• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Stardew Valley: Token minority character

Status
Not open for further replies.

Xbob42

Banned
Nope. Most of these people are white. That's the largest demo make up of the forum so it's pretty much in the green. You can also tell who is white by their language, especially if they say things like "there's no white people in Wu-Tang Clan". It's pretty easy to deduce that person's racial upbringing..

That said, a lot of people don't want an actual, serious mature discussion on race. But white people have the worst of it, and this (and many other threads) are endemic of that observation.

Still waiting on any sort of facts on literally anything you're saying. You say some really shitty things and use "Well this race of people are a bunch of jerks who don't want to talk nice!" as your leverage for doing so. Really nice self-fulfilling prophecy, there. I forget that a GAF thread is clearly the representative of white people. Even in that case, what sort of white people are you talking about? American white people? Canadian white people? European white people? South African white people? Because they're all pretty fucking different.
 
Nope. Most of these people are white. That's the largest demo make up of the forum so it's pretty much in the green. You can also tell who is white by their language, especially if they say things like "there's no white people in Wu-Tang Clan". It's pretty easy to deduce that person's racial upbringing..

That said, a lot of people don't want an actual, serious mature discussion on race. But white people have the worst of it, and this (and many other threads) are endemic of that observation.

Eh, I don't think it's a good idea to collectively dismiss white people in the discussion, though. I do understand the frustrations as I deal with similar situations in my day to day. However, I do hate it when people dismiss me when I speak about race, accusing me of pulling the "race card" simply because I'm black.

Reciprocating that behavior doesn't help anything and undermines whatever real point you might have to make.
 
Yes, I mean there is a problem, but I dont think its as big of an issue as people seem to make it out to be. Theres a million other hobbies out there that have no end of diversity problems, but nobody cares, because they recognize that these things are hobbies and Not Important in the long run.

Theres nobody talking about a diversity crisis in whittling, fishing, muscle car enthusiasts, stamp collecting, model train building, etc but Id bet my balls that these are all majority white hobbies.

So why are people talking about diversity in Video Games, which is majority white for the reasons I outlined in my previous post? I think theres two reasons for this: 1) Since other groups are coming in to the video game hobby they would obviously want to be represented in the games they play. This makes sense to me, although I don't understand it very much since you almost never see the palyer character anyway in most FPS games, and most RPGs are either gonna be from Japan, or come with a character creator. Still though, this is a legit complaint, and it makes sense, and its understandable why we are seeing a transition from a majority white hobby to a more varied pool of players.

Number 2 is the reason I cannot stand though. Video Game Enthusiasts are a bunch of idiots who take thier hobby way too seriously. The see #1 happening and think "Hmm, well Video Games are the most important thing in the world, and if they aren't properly aligned with my politics then somethings wrong! Since I like video games, and I am Important, video games must also Be Important. Also, maybe if I can convince the world how Important video games are mom and dad will stop telling me to get off the couch." Videogames are Not Important, and people acting like they are just grinds my gears. Video Games are just another avenue for businessmen to invade your wallet and inundate you with advertising. Its a miracle a decent one pops out every now and again.

The crazy lengths people go to to prove that the video gaming population is 50% women is another symptom of this. Theyre obviously not, which is why such statistics have to be stuffed by including mobile games or facebook shit. The only people who really, really captial-C Care about opening up demographics are the ones trying to sell the stuff, so that they have a bigger pool of potential buyers. Is it REALLY an issue if women dont like the Xbox as much as men do?

You seem aware of the problem but yet are also dismissing the problem with that whataboutism, weird. If it's "not important", then why the resistance to diversity if this hobby or representation doesn't matter in the long run? Just because you don't care, doesn't mean everyone else should not care.

Not quite crazy lengths. Might want to re-check your stats on believing close to 50% women is only related to mobile games. 40% of active gamers on consoles are women and spend about the same time and investment.

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2014-10-30-platform-not-gender-drives-gamer-differences-eedar
700x-1


BTW do you even play videogames anymore? You seem to have such disdain for them and the people who engage with them :p
 

Aselith

Member
That's totally ignoring the purpose of this discussion on the lack of diversity in gaming. Should we have to build our own water fountains, too?

Why are you aiming it specifically at Stardew Valley that has a positive black character. I don't think he's token at all in the sense of just there to be there.
 

Sylas

Member
Is this thread about inclusiveness and adding diversity to more games really going to turn into, "Oh, won't somebody think of the white people?!"

If a blanket statement is made, and you feel like you don't fall under that umbrella--it's not talking about you. Would Cindi's post be more palatable if it simply said, "Most white people"? Because that's how it is. People who receive privilege often don't like being told that they're receiving it as a factor of what they are, and not who they are. It's not a nice thing to confront, but it's true. Most people don't like being told they didn't do something right. Most people don't like being told that they have it better than someone else by virtue of being born a certain way. It doesn't make it any less true.

The point is, Stardew Valley did something good, but it can always do better. There's absolutely nothing wrong with discussing how it could have done better.
 
Bboy AJ, good thread. However, you're wasting time arguing with these people. Don't try to convince them. Notice how confrontational you are despite seemingly innocuous remark on diversity in games. Most of whom are white. Do not engage white people on racial issues. They are, for the most part with rare exceptions, incapable of talking about race in a serious, mature manner without resorting to arguing like complete children. Even talking about diversity in games makes them lose their shit and make up false equivalence arguments about no white people being in Wu-Tang Clan. Don't engage white people on race, you'll always regret it.

Am I crazy or is this comment blatantly racist?
 

lifa-cobex

Member
so if a game can be played in a physical space, it doesn't count? there are also lots of games that people play on facebook that aren't just copies of games that can be printed in book.

Like I said, I think it's an odd ball factor.
I think it starts breaching into what each person considers to be a casual gamer to a hardcore gamer.

In the area of this thread, the discussion is around representation.
Now this is only something that would be an issue that generally involves characters or a story imo.
Because many of these study's involve these other game types, Should they really count as to finding a demographic in more (what I would call) hard core gamers.

Yes they are games absolutely. But many of these surveys tend to involve these other demographics.
People end up believing that (for arguments sake,) more women play lots of games like Witcher, Uncharted or Final Fantasy. When in fact they just have a quick go on Angry Birds.

I feel the area of research needs to be narrowed down and then slowly opened up, But taking into account of each factor as they go along.
 
Still waiting on any sort of facts on literally anything you're saying. You say some really shitty things and use "Well this race of people are a bunch of jerks who don't want to talk nice!" as your leverage for doing so. Really nice self-fulfilling prophecy, there. I forget that a GAF thread is clearly the representative of white people. Even in that case, what sort of white people are you talking about? American white people? Canadian white people? European white people? South African white people? Because they're all pretty fucking different.

http://www.slate.com/articles/healt...gth_speed_pain_tolerance_and_the_magical.html

http://www.slate.com/articles/healt...eople_don_t_perceive_pain_in_other_races.html

http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/brow...ts/2015/08/18-teacher-expectations-gershenson

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-discrimination-in-america-is-basically-over/

http://www.people-press.org/2014/08...ons-in-reactions-to-ferguson-police-shooting/

I've got my facts.

Where's yours?

Where's my 'cism?
 
Your grouping up a massive group (which includes multiple races. Hate to break it to you white people arent a single race) and judging them on a few people.

Thats racist. Your being racist.
Actually since he's not opressing white people with insitutional pressure and cultural inertia he's not being racist.

Also, speaking as a white person he's totally right about how awful we are tbh
 

Xbob42

Banned
You do see the exact same type of dismissive responses in these threads every single time though. That's indicative of an overarching problem.

It's in no way equally bad of both sides either.

Seeing the same response from the same group of people repeatedly on a forum like this isn't surprising, though. It's still the same forum.

It's doubly murky when the message of the OP comes off as oddly antagonistic and accusatory right off the bat, despite claims otherwise. And despite it "being about more than Stardew Valley," that's not what the thread title proclaims.

Then the actual message is kind of muddy and vague, if I'm being honest? Some are claiming they want more representation even if it's just a skin color, others want research and/or life experience to play a role, still others want there to be actually more diverse creators, still others say they just want the issue to be in creators minds in the future. And in almost every single page I see person after person saying they want that, too, but that they think the thread starts with a bad example, or they get distracted by real life rural stats or whatever, which I can see as getting frustrating.

But in the end what is the actual discussion we want to have, here? Just to say "Huh, yeah, that IS a lot of white people." because I feel like that has absolutely happened, here. Also, who is the message for? The developer? Because it feels like a really direct comment for the developer in thread form, which again, really blurs the message.

As someone new around here and who hasn't been in many of these threads, I guess I'm just asking for a foundation of an argument that's a little more solid and a little less nebulous, because I feel like the idea of representation and the "de-white-ification" (so to speak) of games and media in general in a conversation that is constantly happening.

And of course you'll get the usual loonies, and you'll get plenty of dismissive people, but even in this thread it's clear that those dismissing it are doing so because they appear to be incredibly easily distracted.

I feel like I'm going in circles here, so I'll wrap it up. What's the real discussion we're trying to have without being distracted by specifics like Stardew Valley or rural population statistics or any extraneous fluff?
 
What on earth does any of this have to do with whether or not Stardew valley has a positive portrayal of a minority?

It has a lot to do with this threads reception and people's response to merely wanting to have a modicum of a dialogue about this issue.

It is entirely pertinent if you have bothered to read this thread and the overall retorts by the posters.
 
this is turning into that Xbox nightclub thread all over again.

people just coming in, reading the latest post, and reacting without reading the thread or actually considering what they're saying.

OP isn't even that inflammatory, is everyone on edge today?
 

bomblord1

Banned
It has a lot to do with this threads reception and people's response to merely wanting to have a modicum of a dialogue about this issue.

It is entirely pertinent if you have bothered to read this thread and the overall retorts by the posters.

You seem to just be arguing instead of having an open dialogue about a perceived issue though.
 
Yeah sorry, I'll just sit and wait for a white member of wu-tang to happen before I can get serious about the subject.

Don't know if you saw it, but this is what he's referring to:

Did you make a thread already about the lack of white rappers in the Wu Tang clan?

I mean they can pretty much do what they want but they ignore a large demographic that buys there product. In 2016 there is no excuse for not having some suburban rappers join the WU and rap about issues that matter to me as a whitey.

I'd also like a female rapper to join them, so my daughter will have some connection to the Killer Beez. Obviosly they have to stop using the words bitches and ho's and LEAN IN a bit.

Also tone down profanity cause she is only 1 so I don't want her to learn bad words.

Maybe change their name from clan to club, cause clans cause wars and are non-inclusive and that's just not cool.
 

Lime

Member
What's the real discussion we're trying to have without being distracted by specifics like Stardew Valley or rural population statistics or any extraneous fluff?

"It would be pretty cool to have (more) non-White characters in this game and in video games in general"

How that is in any form offensive or antagonistic or warrant the dismissals in this thread I have no idea

OP isn't even that inflammatory, is everyone on edge today?

a certain type of fragility, I'd say
 

Spence

Member
I just find it odd that a very charming indie game about farming and exploration made by a single person is the catalyst for this kind of discussion.
 

Infinite

Member
Still waiting on any sort of facts on literally anything you're saying. You say some really shitty things and use "Well this race of people are a bunch of jerks who don't want to talk nice!" as your leverage for doing so. Really nice self-fulfilling prophecy, there. I forget that a GAF thread is clearly the representative of white people. Even in that case, what sort of white people are you talking about? American white people? Canadian white people? European white people? South African white people? Because they're all pretty fucking different.


"White Fragility is a state in which even a minimum amount of racial stress becomes intolerable, triggering a range of defensive moves. These moves include the outward display of emotions such as anger, fear, and guilt, and behaviors such as argumentation, silence, and leaving the stress-inducing situation."

http://libjournal.uncg.edu/index.php/ijcp/article/view/249
 

Xbob42

Banned
"It would be pretty cool to have (more) non-White characters in this game and in video games in general"

How that is in any form offensive or antagonistic or warrant the dismissals in this thread I have no idea

Because that's not what the thread is titled, it claims that a great, non-token character from Stardew Valley is in fact a token character that sticks out like a sore thumb.

Whereas the argument you gave is much more succinct and makes a lot more sense and is something that I bet you'll find is generally an agreeable argument around here when stripped of accusing good characters of being there just to fill a quota.
 

23qwerty

Member
I just find it odd that a very charming indie game about farming and exploration made by a single person is the catalyst for this kind of discussion.
it isn't the catalyst though, this discussion has been had many many times in the past about many many different games and it will happen many many more times
 
Bboy AJ, good thread. However, you're wasting time arguing with these people. Don't try to convince them. Notice how confrontational you are despite seemingly innocuous remark on diversity in games. Most of whom are white. Do not engage white people on racial issues. They are, for the most part with rare exceptions, incapable of talking about race in a serious, mature manner without resorting to arguing like complete children. Even talking about diversity in games makes them lose their shit and make up false equivalence arguments about no white people being in Wu-Tang Clan. Don't engage white people on race, you'll always regret it.

So do the rare exceptions wait until they've been offended by your statement to have a discussion? I mean what good is it to make a generalization insulting all of a demographic which probably makes them even less willing to have a real discussion now because of your insults? This just seems like a bad stance to have if you're really open to have a discussion in a mature manner.
 
I just find it odd that a very charming indie game about farming and exploration made by a single person is the catalyst for this kind of discussion.
Stardew Valley uses the old trope of Token Minority. It's kind of a fact.

This doesn't mean that Stardew Valley is bad. (Something which, of course, people don't get.) It just means it uses one problematic trope and things could be better.
 

OmegaDL50

Member
I'm White. I have no issue with any individual regardless of their race or religious background.

I still think it's unreasonable to make gross generalized statements such as this.

Bboy AJ, good thread. However, you're wasting time arguing with these people. Don't try to convince them. Notice how confrontational you are despite seemingly innocuous remark on diversity in games. Most of whom are white. Do not engage white people on racial issues. They are, for the most part with rare exceptions, incapable of talking about race in a serious, mature manner without resorting to arguing like complete children. Even talking about diversity in games makes them lose their shit and make up false equivalence arguments about no white people being in Wu-Tang Clan. Don't engage white people on race, you'll always regret it.

People should be defined by their actions and the way they interact with other people.

Your ethnicity doesn't dictate your actions either.

You would take issue if others generalized your entire skin tone based on the actions or experiences you had with those few individuals you interacted with. It doesn't make you look noble when you do the same thing.

You are the one that said don't engage white people on race, but with that statement you made an open invitation, but I make this evidently clear race is irrelevant. Your skin tone doesn't justify your stance to make gross generalizations.
 
Just to say, for people saying "it's just an indie game", it's valuable to criticize "just an indie game" because I think most people want indie games to be equal.
 
Because that's not what the thread is titled, it claims that a great, non-token character from Stardew Valley is in fact a token character that sticks out like a sore thumb.

Whereas the argument you gave is much more succinct and makes a lot more sense and is something that I bet you'll find is generally an agreeable argument around here when stripped of accusing good characters of being there just to fill a quota.

so are you just purposely ignoring this part of the OP where he summarizes his entire position:
I'd appreciate a more diverse cast in Stardew Valley. In gaming. Indie devs can easily implement this change to gaming. They're not subject to the Hollywood effect of AAA games. Help create a better, more diverse environment for the gaming community.

because he makes his opinion--and the topic of this discussion--pretty clear.
 

Sushi Nao

Member
nm

Repeated dismissals of diversity representation discussion is an indication that it is is a problem, by definition.

This includes semantics debates and pedantry about the argument being presented correctly.
 

Lime

Member
Because that's not what the thread is titled, it claims that a great, non-token character from Stardew Valley is in fact a token character that sticks out like a sore thumb.

Whereas the argument you gave is much more succinct and makes a lot more sense and is something that I bet you'll find is generally an agreeable argument around here when stripped of accusing good characters of being there just to fill a quota.

Am I reading the same OP as you?

If there were more minority characters in the game, Demetrius would not be the sore thumb he is.

I'd appreciate a more diverse cast in Stardew Valley. In gaming. Indie devs can easily implement this change to gaming. They're not subject to the Hollywood effect of AAA games. Help create a better, more diverse environment for the gaming community.
 

Xbob42

Banned
so are you just purposely ignoring this part of the OP where he summarizes his entire position:


because he makes his opinion--and the topic of this discussion--pretty clear.

Am I ignoring it? No. But I'm trying to make it clear that this is a forum, and lots of people will read the title, skim the post, and then reply. When the thread's title is something that immediately rings in your head as bullshit, you're gonna have people typing up replies as soon as they get inside the thread.
 
So you're saying that a certain large group of people need to actively display shitty behavior to a segment of the population for a long time so that we can be certain they're not being pre-judged, they're just being judged?

Got it

What? Maybe its because english is not my first language, but I dont understand what you are trying to say here.Can you elaborate please?
 
I think this quote is a good way to sum up my feeligns on the matter. Popular culture is a bellweather, not really a cause to be fought for. It shows us where our culture is at that moment in time. Its like a thermometer, useful for taking a temperature reading but a thermometer couldnt tell you why something was hot to begin with.

Certainly the golden age of film and the Vaudville era of stage perpetuted racist stereotypes, but I don't know if Id argue that they were propaganda vehicles. I bring up propaganda because that would suggest that people were conciously pushing such sterotypes, instead of just exhibiting them because those were the ways people thought of other groups of people at the time.

So those films can tell us about how people thought back then, but it cannot really tell us why. In fifty years we can do the same with the video games of this era, and I think the changing demographics will be readily apparent. Trying to 'fix' them is like trying to cure a symptom instead of the disease though, like I said these popular culture items reflect the makers at the time of making them. Video games are a thermometer, theyre not the cure. This is why I was railing on how Not Important they are, because they arent driving the conversation on race, we are having that conversation and its showing up in our entertainment as a result. Everyone gets the cause and effect backwards and it drives me up the wall.

And you think that the "symptoms" don't feed back into strengthening and reinforcing the "disease?" Sorry, but they're more than just a measuring stick for our current culture. They directly affect it.
 

Lime

Member
Am I ignoring it? No. But I'm trying to make it clear that this is a forum, and lots of people will read the title, skim the post, and then reply. When the thread's title is something that immediately rings in your head as bullshit, you're gonna have people typing up replies as soon as they get inside the thread.

That's not the fault of the OP, but people who don't read the argument and instead resort to White Fragility on Full Display.

nm

Repeated dismissals of diversity representation discussion is an indication that it is is a problem, by definition.

This includes semantics debates and pedantry about the argument being presented correctly.

Yup.

Also "you're the real racist" being trotted out right now
 
I'd appreciate a more diverse cast in Stardew Valley. In gaming. Indie devs can easily implement this change to gaming. They're not subject to the Hollywood effect of AAA games. Help create a better, more diverse environment for the gaming community.

Yes, this would be better.
 

Xbob42

Banned
That's not the fault of the OP, but people who don't read the argument and instead resort to White Fragility on Full Display.

Yup.

Also "you're the real racist" being trotted out right now

Yes, that is the fault of the people who don't read -- as I said, it's a forum. Everyone is quite easily distracted. But I'd very much argue against the "well people are just being pedantic about the argument being presented correctly" when the title of the thread is completely misleading about the actual subject matter, instantly creating a divide in the argument itself as witnessed here.

Like I said, the vast majority of replies in this thread are about people who are entirely open and for more representation in games and disagreed with the specific example given. But I guess if someone doesn't agree with your entire opinion they're being dismissive, right?
 

Sushi Nao

Member
Yes, that is the fault of the people who don't read -- as I said, it's a forum. Everyone is quite easily distracted. But I'd very much argue against the "well people are just being pedantic about the argument being presented correctly" when the title of the thread is completely misleading about the actual subject matter, instantly creating a divide in the argument itself as witnessed here.

It's well-established that one of the first devices that an empowered group uses to dismiss the protests of an under-privileged group is to downplay their ability to make an argument correctly. Any perceived flaws become amplified, entirely regardless of the legitimacy of the grievance.
 

besada

Banned
Am I ignoring it? No. But I'm trying to make it clear that this is a forum, and lots of people will read the title, skim the post, and then reply. When the thread's title is something that immediately rings in your head as bullshit, you're gonna have people typing up replies as soon as they get inside the thread.
Which is bannable. We require members to read the OP. If they can't manage that, there are plenty of other forums where that sort of behavior is acceptable.

Please get back to discussing the topic, rather than having a meta discussion about the topic.
 

Lime

Member
the vast majority of replies in this thread are about people who are entirely open and for more representation in games and disagreed with the specific example given. But I guess if someone doesn't agree with your entire opinion they're being dismissive, right?

- Make your own game instead of whining
- Mod the game yourself
- Developers are White, therefore they are unable to make non-White characters
- You're the Real Racist
- The game takes place in White People Only World
- The game is made my one person, therefore mostly/only White characters exist
- I'll talk when there's a White member in Wu Tang (???)

For how diplomatic and milquetoast the OP is (it's so incredibly basic), the responses and reactions and counter-replies have been vastly disproportionate to the OP's basic claim of just asking for better representation among indies especially.

There are no excuses. No excuses for not having more non-White characters.
 
"White Fragility is a state in which even a minimum amount of racial stress becomes intolerable, triggering a range of defensive moves. These moves include the outward display of emotions such as anger, fear, and guilt, and behaviors such as argumentation, silence, and leaving the stress-inducing situation."

http://libjournal.uncg.edu/index.php/ijcp/article/view/249

So not only are the people actively discussing the subject demonstrating white fragility, but lurkers merely reading along, as well as those who glance at the thread and close it are also exemplifying white fragility?

It would seem that the only way for a white person to avoid being fragile would be to have not seen the thread title through some stroke of luck.
 

Hip Hop

Member
Bboy AJ, good thread. However, you're wasting time arguing with these people. Don't try to convince them. Notice how confrontational you are despite seemingly innocuous remark on diversity in games. Most of whom are white. Do not engage white people on racial issues. They are, for the most part with rare exceptions, incapable of talking about race in a serious, mature manner without resorting to arguing like complete children. .

It's crazy how you can spew shit like this, but it's cool. You can't be racist against white people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom