• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Love Boat [Mafia] |OT| Till Death Do Us Part

So you think they intentionally claimed for attention? In that case, are you for or against lynching one of them? Your vote is on one right now, yet your post makes it sound like you think they're playing for attention to benefit someone. I'm not seeing the lining up.

If launch had put it like that, it would have made much more sense!

Worth the wait. The role magnet issue is a pain we have to live with. We can deal with that on night two.

Whos on your hit list?

Honestly my vote is my "hit list" for the day. Of the two "attention seekers" I distrust the Miller/tracker role claim more. The playing for role attention only works if they have some sort of mitigation for death, which they might.
 
TWO WAY TIE

CURRENT VOTE TALLY:

Boo Boo'n & UltraJay (5)
Never Forever .515 .920
kingkitty .532
Coppanuva .551 .727
Kyanrute .755 .887
cabot .1029 .1030
cabot .1030
*Splinter .1273 .1299
CzarTim .1318
Never Forever .1334
Coppanuva .1349

Hyperactivity & kingkitty (5)
Hyperactivity .373 .542
CzarTim .669 .1318
Never Forever .920 .1334
Kawl_USC .934
Boo Boo'n .1025
Kyanrute .1033
LaunchpadMcQ .1121 .1281
Gorlak .1128
Ty4on .1202

CzarTim & Never Forever (4)
Coppanuva .484 .487
Coppanuva .487 .551
Karu .749
FluxWaveZ .1321
LaunchpadMcQ .1325
Blargonaut .1331

Coppanuva & Flame_AC (3)
batsnacks .393 .1149
*Splinter .451 .751
FluxWaveZ .537 .616
Hyperactivity .542
Ty4on .689 .880
Retroid .1264
*Splinter .1299

Gorlak & LaunchpadMcQ (2)
cabot .264 .372
FluxWaveZ .788 .1083
*Splinter .792 .802
Blargonaut .814 .1081
Giant Panda .1045
batsnacks .1230

Blargonaut & Kawl_USC (2)
Flame_AC .353 .559
Boo Boo'n .521 .680
Karkador .733
Zippedpinhead .789

Kyanrute & Retroid (1)
*Splinter .751 .792
*Splinter .802 .992
Sophia .852 .888
Flame_AC .917
batsnacks .1149 .1230

FluxWaveZ & Timeaisis (1)
Coppanuva .279 .484
*Splinter .295 .297
*Splinter .301 .387
Camjo-Z .319
Rest .434 .921
*Splinter .444 .451
LaunchpadMcQ .796 .1056
UltraJay .864 .1254
Ty4on .880 .1202

Karu & Rest (0)
FluxWaveZ .257 .432
Sophia .888 .1032

Sophia & Ty4on (0)
LaunchpadMcQ .1056 .1121
Blargonaut .1081 .1331
FluxWaveZ .1083 .1321

El Topo & Giant Panda (0)
cabot .388 .1029
Gorlak .842 .1128
*Splinter .992 .1273

*Splinter & cabot (0)
kingkitty .267 .386
Gorlak .401 .842
LaunchpadMcQ .1281 .1325

No Lynch (0)
Retroid .1145 .1264

batsnacks & MagnumBoy20xx (0)
Flame_AC .559 .917

Karkador & Zippedpinhead (0)
FluxWaveZ .432 .537
FluxWaveZ .616 .788
Coppanuva .844 .900
Giant Panda .966 .1045

Camjo-Z & TL21xx (0)
Coppanuva .727 .844


No active vote for Day 1:
El Topo
MagnumBoy20xx
Sophia (has previously voted)
Timeaisis
TL21xx
UltraJay (has previously voted)



Day 1 ends:
red_1455818400.png


16 votes for majority
 

Ty4on

Member
Here: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=195590264&postcount=977

And it's vague because that's the whole point: there's nothing obvious about the people who would be playing scum. Their entire playstyle would inherently be "vague." Just like yours right now, by playing Devil's advocate in a way to either implicate and/or defend the Flame/Coppa team, while simultaneously trying to question us.

That's... even vaguer.
Vague and uncertain aren't the same thing. You can be very clear on what you're not certain of.

There's a third purpose you missed (but I'll be vague about that ^_^), but I think Flame and Coppa are still a good lynch target and would like more opinions of them. One big reason I lean against them is the plethora of interactions they've had. Shooting some of the lower activity teams feels like a shot in the dark.
 

El Topo

Member
so option 2 will most likely be confirmed on D2, because frankly even if they are rolebocked and are the legit name cop, quite obviously we'll flip them because their use to us is zero at that point, and the flip would clear up all the noise of today.

This is a bit unfortunate. You are basically saying that if there is a scum blocker, I assume even a switcher might be sufficient or the death of their target, you are going to lynch Time/Flux on D2. Heck, even if they are not blocked we will have no real confirmation on D2.

Depending on supposed confirmation on D2 to justify not lynching them today is nonsensical, when the only way we will ever get a useful confirmation is by lynching.

For option 3, I'm very inconsistent with reads but in a game that is effectively 15 people, 3 (max 4) are scum and to pull this gambit off as scum considering these circumstances......I just don't see that happening. it's absolutely batshit. The cub theory is the only thing I can see where this .......could make sense (doesnt make sense on D1 tho) but I'm not confident that is the case.

I think "Too insane to be a lie" is a horrendous defense. Claiming town/cop for a mafia player on D1 is risky, but it causes chaos, allows mafia to better plan ahead, maybe even gets the cop to reveal too early. It's a risky gambit, but if I recall correctly wasn't there an earlier game where a mafia member claimed to be a cop rather early and went undetected for a long time? If it works, it's a vital blow against town.

Here's my thinking for option 1 (which currently I believe):

a) Terrible play. Completely agreed.
b) they target someone N1
c) if they die, we know what they are on flip and mafia didnt want the risk of the name cop check, which implies
i) loveless is in their role name
ii) There probably isn't another cop if that's the case
d) they do a n1 check, they survive and claim it. This is probably the most vague option, because it depends on the results what happens next.
e) They do a n1 check, claim its blocked. I'd probably flip TimeFlux in this situation, as said it ends all this shit from D1, removing noise and it would also confirm some form of block or switch which would be very likely scum aligned.

Assuming they are the cop:
a) Terrible only if it fails, otherwise a feat for the ages. Extremely risky though.
b) If they are not blocked/killed.
c) If they die, that only means mafia wanted to get rid of the cop, which is reasonable in any case. Why take the risk? It would however also mean that our doctor was incapacitated or that we have no doctor.
i) Not necessarily.
ii) Probably. Except mafia might have such a role.
d) Best case scenario. Still most likely not very useful.
e) Except this seems far and away the most likely scenario, which is also why a cop should never claim early.

If you people absolutely read them as town and are against lynching them based on that, fair enough. I don't think keeping them around is going to yield much, likely we are just delaying the inevitable. If they're not scum, they'll likely be killed during N1 or N2. I don't know. If you believe them enough today, why would you suddenly change your mind on lynching them tomorrow?

Who else would you lynch if not TimeFlux? there has to be some other suspicious targets you're considering.

I don't really have a read on anyone. Some players have been quiet, but maybe they've simply been busy and posting little is not a definite scum tell, not to mention I have expressed (in every game I think) that I don't think much of D1 readings. That's contributing to me focussing on Flux/Time, since at least for them there are scenarios we can investigate. Let me think about it for a few more minutes.
 
Terrabyte from Werewolf 2 was self-deprecating on D1 and said that he would see himself as a great lynch target if he was anyone else due to his performance (or lack thereof). This is what caused Swamped (the Town vigilante) to shoot him on N1. Lo and behold, he was scum.

I'm like half working, half paying attemtion. What are you comparing that situation to?
 

FluxWaveZ

Member
Shooting some of the lower activity teams feels like a shot in the dark.

Better than lynching high profile teams simply because they're high profile.

I'm like half working, half paying attemtion. What are you comparing that situation to?

BooJay: I didn't do us any favors forgetting there was a game on, but after coming back Boo made some pretty bad posts. That post consisting of a single vote was bad. I can see why people have their votes on us. Our lynching won't hurt town tremendously. Plus if mafia kills us it won't give you much information given that our current status makes us an easy kill, unlikely to be watched, protected, or really give any incriminating evidence.
Unless mafia have their votes on us right now, though you'd think they jump onto HyperKitty.
Lynch target status: Viable
 

cabot

Member
If you people absolutely read them as town and are against lynching them based on that, fair enough. I don't think keeping them around is going to yield much, likely we are just delaying the inevitable. If they're not scum, they'll likely be killed during N1 or N2. I don't know. If you believe them enough today, why would you suddenly change your mind on lynching them tomorrow?

Because we have no information. If they claim they're blocked tomorrow and then we subsequently flip them to show them telling the truth that confirms something awry happened to their night ability.

That's one example of more information flipping tomorrow than flipping them today.
 

TL21xx

Banned
Sorry for not getting a vote up yet, had to get my brothers to their 8:30 class on time and stayed up way too late last night. Just finished catching up from where I left off.

So we have a tie. Not anymore.

VOTE: Boo Boo'n

I was on the fence on this one and could have gone either way with our current frontrunners, but Coppa had a pretty good point about the HyperKitty situation. Still not dead set on it if I'm perfectly honest, but the last thing we need is a tie.
 

UltraJay

Member
I knew people would make that connection when I posted it. I did it anyway because it's true. I should have asked to be replaced when I got the PM from Yeeny. Others already sought that option.

I hurt my team. I hurt town. Because I wasn't paying attention. Uni is starting up in a few weeks for me. Just fucking kill me already. I am not good at mafia.

Whoops! I slipped up on my whole "no cursing" silly roleplay. Fuck it. Boo isn't even here right now.

Vote: UltraJay

I've always wanted to do that.
 

Sophia

Member
Sophia, magnum, time, TL all making us wait out in squeaky Bum time

The other non votes have posted recently.

I'm here.

In regards to Flux/Time lynching, I'm actually, and personally, getting town-ish vibes from Flux right now. He's aggressive, he's emotional in his responses. I feel like, if Flux was scum, he'd be playing more methodically. I want to see how a Day 2 with Flux is going to play out because of that. Time is more of a mystery because he's not posting much, but I'm not getting scum reads from him right away either.

As for Retroid, the idea of actively voting for a no lynch in this game in particular seems a bit silly. Everyone in this game enters in pairs, and everyone will leave in pairs. We will get more information than usual because of this.

Right now the two pairs that bother me are Hyperactivty/Kingkitty and Gorlak/Launch. Something feels off about Hyper/KK's posts that I can't place my finger on it, and as for Gorlak, his insistence on voting a few pages back rubbed me completely the wrong way. Launch I'm feeling a bit more neutral on. Also, in regards to Hyperactivity posting his notes, it seemed more of a fluff post than anything. I'm not sure I want to make anything of it just yet.

VOTE: Gorlak
 

FluxWaveZ

Member
So Werewolf 2 was all about Townies self-voting out of desperation and frustration at the end of Day phases and subsequently getting lynched, which we laughed about in the scum chat. Don't let this happen again.
 

El Topo

Member
It's seriously not the end of the world if we wait until Day 2 for a lynch on them. The information they will provide, even if it is fake, will prove useful.

Fake information is useless. Delaying the inevitable is pointless.

If they are town (or rather not mafia), they will most likely be killed during N1/N2, especially if we have a doctor that cannot save the same players on consecutive nights. Mafia cannot risk letting a player like that run around for too long. If they are scum, they will not get killed during the night (outside of freak accidents).

Therefore, lynching them on Day 2 is essentially a waste. If they are town, we give mafia a free kill (unless they go for a weird strategy), if they are scum, no reason not to kill them today. Whether Time/Flux are telling the truth or not, mafia have likely no need to lynch them on Day 1, given their options. If he is town maybe they kill him during N1, maybe they block him, maybe they switch him and try to convince us to lynch him Day 2. They are a (more or less) known, controllable quantity for them.

Am I missing something here? Honest question. Again, if you guys strongly believe them, that's fine, but don't give me this "We'll lynch them Day 2" nonsense.
 
El Topo and whoever: Whine whine whine. I caught up 9 pages (100ppp) over 2 and a half hours then went to bed with the sun coming up. Probably shouldn't have, butt love it, whatever. Lynch target status: Viable

tumblr_m6wetxyHIW1r5lshvo1_500.gif


I'm feeling generous and won't policy vote you for that.

;)
 

Kyanrute

Member
RetroKyan: No thoughts here. No thoughts here. No thoughts here. On your read list Retro. Even for me and Boo? Have you not seen how my beau has been acting? (Hint: Not well.) Lynch target status: Viable

While I could see a few reasons for the Kyanroid vote (that too safe reads list from Kyan, them not contributing too heavily), I don't think people interacted with them enough during the day to make that the best "Low contributor" lynch if we go for that.

I shall explain myself a bit .There are few things in play in here. I am a very thoughtful person irl, who likes to look at things from every angle to get things correctly. The other side to this is that I generally do not like voicing my opinion on half-baked things. The first days of the game have been somewhat of a learning experience to me, since I am supposed to comment on the smallest of things. Did he say thing x because he was going for thing y or is it the complete opposite? I cannot tell, because I have no information, sans what me and Retroid were given at the start. Many of you also use the meta to point things out. I do not have such experience, I do not know the exact details of the past Gafia games nor I can reference my own past ones, since there are none.

So if you, the person behind the screen, feel that my lists and contributions have been light, I understand. I implore you to consider that I am a new player, who is not used to debating with this kind of what-ifs. This is new ground to me. Yet still, my apologies for the lack of content. I shall keep on trying to do better.

Still voting for team Kitty. Even after all the attention on Hyper, he barely defends himself. The concerns that have been raised have not been met with answers. The note post hasn't had any meaningful followup to it. Their current play is to not participate in the discussion, hoping that the last hour shenanigans lead the votes onto a pair who is active during the final hours.
 

El Topo

Member
I'd also like to clarify that it seems problematic to make the life of our (presumed) cop depend on whether or not he can deliver role names. What if he finds our doctor?
 

cabot

Member
I'd also like to clarify that it seems problematic to make the life of our (presumed) cop depend on whether or not he can deliver role names. What if he finds our doctor?

He gives the role name not the target.

You pointed out a number of reasons to keep them alive in your post

There are a lot of unknowns our there. How does giving scum less questions on their nk action benefit town?
 

Warxard

Banned
Well, shit. I don't necessarily mean to sound defeatist but admittedly the posts I made were shitty/uncontributive to the discussion. I still keep my reservations of suspicion on the teams I've listed before, and I really find it sort of weird that only one voter, Camjo, is keeping strong on Flux/Time in regards to votes.

Seeing my own lover vote me...Y'know...like, I mean, me being--like, like...with the uh...it just--just--just...it's far, man, it's very vulgar.

Still, I'll share my last thoughts on another poster before my team eventually gets waxed.

So, CzarTim is your vote on me just to get the ball rolling and break the tie? Because this:

I'm voting for the team I think is most likely to flip scum, that's the best I can do here.
kind of just comes off to me that you're uncertain. Then again you've got nothing to lose if we are town, right? It's day one, no reason to lose sleep over early game kills. Just hope that your gut feeling on previous posters who you've pressured in the previous day doesn't go to waste...if you die, I mean.
 

batsnacks

Member
Here are my notes so far
I have compared your notes to hyper's notes and I am noticing one particular difference between them:

Your notes have alignment info, which is what I would expect to see in a townie's notes. Hyper's are just paraphrasing the thread, which is probably important to mafia who are trying to keep their stories straight.
 

Karkador

Banned
I have compared your notes to hyper's notes and I am noticing one particular difference between them:

Your notes have alignment info, which is what I would expect to see in a townie's notes. Hyper's are just paraphrasing the thread, which is probably important to mafia who are trying to keep their stories straight.

Interesting
 

FluxWaveZ

Member
Well, shit. I don't necessarily mean to sound defeatist but admittedly the posts I made were shitty/uncontributive to the discussion. I still keep my reservations of suspicion on the teams I've listed before, and I really find it sort of weird that only one voter, Camjo, is keeping strong on Flux/Time in regards to votes.

Stop with the defeatist shit, it never, EVER does anything good.

Especially when you're not even far ahead in votes.
 
I have compared your notes to hyper's notes and I am noticing one particular difference between them:

Your notes have alignment info, which is what I would expect to see in a townie's notes. Hyper's are just paraphrasing the thread, which is probably important to mafia who are trying to keep their stories straight.

That's an interesting take on that.
 

Warxard

Banned
At least Launchpad has some sense.

Launchpad is probably scum too, there's no context behind it but I mean I wouldn't trust 'em but considering how all aggro he went on cabot a while back -- who I believe is something , not necessarily town -- it's just something to keep in mind. Then again I'm biased after the last wolf game idk.
 

FluxWaveZ

Member
I'm just being realistic here. I'm all for thinning the herd even if it means I myself gotta be thinned out.

Well I'm not for "thinning the herd," I'm for hunting scum. Thinning the herd is a possible byproduct of that, but it isn't the goal. If you're Town, it shouldn't be your goal, either.
 

FluxWaveZ

Member
Eh, I get batsnacks' reasoning, but I know that I had extensive notes in Heist about the general situation and not alignment info on D1, and I was Town. I did the same to a lesser extent as a neutral in Werewolf 2.
 
Interesting

That's an interesting take on that.

The fact that you two used the same adjective ("interesting") to describe the same post within a mere minute of each other implies to me that you two have been colluding despite your apparently nonexistent partnership, suggesting that you both linger in the collective side thread of your Loveless peers in actuality, which in turn implicates your officially prescribed partners to be scum as well.
 
The fact that you two used the same adjective ("interesting") to describe the same post within a mere minute of each other implies to me that you two have been colluding despite your apparently nonexistent partnership, suggesting that you both linger in the collective side thread of your Loveless peers in actuality, which in turn implicates your officially prescribed partners to be scum as well.

If anything, it should point to the opposite. Why the hell would we collude to post the same exact adjective?
 
Top Bottom