You must be kidding right? Right?
Goddamn why are you even bothering with PS4 version? It's PC all the way.
Pathetic
Still getting it but totally pathetic that jib can't pull off 1080p on ps4
I'd go with the PC version, definitely. You'll be pulling 1080p with most settings maxed, no problem.
Witcher 3 is semi-confirmed or very strongly rumored to be sub-1080 isn't it? Probably wanna put Ubi's MMO Clancy FPS (The Division) on there too.
With what CD projekt was able to accomplish with Witcher 2 on the xbox 360, Witcher 3 could have one pixel and it'd still look amazing. I have full faith I will play that game and won't be disappointed graphically.Witcher 3 is semi-confirmed or very strongly rumored to be sub-1080 isn't it? Probably wanna put Ubi's MMO Clancy FPS (The Division) on there too.
MY CLIENT, WAAAATCH_DOGS, BROKE THE STREAK. MY. CLIENT. WATCH UNDERSCORE DOOOOOOOOGS BROKE THE 1080p STREAK.
Wow, TIL all people care about is resolution.
Game will be fun, I'm buying still.
I think their QA department needs a makeover much more than their engineers, quite frankly.
It is embarrassing but they are here to stay for another 8 years so...so should we start calling this gen the 7.5 generation? seriously this is embarrassing that Sony and MS would release consoles that are unable to hit 1080p/60fps with ease, they seriously expect these consoles to last 5-8 years like previous generations? glad i'm holding off on buying either console.
How much of it have you played?
I love getting inside info like this. I wanted to do QA in college, but it sounds boring. PEACE.This is simply not true.
Having worked in QA for years, I can honestly say that all these things would have been found by the team. They sit there for 8 hours a day testing a single area/mission/mode for the duration.
During the last 6 months before a game ships, they contract out even more (the majority actually) QA members. Once the game is (about) 3 months out, development goes into 'crunch mode' where the QA is expected to play the same stuff for up to 12 hours a day (including weekends).
If the company is on their toes, then QA would get a new build every morning and the first they do is check (if any) of the bugs submitted (and marked fixed by devs) were actually fixed.
Two weeks prior to release the game is sent to Sony/xbox etc. for certification.
Having worked on the Sony side in this example, I can say that those two weeks are basically the same as described above, 8 hrs a day on the same mode/missions etc. If the game is a real disaster and fails cert, then Sony employees go into 'crunch mode' once the new build arrives.
This whole time the devs still have their QA working on the game (plus contracted QA) A game needs a certain (I forget sry) amount of hours of testing per build.
What I'm getting at here is that QA finds the shit, reports it into DevTracker, and either the team can (and does) fix it or they can't for some reason (and people blame QA).
TLDR: All the shit gets found and reported, if it gets fixed or not is up to the devs.
/rant
As for watch dogs, I'll still get it at launch, the 900p sucks, but I'm sure the team did the best they could. (bullshots and target renders however need to stop).
If they went to 900p to keep a locked 30fps than I'd say it was the right choice.
Now If it still can't maintain a consistent 30fps....
I'm dying
Thank you Ubi, made my morning.
Let's hope PC is a good port.
Hmm, if Xbone can have an odd res like 792p why can't PS4 have something like 1000p LOL
Seems like they are maximizing one platform but not the other. ;-)
It is embarrassing but they are here to stay for another 8 years so...
Everything is possible but they sure as hell are taking their sweet time considering they must've known a shit storm would be coming.Is it possible they will patch it to 1080p as they did with Assassin's Creed IV?
Quite possibly more than you.
You do realise that even if a console was packing a titan some developers would add so much eye candy that 1080p/60fps would be difficult to hit. There are always choices in development, some people had unrealistic expectations regarding what targets studios will prioritise.seriously this is embarrassing that Sony and MS would release consoles that are unable to hit 1080p/60fps with ease
Maybe.
But if he hasn't, that's an odd claim to make.
Well it could have been worse I suppose. UbiSoft could have come out with some Capcom like excuses used for DmC like saying something along the lines of "Watch_Dogs looks/feels like 1080p. Also, 1080p is tiring for your eyes, thus 900/792p"
There's that I guess :/
Im having my doubts. If there was a patch coming and they thought there was a chance to hit 1080p I think they wouldnt have announced this at all until the last minute.Is it possible they will patch it to 1080p as they did with Assassin's Creed IV?
Disappointing for the PS4, but I'm burnt out in Ubisoft open world "experiences" anyway.
so should we start calling this gen the 7.5 generation? seriously this is embarrassing that Sony and MS would release consoles that are unable to hit 1080p/60fps with ease, they seriously expect these consoles to last 5-8 years like previous generations? glad i'm holding off on buying either console.
its getting ot now. I know who is developing it but Nintendo will publish this title in the west.
My point is, that they will never release two Zeldas within the span of a few months. The next real Zelda will come next year maybe, Watch Dogs on WiiU this year. And i dont care about that Hyrule Warriors thing. If the new mainline Zelda is indeed coming out this year like you said, i will buy you a copy as a present
quoting this for future use lol..............but as much as I want it to release this year.....due to the free copy XD.........it's going to be spring..........just because its Nintendo, I'm going to get spited for it and because Nintendo doesn't want you buying me a copy of the new Zelda lol
Botch Dogs.
Am I the only one that doesn't care about pixels and instead is simply pissed off at the constant false advertising that is thrown our way?