We just a had a thread about cyclists on the road and what GAF think about it. Sadly, It was closed before the discussion could unfold due to an unrelated issue. I think that this recent article will be a good starting point to start the discussion anew.
Some excerpts:
Source.
So, here we are at. Do you feel biased against cyclist, GAF?
Why, when there is a crash, do drivers (and the police) always blame the cyclist? Tara Goddard asked these questions and a whole lot more in her PHD thesis, Exploring Drivers Attitudes and Behaviors toward Bicyclists: The Effect of Explicit and Implicit Attitudes on Self-Reported Safety Behaviors. In it she tries to dig into what drivers are actually thinking, writing in the summary:
Drivers attitudes toward bicyclists, and how those attitudes may affect drivers behavior, are a largely unexplored area of research, particularly in the United States. Bringing together social psychological theories with existing techniques for measuring driver attitudes and behavior, this research utilizes an online survey to measure drivers explicit attitudes and self-reported behaviors and test drivers implicit attitudes toward bicyclists. Understanding drivers attitudes toward bicyclists, and whether those attitudes predict behaviors, is integral to advancing goals of community livability that incorporate safety and environmental sustainability.
Some excerpts:
Roadways are highly congested (and thus contested), publicly funded space, and both space and funding are a finite and limited resource. This results in the perception and reality of roadway competition as a zero-sum game between roadway users (Aldred, 2012). It may be that this realistic competition is a stand-in for social competition; that is, the roadway is a battle ground for social domination, rather than just access to physical space.
While the physical bodywork of a car essentially anonymizes drivers, bicyclists are visible in their variety of shapes, sizes, ages, gender, and racialized bodies (Urry, 2007, p.48). Drivers have shown bias in yielding behavior by the race, apparent disabled status, or age of a crossing pedestrian (see TreeHugger: Don't cross the street while black, according to new study); while drivers in higher status cars were less likely to yield to a pedestrian. (See TreeHugger: Study reveals the obvious: The rich are different from you and me, especially behind the wheel) When interacting with bicyclists, drivers used greater passing distance when the bicyclist was unhelmeted or appeared female.
In the model of pressure to overtake, only age, social dominance, and legitimacy were significant predictors. The social dominance scale had the highest standardized coefficient. This factor scale reflects anger at bicyclist rulebreaking, willingness to excuse drivers rule-breaking, and perhaps most importantly, the belief that bicyclists should not hold up traffic. This suggests that drivers own feelings about bicyclists not holding up traffic may cause them to perceive, real or not, that drivers behind them are angry if they do not overtake. Another possibility is that they get angry when drivers in front of them do not pass bicyclists, and so they assume other drivers feel the same. ... Although roadway legitimacy is modelled as the predictor of overtaking pressure, it is possible that the relationship goes the other direction drivers who feel pressure to overtake may see bicyclist licensing and registration as a way to control bicyclists or make them behave.
So, basically, the more people hate cyclists, the more they want to regulate them and helmet them and licence them, rather than actually give them some basic safe infrastructure (which might mean giving up some precious road.)
Source.
So, here we are at. Do you feel biased against cyclist, GAF?