Finally something to work with.
My reasons;
Both have access to the same tech.
Same base tech, both heavily customised - well the GPUs anyway, I guess the CPUs are virtually untouched. Therefore unknown quantity at this point until more is released. MS released vague specs, Sony have released jack shit.
MS are on the back foot after X1 launch.
Oh dear, back to something irrelevant again, but anyway, MS are not on the back foot, wasn't the Xbox One X the most powerful console, easily better than PS4 Pro in every (technically - games are subjective) measurable way. Still this assumes xbox has unlimited coffers, which they don't. Microsoft as a company are clearly ready to pull the plug on the console business at any point. Phil doesn't have a blank cheque. Sony are rich as fuck also, not as rich as MS for sure, but they will bet the house on PlayStation if they had to.
Sony have no incentive to go over the top.
Rorow, I sense some dumb here. Yeah no incentive at all, oh besides not giving people a reason to switch back to Xbox. The stakes are high for both, both will maximise their budgets, without question.
MS have talked nothing but power and "best place to play" for 4 years.
Erm, good for them I guess. Was relevant, well at least the power statement, when the X was released. Means didely squat for PS5 and Series X though, surely you can see this. There is absolutely no talk of being most powerful between the two console coming from MS, at all.
MS show off a controversially massive case, out of the blue, and stating the design team were mandated on performance over looks.
OK, this means what? seriously? Maybe they cannot cool their device with the facsimile of the PS3/PS4 cooling design they used for the One X. (yes yes, vapour chamber rather than heat pipes) Maybe with the Series X Xtra, or Series Z whatever they call the interim console this time, it will be a standard console design with a better cooling system. Maybe the tower is dictated by their lack of funds/ability to design anything better.
And yes a photo of the SoC for all to see.
And when iFixit do a PS5 teardown (Sony won't do a response for this as it's irrelevant) and it's bigger, or 3d stacked, or split bother sides of the motherboard. What then? Let me tell you, you will realise this is a dumb point.
The latter two appear to be a show of confidence.
Really, I guess you could see it that way, being xbox inclined. There is absolutely a reason why Phil used a picture, and it's because he thought Sony were about to drop the motherload at CES and they didn't have any other response prepared. It's not confidence, it was simply trying to keep xbox in the conversation.
Lastly the 12/9.5 that's all over. Where there's smoke there's fire.
Lets lay this out, if PS5 is actually 9.2, then Xbox is actually 9.0. The 'real' smoke is the consoles are very close in power. The source for this is everyone other than a random AMD employee testing a chip some mouthy forumers are convinced is the actual retail PS5 chip. So I'll buy the PS5 is 9 tflops if you like, if you are also buying the xbox is roughly the same (we kinda know it isn't due to the APU size, but maybe is super low clocked) Devs cannot be saying they are both close, if there's a 3 tflop difference, as that wouldn't be close at all.
If that's as daft as fuq then call the loony bin and book a room for Milky Wibble!
To be honest, I'm not quite sure if a call is required at the moment. I will make sure they are on standby though. Don't want you to suffer if it all drops the way 90% of the insiders are saying.
Anyway, I will look forward to your next delusional ramblings.