You've been doing this with everyone who has information that may point in another direction.
It's perfectly fine if you don't believe him or think he's complete fraud, but there's no need to keep repeating yourself whenever his information is posted. The fact is, he has been verified, which means he at least knows something. Is his information old? Is it new? It still remains to be seen.
Just sit down and wait because what you're saying can completely blow up in your face.
The fact that you havent been doing that yourself is more of a problem than me doing it. You should take everything said by a person on a forum as bullshit until it is proven by facts. There have been leaks that I think are correct, such as the one back on Reddit that said Xbox had two consoles, Anaconda and Lockhart, and it had all the specs listed including tflops, RAM ans CPU speeds. At the time I took it with a peice of salt as it was some random on an internet forum. However, as time has gone on those leaks have proven correct. However, unlike the Reddit leak, not one of these so called insiders you have bet your life on have said even one spec. Not one. That's hardly a credible leak is it? Vague isnt something you should put your bets on. Now the AMD leaked benchmarks are 100% true, from the makers of the chip themselves. Sure Sony could have made some changes, but it is quite the head shaker that you have having a go at me because I am only putting stock in stuff that comes from a good source (AMD vs internet poster who said nothing) or has been proven correct (Reddit leak).
You are choosing to believe whatever backs your desire. If the AMD leaks showed PS5 putting out 13tflops, I bet you would be 100% in favour of the accuracy of the leaks. And if the leaks said that, then I would also be thinking it's most likely correct.
In the end however, wishful thinking wont make things so. PS5 and XSX will be what they will be. If Sony have upped the PS5 specs since the leaks I wont be upset, not be proven wrong. I havent said that I know PS5 is 9.2tflops, as I dont. I have said the only real leaks of credibility are the ones from AMD, and that tends to point towards a 36cu, 2.0ghz GPU. It also tends to show a XSX GPU having 56CUs, but thats all. The AMD leaks didn't say anything about Ray Tracing, by Cerny said it has hardware accelerated RT, so I believe it does as Cerny is more credible than something missing from a leaked benchmark. As I said, I am forming my "opinion" on what the specs maybe by taking into account only the most credible leaks. Klee doesn't make that list. Sorry.
