• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Super Smash Bros Wii U Review Thread

Dénouement;139543537 said:
When are the reviewers going to experience online? Tomorrow or Friday?

It appears the early part of Friday / Late Thursday.

Such a dumb decision on Nintendo's part IMO, unless the online is awful, which I am starting to fear it is.
 
I'm a bit confused since Online Multiplayer for the 3DS version was turned on before the review embargo was up. Not sure what changed here.
Japan would already have access to it before the NA embargo was up, right? Servers were probably on for that already, here they arent because NA is the first region to release on.
 
Watching the GameXplain review so far. Looking good!
I guess they are going to make a new video to review the MP when it is online?

Edit: Also screw the people who hate Andre's voice. I find it has a charm to it.
 
Online should be up at launch. I know our rough plan at Nintendo World Report is to see how the online is over the weekend and likely put a final score on the game early next week.

I haven't faced it too much running a Nintendo site, but I assume we will see this more and more often from now on. We did a similar thing for Mario Golf: World Tour (online wasn't up until close to launch, I believe) and I was super disappointed a ton of other outlets just didn't even mention the online.
 
GameZone Review - 9/10

At the end of the day, it's Smash Bros. any way you look at it. It's not longer the floaty fighter that Brawl was and instead now sits at a comfortable mid-ground between Brawl and Melee. The roster is huge and diverse, with very few clone characters this time around. It's still one of Nintendo's most innovative and extremely fun party games to date, and anyone with a Wii U has surely been looking forward to its release. It's not perfect, but it certainly comes close.
 
Seems kind of odd to not review the game due to not having multiplayer in place...Has that been the approach for all modern fighting games? I plan on playing the single player and local matches mostly.
 
Well that settles it: Worst Smash ever.

That excerpt does make me think that the other 30 seconds of a newcomers Mega Man 2 masterpiece experience will be simply running forward avoiding birds until they hit the wall they need to use Item 1 or 3 to get over with likely no knowledge of them or their usage.
This may be the masterpiece to beat for humorously poor game representation, guess Sakurai just really wanted to show that Wily Castle visual the smash stage is based upon.
 
Embargo just 2 days before launch and reviewers havent tried online yet. I dont care that this is considered "normal". I dont agree with this.
 
Well, we're getting the game first than anybody else so waiting till servers go live until tomorrow is understandable. With the 3DS embargo was different because at that time the game was already out in Japan and servers online so I'm not worried about the netcode or a total disaster with online MP on Smash U. There's no way it could be worse than Brawl or the 3DS version. Other than that, most of the reviews seem VERY positive wich is awesome #HYPEEEEEEEEE
 
This is going to score lower than Melee and Brawl. I'm really feeling it. You can tell that the 3DS version held it back based on the stage count and lack of adventure mode alone.

Read the whole thing and his only negatives are the stages and that the control schemes are tied to a specific profile. "9/10 - not perfect".

Lol reviewers.

Complaining over a 9/10? We're off to a great start already.
 
Read the whole thing and his only negatives are the stages and that the control schemes are tied to a specific profile. "9/10 - not perfect".

Lol reviewers.

I can't believe they only gave it a 9/10. This is such an insult to Sakurai-san, Namcot & most of all Nintendo. If I wanted opinions I wouldn't be reading objective game reviews!
 
Specific profile?
I'd imagine how it worked in Brawl.

Read the whole thing and his only negatives are the stages and that the control schemes are tied to a specific profile. "9/10 - not perfect".

Lol reviewers.
Are you saying he should have put it higher or lower? The stages are my biggest complaint too. Are stages being worse than past games objectively not worth taking a full point off? Or should it get at least two points off objectively? What are you trying to say lol. Is this about ethics?
 
Top Bottom