Stoney Mason
Banned
AranhaHunter said:I think Vitor Belfort would be a good option too for the cover.
He might be in the UFC relatively soon too.
AranhaHunter said:I think Vitor Belfort would be a good option too for the cover.
Even if he isn't I doubt he or any other american fighter wants to get blacklisted. I would be surprised if any of the top Affliction or Strikeforce guys sign. Their best bet would be to get over sea fighters from Dream and Sengoku, but I doubt that would be compelling to a majority of the public.Stoney Mason said:He might be in the UFC relatively soon too.
LakeEarth said:Can EA do anything, say cut all advertising on UFC programming? Would that make any difference?
Bob or Fedor?Blackace said:he said EA has talked to him
The Faceless Master said:back in the day, it was EA bending people over.
God's Beard said:Bob or Fedor?
so much that is lol worthy here.ggnoobIGN said:And they still will here. UFC is retarded for doing this.
EA would pay a shit ton for the UFC license when it expires down the line. In the very least, it drives up a bidding war with THQ.
EA of course will never deal with UFC again. Now THQ will have next to no rivals and they'll get the UFC license on the cheap.
ggnoobIGN said:And they still will here. UFC is retarded for doing this.
EA would pay a shit ton for the UFC license when it expires down the line. In the very least, it drives up a bidding war with THQ.
EA of course will never deal with UFC again. Now THQ will have next to no rivals and they'll get the UFC license on the cheap.
Also known as: "Please use Vaseline, sir."Truespeed said:So, you see, I have no problem signing away my rights, but just respect me when I do it, k?
LakeEarth said:Can EA do anything, say cut all advertising on UFC programming? Would that make any difference?
Big-E said:EA needs to go after Bas and Kenny Rice for the commentary. Bas alone will warrant a 60 dollar purchase, hell, he was the only redeeming thing from GTA IV.
Yeah, there was another thread speculating on the EA MMA game about a week ago, and I said the same thing. EA isn't dumb. They understand this business, and they understand the importance of licensing and branding. They crushed the opposition when they locked up the NFL license, and they themselves got ran out of town when they couldn't make MLB games anymore and tried -- to failed results -- to make an NCAA baseball game. Right now, given the other options, they've got nothing that will compete with UFC.SolidSnakex said:Even if this is true, there's no way EA will turn down the chance to get the UFC license when it's up for grabs (which I think is 2011). If they're serious about making MMA games then they're going to want the biggest license, and that's the UFC.
we now live in soviet russia. socialism has taken us over! look no further than this situation for proof.The Faceless Master said:wow, how times have changed.
back in the day, it was EA bending people over.
God's Beard said:Ok, no Kimbo then. Fedor is the unbeatable final boss during the ending credit roll.
ooh! ooh! Put in Bob Sapp!
THE BEAST
Vaux said:i call bull crap on this, ufc will never follow up on this
their not going to turn down fighters like fedor, aoki and future top fighters
I believe the page thing was some real tricky wording like "if you get caught in a choke don't tap out" that could be interpreted in two ways.GekigangerV said:It's real, but you'll hear stories of certain fixed fights in the now defunct old Pride FC (a Japanese organization). I think Mark Coleman threw his fight to Nobuhiko Takada and "Rampage" said he was offered more money to throw his fight against Sakuraba than to actually win it (he refused the offer and tried to win it anyways to get his name out there). I think those fixed fights were influenced by the Yakuza and were the Yakuza connections led to Pride's downfall.
KOC 2 has built in edits of both!God's Beard said:No one currently fighting in UFC, so that leaves...
Bas Rutten
Kimbo Slice
Gina Carano
Fedor Emelianenko
Ken Shamrock
Chuck Liddelllol )
Royce Gracie
Rickson Gracie (oh god do it!)
hmm... not bad options. I'd pay out the ass for Rickson Gracie v. Fedor Emelianenko.
edit: put in fucking Kimura as a secret character and I don't care if the game sucks.
Dream and Sengoku don't allow stomps now.GekigangerV said:I think there is still room to grow overall and different ways to interpret the ground game. I think I mentioned in the other UFC thread somewhere that if EA were so inclined they could diversify the gameplay to include Japanese/Pride rules which would allow stomping/soccer kicks and take away elbows.
Also, is it a possibility to do a Fire Pro kind of thing and do fighters based on real people just name them differently and change up their appearance? Doesn't Konami do a soccer game that uses different names, but based on real people to avoid the EA copyright?
Ok...what the hell happened to Bob?Blackace said:he said EA has talked to him
madhtr said:Definitely not Nascar, since the license will be in Gran Turismo 5. The other two, not sure, but seems likely.
nothing happened to him... he has always sucked. did you think otherwise?Outcast2004 said:Ok...what the hell happened to Bob?
I know he doesn't fight much anymore, but damn did Bobby Lashley make him look bad :/
Sapp should have taken the pro wrestling money that TNA was offering him.
Minotauro said:Agreed. It's a bluff on their part. They're trying to leverage their stature to bully up-and-coming fighters. Do you honestly think that this would be a deal-breaker in a situation where they could sign the Fedors and Robbie Lawlers and Gina Caranos and Mo Lawals and Satoshi Ishiis of the world? I fucking doubt it.
This isn't even the most outrageous thing that Zuffa has done recently either. The bullshit they're pulling with sponsors is far, far more over-the-top and reprehensible if you ask me.
TOAO_Cyrus said:They most certainly do have NASCAR. I still havent forgiven them for killing the greatest sim racing series ever, Papyrus's NASCAR Racing series. The exclusive period might be ending or possibily its 3rd party only like 2K Games MLB license.
NASCAR is in Gran Turismo 5.TOAO_Cyrus said:They most certainly do have NASCAR. I still havent forgiven them for killing the greatest sim racing series ever, Papyrus's NASCAR Racing series. The exclusive period might be ending or possibily its 3rd party only like 2K Games MLB license.
I don't think it's about backing them, so much as recognizing that although this looks like some massive bullying on Dana's part, it really isn't going to amount to much. People in the UFC have already dealt with this licensing nonsense, and people outside of the UFC are either big enough that they really don't need to bow to Dana's whims, or aren't big enough to be an issue anyway. Why is EA going to stock the game with "up and comers" that nobody has heard of? They're not going to help sales, and I'm sure EA knows it.kobashi100 said:Now we all know UFC wouldnt really blacklists the fighters if they really wanted them but if true they are using this as tactic to scare fighters from signing with EA.
...
I don't really see how any UFC die hard can back the UFC on this.
mrbagdt said:total bluff. good call. and that was november of last year.
mrbagdt said:fedor is not going to sell copies (despite what you may believe), lawler is not going to sell copies, bringing up carano is a joke (who the hell will you have her fight? 3 other semi-nameless female fighters no one knows other than cyborg?), mo lawal is REALLY not going to sell copies (but you look so smart throwing his name out there) and satoshi ishii, while a gold medalist in judo this summer, has not even had a pro mma fight and is not even fighting in the states. honestly, i think the biggest foreign name that could actually sell copies of games is probably dong hyun kim, but i really dont know how big of a market there is in s. korea for ps3 and xbox360 games. i think he should have been included in the game just to try to get the ufc more exposure over there. most fans in the states dont give him much thought (he is still very green) but he opens a big doorway to expansion in that part of asia.
mrbagdt said:fremember dudes- if you want to discuss a video game, thats one thing. if you want to discuss mma, that is quite another. a lot of the names you toss out to be in the game would be good additions in the ufc, but i cant believe they will affect sales of whatever ea comes out with.
Better from a technical perspective? It was and still is quite possible. Better from a sales point? No. With or without Dana's posturing, this game wasn't going to outperform a UFC game.Tiduz said:i for one think this is a pretty shitty move. i was curious what EA was gonna do with this, could ended up being better than ufc.
so i guess theyre scared of competition, weaksauce.
cultofweaver said:This isn't totally unexpected and is further reason to question exactly why EA are getting involved in an MMA game. The sales of UFC and the popularity of the sport on the face of it suggest there is a big market for another game, but the huge success of UFC came down to the way the UFC marketed the game directly to its fans on their programming.
The vast majority of people who bought the UFC game are UFC fans first, videogame players second. Fedor is the biggest name outside UFC and even he is not a big enough draw to all but the most hardcore of UFC fans. There is no one EA could get that would market this game to those people, and the MMA concept is secondary to the UFC license for those people too.
It is clear they are hoping that when the deal is up they can snatch the license away from THQ and will look to use the first game as a test bed for concepts so they can get a head start before any potential license is signed. It's still a bizarre situation though, and a big risk for EA to be doing something like this.
cultofweaver said:This isn't totally unexpected and is further reason to question exactly why EA are getting involved in an MMA game. The sales of UFC and the popularity of the sport on the face of it suggest there is a big market for another game, but the huge success of UFC came down to the way the UFC marketed the game directly to its fans on their programming.
The vast majority of people who bought the UFC game are UFC fans first, videogame players second. Fedor is the biggest name outside UFC and even he is not a big enough draw to all but the most hardcore of UFC fans. There is no one EA could get that would market this game to those people, and the MMA concept is secondary to the UFC license for those people too.
It is clear they are hoping that when the deal is up they can snatch the license away from THQ and will look to use the first game as a test bed for concepts so they can get a head start before any potential license is signed. It's still a bizarre situation though, and a big risk for EA to be doing something like this.
Randy Couture Presents Randy Couture's MMA All-Stars isn't going outperform a UFC game.kobashi100 said:Randy Couture??
Steve Youngblood said:Randy Couture Presents Randy Couture's MMA All-Stars isn't going outperform a UFC game.
this is the absolute truth- if it makes zuffa money, it wont be a deal breaker. if cung le was in the game and eventually left his contract with strikeforce, you can be damn sure that dana would want him with zuffa regardless.Minotauro said:But in the case of fighters that can potentially make them money (like some of the ones I mentioned), Zuffa isn't going to allow something silly like this to be a deal-breaker. Dana White has a history of posturing and making all sorts of bold threats before ultimately going back on his statements and doing what's best for business. Case in point: Kimbo Slice.
They can string together enough fighters to release a respectable game. But what's their sales potential without the license? I'd say it's the following:kobashi100 said:I never said it would. I am saying he is the one guy EA have who they can use to push this game towards the general UFC fan.