problem, considering the amount of energy actually being wasted elsewhere.

Clefargle · Sep 6, 2015

akachan ningen said:
There you go. If you choose PC gaming over console, you're destroying the world.

Lol, wonderful. Im gonna use this unrelated line of reasoning in my next "should consoles die" argument.

Ricky Ricardo · Sep 6, 2015

akachan ningen said:
There you go. If you choose PC gaming over console, you're destroying the world.

Heh.

Brewster's Wallet said:
This seems right, although console gamers make up for it in the energy they waste to constantly bitch in system wars on forums

HEH!

OT: I have a 620W PSU and run a stock i5-3570K and a factory OC'd EVGA GTX 970. My computer doesn't run 24/7 either so I doubt I come close to any of these figures.

Dreams-Visions · Sep 6, 2015

is there an easy way to estimate your PC's power cost annually?

gdt · Sep 6, 2015

Some men just want to watch the world burn.

In 4k.

BasilZero · Sep 6, 2015

^ Beaten somewhat l0l

akachan ningen said:
There you go. If you choose PC gaming over console, you're destroying the world.

Cpt.Underpants · Sep 6, 2015

akachan ningen said:
There you go. If you choose PC gaming over console, you're destroying the world.

The world's sacrifice will be remembered

fedexpeon · Sep 6, 2015

Lautaro said:
Worth it.

Indeed.

statham · Sep 6, 2015

to play the devil,PC gamers have no online fees but they will have higher monthly electricity bills, does it even out?

Lactose_Intolerant · Sep 6, 2015

statham said:
to play the devil,PC gamers have no online fees but they will have higher monthly electricity bills, does it even out?

price of games?

inky · Sep 6, 2015

akachan ningen said:
There you go. If you choose PC gaming over console, you're destroying the world.

If global warming is real explain how we can render 4K snow.

TheHolyTurnip · Sep 6, 2015

PC gaming is the hottest trend this year, and with AMD and NVidia vying for market share it's going to get even hotter! And in other news, California is on fire... with over 70% of gamers now using PC!

cwistofu · Sep 6, 2015

statham said:
to play the devil,PC gamers have no online fees but they will have higher monthly electricity bills, does it even out?

The environment probably doesn't care about people paying online fees.

10k · Sep 6, 2015

So now instead of turning down our graphics settings for more frames or better performance we're gonna do it to save energy/the planet?

Dennis · Sep 6, 2015

PC is the new hotness. Same as old hotness.

statham · Sep 6, 2015

Lactose_Intolerant said:
price of games?

you can resell retail games which PC doesn't for the most part do. I did this for most of 360, buy cheap, sell high after I beat the game, games usually only costed me $5-8 bucks. Tho I'm mostly digital now.

TouchMyBox · Sep 6, 2015

So... If consoles use around 80-100 watts, let's say. That means the average gaming pc uses 800-1000 watts?

Are they talking exclusively about people with quad sli rigs or something?

akachan ningen said:
There you go. If you choose PC gaming over console, you're destroying the world.

Tell your energy providers to git gud, noob.

ClaptoVaughn · Sep 6, 2015

More power costs more money? No way.

Langdon Alger · Sep 6, 2015

You can't put a price on an almost unnoticeable resolution or frame rate increase.

Pachael · Sep 6, 2015

Of course, Steam can't generate by itself

Arjac · Sep 6, 2015

sub-400watt gaming rig ftw

Shard · Sep 6, 2015

I am shocked at this news. Okay, not that shocked.

MGrant · Sep 6, 2015

Langdon Alger said:
You can't put a price on an almost unnoticeable resolution or frame rate increase.

andherewego.gif

On Demand · Sep 6, 2015

Stealth bragging thread.

Renekton · Sep 6, 2015

(Deflect) What about the datacenters that deliver digital content to our mobiles?!

statham · Sep 6, 2015

On Demand said:
Stealth bragging thread.

bragging about my 130w 7850? sure.

Self_Destructive · Sep 6, 2015

NeoGAF wastes way more arguing amungst ourselves

Mohasus · Sep 6, 2015

TouchMyBox said:
Are they talking exclusively about people with quad sli rigs or something?

Probably, high end PCs (like GTX980 + i7) don't even reach 400W on consumption charts. I'd say the average PC is around 300W.

DownGrader · Sep 6, 2015

Fairfax said:
It's not "wasted energy" at all, so there's absolutely no problem, considering the amount of energy actually being wasted elsewhere.

I agree with you, but one should need to not underestimate the amount of amateur PC builders who put 800W or 1000W PSU in their low- and mid-tier machines which would be fine with 500W PSU. Thankfully, the problem isn't as big as in 2000s when notebooks were expensive and niche and pre-built PCs weren't as popular as custom-made ones - now most of amateurs moved out to pre-built solutions.

benny_a · Sep 6, 2015

I think the numbers in this image are greatly exaggerated:

Of course I don't run a Titan setup but more than twice than what PC uses for active gaming is a bit much.
(And a non-optimized PC using over 200 W to surf the web?)

They also count in the display in this setup and sure, if you're using a triple display setup with the GPUs to match that but even within the enthusiast market that can't be a big percentage.

Edit: It seems they base those numbers partially on gaming benchmarks power consumption results. I haven't looked into but I don't know how representative this is about actual game usage. In my experience I can have 50 Watt difference between different games.

Stumpokapow · Sep 6, 2015

None of the article mentions whether this conclusion--or rather, the magnitude of it--is a function of the fact that PCs are left on most/all the time even when not gaming, while consoles are generally turned off

TouchMyBox · Sep 6, 2015

If a really high end pc uses 500 watts while gaming and is used to game 3 hours a day every day, that's ~550 kWh per year... Where the fuck are they getting the 1400 figure from?

Dio · Sep 6, 2015

Stumpokapow said:
None of the article mentions whether this conclusion--or rather, the magnitude of it--is a function of the fact that PCs are left on most/all the time even when not gaming, while consoles are generally turned off

Yes, this. People use their PCs for stuff that isn't just videogames.

SamastahSukhino · Sep 6, 2015

How else would I heat up my room? Actually saves me money on my heating bill. More power to me.

hateradio · Sep 6, 2015

Gotta get one of those Tesla batteries and charge up to save cash.

tim.mbp · Sep 6, 2015

4.4 hours a day spent gaming seems high for the average person.

Renekton · Sep 6, 2015

Dio said:
Yes, this. People use their PCs for stuff that isn't just videogames.

That's so 90s.

Office laptop for productivity. Mobiles for video, chatting and surfing. Gaming PC for only gaming.

Fitts · Sep 6, 2015

Huh. I didn't realize so many gamers ran AMD cards.

benny_a · Sep 6, 2015

tim.mbp said:
4.4 hours a day spent gaming seems high for the average person.

The article doesn't make it clear, but the study that is cited says "extreme" or "avid" gamer is at 4.4h on average.

statham · Sep 6, 2015

Stumpokapow said:
None of the article mentions whether this conclusion--or rather, the magnitude of it--is a function of the fact that PCs are left on most/all the time even when not gaming, while consoles are generally turned off

not for my xbox, all my TV viewing is through it, it stays on aslong as I'm awake.

Support NeoGAF

PC gamers use ridiculous amount of energy

Member

Banned

Banned

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Banned

Member

Member

Member

Banned

Member

Member

XBLAnnoyance

Member

Banned

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

extra source of jiggaflops

listen to the mad man

Member

Banned

Banned

The Most Dangerous Yes Man

Member

Member

Member

extra source of jiggaflops

Member

Similar threads