• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Gran Turismo Sport - Review Thread

I assumed they were counted. I didn't comb through the reviews to see they were not.

Only 5 review on MC right now, the rest are not on yet.

There are more good than bad reviews right now though, only 3 lower scoring ones and they aren't really terrible scores either, against 9 really good reviews.

Trusted Reviews - 3.5/5

Leadergamer (Turkish) - 7/10

CGMagazine - 6.5/10
 
Why do people keep saying you need PS+ to save your game and do other stuff?

It’s true, you need to be online. But as far as im aware you only need PS+ for online races, not campaign/liveries/scapes/arcade/etc.


I love the game btw and all the helpful videos. I feel like I’m actually learning something lol.
 

MilkyJoe

Member
Top Gear:

Not Dynablast's words, Carol, the words of top gear magazine!

BHGU9xACEAAGH86.jpg
 
From what I can tell, this game has a pretty specific target audience, which, I mean yeah, focus can be a very good thing?

Earlier titles might have had a broader appeal, but they also lost themselves in some ways since 1997.


I agree, post Motor Toon Grand Prix they fucking lost it.
 

ethomaz

Banned
We shall see. Real nail biter
Well if you add the others reviews in OP it will go up to 82+

With 76 on meta any review added will make the score go up unless it is 7 or lower and there are five 9s and five 8s in OP... way more than 7s.
 

Septic360

Banned
PlayStation Universe Review:

http://www.psu.com/review/34465/gran-turismo-sport-review

Score: 7.5/10

Gran Turismo Sport mixes things up with its online scene and always-online front, but the heart of the game is still here ever-present as one would expect of such a beloved franchise. Not every issue is major. In fact, most may never bother most. I quite loved the motion control changes Polyphony brings this time around, adding an extra bit of heart to a game already filled with it. However, like any heart, there's some bad that cannot be forgotten, even if the greatest parts shine so brightly.

Pros:

Photorealism squared
New motion control option
Beautiful musical score

Cons:

Internet connection is mandatory
Some weak-sounding engines
Lackluster VR support
 
It will probably go up with actual reviews.

If it doesn't, there will be massive meltdowns.

I don't think it will go up - if comparing to what Forza 7 delivers. FYI, I have both.


Edit: 76 Meta now?

I was thinking 78 or so. Have to wait until more flow in.
 

MaDKaT

Member
Well if you add the others reviews in OP it will go up to 82+

With 76 on meta any review added will make the score go up unless it is 7 or lower and there are five 9s and five 8s in OP... way more than 7s.

Lol, I know how it works. I was just pointing out that "Like Forza" would mean it would just tick down.
 

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
Great metacritic dont ignore single player in gran turismo.

I loved 4 5 and 6 b spec and a spec mode was my fix.
This will be the first i won't get.

I really hope they will patch in a beefy sp mode and b spec.

Will buy it in a heartbeat then.

Metascore is fair imo
 
Great metacritic dont ignore single player in gran turismo.

I loved 4 5 and 6 b spec and a spec mode was my fix.
This will be the first i won't get.

I really hope they will patch in a beefy sp mode and b spec.

Will buy it in an heartbeat then.

Metascore is fair imo

I agree to an extent that the score is fair. They are going in a different direction which is a huge gut-check for PD. To have such a drastic change for one of the best selling game franchises in history is very risky.

Plenty of games go up all the time when real reviews come in. Yakuza 0 kept increasing to 85 for example.

For sure. This is based off of playing both Forza and GTS. I would give the advantage to Forza for numerous reasons over GTS and if I have numerous reasons, it will reflect in my score. But that's just me.
 

Unknown?

Member
Great metacritic dont ignore single player in gran turismo.

I loved 4 5 and 6 b spec and a spec mode was my fix.
This will be the first i won't get.

I really hope they will patch in a beefy sp mode and b spec.

Will buy it in an heartbeat then.

Metascore is fair imo

How is it fair when they have excluded many reviews that favor the game? Lmao!

I bet it ends up low to mid 80s. This reminds me of the Ratchet reboot. Before it came out some speed runner said he beat it in 5 hours and EVERYONE was literally trashing the game. That was until favorable reviews came out and we saw that it wasn’t short. I swear some people look at a meta and don’t do critical thinking.
 

TheMan

Member
I think most reviewers will gloss over this, but this game deserves a kick in the metaphorical teeth for its terribly barebones VR mode. I can accept technical limitations limiting the number of opponents, but not even implementing a TT mode is just sloppy as hell. So salty.
 

Synth

Member
I think most reviewers will gloss over this, but this game deserves a kick in the metaphorical teeth for its terribly barebones VR mode. I can accept technical limitations limiting the number of opponents, but not even implementing a TT mode is just sloppy as hell. So salty.

I've been finding the VR modes in a lot of the bigger name releases for PSVR are rather disappointing. They often feel like small proof-of-concepts, but if you weren't already going to buy the game without VR, then they're hard to justify a purchase. There's too few RE7 type implementations at this point.
 

MaDKaT

Member
How is it fair when they have excluded many reviews that favor the game? Lmao!

I bet it ends up low to mid 80s. This reminds me of the Ratchet reboot. Before it came out some speed runner said he beat it in 5 hours and EVERYONE was literally trashing the game. That was until favorable reviews came out and we saw that it wasn’t short. I swear some people look at a meta and don’t do critical thinking.

Would you feel the same if the meta was higher? I personally think the meta is fine. Online focused games tend to score lower on average.
 
But does this count as a real review?

Looks like a good and fair review.

GT Sport was always going to be a game that isn't for everyone because of the changes / online focus and it's not perfect but it's still scoring well enough despite those issues, which shows the parts it does well, are good enough to keep the score at a decent level.
 

Gestault

Member
I think most reviewers will gloss over this, but this game deserves a kick in the metaphorical teeth for its terribly barebones VR mode. I can accept technical limitations limiting the number of opponents, but not even implementing a TT mode is just sloppy as hell. So salty.

TT mode?
 

TheMan

Member
I've been finding the VR modes in a lot of the bigger name releases for PSVR are rather disappointing. They often feel like small proof-of-concepts, but if you weren't already going to buy the game without VR, then they're hard to justify a purchase. There's too few RE7 type implementations at this point.

Agreed. Not only is the tech still in its infancy, but there's the age old catch 22 regarding growing platforms and the financial risk of developing dedicated software.

That said, I think PD failed to implement low cost and frankly obvious options that would have worked within the limits of the hardware while significantly expanding replayability. I mean, for a lot of racers the meat of racing games is just learning the track, alone, working to improve lap times. They could have stuck that in there effortlessly! In fact performance could even be improved by removing the extra car with its shitty AI! Ugh, so dumb. Ok done ranting.
 

Synth

Member
Agreed. Not only is the tech still in its infancy, but there's the age old catch 22 regarding growing platforms and the financial risk of developing dedicated software.

That said, I think PD failed to implement low cost and frankly obvious options that would have worked within the limits of the hardware while significantly expanding replayability. I mean, for a lot of racers the meat of racing games is just learning the track, alone, working to improve lap times. They could have stuck that in there effortlessly! In fact performance could even be improved by removing the extra car with its shitty AI! Ugh, so dumb. Ok done ranting.

Yea, it's a bit silly.


Time Trial
 
Same that happened with Forza 7 93 meta...

There was a reason for that development, and that particular reason is not affecting GTS reviews.

We all knew GTS would get mixed reviews due to its stripped content - both compared to previous entries as well as other console racing games. And rightfully so. The big question is if the online experience which reviewers are now finally able to test will make up for the flaws.
 

Unknown?

Member
Would you feel the same if the meta was higher? I personally think the meta is fine. Online focused games tend to score lower on average.
I personally don’t care what the meta is but to say something is fair based on what it is now because it fits with your own opinions is laughably embarrassing. It’s almost like picking out the worst reviews and using that to feel somehow “right”.

I would never say something like that regardless the score. I remember when Neir was a 94 based on four reviews and the company tweeting their score. It was a joke because they knew it wasn’t going to stay the same.

I’m very curious as to what it will be when all is said and done but that won’t be for awhile. Especially with Metacritic taking their sweet ass time to put up reviews.
 

WHM-6R

Neo Member
Like Forza early reviews are not accurate...

Incorrect. The early ones that focused on the actual gameplay were quite accurate, the later ones who cited incorrect info about how the dreaded loot crates affected game play negatively actually have it wrong.
 
I think that when you have 6 numbered installments that seem rooted in a Career Mode with ever-growing features, it becomes pretty difficult to communicate a shift like Sport.

I mean, right off the bat, using the title "Sport" instead of a number seems like a pretty obvious symbolic choice, and revealing the game with an outline on a persistent multiplayer experience did draw some negative backlash.

However, as a long-standing GT fan, I feel like this is the most polished and interesting effort for the series in a long time, even if it lacks some features that its peers have pursued in recent years (dynamic day/night and weather).

Every activity in this game -- whether single- or multiplayer -- now centers around a single persistent driver profile that is socially shared (via the online network), but the breadth of activities that existed in other GT games is still largely present, it's just not accounted for in the same "Career" structure that's been familiar to fans for a long time. Where this gets even more hazy is in small places like how your DR/SR -- two of the most important aspects of your driver profile -- aren't affected by your single player activity, which makes the lack of a Career structure stand out a bit since it still shows some discrimination in priority over what activities the game deems more important than others, running counter to this universal/social notion it seems to be built on.

We also had to take a hit on the content levels for vehicle count and track count, as this game was built from the ground up for PS4 tech in response to the infamous use of PS2 assets in the previous PS3 installments. While it is a pretty drastic reduction compared to those games, I think that the high level of detail and individual attention paid to the way cars behave at the lower car count has proved to be its benefit, owing to more distinctive car properties and a more robust range of engine noises.

And this is just a personal take, certainly not one I think will apply to or interest all long-running GT fans, but the multiplayer genuinely addresses most of the aspects of online multiplayer racing that intimidated me before, and now it's enjoyable, an entirely new approach to "casual sims" that I never really ever paid any attention to before. It doesn't make me immune to making embarrassing mistakes, and it doesn't necessarily make it so that I can completely avoid bad driving practices and poor sportsmanship online, but the safeguards in place literally feel like every effort to play fair-but-competitively is honored and rewarded at most times -- a remarkable majority of the time, even. I'm actually glad that these considerations seem to have been the focus of the development of Sport after all, because it's actually making me interact with GT in a way I always felt too intimidated to as a casual player, and making GT feel perhaps far more fresh and exciting than just getting yet another predictably structured career mode has.

On top of that, I think they absolutely nailed various aspects of presentation that they aimed for and fell short of in the past. Menus look and sound beautiful and seem to contextualize Gran Turismo into a larger, more human experience, rather than a museum-like ode to car and motorsport culture only. "Driving is for everyone" feels like a well-achieved mantra for this game, despite some of its shortcomings in respect to long-running expectations whenever a game is titled "Gran Turismo" and a number is placed behind it, or when compared to its peers on market. It's still a unique, polished, and well-designed "casual sim" experience from the ground up, even despite many of the criticisms that can reasonably be held against it for carrying the weight of "Gran Turismo" title. I'm not saying that it should have been called something else, but I think putting "Sport" behind it was all the indication you need that they were trying something different -- and I think, even as someone who adores the long-running numbered titles in the series, they absolutely pulled off something special and worthy of their time and effort here.
 

MaDKaT

Member
I personally don’t care what the meta is but to say something is fair based on what it is now because it fits with your own opinions is laughably embarrassing. It’s almost like picking out the worst reviews and using that to feel somehow “right”.

I would never say something like that regardless the score. I remember when Neir was a 94 based on four reviews and the company tweeting their score. It was a joke because they knew it wasn’t going to stay the same.

I’m very curious as to what it will be when all is said and done but that won’t be for awhile. Especially with Metacritic taking their sweet ass time to put up reviews.

Or all the high scoring reviews? Bias goes both ways.
 

spwolf

Member
I think most reviewers will gloss over this, but this game deserves a kick in the metaphorical teeth for its terribly barebones VR mode. I can accept technical limitations limiting the number of opponents, but not even implementing a TT mode is just sloppy as hell. So salty.

as supposed to what racing game that has full VR experience? PC2? Forza? Which one?
 
Top Bottom