• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

What are the best dinosaurs

Status
Not open for further replies.

efyu_lemonardo

May I have a cookie?
No dinosaur thread should be without one of my favorite online comics from years back:
Dinosaur Comics was basically the exact same set of panels every week, but the writing made those panels shine!

18fy63tu0y52epng.png

This is a boring choice since there has been so much focus on the sarupods, but im gonna say Argentinasaurus.

Can you even comprehend its size? This thing had to eat every moment it was alive to facilitate its size. This thing was so big, it could knock over a T-Rex with its tail.

And this thing.. For everything to grow so supersize. Imagine how hot it must have been. Imagine the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The entire ecosystem on massive steroids.

I bet a human being would probably be sick from just trying to breathe the air. It would be so hot it would be unbearable. What else can explain the sheer size? 100 fucking tons. Elephants are between 4-7 Tons, and they spend all day eating too. It's completely ouragous. Gigantic doesn't describe these fucking things.

Could you explain to a layman, what is the connection between the content of the atmosphere and the size of such animals? Is it just that more CO2 means bigger plants which means bigger plant-eaters? 100 tons is just incomprehensibly huge for a land animal.. How did that thing support its own weight, let alone eat enough to survive?
 
Could you explain to a layman, what is the connection between the content of the atmosphere and the size of such animals? Is it just that more CO2 means bigger plants which means bigger plant-eaters? 100 tons is just incomprehensibly huge for a land animal.. How did that thing support its own weight, let alone eat enough to survive?

I think he meant "imagine how much CO2 must have an animal like that emitted"

ediy: now I'm unsure.
 

Curler

Unconfirmed Member
Yup.


He looks so evil, seriously.
He completely lacks elegance, but he's truly fucking scary.

But seriously, what were the arms even for?? They don't even look stable enough to help with mating or getting off the ground or anything! Unlike other large predators, once it fell, could it even get up??
 
For him, that's the same thing as Nanotyrannus.

Dracorex is also a juvenile Pachycephalosaurus.

And he is probably right. LA's NHM has a juvenile T-Rex on display next to an adult and it's uncanny how different the body proportions are. Much more elongated and slender snout, and much longer legs to the body, almost like a Velocirator, except much bigger and tiny forelimb.
 

Toxi

Banned
But seriously, what were the arms even for?? They don't even look stable enough to help with mating or getting off the ground or anything! Unlike other large predators, once it fell, could it even get up??
Carnotaurus wasn't a bruiser like larger theropods, it was a sprinter that likely ran down prey like a modern day cheetah. Big arms would have been unnecessary weight for a dinosaur built for speed.
 

linkboy

Member
But seriously, what were the arms even for?? They don't even look stable enough to help with mating or getting off the ground or anything! Unlike other large predators, once it fell, could it even get up??

They're vestigial limbs. Once the Rex and the subspecies went bipedal, they no longer needed they're from legs and they shrunk over time.
 
Ok, give me a day or two to type up the OT. I'm gonna try and figure out how to do this since we're encompassing more than just dinosaurs. Dinos are my specialty.

Sweet!
TVtropes has some pretty nice useful notes pages on all kinds of different forms of prehistoric animals if you need some help.
Though they do lump the proto-mammals/stem-mammals (aka the Paleozoic non-mammalian synapsids like Dimetrodon) in with the non-dinosaurian reptiles which is more than a little irksome considering that synapsids didn't branch off from sauropsids and they even acknowledge this.

Despite this though, I remember most of the pages having good information and being pretty fun to read; I'd totally recommend using it as a guide, especially for non-dinosaurian prehistoric life.
 

Amalthea

Banned
But seriously, what were the arms even for?? They don't even look stable enough to help with mating or getting off the ground or anything! Unlike other large predators, once it fell, could it even get up??
Why not? They must have had more than enough musculature in their legs and the tail.
 
Dunno about species, but my favorite depiction of a dinosaur is this feathered T-rex:


It actually manages to capture a sense of vulnerability and curiosity almost like that of a gorilla, rather than making it look like SCALY MURDER MACHINE WITH CROSSFIT LEGS IS COMING TO EAT YOU the way pop culture usually depicts them.
 

Gr8one

Member
Can you imagine running into one of these bad ass bruhvs? Shit was crazy back then.


They need to reboot that shit! Best dinosaur toys ever, they actually based the Rex in toy story off that model. Therefore Krulos' T-Rex is best dinosaur.
 
Sweet!
TVtropes has some pretty nice useful notes pages on all kinds of different forms of prehistoric animals if you need some help.
Though they do lump the proto-mammals/stem-mammals (aka the Paleozoic non-mammalian synapsids like Dimetrodon) in with the non-dinosaurian reptiles which is more than a little irksome considering that synapsids didn't branch off from sauropsids and they even acknowledge this.

Despite this though, I remember most of the pages having good information and being pretty fun to read; I'd totally recommend using it as a guide, especially for non-dinosaurian prehistoric life.

Yeah, that's pretty much what I had in mind. Just going through the history of the planet.
 

Horns

Member
Spinosaurus. The only decent fossil of a spinosaurus was lost during WW2, which makes it even cooler. The museum holding it was right next door to the Nazi headquarters. Since then they've only found small pieces of them, nothing as complete as they had.
 

Curler

Unconfirmed Member
Spinosaurus. The only decent fossil of a spinosaurus was lost during WW2, which makes it even cooler. The museum holding it was right next door to the Nazi headquarters. Since then they've only found small pieces of them, nothing as complete as they had.

Is there any known photos of them before they got destroyed?
 

Toxi

Banned
Spinosaurus. The only decent fossil of a spinosaurus was lost during WW2, which makes it even cooler. The museum holding it was right next door to the Nazi headquarters. Since then they've only found small pieces of them, nothing as complete as they had.
Neat. Such a shame stuff like that gets destroyed (of course, so much DID in WWII) but it stinks that they've barely found anything since.
Didn't they just find some decent remains? The fossils (Shown in red, Berlin are orange) revealed some crazy stuff, especially the short legs, small pelvis, and flat feet.

spinosaurus-reconstruction.jpg
 
Neat. Such a shame stuff like that gets destroyed (of course, so much DID in WWII) but it stinks that they've barely found anything since.

There are more complete specimens in the hands of private collectors, but these are equally inaccessible to science.

Happily, the team that described the new partial remains last year has returned to the site and recovered some new material, (video, mostly in Italian).
 

Curler

Unconfirmed Member
There are more complete specimens in the hands of private collectors, but these are equally inaccessible to science.

Having to own full fossil skeletons would be neat, but too bad they couldn't also be researched in a sort of "you can keep these, but let us take a look at it too".
 

Toa TAK

Banned
Having to own full fossil skeletons would be neat, but too bad they couldn't also be researched in a sort of "you can keep these, but let us take a look at it too".

Or at least make copies of them like Museums do at least. That's kinda a bummer.
 

Ferr986

Member
Here's something for the ankylosaurus lovers, an insanely well preserved fossil (the one they found in a tar sand mine years ago I believe):

wow! so nice to see a fossil in that state! amazing!

I always had a soft spot for the JP velociraptors (so Deynonichus). But I guess a lot from them is just "fan-fiction", not only their size, also their intelligence or how good hunters they are in the movies.
 

Curler

Unconfirmed Member
Trust me, as someone who's actually see most of the Land Before Time sequels, you don't.

I remember the second one being alright (although wasn't a fan of the singing they started in it), and rented 3, but ended up playing NES instead.

Don Bluth's original was amazing. Too bad they had to edit the main fight scene, due to the original scene being "too scary for children". I miss his darker kids movies...
 
Fantastic thread!

Here's something for the ankylosaurus lovers, an insanely well preserved fossil (the one they found in a tar sand mine years ago I believe):
pmj3pnH.jpg

Wow! That is just, spectacular! are there any more photos of it?


I've always been a fan of Styracosaurs:

074_styracosaurus_ppyjgj.jpg


It's like the Super Shredder version of Triceratops.

Bit of a soft spot for Styracosaurus it was one of my first dino-rider toys, and the beginning of a massive collection of them, my other toy i got with it was a Monocolonius, who had a bad ass nose horn

pic951203_md.jpg


There were many other varieties of Ceratopsians

palo3.jpeg


Can you imagine running into one of these bad ass bruhvs? Shit was crazy back then.


Man if this was rebooted and well done it would be the best thing ever.

My favourite dino as a child though was Deinonychus, I was always pissed Speilberg called the ones in JP Velociraptors but the film was beyond my wildest dreams so ill let that one slide lol
 

Ecotic

Member
Just finished the National Geographic Spinosaurus special, it was so good. If Spinosaurus existed today, I'm imagining a glass tank exhibit, or an underwater tunnel exhibit like at the Georgia Aquarium. My stars, it would be beautiful.

 
I was just thinking this morning, I think someone on the Final Fantasy team is a paleontology nut. I mean, you have Allosaurus and T. rex in the original game and a few others as very tough (but often ultra rare) random encounters, and then you have the infamous Brachiosaur in FFVI, but then you have...

Phorusrhacos in FFXI:

180


And--even crazier--Megistotherium in FFXIII:

These are not animals that laypeople would just know about. With the latter, even I was like, "What the hell is that?" when I was playing FFXIII and had to look it up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom