• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Predict the Biggest Box Office Bomb of 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.

DonMigs85

Member
Didn't the first Alice movie do great in the box office? If anything Tim Burton's name plastered on it will get it to break even.

That was at the height of the 3D craze coming off Avatar, and anecdotally a lot of people seemed to find it boring.
I also have a feeling Disney's Jungle Book will do better than WB's Tarzan.
 
Wouldn't surprise me in Alice bombed. I mean who actually wanted a sequel to that film? Tim Burton is a hack.

True but I don't think the movie will bomb mainly because people still love him for some reason.

That was at the height of the 3D craze coming off Avatar, and anecdotally a lot of people seemed to find it boring.
I also have a feeling Disney's Jungle Book will do better than WB's Tarzan.

I don't think 3D had as much to do with it as Burton being involved. Though I have to say I would love to be proven wrong. I really dislike the first movie.
 

sarcastor

Member
WoW cost $100 mil to make, it might pull $20mil domestic, maybe.

I never played WoW but I'm sure there are enough fantasy movie lovers and action lovers to get it to $100 domestic. Even John Carter made $70 million in the US.

I would probably go with WoW or that new Alice in Wonderland movie

The first movie made $1 billion worldwide. That's $1,000 million dollars. Even if the 2nd one does half as much that's still $500 million WW. I'm sure it will be fine.
 

reckless

Member
WoW seems like it'll bomb domestically, but do all right after international sales.

Tarzan and Gods of Egypt just seem like disasters all around.
 

Aselith

Member
I think Rogue One will do very well but be considered a huge disappointment because it doesn't do "Star Wars" numbers
 
Nah. Expectations will be lowered by both audiences and media because it's a spinoff.

It could possibly do better overseas than Force Awakens did, though.
 

overcast

Member
By the way Burton is just a producer on that Alice flick. Not the director.

Not that it makes a difference. Would have been shit either way.
 

duckroll

Member
The only way I can see Rogue One being seen as a disappointment is if it has a great opening weekend, followed by terrible reviews and word of mouth, and then tanking before crawling to the nearest 100 million milestone. I think I will call this "pulling a Godzilla". :p
 

sarcastor

Member
This thread made me re-check last year's thread for reference.
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1044211
Some of the top picks were Ant-man, Terminator and Pixels. Amusing in retrospect. The predictive powers of the average GAF poster is not very keen. So, I would say the outlook for the Warcraft movie is bright.

Don't forget the infamous eating crow threads for both Guardians of the Galaxy and Ant-man, when people said stuff like:

"I have a sneaky suspicion this is going to be the first Marvel movie to bomb, or at least come in way under normal Marvel money."

"I can't believe anyone even wants to see a movie about Ant Man"

We're just normal people with opinions, not soothsayers or Hollywood experts. Although some here put up arguments like they are :)
 

johnsmith

remember me
Gods of Egypt for me. I've never been so bored during a movie trailer in my life, despite it being nonstop action the entire time. It's a 140 million movie, released in February, without a single star.
 
These Two Films Will Flop!!!
  • X-Men Apocalspe
  • Batman vs Superman

Seeing as you're so adamant on this, are you prepared to take an avatar bet? Or, if the mods allow (and assist), a user tag?

ok, I'll make an avatar bet! You pick the avatar, and if I lose I shall wear it! Also you get to pick how long I'll wear it! I back up my statements! (ps I don't know how to make user tags)

*scratches my head* ugh....does it mean....not ugh...NOT selling at expected levels? lol, both those films looks Mortal Kombat Annihilation bad.

Okay, now we need to fairly agree what defines a 'flop'. According to Wikipedia BvS has a budget of $200 million (which seems like it could be a guess) and it doesn't have a budget listed for X-Men Apocalypse, although DoFP is also listed as costing $200 million, so I'd wager Apocalypse is fairly similar. Man of Steel earned $668 million at the box office and Days of Future Past earned $747 million.

Would you say it's fair that for these films to not be considered flops they need to earn at least $600 million at the box office? (Of course, I wouldn't necessarily call earning under that a flop, but rather a disappointment. But regardless, we need to agree on terms). I personally would not be surprised to see them both earn $200-300 million more than that, and BvS may be a Jurassic World-style surprise and comfortably clear $1 billion. I'm happy to have an avatar of your choice as well if they do 'flop'.

If one of the mods is prepared to help then I'll nominate that you have this tagline:

Terrible at box office predictions

or failing that, I'll come up with an image for your avatar, for use maybe until the end of the year. I'm thinking I will try to crop this into a usable image:

adv-superman001f.jpg
 

Chewy Spaghetti

Neo Member
Anecdotal evidence here...a ton of my friends used to play WoW and no longer do, but we are all still SUPER excited about the Warcraft movie.
We are chinese
 

Loakum

Banned
Okay, now we need to fairly agree what defines a 'flop'. According to Wikipedia BvS has a budget of $200 million (which seems like it could be a guess) and it doesn't have a budget listed for X-Men Apocalypse, although DoFP is also listed as costing $200 million, so I'd wager Apocalypse is fairly similar. Man of Steel earned $668 million at the box office and Days of Future Past earned $747 million.

Would you say it's fair that for these films to not be considered flops they need to earn at least $600 million at the box office?

or failing that, I'll come up with an image for your avatar, for use maybe until the end of the year. I'm thinking I will try to crop this into a usable image:

adv-superman001f.jpg

I can agree with those terms and that amount. If each film fails to earn at least 600 million, then it will be considered an flop. IF I lose, you can dm me the avatar, and I shall wear it until the end of the year.
 
The only way I can see Rogue One being seen as a disappointment is if it has a great opening weekend, followed by terrible reviews and word of mouth, and then tanking before crawling to the nearest 100 million milestone. I think I will call this "pulling a Godzilla". :p

I always called it "hulking" as in Ang Lee's Hulk.
 

TDLink

Member
WoW cost $100 mil to make, it might pull $20mil domestic, maybe.

I think you're vastly underestimating it. It's definitely going to make most of its money internationally, but $20 mil is a ridiculously low domestic number for a summer film. There's no way it does that bad domestically, even if it ultimately under-performs here. And even if it does under-perform that international take will push it into profitability. At worst it's going to be a situation similar to Pacific Rim. But it has the potential to do better than that. I don't think there's any way it makes less than $60 mil domestically, and that number is still likely low. To only pull in $20 mil it would have to do something like open at $10 mil or lower, which is incredibly unlikely.
 
This thread made me re-check last year's thread for reference.

http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1044211

Some of the top picks were Ant-man, Terminator and Pixels.

Amusing in retrospect.

The predictive powers of the average GAF poster is not very keen.

So, I would say the outlook for the Warcraft movie is bright.

Pixels bombed, Genyisieys was barely saved by China's BO and Ant-Man didn't do "great" for a Marvel movie. Lots of people mentioned john carter of Jupiter and Tomorrowland and PAN and they were right. It's not rocket science, every year these studios seem to be throwing (lots of) their money on garbage just because.
 

pestul

Member
I think Rogue One will do very well but be considered a huge disappointment because it doesn't do "Star Wars" numbers
If Darth Vader has any presence in this film at all, I think it could be $450M+ domestic. I guess that's not TFA numbers, but still quite respectable. It needs to review quite well too.

Tarzan is going to mega-bomb, unless China takes a liking to it for whatever reason.
 

Xiaoki

Member
Pixels bombed, Genyisieys was barely saved by China's BO and Ant-Man didn't do "great" for a Marvel movie. Lots of people mentioned john carter of Jupiter and Tomorrowland and PAN and they were right. It's not rocket science, every year these studios seem to be throwing (lots of) their money on garbage just because.

How did Pixels bomb? It made $243 million off a total cost(budget, marketing, prints, other stuff) of $145 million. Did the definition of "bomb" change?

And the other 2 examples smells like excuses. Doesnt matter where Terminator made the money or how Ant-man did in comparison to other Marvel movies, they were still not bombs.
 

SpaceWolf

Banned
I can't help but feel this thread would probably be more successful if a larger portion of the posters actually took the time to understand what the term "box office bomb" means.
 
I can agree with those terms and that amount. If each film fails to earn at least 600 million, then it will be considered an flop.

any film earning 600 mil off a 200 mil budget isn't a flop or a bomb by any stretch.

This would be a very silly metric for a pretty bad bet.

I can't help but feel this thread would probably be more successful if a larger portion of the posters actually took the time to understand what the term "box office bomb" means.

Yeah, things have gone a little sideways it seems.
 
Surprised to see people legit think BvS will bomb. I think you can make a discussion based around whether or not it will hit WB's expected goals, I'm guessing anything less than a billion will be considered a disappointment. It will be profitable though.

Now I'm hoping Tarzan ends up being some Fury Road dark horse of 2016.
 

Anoregon

The flight plan I just filed with the agency list me, my men, Dr. Pavel here. But only one of you!
I feel like Warcraft (it's actually not a "WoW" movie, as it's a retelling of the original Warcraft game from 20 years ago) is going to bomb domestically, but it might be a big hit in China.
 

18-Volt

Member
Producers are so hopeful about Angry Birds but the franchise is so 2010. It's sure to be a bomb but not to the point to make loss.
 

mjc

Member
I think Warcraft could be a bit of a wildcard. I don't think it's gonna light anything on fire BO-wise, but it might do alright domestically.
 
That's about break even. Newest Bond cost 245M and I read that it would take 600ish to break even.

Break Even isn't bomb. Lose a little money isnt bomb. Cant even get close to your production budget? Bomb. Spend 150 mil and only make 30 mil domestic? Bomb. Even if overseas kicks in another 100 mil? Still bombed.

Rule of thumb is 2.5x budget gets you profitable. Anything between 2-2.5 isn't great, but might be salvaged at home video. Anything between 1-2 can be disappointment territory.

But you don't even make budget back? That's the kind of financial failure the thread is focused on. That level.
 

IconGrist

Member
This is the same forum where people thought Star Wars would do less than AoU. Some people just live in their own world.

Anyways, Tarzan will likely come up short. There's like zero interest for it from what I've gathered. What's it's competition? Is out on its own? I don't know when it releases.

Warcraft as said will do great in China so it'll be fine.

That Egypt movie is the sure fire bet, lol.
 
True but I don't think the movie will bomb mainly because people still love him for some reason.
Wouldn't surprise me in Alice bombed. I mean who actually wanted a sequel to that film? Tim Burton is a hack.
The first movie made $1 billion worldwide. That's $1,000 million dollars. Even if the 2nd one does half as much that's still $500 million WW. I'm sure it will be fine.
If it bombs for any reason, it will be because it comes out on the same day as Xmen Apocalypse.
 

gamz

Member
Break Even isn't bomb. Lose a little money isnt bomb. Cant even get close to your production budget? Bomb. Spend 150 mil and only make 30 mil domestic? Bomb. Even if overseas kicks in another 100 mil? Still bombed.

Rule of thumb is 2.5x budget gets you profitable. Anything between 2-2.5 isn't great, but might be salvaged at home video. Anything between 1-2 can be disappointment territory.

But you don't even make budget back? That's the kind of financial failure the thread is focused on. That level.

I know. I was agreeing with you. That's why I posted the break even.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom