Looks more like a new full game.Don't tell me it's gonna be some fucking paid DLC bullshit.
Well they chose to ask you $60 + $60 lol
Edit - Sorry by the an in the title.
They are done by separated teams... keeping the MP for late doesn't mean you will get more or better SP.I’m okay with focusing on the single player.
Too many times, I’ve been disappointed with a developer spending creative energy on a multiplayer mode that I just didn’t want at all.
Sounds like a win-win, with multiplayer coming anyway. Maybe that will be more fleshed out as a result, too.
Think that the skepticism of others is warranted too. It’s all too easy to sell a package, cut out a piece for later, charge separately for it, and chalk it up to ‘ambition’.
Given how good the game looks, I’m going to take them at their word, though.
They are done by separated teams... keeping the MP for late doesn't mean you will get more or better SP.
It means you will pay twice.
What on Earth are you on about? What is it about this message that upsets you?They can piss off, I won’t pay for it. This industry is getting filled with garbage practices with an excuse stamped on them.
That you have to pay twice is enough...What on Earth are you on about? What is it about this message that upsets you?
Don't tell me it's gonna be some fucking paid DLC bullshit.
Oh yeah, because they announced a price for a game that isn't even announced. Come on.That you have to pay twice is enough...
About the message? Lol he isn’t writing it for me. But here you go, ethomaz was kind enough to point out the obvious
Yeap it will be a new free gameOh yeah, because they announced a price for a game that isn't even announced. Come on.
Yeap it will be a new free game
They are clearly saying it won't be part of TLOU2 but a new game.
Yeap it will be a new free game
They are clearly saying it won't be part of TLOU2 but a new game.
Well they choose to ask you $60 + $60 lol
Edit - Sorry by the an in the title.
Read about Bioshock Infinite's development and see how they wasted so much energy on a non-existent multiplayer component. Naughty dogs did the right decision, just like Rockstar did for RDR2.I’m okay with focusing on the single player.
Too many times, I’ve been disappointed with a developer spending creative energy on a multiplayer mode that I just didn’t want at all.
Sounds like a win-win, with multiplayer coming anyway. Maybe that will be more fleshed out as a result, too.
Think that the skepticism of others is warranted too. It’s all too easy to sell a package, cut out a piece for later, charge separately for it, and chalk it up to ‘ambition’.
Given how good the game looks, I’m going to take them at their word, though.
Read about Bioshock Infinite's development and see how they wasted so much energy on a non-existent multiplayer component. Naughty dogs did the right decision, just like Rockstar did for RDR2.
Read about Bioshock Infinite's development and see how they wasted so much energy on a non-existent multiplayer component. Naughty dogs did the right decision, just like Rockstar did for RDR2.
Shawn Layden, is that you?We don't even know what the game is, yet some of you are already upset.. I don't get it.
Most of you will happily spend $60 on The Last of Us - Part II, just to experience the single player, which will - let's say - be 20-25 hours long. But you won't spend $60 on a multiplayer-only game? Like, where's the logic in that?
I mean, if Neil and the team deliver on the content - and it justifies a standalone game - shouldn't we then -rightfully so - pay the extra $60?
If a single player game can be worth $60, why can't a multiplayer-only game?
We don't even know what the game is, yet some of you are already upset.. I don't get it.
Most of you will happily spend $60 on The Last of Us - Part II, just to experience the single player, which will - let's say - be 20-25 hours long. But you won't spend $60 on a multiplayer-only game? Like, where's the logic in that?
I mean, if Neil and the team deliver on the content - and it justifies a standalone game - shouldn't we then -rightfully so - pay the extra $60?
If a single player game can be worth $60, why can't a multiplayer-only game?
Death stranding to feature an exclusive strand mode for an additional 60 euroShawn Layden, is that you?
Jokes aside, I completely agree with what you said.
If they charge extra for the online mode that's scummy af.
What does this even mean? They said there's no multiplayer in TLOU2 so now its somehow okay!This argument makes no sense. It's been stated TLOU2 doesn't have online. Treat whatever this is as a separate project entirely, but inspired by TLOU MP.
What does this even mean? They said there's no multiplayer in TLOU2 so now its somehow okay!