Just because it might not have Western AAA 3rd party support doesn't mean that it's not going to have 3rd party support. If you take the 3DS Japanese 3rd party support, combine it with the Western indies that the Vita was getting (probably a lot more now that you don't have to worry about getting your game to work on the Vita's weak hardware and have a better than Vita install base to sell to), and Nintendo full-focused attention (not divided between two platforms) and this looks primed to have the best software lineup of any Nintendo system since the SNES.
And after the Cell architecture Sony steered clear
Erm, a Wii U is ~170 GFlops. And less efficiently usable ones at that.
The dev units use this:
Which is just about a WiiU. It's very dissapointing.
Great post. There are other notable points too but you hit the big ones. There is a reason why people were speculating a hybrid for so long.This is Nintendo reacting to the reality of their situation.
1) They are not going to chase the other two consoles power wise. They will always be behind because they concentrate on price and family oriented gaming.
2) Third parties were not going to magically come back to Nintendo just because of power. Nintendo has to have a successful console for them to really be into making games for it.
4) Nintendo really is a great software company, people literally buy their consoles for their games. Sony and MS cannot say that with a straight face. by focusing on just one console instead of a home console and a portable they could actually release a formidable library games of games on their own.
And after the Cell architecture Sony steered clear
Sure it does. It reduces Nintendo's need to even think about third parties anymore. They could probably sustain the device on their own with Japanese and indie support, just like they did on 3DS.
Nintendo honestly does not need western AAA support to be successful.
Is it two little controllers or two halves of one build able controller?
There is a possibility that the layout of the two controllers will not match the layout of a conventional controller. Both controllers will probably be symmetrical. That alone kinda rules out a layout where one side has a d-pad and the other side a group of four buttons.
If it's two full blown separate controllers then I have negative interest in this as a handheld and would rather just leave it at home. How are you supposed to carry that in your pockets?
The dock is more than likely going to add additional power.
Mmm, okay...but why should consumers buy it? I guess it's good news for some Nintendo fans because it presumably eliminates the separate handheld console. Without a hook or a catch (beyond the MS Surface hybrid nature) I don't know. Maybe if they introduce it with a VR headset or something. Seems far behind the times if it's going to be using a cellphone processor, I mean high performance graphics cards are more affordable now than they have been in a long time.
I guess I'll have to see when and how they actually reveal it, because there must be more to it.
I called it first way, way back ON FLIPPING PAGE 13 :O :ONintendo Go.
Calling it.
Go is five in Japanese, this being their 5th generation handheld. Also, makes sense to capitalise on the Pokemon Go mindshare.
What should they have done instead?Goddamnit.
They never learn.
On a television sure. On a handheld there are battery concerns. Not a tough concept to wrap your head around. Handheld and TV output resolutions will be different.
This is Nintendo reacting to the reality of their situation.
1) They are not going to chase the other two consoles power wise. They will always be behind because they concentrate on price and family oriented gaming.
2) Third parties were not going to magically come back to Nintendo just because of power. Nintendo has to have a successful console for them to really be into making games for it.
4) Nintendo really is a great software company, people literally buy their consoles for their games. Sony and MS cannot say that with a straight face. by focusing on just one console instead of a home console and a portable they could actually release a formidable library games of games on their own.
I guess all the Breath of the Wild footage we have seen is Wii U graphics.
Put Pokemon, Fire Emblem and Monster Hunter on my living room TV? Yes please.
To be fair, even if it's $300, it's still a handheld AND a console, rolled together. That suddenly seems like a better value proposition. They're going to heavily market the fact it does both, according to the rumor.
I think the form factor is key here. If it looks sleek, if it looks like something people would want to lug around with them, then I think it'll catch on quicker.
...not looking forward to the inevitable revisions every couple years, though.
Two separate controllers:
Well it looks like devs will have there choice as to whether they want to focus in the handheld side or the console side atleast. Because i just don't see how just Dance is gonna work on a portable lol.
Mmm, okay...but why should consumers buy it? I guess it's good news for some Nintendo fans because it presumably eliminates the separate handheld console. Without a hook or a catch (beyond the MS Surface hybrid nature) I don't know. Maybe if they introduce it with a VR headset or something. Seems far behind the times if it's going to be using a cellphone processor, I mean high performance graphics cards are more affordable now than they have been in a long time.
I guess I'll have to see when and how they actually reveal it, because there must be more to it.
Apple make the best custom-uarch ARMv8s on the planet, ergo there's nothing that can beat apple's ARMs at single-core in their power bracket.Really hope this is a Tegra X2.
The X1 benchmarks (in the Pixel C tablet and Shield "console") slightly better than the iPhone 6S on GPU and multicore CPU tasks, but is sub-iPhone 6 for single-core CPU tasks (and various system/memory benchmarks, but those aren't necessarily SoC related).
I think you have it wrong. My guess is that they're going to be held upright and be a seperated pair, wiimote+nunchuck style.
Put in IR because the wii's IR is usable and shouldbe insanely cheap to add in by this point.
A wii u hits around .3 tflops whereas the tegra (as stated in the op) hits .512. So it's stronger and great hardware for a handheld but disappointing for a home console
I'm sure Tegras are designed to deliver high resolution graphics and great battery life.
Yeah so this is gonna have:
Mario Kart
Pokemon
3D Mario
Zelda
Fire Emblem
SSB
Monster Hunter
On the go, or at home.
Shit me if this won't do well.
I whipped this up pretty quick. My best guess atm. I'm thinking Wii Remote-style rotation.
That's a good point. I doubt Nintendo would allow devs to just have one over the other as that would make half of the system's functionality worthless but at the same time some games might just not work on the go.
Maybe this will be the first Nintendo console without Just Dance. O:
To be fair, even if it's $300, it's still a handheld AND a console, rolled together. That suddenly seems like a better value proposition. They're going to heavily market the fact it does both, according to the rumor.
I think the form factor is key here. If it looks sleek, if it looks like something people would want to lug around with them, then I think it'll catch on quicker.
...not looking forward to the inevitable revisions every couple years, though.
*Three months later*
Reggie: we present you, the Wii Go.