• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Witcher 3 gameplay from YouTubers from CDPR event

I find the characters very inconsistent. They range from excellent like in that shot to downright terrible (the quest NPC from the Precious Cargo video).

What is "downright terrible" about this?

hU8AHj5.png
 
Having finished The Witcher 2 again, CDPR are masters are faces. Everyone looks so distinct.
Unique faces look great, but there are plenty of duplicate models in Witcher 2. Well not quite, they mixed around various body parts, hair and clothing.
Still a lot better than in Witcher 1, where often even major NPCs weren't unique (ethernal fire "priest", lewarden "merchant" etc.)

Example (same face in-game):

oaumt.png
1kuwu.png
n28z37nnquxg.png


(same story with ruffian/thug/dwarfes etc.)

In any case, there is a massive increase in character quality with each Witcher game.
 

PFD

Member
It's an unfair reputation, mind you. Crytek gained that reputation because Crysis and Crysis 3 are tremendously demanding games if you want to max them out, both using for the time cutting edge rendering technology that more or less no other game was doing. Crysis 2 is the only outlier and even that was patched to more or less do the same. Each of the three Crysis games are technical benchmarks for their time.

With The Witcher 2 CDPR had their own engine that was pushing a lot of geometry for games of that era and fantastic texture resolution, and that combined with the buzz around Ubersampling gave them a false reputation of being almost Crytek level of crazy hardware pushing wizards. The Witcher 2 also had a fucking assy shadow rendering engine (dithered to shit), tons of pop-in and LOD asset culling, and other quirks. It's still an insanely gorgeous game because the final image comes together nicely, and CDPR's artists are among the best in the industry (armour detail is outstanding), but yeah. RedEngine was doing some very lovely stuff for the time (bokeh dof) and the game had some amazing graphics (like character models, textures, and lighting), but was far from some insane technical landmark.

For some reason there's been the expectation that Wild Hunt would be like a Crytek game; whimsical PC hardware pandering technical godsend. But I feel that's never been on the cards. As good as TW2 looked, it still had grass LOD pop-in about two metres in front of your character, aggressive foliage billboarding, pop-in on characters and objects, and dithered shadows. All things considered, Wild Hunt looks about par for course: stuff that could be improved and more technically demanding that some other games on the market are doing (see: GTAV PC and it's abundance of tessellation and POM), but nonetheless fucking gorgeous thanks to a very strong art direction and team of talented programmers and artists who know how to make the final image come together.

You just reminded me of a terrible graphical artifact from The Witcher 2, z-fighting. It was evident on many objects and characters.

Has anyone noticed any z-fighting issues in Wild Hunt?
 

GavinUK86

Member
Unique faces look great, but there are plenty of duplicate models in Witcher 2. Well not quite, they mixed around various body parts, hair and clothing.
Still a lot better than in Witcher 1, where often even major NPCs weren't unique (ethernal fire "priest", lewarden "merchant" etc.)

Example (same face in-game):

I think they were quite clever with those examples. You wouldn't necessary notice it's the same model on first look. Some games, even The Witcher 1, don't even try to hide the copy/paste NPC's.
 

SaberEdge

Member
I think even that is quite good looking model and realistic, almost like there is different kind humans around :b Also it's understandable that they would put more time and effort into key characters than into secondary characters.

Yeah, I thought that character model looked great. Compared to the character models we get in most open world games it's downright impressive.
 

erawsd

Member
I think even that is quite good looking model and realistic, almost like there is different kind humans around :b Also it's understandable that they would put more time and effort into key characters than into secondary characters.

Yeah, they obvious put more detail into the main cast, but in no way is that model "terrible".
 

Denton

Member
Is it just me or has Yennefer's face changed since that trailer? Or is it just the angle?

She looks completely different now. And much more faithful to the books (and my imagination). Yen on that picture looks like some young almost girlish model completely unlike Yennefer.
 

tuxfool

Banned
The major difference is....

Top: good lighting

Bottom: bad lighting

EDIT: Her hair is less detailed \ less curly now as well.

See my post.Also her hair style has changed. It is more wavy and less curly. It is possibly due to hairworks, which I don't think handles curly hair.

People on the Witcher forums were losing their minds over the old Yennifer hair.

Maybe because of complaints too.
 

Tovarisc

Member
The major difference is....

Top: good lighting

Bottom: bad lighting

EDIT: Her hair is less detailed \ less curly now as well.

I think there is some small differences in her face [makeup, eyebrows, maybe shape of eyes...], but clear difference is hairstyle and color. I personally like raven haired version better.
 

Lunar15

Member
The one thing I count on CDPR for is amazing clothes. Seriously, they keep nailing that shit.

Hell, clothes in this game have only gotten better with each screenshot. Seriously, go look at some of the first trailers for the games and you can clearly see that they've greatly improved the textures and designs for the clothes. No downgrade there.

EDIT: Except for the Wild Hunt, dammit.
 
I find the characters very inconsistent. They range from excellent like in that shot to downright terrible (the quest NPC from the Precious Cargo video). Comes with the territory of games this big but is one of those issues that seems more pronounced given the high quality of everything else.

Inconsistent? He said they looked distinct. And your terrible example, whats so terrible about it? Ive seen people with similar faces in real life. He is not a looker, nor has a cinematic face, but thats becuase he doesnt have too. He looks like a tear yed liar, and thats exactly what he is in the quest.


I always thought his hair looked too brown on this shot. Glad she has amber black hair now, as described in the books.
 
EDIT: Her hair is less detailed \ less curly now as well.

Do we know if these screenshots have that Nvidia hair FX turned on? Gopher mentioned it in one of his vids and said it wasn't turned on for the footage he recorded, but he saw it and it looks fantastic. Said it mostly affects wildlife/monsters, but it did appear to improve the quality of Geralt's hair, from what he could tell.

The problem is that the performance hit is significant.
 

misho8723

Banned
Unique faces look great, but there are plenty of duplicate models in Witcher 2. Well not quite, they mixed around various body parts, hair and clothing.
Still a lot better than in Witcher 1, where often even major NPCs weren't unique (ethernal fire "priest", lewarden "merchant" etc.)

Example (same face in-game):

oaumt.png
1kuwu.png
n28z37nnquxg.png


(same story with ruffian/thug/dwarfes etc.)

In any case, there is a massive increase in character quality with each Witcher game.

I don't think that those are the "same" faces.. the type of head maybe, but eyes, noses, mouths, cheeks, makeup, etc. are all different.. but I can't remember a single RPG where the faces looked so good, realistic, and unique as in TW2.. not even in DAI.. but TW3 as it seems is stepping it a few good levels up.. even that guy from Crago mission looks almost as good as the major characters which we have seen so far : unique face - check.. great details - check.. unique clothing - check.. and to thing, that the game has 90 main and around 2 000 side characters this quality, is fucking insane.. this is for me the TOP feature where I'm absolutely speechless

And Yennefer looks now way, way better than before.. she looks like she is described in the books..
 
Do we know if these screenshots have that Nvidia hair FX turned on? Gopher mentioned it in one of his vids and said it wasn't turned on for the footage he recorded, but he saw it and it looks fantastic. Said it mostly affects wildlife/monsters, but it did appear to improve the quality of Geralt's hair, from what he could tell.

The problem is that the performance hit is significant.
I doubt it.
 

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
Inconsistent? He said they looked distinct. And your terrible example, whats so terrible about it? Ive seen people with similar faces in real life. He is not a looker, nor has a cinematic face, but thats becuase he doesnt have too. He looks like a tear yed liar, and thats exactly what he is in the quest.
I've seen several sidequest NPCs in videos that looks almost exactly like him. Something about the model seems "off" compared to the other ones, kinda dead looking. It's a minor, minor complaint and a poor choice of words on my part.
 

viveks86

Member
I've seen several sidequest NPCs in videos that looks almost exactly like him. Something about the model seems "off" compared to the other ones, kinda dead looking. It's a minor, minor complaint.

Hmmm… would like to see image comparisons. I got the exact opposite impression. They felt like entirely distinct models. I have issues with the facial animation (which are understandably basic), but that's besides the point.
 

Denton

Member
They are the same faces, they even have the same hair model. But the makeup and the amount of freckles is different, yes.
They look different because the lighting, camera angle and perspective compression is different.

I agree with Misho and disagree with you, they look like they have different mouth shapes etc.
 

misho8723

Banned
I've seen several sidequest NPCs in videos that looks almost exactly like him. Something about the model seems "off" compared to the other ones, kinda dead looking. It's a minor, minor complaint.

I can show you all characters we have seen in all trailers, gameplay videos, etc. and you wouldn't see any other character which looks like him.. similar maybe, but not a clone, not a brother, no just hair changed or clothers, basically everything changed..
 

erawsd

Member
The one thing I count on CDPR for is amazing clothes. Seriously, they keep nailing that shit.

Hell, clothes in this game have only gotten better with each screenshot. Seriously, go look at some of the first trailers for the games and you can clearly see that they've greatly improved the textures and designs for the clothes. No downgrade there.

EDIT: Except for the Wild Hunt, dammit.

Yeah, no doubt. The characters models have improved so much, there is way more detail and animation -- Geralts necklace is glued to his chest in the old stuff. In all those early gifs people post Geralt is always looking away from the camera.. itd be less impresive if this was staring back at us:

m_4cdd420e34327c00.jpg
 

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
Hmmm… would like to see image comparisons. I got the exact opposite impression. They felt like entirely distinct models. I have issues with the facial animation (which are understandably basic), but that's besides the point.

I can show you all characters we have seen in all trailers, gameplay videos, etc. and you wouldn't see any other character which looks like him.. similar maybe, but not a clone, not a brother, no just hair changed or clothers, basically everything changed..
It may have just been the facial structure and animation that seemed familiar. I can't remember the video I saw with another, similar NPC. I think it was in the last round of previews. I edited my original post. Didn't mean to piss anyone off. I was posting in bed before fully awake and I didn't phrase it well at all LOL
 

EatChildren

Currently polling second in Australia's federal election (first in the Gold Coast), this feral may one day be your Bogan King.
That one below is pretty spoilerish isn't it? I'm out.

Not really. Geralt and Yennefer were lovers. TW2 establishes this if you're unfamiliar with the books.
 
It may have just been the facial structure and animation that seemed familiar. I can't remember the video I saw with another, similar NPC. I think it was in the last round of previews. I edited my original post. Didn't mean to piss anyone off.

I've no doubt that there is some level of model reuse in the game--given the scope, it seems a little crazy not to.

However, I still don't think that makes the model terrible in any way. The model itself is great, but may feel "generic" simply because the game made it so through reuse.
 

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
I've no doubt that there is some level of model reuse in the game--given the scope, it seems a little crazy not to.

However, I still don't think that makes the model terrible in any way. The model itself is great, but may feel "generic" simply because the game made it so through reuse.
I was simply trying to point out that the side NPCs didn't seem all that distinct to me and think it was more an issue with eyes/animation that bothered me. It's a very minor complaint and one that's more than completely understandable given the scope. I was still half asleep when I posted and didn't get my point across at all.
 

Tovarisc

Member
IGN First released article titled "ENDING THE WITCHER 3 ‘WITH A BANG’ - IGN FIRST" today.

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is the final Witcher game with Geralt of Rivia at center stage, and CDProjekt Red Senior Writer Jakub Szamałek told IGN, “we felt that we owed Geralt a proper goodbye, and decided to part ways with a boom.”

Geralt “has reached the end of his journey,” but this doesn't mean it’s the end of The Witcher universe in video games. “The Witcher universe is a very big place with a lot of NPCs, a lot of characters, a lot of places we haven’t shown yet,” Szamałek said. “So, we might return to it at some point…but we think that this is a good place to let Geralt enjoy his retirement and try something new."

As for the add-ons and expansions coming to The Witcher 3 following its release, Szamałek explained that "they’re within the story of the Witcher: Wild Hunt," running within the time frame, rather than after the ending.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/04/29/ending-the-witcher-3-with-a-bang-ign-first

I think this is what they are suppose to look like:

Havent seen them in any recent footage since Elder Blood and the glitched snow shader:

Yeah I have seen that concept art for Wild Hunt and that glitched trailer bits. I hope we get to see properly rendering in-game models before release, just because.
 

tuxfool

Banned
Yeah, no doubt. The characters models have improved so much, there is way more detail and animation -- Geralts necklace is glued to his chest in the old stuff. In all those early gifs people post Geralt is always looking away from the camera.. itd be less impresive if this was staring back at us:

m_4cdd420e34327c00.jpg

Yikes. Old renderer spotted as well.
 

erawsd

Member
That's...interesting. How will these be handled? I mean, theoretically, people will have completed the main game by the time the DLC rolls around.

Well, they've revealed that you will be able to free roam after the credits. I'm wondering if it really just loads a save before the final mission so you can continue playing.
 

Kinthalis

Banned
Anyone else think the story of the Witcher kind of sucks?

I love the witcher in general, love the realistic (well, in some fashion), gritty, medieval world. I actually liked the combat (for the most part), and I love the great RPG elements.

But, that story... I mean it's like something out of daytime soap opera, isn't it? People having amnesia left and right, women drama...

Am I alone in thinking this?

I was thinking about picking up the books actually to flesh out the story a bit more, but I'm not sure if it's any better there.
 

misho8723

Banned
Don't believe me? The devs said so themselves back in 2010:

https://youtu.be/8Ur43KunT8w?t=5m10s

Ok ok, but still they don't look like clones... where in other games they at best change the clothes, or just the color and that's it.. all three girls look distinct enough, that I never said to myself playing through TW2 that :"hmm, I see clones" or "I saw him/her somewhere before". :D

Anyoen else think the story of the Witcher kind of sucks?

I love the witcher in general, love the realistic (wlel, in some fashion), gritty, medieval world. I actually liked the combat (for the most part), and I love the great RPG elements.

But, that story... I mean it's like something out of daytime soap opera, isn't it? People having amnesia left and right, women drama...

Am I alone in thinking this?

What do you mean? Witcher 1 or Witcher 1 & 2?... anyhow, I love them.. I know that the English translation in the first one wasn't great, but other language variations were great, so no problem there in my case.. TW2 has in my opinion one of the best stories ever when it comes to videogames - complex, mature, interesting from start to finish, political side was well made, etc..
 
I've seen several sidequest NPCs in videos that looks almost exactly like him. Something about the model seems "off" compared to the other ones, kinda dead looking. It's a minor, minor complaint and a poor choice of words on my part.

You would be right if that NPC appear really similar in other quests though. Trying not to watch so many videos as to not ruin my experience, si I still have to encounter that.
 
Anyoen else think the story of the Witcher kind of sucks?

I love the witcher in general, love the realistic (wlel, in some fashion), gritty, medieval world. I actually liked the combat (for the most part), and I love the great RPG elements.

But, that story... I mean it's like something out of daytime soap opera, isn't it? People having amnesia left and right, women drama...

Am I alone in thinking this?

I certainly hope so. TW1 and TW2 both had excellent stories.
 
Top Bottom