I love first person shooters. I have played Dreamkiller. Hoped that Legendary would be good (it wasn't). Think Darkest of Days has its merits. Suffered my way through Killzone 2. I'll play any and every shooter there is, even when it's bad.
But... like... Infinite Warfare does not look or sound bad to me at all. In fact, it sounds exciting as hell.
Just a couple years ago, everyone was complaining about modern military shooters. Heck, they still are! Look at all the "oh man, I wish we'd go back to WWII shooters again" remarks. The best shooters of the past few years were WOLFENSTEIN and DOOM respectively. WWII and Sci-Fi.
So, like, Call of Duty, which comes out yearly, was in danger of becoming stale when it was nothing but modern military stuff.
Now we have this game that's got SPACE DOGFIGHTS (I've seen them compared to ACE COMBAT, HOLY SHIT!), has a space carrier that you command? Apparently all this stuff is seamless loading as well. Weapons include stuff like those amazing tracking grenades from Advanced Warfare and--I think?--gravity lift grenades? Like, that footage I saw at E3 blew my mind, and I'm probably the most jaded FPS player there is. I'll PLAY anything, but I'm never wowed as a result.
All the folks calling Call of Duty stale should be losing their shit at this, surely? Because, like, hey, it's doing so much new stuff; the free dogfighting alone looks amazing.
I get being mad that MWRemaster is attached at the hip, but it seems so much ire is directed at Infinite Warfare specifically, and I just don't understand what the problem is. It sounds like a really cool game, and a breath of fresh air for the Call of Duty series.
A yearly series that isn't stagnant? AWESOME... or... at least, so I thought.
Do people just wanna hate Call of Duty because it's the FPS on top? Or are there actual legitimate criticisms of the game itself out there?
But... like... Infinite Warfare does not look or sound bad to me at all. In fact, it sounds exciting as hell.
Just a couple years ago, everyone was complaining about modern military shooters. Heck, they still are! Look at all the "oh man, I wish we'd go back to WWII shooters again" remarks. The best shooters of the past few years were WOLFENSTEIN and DOOM respectively. WWII and Sci-Fi.
So, like, Call of Duty, which comes out yearly, was in danger of becoming stale when it was nothing but modern military stuff.
Now we have this game that's got SPACE DOGFIGHTS (I've seen them compared to ACE COMBAT, HOLY SHIT!), has a space carrier that you command? Apparently all this stuff is seamless loading as well. Weapons include stuff like those amazing tracking grenades from Advanced Warfare and--I think?--gravity lift grenades? Like, that footage I saw at E3 blew my mind, and I'm probably the most jaded FPS player there is. I'll PLAY anything, but I'm never wowed as a result.
All the folks calling Call of Duty stale should be losing their shit at this, surely? Because, like, hey, it's doing so much new stuff; the free dogfighting alone looks amazing.
I get being mad that MWRemaster is attached at the hip, but it seems so much ire is directed at Infinite Warfare specifically, and I just don't understand what the problem is. It sounds like a really cool game, and a breath of fresh air for the Call of Duty series.
A yearly series that isn't stagnant? AWESOME... or... at least, so I thought.
Do people just wanna hate Call of Duty because it's the FPS on top? Or are there actual legitimate criticisms of the game itself out there?