• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Star Wars: The Last Jedi Official Teaser

Status
Not open for further replies.

RSTEIN

Comics, serious business!
It doesn't matter though. Even without R1, we know Vader can mow down rebel soldiers like no big thing, but he let the troopers handle it in the beginning of ANH anyway. The apparent lack inconsistency you see still remains.

I see his point that after Rogue One a viewer may ask "wait, why doesn't he just rip everyone apart?"

But ANH is a very different situation. The corvette is captured. They can't run anywhere. It's best if everyone is captured alive and interrogated. Vader knows the death star plans are on board somewhere. He just saw them escape.

In RO, Vader is in infiltration mode. There's no time to send a squad of troopers (and even if there was he'd still do it himself).

Plus there are countless situations where Vader tells officers/troopers to do shit for him even though he can do it himself easily.
 

ZeroCDR

Member
Rey's saber pulling filled me more with disappointments because at that point I realized Finn's role was basically a marketing swerve.

Finn is still a bit of a mystery, his defecting looks like force influence but I don't think he's force sensitive. His action with the lightsaber feels like a tease of something bigger, It's a prime opportunity to downplay midichlorians should they choose. I hope he takes an interest in the force in the next two films and earns it rather than being born with it.
 

Guy.brush

Member
Super Nerd

I mean people are countering me by citing the cannon technical readout books which would go contrary to me being the Super Nerd tbh.

It has nothing to do with too much technical detail knowledge of non-important BS.
It has everything to do with not keeping the world building consistent, thus harming what e.g. was a real threat in film 1 and downgrade it to visual fluff that needs explode in film 2.
It makes the rules our heroes need to follow in overcoming their obstacles in the plot go from solid to arbitary and just what the script now needs to proceed to the next bit.
It actually becomes more like arbitary nerdy techno-babble Star Trek explanathon vs. feeling the rules in your heart.
 
I prefer RoboNerd, personally

Nf2ELsa.gif


I mean people are countering me by citing the cannon technical readout books which would go contrary to me being the Super Nerd tbh.

I wasn't even talking to you, nerd.

you put those Pro Keds on yourself.
 

Toa TAK

Banned
I mean people are countering me by citing the cannon technical readout books which would go contrary to me being the Super Nerd tbh.

It has nothing to do with too much technical detail knowledge of non-important BS.
It has everything to do with not keeping the world building consistent, thus harming what e.g. was a real threat in film 1 and downgrade it to visual fluff that needs explode in film 2.
It makes the rules our heroes need to follow in overcoming their obstacles in the plot go from solid to arbitary and just what the script now needs to proceed to the next bit.

It actually becomes more like arbitary nerdy techno-babble Star Trek explanathon vs. feeling the rules in your heart.
I zoned out a bit tbh it's like reading my Chem textbook.


If it makes you feel better we're all Super Nerds here. But not in a Justice League kinda way more of an incompetent Legion of Duur kinda way.
 

RSTEIN

Comics, serious business!
I mean people are countering me by citing the cannon technical readout books which would go contrary to me being the Super Nerd tbh.

It has nothing to do with too much technical detail knowledge of non-important BS.
It has everything to do with not keeping the world building consistent, thus harming what e.g. was a real threat in film 1 and downgrade it to visual fluff that needs explode in film 2.
It makes the rules our heroes need to follow in overcoming their obstacles in the plot go from solid to arbitary and just what the script now needs to proceed to the next bit.
It actually becomes more like arbitary nerdy techno-babble Star Trek explanathon vs. feeling the rules in your heart.

You can't just list a bunch of apparent inconsistencies, get clarification that proves that what you perceive to be inconsistencies aren't really inconsistencies and then just say "oh well, I didn't feel the rules in my heart."

Pretty much everything is consistent. Which is pretty remarkable considering we're talking about an entire galaxy created by numerous authors and screen writers spring-boarding off of a campy space opera movie made back in 1977 in the desert.

Now, there's plenty of stuff that seems a bit wonky like ANH's Vader vs Obi Wan but why that is should be obvious.
 
First of all, thanks for including the excerpt from Aftermath, I've never read that before.
No worries, it's all new stuff made to tie in with the current trilogy, and its those things that are the crux of my argument that make it hard for Rey to be a Skywalker, because of everything being established right now.

The elements from the PT, especially the Jedi, are canon. Why are you saying they're irrelevant? The Jedi Order symbol, which (I believe) was first established in the prequels, is smack dab in the middle of the TLJ trailer. Of course it's relevant!
I'm saying its irrelevant because you're using what was established in the PT to justify or explain your opinions on the OT. And while that works in theory, it doesn't work in reality. Because the fact of the matter is, when Lucas was creating the OT, these weren't things he was thinking about, they weren't established and thus are irrelevant to that material. They're retcons and since that material was made prior to the retcon, you can't used retconned material to explain pre retconned material, because that would be taking it out of context. Yes it is canon, but at the end of the day, that wasn't Lucas's intention at the time, it was added later. You can use retconned material to explain and understand things going forward, but you can't do it going backwards (in a real world timeline sense) because it doesn't make logical sense, unless that retconned material was made specifically with that intention. Darth Vader being Anakin Skywalker was a retcon, Luke and Leia being twins was a retcon, which is why you can't use it as an argument to say Vader didn't sense Leia as her daughter. Because that wasn't the original intention, it was changed later, and thus there are going to be inconsistancies in what came before.

Just because it worked out for Luke doesn't mean he didn't break the Jedi code. Again, be blatantly defied his masters and went against their commands. They told him not to go because it's a trap, and because the empire is playing on his emotions. They were right. Luke was lucky enough to venture into that trap and not fuck everything up. Which is why I'm saying he's as far from the old Jedi as you can get; the vast majority of them would have obeyed their masters and followed the code and their teachings. Luke redefined what it means to be a Jedi and largely listened to his own instincts.

At the time, yes, but since then Luke has trained to become a Jedi, he's gone to their ancient temples, read their scriptures, he wouldn't bother with all this if he wasn't devout, and the fact that he is doing all this, going through all this effort and trying to create an order of Jedi, assumedly through the knowledge he's amassed from his research and travels that he's trying to be a true Jedi. There's also something that's implied in a leak that makes me support this idea, but I won't bring it up here.

I think that Luke's new order won't be a true Jedi order, but still an order for good, but in order to tell that story, his original order of Jedi has to be a more traditional one, for this to make sense. Again, or otherwise it wouldn't matter if he created a second order of non jedi or not, because he wasn't really following them anyway, and if that's the case why not just continue what you're doing.
As far as I know, only the Emperor (and Yoda) sensed someone specifically via the force who he was unaware of before. In ESB, he senses that the offspring of Skywalker cannot become a Jedi. And the only reason he was able to sense this was because of Luke's ability to destroy the Death Star, said in the dialogue.
Who else has done this?
In the Clone Wars, Obi Wan and Yoda sensed that Darth Maul had resurfaced after his "death". This could be a retcon yes, but it's okay in this instance because it's being used to explain material going forward, this was established prior to the sequel trilogy and was already canon by the time the sequel trilogy came around. The point is that Obi Wan and Darth Maul had some kind of connection through the force. As seen with those excerpts from the books, you naturally have a connection with the force with your family. The only instance that the skywalkers didn't have one was before the retcon that they were actually family. In the infamous edited interview people are passing around, Mark Hamil states that Leia, could have and would have contacted him mentally for help through the force. It's because they're both force sensitive and related, not just because they've met before.

Leia DID sense Han, she felt him die. She did this through the force.
I thought your point was that my quote was about Leia sensing Han, rather than Leia sensing Snokes influence through the force, which is the point I was making. Which goes back to my point that if Leia, a relatively weak force sensitive can do that, why wouldn't Kylo Ren or Luke, two far more powerful force users have some connection with a member of their family? It makes no sense.

Arguably, you could make it into the story, but the more they add details like this into the sequel trilogy, the less believeable it is to craft a story about it. I could make a story about Jar Jar binx pulling the strings the whole time, but it would be silly considering everything else that's established. Which is my point.
 

timewyrm

Member
All I want is a Vader film set between III & IV.

BTW, was there a way that they could've altered JEJ's voice in R1, so that Vader wouldn't have sounded so old ?
 

Guy.brush

Member
You can't just list a bunch of apparent inconsistencies, get clarification that proves that what you perceive to be inconsistencies aren't really inconsistencies and then just say "oh well, I didn't feel the rules in my heart."

Pretty much everything is consistent. Which is pretty remarkable considering we're talking about an entire galaxy created by numerous authors and screen writers spring-boarding off of a campy space opera movie made back in 1977 in the desert.

Now, there's plenty of stuff that seems a bit wonky like ANH's Vader vs Obi Wan but why that is should be obvious.

Really pretty much everything is consistent?!

  1. What about StarDestroyers never seen in atmosphere in the OT and nowadays being used as hovering visual landmarks in atmosphere abundantly, probably caused by what seems an acute case of "concept arteritis"? Why was there no SD hovering right above the Endor shield generator?!
  2. What about the DeathStar being able to quickly jump to Hyperspace in Rogue One to destroy the Imperial R&D planet, yet having to maneuver slowly around Yavin to target Yavin IV?
  3. What about Vader killing Admiral Ozzel for coming out of Hyperspace too close to the planet Hoth in ESB and then Han Solo using coming out of Hyperspace too close to Starkiller base as a valid tactic to bypass its shields?
  4. What about "without precise calculations we could be jumping right through a star!" in ANH and then in TFA just jumping from inside the freighter hangar without lenghty calculations?
  5. What about travel times actually taking their sweet time in ANH/ESB and then in TFA everybody just appears or jumps in from anywhere in mere seconds? (I know this is the usual JJ compresseritis, but still, why are there even people on shitty dry worlds if it takes a couple of minutes to get to a nice lush jungle planet?)
  6. What about Starkiller base being able to shoot through motherfucking Hyperspace in arching beams splitting to multiple targets? How is this consistent?
  7. To be fair to the new filmmakers, this started during the prequels.
    Emperor going "The weapon of a Jedi knight", looks at it in disgust in ROTJ and then humping and jumping the senate pods while fighting with a lightsaber.
    Same for Yoda.

The only thing consistent seems to be the borrowing from the same great, deep well, drying it out over time, while at the same time somehow managing to make the water taste shallow.
 

-griffy-

Banned
This thread turning into an exercise in *Typing out lengthy, detailed refutation and then thinking "NAH, NOT WORTH IT" and hitting delete*
 

Einchy

semen stains the mountaintops
This thread turning into an exercise in *Typing out lengthy, detailed refutation and then thinking "NAH, NOT WORTH IT" and hitting delete*

This thread is now what I used to think Star Wars fans were before I became out.

Even Comic Book Guy wouldn't get involved, he's not nerdy enough.
 
Forgive my ignorance, but was there any reason that they didn't (that you can think of) ?

Probably just didn't occur to em? Or maybe they did try it and were like "Nah, this makes it sound worse."

I'm sure some fan somewhere is probably doing it for their personal fan-edit w/ Star Wars or something.
 

Einchy

semen stains the mountaintops
Probably just didn't occur to em? Or maybe they did try it and were like "Nah, this makes it sound worse."

I'm sure some fan somewhere is probably doing it for their personal fan-edit w/ Star Wars or something.

Well, they didn't mess with his voice in Rebels' so they were probably like, "that's just the way he sounds now".
 

Toa TAK

Banned
Probably just didn't occur to em? Or maybe they did try it and were like "Nah, this makes it sound worse."

I'm sure some fan somewhere is probably doing it for their personal fan-edit w/ Star Wars or something.
People need to make a fan edit of Rogue One?

I thought fan edits became a thing with Star Wars because of the special editions and such.
 
This thread turning into an exercise in *Typing out lengthy, detailed refutation and then thinking "NAH, NOT WORTH IT" and hitting delete*
Not gunna lie, I thought about it lol
This thread is now what I used to think Star Wars fans were before I became out.

Even Comic Book Guy wouldn't get involved, he's not nerdy enough.
Honestly I have no idea how I got this way lmao. One thing led to another and here we are. I didn't even care for star wars a few years ago and it's not like I don't have better things to do.

But I'm enjoying it nonetheless.
 
People need to make a fan edit of Rogue One?

I thought fan edits became a thing with Star Wars because of the special editions and such.

They don't need to but the first thing that happened when the blu-ray leaked was people gluing the opening of Star Wars to the end of Rogue One.

Fan-editing basically became a thing because of The Phantom Menace, and now it's just a thing, period.

edit: And yeah, this thread is nerdy as shit but I swear to you the Kendrick thread has actually got us beat right now.
 

Toa TAK

Banned
They don't need to but the first thing that happened when the blu-ray leaked was people gluing the opening of Star Wars to the end of Rogue One.

Fan-editing basically became a thing because of The Phantom Menace, and now it's just a thing, period.

edit: And yeah, this thread is nerdy as shit but I swear to you the Kendrick thread has actually got us beat right now.
Ah

So the fans want to destroy films. Sounds good.


Also need link to Kendrick

Edit: nevemind
 
Ah

So the fans want to destroy films. Sounds good.

It's more that they just wanna feel like they did something. The act of putting your hands on the thing and changing it somehow is pretty cathartic in and of itself, I guess. A lot of fan editors basically only learn to edit films because then they can also edit themselves into a credit block, which is the fantasy that's getting the most fulfilled there: Seeing their name present in those blue letters.

Of course, the problem is their edits tend to fuckin' suck, so they've stuck their name on their mishandled turd and are trying to share it with everybody like they "fixed" something, so that's kind of a problem.

But there are fan-edits that are absolutely interesting to poke at. I looked at one for Prometheus that didn't fix the film but some of the decisions weren't bad. The best fan-editors seem to be competing to see who can turn the Hobbit trilogy into a three hour movie that works.

None of the Prequel fan edits I've seen have ever made the movie better, however. Not one. It's just rearranging half-digested crayons in the same pile you already stepped in once.
 

Ridisc

Banned
"S-SACRED LORD VADER SAN W-WOULDNT MAKE PUNS, HES NOT MY DAD THIS FILM IS SACRILEGE"-half the rogue one OT

The same vader who choked a guy out and said "Apology accepted"

I agree its not like prequel Anakin who had no sense of humour, but I felt it was in line with OT Vader.
 

Guy.brush

Member
I loved the "Choke on your aspirations" line, then i came online and found people hated it

I though it was prime vader

I actually liked that as well!
Krennic was something fresh too. Basically a hard working lower class guy fighting to ascend into and be accepted by blue blooded royality. Just wish his ending beneath the giant wi-fi antenna would have been handled a bit better.
 

Sephzilla

Member
The only fan edit I'd ever do is make my fan edit that makes the Back to the Future trilogy all one movie

I loved the "Choke on your aspirations" line, then i came online and found people hated it

I though it was prime vader

I thought it was ok. It's not like Vader doesn't have a few smartass lines in the OT anyway
 

timewyrm

Member
It's more that they just wanna feel like they did something. The act of putting your hands on the thing and changing it somehow is pretty cathartic in and of itself, I guess. A lot of fan editors basically only learn to edit films because then they can also edit themselves into a credit block, which is the fantasy that's getting the most fulfilled there: Seeing their name present in those blue letters.

Of course, the problem is their edits tend to fuckin' suck, so they've stuck their name on their mishandled turd and are trying to share it with everybody like they "fixed" something, so that's kind of a problem.

But there are fan-edits that are absolutely interesting to poke at. I looked at one for Prometheus that didn't fix the film but some of the decisions weren't bad. The best fan-editors seem to be competing to see who can turn the Hobbit trilogy into a three hour movie that works.

None of the Prequel fan edits I've seen have ever made the movie better, however. Not one. It's just rearranging half-digested crayons in the same pile you already stepped in once.

Not a fan edit, but the Richard Donner cut of Superman 2 was a better movie, IMHO.
 

Rayme

Member
I loved the "Choke on your aspirations" line, then i came online and found people hated it

I though it was prime vader
Manchildren that have decided Vader pipes constant Linkin Park music into his helmet hated it.

I think you are correct. Loved it. "Apology accepted, Captain Needa.", etc.

(...in my heart of hearts, I wish he'd stressed "_CHOKE_" a little less in the reading, but it doesn't kill it for me.)
 
The same vader who choked a guy out and said "Apology accepted"

I agree its not like prequel Anakin who had no sense of humour, but I felt it was in line with OT Vader.
We're in agreement completely. I even brought that up and some guy complained that that was entirely different and anyone who liked this was easily impressed.

The guy was like 40, you'd think he would've grown out of being an edgelord
 

Ridisc

Banned
I actually liked that as well!
Krennic was something fresh too. Basically a hard working lower class guy fighting to ascend into and be accepted by blue blooded royality. Just wish his ending beneath the giant wi-fi antenna would have been handled a bit better.

When I first pictured Krennec from the teasers I thought "Ok this guy is a ruthless, cold blooded killer without remorse", I read a bit of catalyst and found that he is ruthless and cold blooded, but more calculated than blunt and I feel they didnt necessarily do that justice in Rogue One, so he came off kind of....weak. Perhaps that was the point, not sure, but as a character he was one of the least compelling to me personally.
 

Ridisc

Banned
With the prequels, ive gone beyond outrage with them, they just "are", I can watch them like I can watch the OT, which I dont watch with a critical eye, I just watch them and enjoy what I enjoy.

Except for Clones, which is a genuinely difficult watch.
 

Sephzilla

Member
Maybe this is my inner RoboCop fan creeping out but I'd totally watch another Star Wars story that had a lot of Empire politicking for ranks/promotions/etc. Basically a contest to see who can be the biggest asshole (a la Bob Morton/Dick Jones in RoboCop). Krennic's Rogue One arc gave me a nice taste of that.
 
"ARE WE BLIND?!"

Krennic was the best character in Rogue One.

EDIT: Okay second best, after K-2SO.

I love Krennic in so much that he's, in an odd way, one of the more realistic characters to come out of the franchise. Like, he is committed to the empire, but like many an actual figure in such empires throughout history, more concerned with his personal rise and currying favour with the elite while avoiding or backstabbing his rivals. He's more invested in going down in the history books than he is the particulars of how he does so, and has so little empathy for those who must suffer for it - the kind of disconnect that, again, is quite realistic of almost every major empire ever - that he's evil by consequence, more than deliberately setting out by thinking about who he'll oppress today.
 
The same vader who choked a guy out and said "Apology accepted"

I agree its not like prequel Anakin who had no sense of humour, but I felt it was in line with OT Vader.
The problem for me wasn't that he made a joke unlike in the OT where he didn't make jokes (he did). The problem was the jokes in the OT were funnier.
 

RSTEIN

Comics, serious business!
Really pretty much everything is consistent?!

1. What about StarDestroyers never seen in atmosphere in the OT and nowadays being used as hovering visual landmarks in atmosphere abundantly, probably caused by what seems an acute case of "concept arteritis"? Why was there no SD hovering right above the Endor shield generator?!
A. Jedha had active saboteurs destroying transports and causing chaos. Endor had Ewoks--not exactly a threat. Plus don't need a Star Destroyer in the atmosphere when the planet has a Death Star protecting it. Scarif didn't have any Star Destroyers, either.

2. What about the DeathStar being able to quickly jump to Hyperspace in Rogue One to destroy the Imperial R&D planet, yet having to maneuver slowly around Yavin to target Yavin IV?
A. As we saw in Rogue One, it took a while to maneuver into position before destroying both Jedha and Scarif.

3. What about Vader killing Admiral Ozzel for coming out of Hyperspace too close to the planet Hoth in ESB and then Han Solo using coming out of Hyperspace too close to Starkiller base as a valid tactic to bypass its shields?
A. Starkiller base used a different type of shield generator than Hoth (a thermal oscillator). Finn told the rebels about it.

4. What about "without precise calculations we could be jumping right through a star!" in ANH and then in TFA just jumping from inside the freighter hangar without lenghty calculations?
A. A move out of desperation (jump or be killed).

5. What about travel times actually taking their sweet time in ANH/ESB and then in TFA everybody just appears or jumps in from anywhere in mere seconds? (I know this is the usual JJ compresseritis, but still, why are there even people on shitty dry worlds if it takes a couple of minutes to get to a nice lush jungle planet?)
A. I can see your point here. None of the movies do a good job of explaining how long it takes to get places.

6. What about Starkiller base being able to shoot through motherfucking Hyperspace in arching beams splitting to multiple targets? How is this consistent?
A. That's explained by Star Wars magi-science (dark energy/phantom energy/quintessence + kyber crystals). New tech. Not inconsistent.

7. To be fair to the new filmmakers, this started during the prequels.
Emperor going "The weapon of a Jedi knight", looks at it in disgust in ROTJ and then humping and jumping the senate pods while fighting with a lightsaber.

A. That was more of a comment about Luke than anything. No secret that the Emperor used a lightsaber (as did other sith lords/apprentices).

See, everything is consistent :)
 

Lord Panda

The Sea is Always Right
Really pretty much everything is consistent?!

  1. What about StarDestroyers never seen in atmosphere in the OT and nowadays being used as hovering visual landmarks in atmosphere abundantly, probably caused by what seems an acute case of "concept arteritis"? Why was there no SD hovering right above the Endor shield generator?!
  2. What about the DeathStar being able to quickly jump to Hyperspace in Rogue One to destroy the Imperial R&D planet, yet having to maneuver slowly around Yavin to target Yavin IV?
  3. What about Vader killing Admiral Ozzel for coming out of Hyperspace too close to the planet Hoth in ESB and then Han Solo using coming out of Hyperspace too close to Starkiller base as a valid tactic to bypass its shields?
  4. What about "without precise calculations we could be jumping right through a star!" in ANH and then in TFA just jumping from inside the freighter hangar without lenghty calculations?
  5. What about travel times actually taking their sweet time in ANH/ESB and then in TFA everybody just appears or jumps in from anywhere in mere seconds? (I know this is the usual JJ compresseritis, but still, why are there even people on shitty dry worlds if it takes a couple of minutes to get to a nice lush jungle planet?)
  6. What about Starkiller base being able to shoot through motherfucking Hyperspace in arching beams splitting to multiple targets? How is this consistent?
  7. To be fair to the new filmmakers, this started during the prequels.
    Emperor going "The weapon of a Jedi knight", looks at it in disgust in ROTJ and then humping and jumping the senate pods while fighting with a lightsaber.
    Same for Yoda.

The only thing consistent seems to be the borrowing from the same great, deep well, drying it out over time, while at the same time somehow managing to make the water taste shallow.

Exactly.
 

Thaedolus

Gold Member
You don't actually know that at the end of Star Wars though. You know that because the opening of Empire tells you.

I don't get how you say that when there's talk of the emperor, other star destroyers are shown, and someone fucking built that space station. Clearly the entity existed before the Death Star and its destruction wouldn't mean the whole thing is done?
 

Steejee

Member
When I first pictured Krennec from the teasers I thought "Ok this guy is a ruthless, cold blooded killer without remorse", I read a bit of catalyst and found that he is ruthless and cold blooded, but more calculated than blunt and I feel they didnt necessarily do that justice in Rogue One, so he came off kind of....weak. Perhaps that was the point, not sure, but as a character he was one of the least compelling to me personally.

I ended up liking his character, despite it not being what I expected. He's basically a career bureaucrat, a spineless weasel who doesn't give a damn about the empire, vadar, or anything beyond his own ambitions and is ruthless in trying to obtain them (even while being a 'spineless weasel' at the same time).

Death by his own weapons project was a nice touch on top.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom