She actually looks very sharp and pretty !
She actually looks very sharp and pretty !
Makes broad commanding statement that a policy should be put in place.
Clearly has no idea about what they're talking about.
Yup, it's politics.
Where are these posts coming from?Another dumb politician who desperately wants a little public attention.
Just because bigger problems exist doesn't mean smaller ones can't be dealt with.Sure, we should focus on Pokémon GO and forget the several problems we have to deal with.
This. Country.
I was thinking more Team Flare Admin...minus the hair...Connection?
Where are these posts coming from?
Police presence at schools isn't as common as you think.
Never heard of that. I and my friends were crazy about Pokémon after Blue/Red came out, my school didn't talk about a ban or anything else.
Or you know, she doesn't want a ton of grown-up, strangers trespassing on school properties full of children to score rare pokemon? Not to mention, it also being a huge distraction from what the kids should be doing during school hours. Clearly you don't know what you're talking about.
Yup, it's GAF and politics.
Except she's right...
Not really. Wtf is she even talking about "rare Pokemon should not be allowed". It's a compeltely misunderstanding of how the game even works. It's all procedurally generated. She has no idea what's she's talking about.
Real talk: if the Pokemon thing really is a distraction, why are they letting cell phones in the classroom in the first place? And if they aren't, why is Pokemon GO an issue then?
And I mean, you know trespassing laws do exist right? It really isn't an app's fault people are going where they clearly shouldn't be.
This all seems kneejerk and inconsequential, honestly.
I'm kinda baffled people are on her side.
.It makes sense if they want to avoid crowds gathering in front of schools. Which are already under strict surveillance because of the terror counter-measures (no car, police presence etc). Maybe it will be pointless in a few months, but it's worth anticipating, having a discussion with Niantic doesn't cost much.
As for kids, I do hope any usage of smartphone is forbidden at school anyway, except maybe for recess.
Not really. Wtf is she even talking about "rare Pokemon should not be allowed". It's a compeltely misunderstanding of how the game even works. It's all procedurally generated. She has no idea what's she's talking about.
Real talk: if the Pokemon thing really is a distraction, why are they letting cell phones in the classroom in the first place? And if they aren't, why is Pokemon GO an issue then?
And I mean, you know trespassing laws do exist right? It really isn't an app's fault people are going where they clearly shouldn't be.
This all seems kneejerk and inconsequential, honestly.
I'm kinda baffled people are on her side.
I don't see how that is her problem, it is on Niantic to solve it.Not really. Wtf is she even talking about "rare Pokemon should not be allowed". It's a compeltely misunderstanding of how the game even works. It's all procedurally generated. She has no idea what's she's talking about.
Prevention over criminalization is a thing.And I mean, you know trespassing laws do exist right? It really isn't an app's fault people are going where they clearly shouldn't be.