DS9's point was that you couldn't just "warp away" from your problems each week.Was the Borg never showing up in DS9 because the writers had restraint and didnt want to just ape the big TNG villains or was it more down to saving them because they knew Voyager was literally heading in their direction?
There was likely a writer that said "these guys are too one-dimensional."Seriously, I mourn for how they just destroyed the Borg simplicity. Work with the federation against some other super species? Get that shit out of here. The Borg wouldn't make a damp truce with the federation. If they had any reason to think that Voyager would have tech that they could use, they would assimilate them to get it. That's how they work. That's how the Borg survived for hundreds of years dominating species after species, planet after planet.
Was the Borg never showing up in DS9 because the writers had restraint and didnt want to just ape the big TNG villains or was it more down to saving them because they knew Voyager was literally heading in their direction?
Was the Borg never showing up in DS9 because the writers had restraint and didnt want to just ape the big TNG villains or was it more down to saving them because they knew Voyager was literally heading in their direction?
They did, though. Once they got smart enough to set phasers to rotate frequency after every shot, they still only had a limited window before they would stop them anyway.Uh, they were adjusting frequencies dude.
It's not like The Borg could just, I dunno, block all of them.
Due to how the Voyager writers were pretty much told/ordered by executives and so on to "fuck continuity", they really couldn't develop an original recurring antagonist, and the ones they tried to create either were pretty crap (the stupid Kazon, the Predator wannabe's Hirogen, the trashy Malon, random Hologram psychos) or underutilized (The Vidiians, the Krenim) and none were really "accepted" by fans as a real threat. The Borg carried that cache of prominence that could always be counted on to bring viewers in.
Part of that has to do with the theme, they're traveling across an entire quadrant. According to fan calculations I saw once: In the time it took them just to get out of Kazon space is like all of everything we saw in TOS/TNG/DS9 in terms of species/planets/empires/etc. So you'd go through the Klingons, Romulans, Cardassians, Ferengi, Breen, Tholians, etc.Voyager writers threw every other villain in the bushes so might as well get the borg.
Kazon? Ha.
Vidians? Ha.
Hirogen? Who?
Species 8472? Wut.
Part of that has to do with the theme, they're traveling across an entire quadrant. According to fan calculations I saw once: In the time it took them just to get out of Kazon space is like all of everything we saw in TOS/TNG/DS9 in terms of species/planets/empires/etc. So you'd go through the Klingons, Romulans, Cardassians, Ferengi, Breen, Tholians, etc.
And then they were making tens of thousands of light year jumps sometimes, so you can't really have the Kazon suddenly show up when you're 25 years travel time across the quadrant.
Well, yeah, that too. But they couldn't have kept the Kazon plausibly for the entire seven year run. Like TOS/TNG/DS9/ENT could do with Klingons, Romulans, etc.Well, they ditched the Kazon after season 2 because they were a failure as a credible villain.
The series' co-creators originally conceived of the Kazon as contemporary Los Angeles street gangs. Jeri Taylor recalled, "We felt with the Kazon we needed to address the tenor of our times and what [...] was happening in our cities and recognizing a source of danger and social unrest. We wanted to do that metaphorically." (Captains' Logs Supplemental - The Unauthorized Guide to the New Trek Voyages, p. 151) One factor in this analogy was that the trio wanted to have in-fighting between the alien "gangs". Michael Piller commented, "Our intention was to create a sort of disorganized anarchy, them-against-them as much as them-against-us." (Captains' Logs Supplemental - The Unauthorized Guide to the New Trek Voyages, p. 161)
The earliest material evidence of the Kazon concept is one of many summaries of the discussions written by Jeri Taylor during the development process; the specific summary in which the idea first appears is dated 10 August 1993 and reads, "Maybe there are 'gangs' who are the villains. They don't respect the prime directive, and have interfered with many non-warp cultures. They come in and 'squat' on a planet. They're basically bullies." The same set of notes also posits, "At least two gangs–Crips and Bloods, in competition for influence." (A Vision of the Future - Star Trek: Voyager, p. 186) The terms used to refer to these two groups were intentionally meant as preliminary, shorthand names. (A Vision of the Future - Star Trek: Voyager, p. 187)
On 16 August, Jeri Taylor wrote another summary, including the statement, "The Crips have a rival (or more), for territory; they vie for new worlds, wiping out people on the way. Maybe on some planets they get along with the native population. But generally, they begin, like skinheads, to practice 'ethnic cleansing.'" This summary also shows that, at this point, Taylor and her fellow series co-creators were considering the possibility that, in the pilot episode of the forthcoming Star Trek series, the series' main characters might form a truce with one of the gangs, making the other gang an enemy for the rest of the series. The document went on to state, "Perhaps there are three gangs, with constantly shifting relationships and allegiances. Just as we think we have sorted it out, the balance shifts again." (A Vision of the Future - Star Trek: Voyager, pp. 187-188)
In a much longer summary, dated the next day (17 August), a preliminary story outline for the pilot episode of the upcoming series described the Crips as "a gang which, in conflict with two other gangs, competes for territory in this region of space." (A Vision of the Future - Star Trek: Voyager, pp. 190-191) In addition, this early story outline shows that the series co-creators were still considering the idea that one of the enemy gangs (now selected to be the Crips) would forge a truce with the series' hero characters and that another of the gangs (said to be the Bloods) would therefore serve as antagonists for the series, vowing to eliminate the main characters. (A Vision of the Future - Star Trek: Voyager, p. 191) This initial concept was scrapped by 10 September 1993, as can be seen in another of Jeri Taylor's notes (which twice abbreviates the terms used for the gangs as "the B's and C's"). The quarrelsome gangs continued to play into development for the pilot episode, although proceeding along much the same lines as they are depicted in the final version of that installment (besides the continued use of their shorthand gang-names). (A Vision of the Future - Star Trek: Voyager, p. 205)
By mid-1994, the name of the new species had been changed to "Gazon" (most likely by Michael Piller, who was working on the script for the pilot episode, "Caretaker", by that point). (A Vision of the Future - Star Trek: Voyager, p. 232) At some time in either June, July or August 1994, the species name was finally changed to "Kazon". (A Vision of the Future - Star Trek: Voyager, p. 281) The reason for the name change between "Gazon" (pronounced with an "a" sound) and "Kazon" (pronounced with an "ay" sound) was that, with the Middle East's Gaza Strip being an oft-mentioned news item at the time, the producers feared that an unintended metaphor might be made between the similarly-sounding "Gazon" and "Gaza Strip". (Star Trek Monthly issue 4, p. 55) The first edition of the Star Trek: Voyager Technical Manual, first printed in September 1994, clarified that only two competing Kazon "sects" were still planned to be established, one of which was branded with the ultimately unused name "Kazon-Sera" (the other being the Kazon-Ogla
I could have gone for fewer Q episodes and more Lore episodes
Wait, that's stupid. I trade Lwaxana for Lore.
And fewer Borg eps. The more you explain, the more you wreck them.
i still remember way back when Star Trek was a thing and The Borg were introduced... shit was actually a TV event leading all the way up to when Picard was assimilated.
Heh, the writers (who probably didn't bother watching previous episodes) wouldn't let a thing like distance stop them when it was convenient. There was an episode where the crew encountered the Malon after two 10,000 light year jumps (nerd talk: First was the Quantum Slipstream flight that nearly destroyed them. Second was the stolen Transwarp Coil from the Borg). And they encountered the Hirogen pretty constantly too (though they were at least written to be a race that at once had a massive empire due to their telecommunications network which spanned the whole Galaxy).Part of that has to do with the theme, they're traveling across an entire quadrant. According to fan calculations I saw once: In the time it took them just to get out of Kazon space is like all of everything we saw in TOS/TNG/DS9 in terms of species/planets/empires/etc. So you'd go through the Klingons, Romulans, Cardassians, Ferengi, Breen, Tholians, etc.
And then they were making tens of thousands of light year jumps sometimes, so you can't really have the Kazon suddenly show up when you're 25 years travel time across the quadrant.
That's a very interesting premise. It's too bad it was executed so poorly with the Kazon ended up more as stupid Barbarians than credible gangs. Heck, they had to write in a Cardassian Spy, Seska (a member of the Obsidian Order in the books) to be an accomplice to them to make them a more credible threat.Well, yeah, that too. But they couldn't have kept the Kazon plausibly for the entire seven year run. Like TOS/TNG/DS9/ENT could do with Klingons, Romulans, etc.
Just as an aside. The Kazon as originally pitched were a bit different:
Heh. I think you meant Seska/Chakotay right?None of the Seska/Tom Paris plot thing made any plausible sense.
And then in the end she just becomes the baby carrier for Maje Cullah instead of superspy pulling off epic betrayal.
Voyager fucked up so many potentially good premises it's amazing. (Like say everything involving the Maquis crew.)
I actually very much liked that episode. The actor who played that Super Borg did a great job. He was like a combination of Hugh and HAL.I BibleThumped pretty hard when that Borg with the advanced technology let himself die and Seven was heartbroken over it.
This thread just makes me miss real Trek, good or bad, it was still better than the shit we're getting now.
Yeah, even Enterprise.
No, the whole plot line where Paris was acting weird and left the ship to expose the spy or whatever.Heh. I think you meant Seska/Chakotay right?
Unless you meant Tom Paris as a character (we all know he's Nicolas Lacarno). But yeah, Seska was another waste. A master spy of the Obsidian Order obsessing over Chakotay and forging an alliance with the Kazon of all people. Garak would have been ashamed that such a creature was a spy.
I liked parts of Enterprise, especially the third season's forcing continuity on the ships status and the crew into hardships.No, Voyager or Enterprise... JUST NO!!!
Lol, the spy, I totally forgot about that one. That must have been one of the few attempts at continuity Voyager did. And yeah, I never could really piece that plotline together. I remember Paris acting badly a few episodes and then that one ep where everything was revealed.No, the whole plot line where Paris was acting weird and left the ship to expose the spy or whatever.
I wiped the Chakotay thing from my brain.
I often wonder how the disparity in the way DS9 and Voyager were handled came about. Where as DS9 became a super-focused continuity and character driven series, Voyager became more of a serial with each week being something completely different. I thought I heard somewhere that because Voyager was on network TV that made the execs try to treat it more as a "procedural", as that's the kind of show network viewers only seem to care about.That probably goes back to Rick Berman, he was the one who when they were talking about the Dominion War wanted only a four or five episode arc.
EDIT: Which is somewhat ironic then considering Enterprise's third season which he was at the helm for.
LolI don't need a reason:
![]()
I often wonder how the disparity in the way DS9 and Voyager were handled came about. Where as DS9 became a super-focused continuity and character driven series, Voyager became more of a serial with each week being something completely different. I thought I heard somewhere that because Voyager was on network TV that made the execs try to treat it more as a "procedural", as that's the kind of show network viewers only seem to care about.
lol, my bad. I meant the antithesis of a serial. Which I guess was a procedural...I don't think you know what a serial is.
That probably goes back to Rick Berman, he was the one who when they were talking about the Dominion War wanted only a four or five episode arc.
EDIT: Which is somewhat ironic then considering Enterprise's third season which he was at the helm for.
I often wonder how the disparity in the way DS9 and Voyager were handled came about. Where as DS9 became a super-focused continuity and character driven series, Voyager became more of a serial with each week being something completely different. I thought I heard somewhere that because Voyager was on network TV that made the execs try to treat it more as a "procedural", as that's the kind of show network viewers only seem to care about.
Hey remember when the Borg and Romulans brought Kirk back to life and then sent him to kill Riker but he got captured and turned back to the light side so then him and Picard took the Defiant to the Borg homeworld and blew it up? Wasn't that fun.
I keep getting Berman and Braga mixed up in terms of who was "worse" for Trek, as well as which one was Jeri Ryan sleeping with. Is there a consensus on that point? Though I have to say I really really wish Braga's Year of Hell being a full season had happened. That was the only two-parter in the show where the characters had actual meaningful development and their interactions actually felt natural.I think it was more Bragga pushing for the Xindi arc on Enterprise. He also wanted a full year on Voyager for Year of Hell.
I keep getting Berman and Braga mixed up in terms of who was "worse" for Trek, as well as which one was Jeri Ryan sleeping with. Is there a consensus on that point?
No. Voyager destroyed their transwarp system that linked the Delta Quadrant to the Alpha Quadrant.I'm confused in voyager series finale are the borg wiped out for good?
I think Ira Steven Behr has usually been credited for a lot of that. And also the fact that all the people who thought differently ran off to Voyager.I often wonder how the disparity in the way DS9 and Voyager were handled came about. Where as DS9 became a super-focused continuity and character driven series, Voyager became more of a serial with each week being something completely different. I thought I heard somewhere that because Voyager was on network TV that made the execs try to treat it more as a "procedural", as that's the kind of show network viewers only seem to care about.
In relation to the decision to set the show in a fixed location, Ira Steven Behr, speaking in 1996, commented; "We have certain advantages that I think no other Star Trek series has had, because we do have a base of operations that doesn't travel through space, which is the space station. Every story we do, the repercussions, the consequences don't disappear. It's not like the other shows where you have an adventure and then you zoom off into the great unknown. We are here, we have made a home, what we do has consequences. And I think we're able to do this mosaic, this fabric of life in the future, which I like." Similarly, Robert Hewitt Wolfe, speaking in 2002 stated; "I think if Next Generation and The Original Series were about going out there and discovering new things about other races, Deep Space Nine is about staying in one place and discovering new things about ourselves. Not that we didn't go out there and discover things, but we had the same characters, we didn't change location every week. Sisko couldn't just solve a problem and sail off into the sunset, and never have to go back to that place again. That place was always there, and that problem could always come back to haunt him. So, in a lot of ways, it was a more complex show." (New Frontiers: The Story of Deep Space Nine, DS9 Season 2 DVD special features)
Setting the show in a fixed location also meant that a large cast of recurring characters could be built up with relative ease; much more so than in The Original Series or The Next Generation before it, or Voyager or Star Trek: Enterprise since. As Rick Berman, speaking in 2002, states; "The show was land-based, but the benefit we got from that was that by staying in one place, it enabled us to create twenty or thirty secondary and recurring characters, which really enriched the show because of all the multi-layers of relationships that have existed over the years. It's a very character driven show as a result, and I think that makes it quite unique." (Deep Space Nine: A Bold Beginning, DS9 Season 1 DVD special features)
The main cast was intentionally assembled to create conflict (Quark and Odo, Kira and Sisko, etc) so as to contrast the relatively tranquil atmosphere aboard Federation starships. This was another very specific decision taken by the producers. Gene Roddenberry's golden rule was that there was to be no conflict among Starfleet characters, so the producers decided to introduce non-Starfleet characters so conflict could come from within the show rather than always coming from outside (as it did on TNG). As writer Joe Menosky explains, "You can see right away they're not the perfectly engineered Humans of TNG. They seem more real. I don't know if that makes them as attractive to viewers or not. But they are really different, and they represent a different way to tell a story. And it was definitely a conscious choice to create that potential for conflict." Similarly, Rick Berman states, "Viewers didn't see that group of loving family members that existed on the first two Star Trek shows." (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Companion) Michael Piller also comments on this, somewhat controversial, aspect of the show; "One of the primary goals of the development process was to come up with a show that had more inherent conflict than The Next Generation. In order to do that, you have to understand that Gene Roddenberry had a very specific vision for humanity in the 24th century. What that meant for The Next Generation was that everybody gets along remarkably well on the Enterprise. There's very little room for interpersonal conflict between those people. In this series, we set out to create a situation that would provide natural conflict. We've populated the show with several aliens, primarily Bajorans, as we are stationed on the edge of the Bajoran star system. And the Bajorans are very different people than we are. They are people who are very spiritual and mystical and have a whole different way of looking at life than the 24th century humanist views which many of our Starfleet people will have. So immediately, there are conflicts. And then there's additional aliens from elsewhere who are thrown into the mix. So, as regular characters, not all the people are Starfleet, not all the people are human, and as a result, you have this continuing conflict, because people who come from different places, honorable, noble people, will naturally have conflicts." (Deep Space Nine: A Bold Beginning, DS9 Season 1 DVD special features)
Why the hell was there a Borg queen?
It destroyed the Queen and the Hive Mind as well as trashing their galactic Transwarp network which was the backbone of their empire. As we saw in Voyager's "Unity" episode though, Drones can easily create new Hive Minds as well. So I'd imagine they would be in a situation similar to how the Zerg have been in StarCraft when left without a central leader.I'm confused in voyager series finale are the borg wiped out for good?