• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The 18 Most Hipster Books Of All Time

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've tried reading Super Sad True Love Story twice and it's self indulgent, not subtle, and doesn't posit anything interesting from what I read. It's horrible. I would not recommend it to anyone. And I really expected to like it. You'll go in looking for 1984 and walk away with a really crappy unimaginative version of 1984 (or something like that)
 
Yep, hate that fucking word and the obsession with labeling anybody that doesn't share your particular taste as one.

Same.

It's really become the new "gay" in terms of an insult. I find that certain groups like to use it as well, mostly the geek/nerd variety. As someone who is gay and has heard the word gay used as an insult growing up, now because of my tastes I'm labeled a hipster for no fucking reason.
 
1Q84 is hipster because it's more experimental and thus "less accessible" than his other books?

Seriously?

If anything it's too damn similar to everything else he's wriiten in his lifetime.

Yeah, it's the only novel from the list that I read and even then I didn't finish it, but I'm not sure how it's experimental. It's the same as his previous novels in writing style.
 
Murakami needed at least one mention in a list like this, 1Q84 is as good as any.
 
Thought about Infinite Jest as I saw the header, and sure enough it's there. It's fantastic, though. Not sure about 1Q84, though. House of Leaves would be a better fit. And The Picture of Dorian Gray. Oscar Wilde was the first hipster.
 
it's a pretty old word actually

I've seen it on the road which was written in 1957

Oh I know it is old. I just get annoyed how it's used as a put down, as if only the most current generation is the one lazy and empty enough to do the stupid things they do. It's just used so dismissively to discount the fun that the kids are having building an identity on wreckage of the pop culture from the generations that preceded it. Which is what all youth trends seem to be built upon are built on.
 
Then what do you call people who say they've read Dostoyevsky, Marx and Machiavelli? I'm so confused.

"say"? You don't believe us?
Bro. Dostoyevsky is really good. Marx is interesting and often required for school. Admittedly, Machiavelli is terrible. But I've read all three and never in my life been accused of being a hipster. . .
 
i1pMW18meIpeH.jpg
 
"say"? You don't believe us?
Bro. Dostoyevsky is really good. Marx is interesting and often required for school. Admittedly, Machiavelli is terrible. But I've read all three and never in my life been accused of being a hipster. . .

Allow me break your hipster cherry then: Hipster
 
1Q84 is hipster because it's more experimental and thus "less accessible" than his other books?

Seriously?

If anything it's too damn similar to everything else he's wriiten in his lifetime.

I'm currently reading 1Q84 and it's incredibly boring. It's almost like the perfect cure for insomnia. I thought hipsters were more fun than that. Or is that the whole ironic thing. Frack I'm confused now.
 
"say"? You don't believe us?
Bro. Dostoyevsky is really good. Marx is interesting and often required for school. Admittedly, Machiavelli is terrible. But I've read all three and never in my life been accused of being a hipster. . .

Nagh, I'm just playing around with the futility of defining what a hipster novel/author is. Marx and Dostoyevsky are just the sort of classic books alienated young people read before they're old enough to really understand them. I wouldn't describe them as hipster (Hipster being just another vague catch-all term like Hippy and Beatnik) but no doubt there are a bunch of privileged white kids worshiping at the alter of a bunch 19th Century Russian authors.
 
franzen isn't a hipster choice, he's just an irate person who likes a moan and his recent books are traditional victorian style novels and don't have much ironic humour or structural trickery. i guess they're mentioning the kraus project, which i suppose could be 'check out this obscure austrian satirist that you've never heard of' but he presents it like old man shouting at cloud stuff, not really tao lin or eggers. hipsters would call him bland middlebrow and talk about how problematic his comments about edith wharton were.
 
No that would be "literally".

The dictionary folk have caved though :( I think the next edition of Webster's or something recognized the use of "literally" as an intensifier. It's literally the stupidest thing I've ever seen a dictionary do.
 
Did someone really just write this? My god what a vapid fucking statement.

I'm not including everyone who reads those sorts of books in that statement. Are you telling me you've never encountered these sorts of people in your life?? Maybe going to an arts university and living around London has clouded my opinion of people or something.
 
Going by the criteria you'd think Finnegan's Wake would have been #1 on that list, but I suppose it's too nigh incomprehensible.
 
I'm not including everyone who reads those sorts of books in that statement. Are you telling me you've never encountered these sorts of people in your life?? Maybe going to an arts university and living around London has clouded my opinion of people or something.

Well 19th century Russia produced some really great literature so of course you're gonna find people of a certain demographic who love those writers. But I guarantee you'll find far more fans outside that demo. That's why those authors are considered great and why their work endures.
 
Well 19th century Russia produced some really great literature so of course you're gonna find people of a certain demographic who love those writers. But I guarantee you'll find far more fans outside that demo. That's why those authors are considered great and why their work endures.

Okay, so 'worshipping at the alter' was undoubtedly over-condescending and exaggerated of me, but there absolutely are people out there who like to consume difficult subject matter purely as a badge of honour. I've met them many times and they tend to be young middle-class white people! :)
 
Okay, so 'worshipping at the alter' was undoubtedly over-condescending and exaggerated of me, but there absolutely are people out there who like to consume difficult subject matter purely as a badge of honour. I've met them many times and they tend to be young middle-class white people! :)

Or maybe they just enjoy reading great literature. I mean, if you like to read and you're not reading the classics, you're missing out. Dostoevsky is not exactly Beckett or Pynchon; his books are incredibly easy to read and understand.

I guess I can see feeling special for reading one of those post-modern writers, but for 19th Century realist classics that are taught in high school Lit classes all over the world, I can only imagine the reason to read one is personal edification and enjoyment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom