-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Tell Me You Love Me: 70 year old cock, hanging balls, & hand job sperm fountains
- Thread starter RSTEIN
- Start date
- Status
RiskyChris
Banned
What did I miss and where can I find a re-run?
I was under the distinct impression that HBO was *not* going to be showing the dangly balls, limp breasts and apartment sized vaginas of the aged on that show - just young folks going at it while the elderly got their disgusting groove on off-camera, where it belongs.
Is this not the case? If so, thanks for the warning.
Is this not the case? If so, thanks for the warning.
Oldschoolgamer
The physical form of blasphemy
Thanks for the heads up. Note to self, stay the hell away.
muahahaha
bishoptl said:
muahahaha
Oldschoolgamer
The physical form of blasphemy
bishoptl said:
You know...I just got an image of some old lady with no teeth, sucking some dudes cock, with sperm dripping down the sides of her mouth like she was drinking milk out of a sippy cup. It isn't a pretty picture.
I'm not going to be able to go to sleep now.
gummer hummer is lolz though.
Crayon Shinchan
Aquafina Fanboy
What's this show about? X-rated reality show about geriatric loving?
Rodeo Clown
All aboard! The Love train!
Sperm fountains?
Dynamite Shikoku
Congratulations, you really deserve it!
any bukkake?
I think I've painted the wrong picture here. The show is not about gummer hummers. This scene was at the end and lasted like 30 seconds.
The show is about people at various stages of their lives/relationships. Some have been married for a while & are having sex problems, another couple is trying to get pregnant, another is young and frisky, etc. etc.
Seen in the show:
- Balls: Dangling. While thrusting.
- Cock: A cock getting a hand job.
- Ejaculation: A cumshot at the end of said hand job.
They didn't push the envelope - they broke it. You thought Californication was graphic? Tell Me You Love Me makes Californication look like a Soap Opera.
The show is about people at various stages of their lives/relationships. Some have been married for a while & are having sex problems, another couple is trying to get pregnant, another is young and frisky, etc. etc.
Seen in the show:
- Balls: Dangling. While thrusting.
- Cock: A cock getting a hand job.
- Ejaculation: A cumshot at the end of said hand job.
They didn't push the envelope - they broke it. You thought Californication was graphic? Tell Me You Love Me makes Californication look like a Soap Opera.
Ninja Scooter
Member
Prvt.Pegleg said:
they gotta save something for sweeps!
Dynamite Shikoku
Congratulations, you really deserve it!
what the fuck is the use of using prosthetics? its fucking ridiculous
ForzaItalia
Banned
70 is too old even for me...though a gummer hummer sounds intriguing...
Ned Flanders
Banned
TheWolf said:
So thats how they got away with the handjob scene..I thought that guys dick looked a kinda plastic.
But yeah..wow. Lots of graphic sexual stuff here. That first sex scene with the younger couple had to be real. The way she was grinding, and the fact that you saw his balls exposed with no shaft presumably indicates that the only place his cock could have been was buried in her love chasm.
I know as of the last 5 years, a lot of more independent, art house cinema has been incorporating real sexual acts into scenes (Brown Bunny, 9 Songs etc), and while I'm the last guy to complain about having quality wank material, I do feel that not all of it is necessarily art for art's sake. TMYLM seems to (no pun intended) straddle that line as well.
There were approximately 2 cocks, one set of balls, 3 sets of tits, 2 masturbation scenes (one assisted, including a prosthetic erection blasting loads), 3 coitus scenes, and one geriatric oral scene. In ONE episode. I mean I understand the whole "Romance novels can be as graphic as they want, so why can't film/TV?" argument, and I'm not entirely opposed to cutting away or fading out of sensual scenes simply to avoid being offensive, but thats still a LOT of graphic sexual content for a one hour episode of a show about relationships.
Will they all be that graphic? I guess we'll have to wait and see, and I imagine that keeping such a spunkerific pace will be difficult, to say the least (refractory period of one episode?? :lol ). The rest of the show seemed fairly engaging, and they managed to get some genuine moments through the potrayal of how couples interact, particularly about delicate subject matter. The old lady blowing her husband was almost completely without context, however, and there were some other oddities (Sonogram table right next to an open office window overlooking a highway? Why can't they just hardwire a feed of your labia straight to an outdoor jumbotron?) that kept it from being as engaging as it could have been. In other words, it doesn't appear to be a throwaway like John From Retardville, but I wasn't as mezmerized as I was by Rome, Soprano's etc.
Anyway, I'll probably be horny enough by the time the next episode rolls around to forgive any ills the show may possess. Sex? You think you got sex, Showtime?? Eat your heart out, Californication!!
Ned Flanders
Banned
TheWolf said:
Yeah, I figured that was...COMING!!! LOLWTFTABASCO
CrushDance
Banned
O_O.....old, man juice!?
Solideliquid
Member
They were trying to show how well she gets along with her husband. Many many (healthy) >60 yr old partners are having sex. Why it's a big deal on GAF is beyond me.
Ned Flanders
Banned
Solideliquid said:
I think the point is that we all accept that certian things happen naturally in the world, but we don't necessarily need to see them dramatically portrayed on prime time television. I mean I'm sure that one of the two of them is likely incontinent as well. That doesn't mean I need a moving depiction of some geezer blasting in their Depends, either.
Unless its sweeps week, of course! :lol
favouriteflavour
Member
There was a show in the UK far more hardcore than this.
Camera attatched to the penis and inside the vagina. Internal moneyshot. Hardcore.
Camera attatched to the penis and inside the vagina. Internal moneyshot. Hardcore.
Phobophile
A scientist and gentleman in the manner of Batman.
favouriteflavour said:
A Girl's Guide to 21st Century Sex
Funny thing is, some shit was censored in that show. Like if it was for "educational" purposes, it was uncensored, but if it showed any of the guests doing it, or something, it was blocked out.
BenjaminBirdie
Banned
Ned Flanders said:
:lol
Holy shit. I don't know why but that sentence just killed me.
BenjaminBirdie
Banned
I just want to know if that Massive Attack song was playing during the blow job.
adamsappel
Member
Wow. I just fast-forwarded through the first episode. Looks terrible, ugly people having (or not having) sex and whining about it. And if you're going to use a prosthesis for a nude scene, as an actor I would have demanded a larger one.
On a personal note, I'm creeped out on several levels. I hadn't realized the "old lady" was Jane Alexander. Besides the skeezy elderly factor, that woman used to be my boss. Many years ago, I worked for the National Endowment for the Arts when she was chairman. It's hard to reconcile the woman I would see in the office with the old lady sucking off her husband. I think she has nude scenes in a later episode. I'll pass.
On a personal note, I'm creeped out on several levels. I hadn't realized the "old lady" was Jane Alexander. Besides the skeezy elderly factor, that woman used to be my boss. Many years ago, I worked for the National Endowment for the Arts when she was chairman. It's hard to reconcile the woman I would see in the office with the old lady sucking off her husband. I think she has nude scenes in a later episode. I'll pass.
Brian Fellows
Pete Carroll Owns Me
adamsappel said:
Where were these ugly people. The guys maybe because none of the women are even close to being ugly.....well except for the Grey Mare.
The show itself is a bit of a downer though. Most of the shows on HBO that I have enjoyed (The Wire, Deadwood, Rome, Big Love)did a great job of mixing in some comedy relief but this show has absolutely none in it. I think it'll get old pretty fast.
John Dunbar
correct about everything
reilo said:
I wanted to see this, so I googled "Michelle Borth". What I got was a picture of, I'm assuming her, lying on the ground with one of her breasts burned off. wtf is this, and how can I see more?
Also, the silly lady should know you don't get Oscars for TV shows.
BenjaminBirdie
Banned
John Dunbar said:
WTF is right. Yikes.
adamsappel
Member
Yeah, that was a little harsh. I guess in the women's case I meant "normal looking" and without typical make-up (I'm just as ugly as the guys, I'm sure). The woman who used to be on that execrable HBO show-- what was it, The Secret Lives of Married Men?--is attractive, and if I found out the woman who was a doctor on ER has a sexy storyline I'll tune in again. It's more the depressing storylines that give them "sharp knees."Brian Fellows said:
Ford Prefect
GAAAAAAAAY
Me too :lolJohn Dunbar said:
Google Image Search is such a dick, sometimes.
I thought it was really engaging. I'm definitely interested to see where this goes. I didn't find it all that explicit. It pales in comparison to 9 Songs or Shortbus. It's obviously showing more than other television shows, but yeah. The way some people were talking, I was expecting so much more, but it was primarily fleeting glances.
Really liked the lack of score. Kept the focus on the performances, which will make or break the show, and they generally deliver, so it's a bold and successful move.
Really liked the lack of score. Kept the focus on the performances, which will make or break the show, and they generally deliver, so it's a bold and successful move.
- Status