brucewaynegretzky
Member
Did a quick search didn't see any threads, but I wanted to get some thoughts.
Does anyone think the recent Sony debacle validates Nintendo's slow rate of online integration? Nintendo has always cited parental and security concerns for its online approach, and the recent Sony hack seems to suggest they were right to be afraid of the online market. Nintendo has publicized their Wii points cards far more than Sony has, and has always kind of done a *wink*Don't put your card online*wink*. I was just thinking I wouldn't be surprised if Nintendo mentioned it in their E3 press conference how they've developed their online experience around security and control. Anyone else have thoughts?
EDIT: Adding this in from a later post of mine in the thread to make this clearer.
Does anyone think the recent Sony debacle validates Nintendo's slow rate of online integration? Nintendo has always cited parental and security concerns for its online approach, and the recent Sony hack seems to suggest they were right to be afraid of the online market. Nintendo has publicized their Wii points cards far more than Sony has, and has always kind of done a *wink*Don't put your card online*wink*. I was just thinking I wouldn't be surprised if Nintendo mentioned it in their E3 press conference how they've developed their online experience around security and control. Anyone else have thoughts?
EDIT: Adding this in from a later post of mine in the thread to make this clearer.
1. Nintendo has a choice to make, Invest resources in online infrastructure or other areas.
2. They see a number of vulnerabilities in the online area so the DECIDED (aka strategy) to invest in other areas.
3. The areas they invested in proved very popular.
4. One of the concerns which they have publicly mentioned in the past becomes a major media issue after the PSN hacks.
5. Nintendo's decision to invest in other design areas OVER online infrastructure is partially validated because it has become more evident that their concerns were justified and at least a good reason to choose one area of investment over another.