• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Xbox Game Pass is five times more popular than PlayStation Now

Andodalf

Banned
Cute response, but nobody will care about any of those titles in a few years when next gen is in full swing which is the point of what I was saying. Those games you mention are only on GamePass for a limited time. If these titles were to stay on the service forever you'd have a legitimate argument. Some of these games only stay on for a few months

damn, too bad they’re locked down and can never add new games. If they could, they could just keep adding new games when next gen comes!
 

GymWolf

Member
giphy.gif
 

Nikana

Go Go Neo Rangers!
I honestly don't think it will hold. Especially when PS Now gets in full swing for next gen and their list of titles continue to grow. A lot of these titles get discounted digitally so quick now which evens out over the long haul

The reason Microsoft can offer the big games from third parties is because of that rotation. The library of Now is now starting to adapt the same method. The AAA games on the service rotate in and out just like Game Pass. If you go and look and Now you can see when games are leaving the service and you will notice a trend of smaller games having ongoing access while the AAA all have end dates.

The difference is Sony doesn't leave their first party stuff on the service to help the library to continually grow.

Microsofts first party games definitley cant match the quality of Sony's. They dont have the Spider Mans and the God of War, but they are attempting to rectify that. BUt they still have quality games like Gears 5, Halo MCC, Ori and the Will of the Wisps, Forza Horizon 4, which are staying on the service and not going anywhere.

The library of AAA will continue to grow on Game Pass as they have invested in it with their IP while Now will only continue to grow with smaller games.
 
Last edited:
I'm not concerned i don't need all my games to be AAA.
Gamepass launched less than 3 years ago. It's still early to see how it can impact MS output content
The change could depend on how it grows if there is one.

Nah you're right, the tone of my response was a bit off.
 

Rolla

Banned
I'd love to know a couple of things about gamepass.

My nephews and everyone at there school who games insist that you can finess GP monthly for £1. I'm not into either service but the money generated by both might be disproportionate. Especially since XBOX makes no distinction between free subs and people paying full price month in month out.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Well, Game Pass is an undeniably great value, IMO. I just have PC Game Pass a the moment but will upgrade to ultimate when the XsX launches.

I dunno what the long term plans are for PS Now. I feel it CAN compete with Game Pass, if Sony wants it to, but it neesd to keep making improvements and strides to match Game Passes ease of use and value. First party games included on launch day are a pretty nice perk to Game Pass.

And this would be the worst thing Sony could include in PS NOW. It'll be extra stupid. This article is pure trash!
 

TheAssist

Member
I dont like that there now exist two subscription models on each console. I would prefer if they made playing online free (something that never should have cost money in the first place) and lump all the other xbl and PS Plus stuff together with their games on demand services.
 

CaptainClaw

Member
Laugh all you want, but the moment people's cheap subs expire and they're stuck with paying full price for the service they'll abandon it in droves. The only redeeming quality for owning GamePass Ultimate is access to exclusives at launch. If they don't up their exclusives for next gen and it plays out like this gen they're screwed.
Do you have any evidence for your claim?...shiii who am I kidding ofcourse you don't.
 

iHaunter

Member
Also isn't it like $1 for 2 years? That could be why numbers are so inflated. I have it but I haven't used it once. I feel once the honeymoon ends the subs will drop en masse. Maybe not.
 

M1chl

Currently Gif and Meme Champion
Also isn't it like $1 for 2 years? That could be why numbers are so inflated. I have it but I haven't used it once. I feel once the honeymoon ends the subs will drop en masse. Maybe not.
You have to have Xbox Live Gold bought for that, so it's still not a 1 or 2USD, but yeah it's like that. Because "who does not have Xbox Live Gold", well PC guys does not have it so answer is "not really"...
 
GamePass
10 Million x 10$ Per Month (it aint)
= 100$ Million
Spiderman PS4
13 Million x 30$ Per Copy (sale price)
= 390$ Million

Why would Sony devalue their games just because Xbox is? Microsoft want to turn the business model into you pay first, you get whatever games they give you.
All this is going to get you is
EA Access
Ubisoft Universe
Activision Box
Rockstar Ticket
2K Kollection
Disney Games +
NICK THQ pass

In the end I dont think Sony cares. They have a profitable PS Now with no first day releases. Its mostly games they cant even sell on the PS4.
Did you really just compare a single games lifetime sales to a single month of a sub service. “You pay first, you get what ever they give you” dafuq is this. You can look up what’s currently offered on GP at any time, in no way is it hidden, not mentioning it’s guaranteed to have the latest and all upcoming 1st party games. Implying Sony doesn’t care is the weakest possible excuse.
You all make no sense because they arent make 10 on each person. You not counting the fact their paying atleast a million per AAA game in there. Sony doesn't just release Spiderman. And they still have PS Now with considerable lower amount of cost per customer since most of their games are old games.
Source on MS paying a million per AAA on GP?
“Sony doesn’t just release Spiderman” and? MS doesn’t just have GP with just its current slate of games.
Lmao. In your rush to defend a service you claim Sony themselves don’t care about, you’ve implied it’s cheaper to run, as it has shitter games on it, yet according to half the SDF in this thread they’re charging as much as ten times the amount as GP? What terribly shit value.
I mean, MS needs a success and from what I understand, GamePass is basically being given away multiple times, right? Revenues are probably really low, but they have no growth and it's probably ok to sacrifice their game sales to see if the subscription service takes off. Lets just see if the service continues to be a success once it's not being given away for free.
Source on low revenues? How can you see them having 10mil+ users as “no growth”? That makes no sense.
If MS quits consoles, goes 3rd party and puts GamePass on Playstation, I'll bite.
Even for a fanboy post that is a weird ass take
Can't believe people are getting so worked up about yet another "Forbes Insider" level piece of sponsored content.

The premise of this *cough* analysis, is that there's a competition to become the "Netflix of Gaming", not at all suspiciously a term MS has used frequently in their marketing, and Sony never has never used despite being the first to market by 3 years.

The article fails to address the fundamental differences between the nature of the services (streaming primarily, versus downloads) and the sacrifices MS has had to make to the rest of the Xbox ecosystem to prop up their offering.

Basically it extracts the one bit of positive news, ignores the many negatives, and creates a narrative where despite a sliding marketshare MS are now the front-runners in gaming...

That's not analysis, that's marketing.
So it’s all shilling? Even if that were true, that doesn’t change the numbers.
Gamepass is the gaming equivalent of "I'll suck your dick for a cheeseburger".
Good to know you’ll suck dick for a dollar.
They can afford it now, but they are not saying they are profiting from it. They have yet to discuss how they plan to recoup the investment and the overall profit margins afterwards.
??? Do Netflix come out every year and tell everyone their plan to recoup their investment? What do you guys gain from these weird sales obsessions. If a service is as good a value as GP is, even if it ends up being unprofitable or unsustainable and stops being offered down the line, what do you guys gain from arguing about it now? I don’t get it. Let the higher ups at the companies worry about it and stop with the constant GP FUD.
oh no it's popular? and i don't use it... that means i'm not doing what is most popular! oh no! ahhh! i'm not doing the thing that most people are doing, so i'm a bad person! oh no! please forgive me! please. i'm sorry. i will try to follow along with what other people are doing instead from now on. i swear! /s

lol like who gives a fuck what is popular or not? hah im not in 3rd grade. i don't have to like Batman because the other kids like Batman.

absurd
The fact you even interpreted the article as some kind of popularity contest slight against you suggests you never made it past third grade.
I honestly don't think it will hold. Especially when PS Now gets in full swing for next gen and their list of titles continue to grow. A lot of these titles get discounted digitally so quick now which evens out over the long haul. The only difference is you own the titles permanently.
Yeah you’re right, cause GP can’t grow their titles list. They’ll just pack up shop cause the meanies on GAF chucked the toys out of the cot cause they dared to offer GP so cheap. Fuckin ludicrous.
Pffft. Just for now. Wait until next gen! PS Now will wipe the floor with gamepass!
That wasn’t fun (or even funny) at all.
 

jshackles

Gentlemen, we can rebuild it. We have the capability to make the world's first enhanced store. Steam will be that store. Better than it was before.
I honestly don't think it will hold. Especially when PS Now gets in full swing for next gen and their list of titles continue to grow. A lot of these titles get discounted digitally so quick now which evens out over the long haul. The only difference is you own the titles permanently.
While it's true that PS Now will inevitably keep adding new titles to the service, this is going to be a pretty stark contrast when Next Gen launches.

Game Pass will have Next Gen games on the Series X from day one. Halo Infinite, Hellblade 2, The Medium, etc. Meanwhile, PS Now might add games like Days Gone or Death Stranding to the service by then, which will be games that will be 1-2 years old by the time the PlayStation 5 rolls out. At their current clip, it'll be 1-2 years after PS5 launches before PS5 games will start showing up on the service. Kinda like how at the beginning of this gen, PS Now was playable on the PS4 but only had PS3 games.

Or perhaps their business model will change. Maybe they'll start trying to attract solid 3rd party output like how Game Pass had Streets or Rage 4 or Blair Witch on day one, and they'll get a few PS5 games at launch as part of the service. If that happens, it'll be fun to see how people think that's just Sony being amazing and fail to grasp that they're having to adjust their business model to compete with the offering of the competition.
 

darkinstinct

...lacks reading comprehension.
For the longest time people assumed Game Pass had less than 5 million subscribers. Then suddenly they announce 10 million (previous statement was "millions of subscribers" in 2018) and now some trolls say there is no growth. LOL. Three years from 0 to 10 million. Six years from 0 to 2.2 million.
 

manfestival

Member
I do not believe game pass vs px now personally is an apples to apples comparison. Considering one is a streaming service and the other is not. Then one actually offers new and big games on release and the other does not. I love my playstation(I don't have an xbox) but I see real value in PS NOW(or other streaming services currently). I do see the value in game pass and absolutely love it. I sing its praises to my friends and my good word of mouth has convinced them to subscribe and we play streets of rage 4 and halo together currently.
 
If we are going to put the best possible numbers then lets do it.

10Mx10$x12=1.2B <Multiple games
13Mx60$x1=780M <One game

But again people arent playing 10 per customer. And Spiderman came out 2 years ago and the average price probably would be closer to 40$. Again maybe Microsoft’s games dont cost much to make considering Crackdown 3 looks worse than God of War 2. Maybe Big M is making them profits. But I bet you Uncharted 4 is more profitable then the entirely of gamepass’s existence.
 
PS Now: Interferes with your games license, you can't download the game you already own since you've played it on PS Now, License becomes invalid.

Xbox Game Pass: Downloadable games on PC and Xbox consoles, 20% off Games, 10% DLCs that's within the service. Xcloud coming soon. Extra Rewards points... Best Value in gaming.
 
Last edited:

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
If we are going to put the best possible numbers then lets do it.

10Mx10$x12=1.2B <Multiple games
13Mx60$x1=780M <One game

But again people arent playing 10 per customer. And Spiderman came out 2 years ago and the average price probably would be closer to 40$. Again maybe Microsoft’s games dont cost much to make considering Crackdown 3 looks worse than God of War 2. Maybe Big M is making them profits. But I bet you Uncharted 4 is more profitable then the entirely of gamepass’s existence.
So now you're revising the very numbers you initially stated. Ok. lol

Don't worry. If you're a Sony shareholder and enjoy Sony getting big revenue from selling first party games, that's fine.

I prefer paying $1 for 3 years of Gamepass Ultimate where there's first party games on day one and much more third party focus on recent games. And all games on the service are downloadable too. None of that streaming stuff.

I'll let MS worry about Xbox Gamepass denting their balance sheets where they make about $10 billion profit per quarter.
 
Last edited:

M1chl

Currently Gif and Meme Champion
If we are going to put the best possible numbers then lets do it.

10Mx10$x12=1.2B <Multiple games
13Mx60$x1=780M <One game

But again people arent playing 10 per customer. And Spiderman came out 2 years ago and the average price probably would be closer to 40$. Again maybe Microsoft’s games dont cost much to make considering Crackdown 3 looks worse than God of War 2. Maybe Big M is making them profits. But I bet you Uncharted 4 is more profitable then the entirely of gamepass’s existence.
Yeah well, sure but I am not so sure how much Superman cost in development/PR costs, etc. And how much with GamePass...
 
PS Now: Interferes with your games license, you can't download the game you already own since you've played it on PS Now, License becomes invalid.

Xbox Game Pass: Downloadable games on PC and Xbox consoles, 20% off Games, 10% DLCs that's within the service. Xcloud coming soon. Extra Rewards points... Best Value in gaming.
That's news to me. But I don't own games on PSN, so I'm fine
 

Jigsaah

Gold Member
Some things to consider...PSNow was released before GamePass. Playstation also has at least double the install base as Xbox.

Putting actual earnings aside because for one, we don't know what those earnings actually are...and two, Xbox is very much still in the investment (first one's for practically free) phase of their service...the difference in numbers are pretty impressive. So impressive that I dare say it's what caused Sony to try and revitalize PSNow after years of leaving it dormant. They added downloadable games and again I think at some point they'll be following suit on some other features of Gamepass.
 

Nikana

Go Go Neo Rangers!
Some things to consider...PSNow was released before GamePass. Playstation also has at least double the install base as Xbox.

Putting actual earnings aside because for one, we don't know what those earnings actually are...and two, Xbox is very much still in the investment (first one's for practically free) phase of their service...the difference in numbers are pretty impressive. So impressive that I dare say it's what caused Sony to try and revitalize PSNow after years of leaving it dormant. They added downloadable games and again I think at some point they'll be following suit on some other features of Gamepass.

It's not a coincidence they added games to download and slashed the price to match the monthly cost of gamepass.
 

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
So it’s all shilling? Even if that were true, that doesn’t change the numbers.

Its sponsored content. i.e marketing in disguise.

Which is fine if that's what you want to read, but its still a pretty scummy, deceptive tactic.

If you've been following this stuff for as long as I have, its entirely unsurprising given that MS has been astroturfing since the OG Xbox, but its still a bit of a lame way of promoting their business.

At the end of the day GamePass isn't elevating hardware sales, which is kind of a big deal as you need Xbox hardware to get the most out of the service. This in turn means its not drawing eyeballs away from Sony and Nintendo, leaving Xbox languishing third in a field of three as per usual.
 
Its sponsored content. i.e marketing in disguise.

Which is fine if that's what you want to read, but its still a pretty scummy, deceptive tactic.

If you've been following this stuff for as long as I have, its entirely unsurprising given that MS has been astroturfing since the OG Xbox, but its still a bit of a lame way of promoting their business.

At the end of the day GamePass isn't elevating hardware sales, which is kind of a big deal as you need Xbox hardware to get the most out of the service. This in turn means its not drawing eyeballs away from Sony and Nintendo, leaving Xbox languishing third in a field of three as per usual.
schizophrenia-male.jpg
 

cryptoadam

Banned
But 0 times 5 is still 0 LOL.

Game pass is the one thing I am jealouse about and if I would go next gen it would probably be an Xbox because of that.

I did try PSNOW, using the streaming and found it decent but the library doesn't match up to what gamepass offers.
 

martino

Member
damn, too bad they’re locked down and can never add new games. If they could, they could just keep adding new games when next gen comes!
it's still a valid criticism and why i'm not a fan
because content don't stay
 
Last edited:

Kokoloko85

Member
Sounds like an article by an xbox fan boy.

Look at the price comparison and advertise difference lol.

How about Playstation selling double the amount of xbox and “ABSOLUTELY CRUSHING” them on Software sales and console sales, has more “Huge Implications” to next generation than streaming numbers?

Maybe because Xbox threw everything at gamepass and the kitchen sink to succeed and put some games on there day 1?

Why would Nintendo and Playstation put there games on stream on day 1?.....
O wait they dont need to, because people actually buy there games unlike Xbox....
 

Jigsaah

Gold Member
Sounds like an article by an xbox fan boy.

Look at the price comparison and advertise difference lol.

How about Playstation selling double the amount of xbox and “ABSOLUTELY CRUSHING” them on Software sales and console sales, has more “Huge Implications” to next generation than streaming numbers?

Maybe because Xbox threw everything at gamepass and the kitchen sink to succeed and put some games on there day 1?

Why would Nintendo and Playstation put there games on stream on day 1?.....
O wait they dont need to, because people actually buy there games unlike Xbox....
Sounds like a post from a Playstation fanboy. It even comes with flawed grammar and hyperbole as well.
 
Last edited:

ANIMAL1975

Member
PS Now is a Games as a service now too.
Yes you can download the games as well. But it's a streaming service first and foremost. Comparing it to xcloud is more appropriate
Exactly, and that's why is only available in 19 countries. 7 of those countries were added last year, which may have contributed to the spike in number of subscriptions, but the core of the service stays the same: using streaming servers, or else PSNow 'only download' could be available everywhere using the regular psplus and net servers.
And in my opinion, you can also add this shorter country availability to the list of reasons of why there is that popularity difference.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
If we are going to put the best possible numbers then lets do it.

10Mx10$x12=1.2B <Multiple games
13Mx60$x1=780M <One game

But again people arent playing 10 per customer. And Spiderman came out 2 years ago and the average price probably would be closer to 40$. Again maybe Microsoft’s games dont cost much to make considering Crackdown 3 looks worse than God of War 2. Maybe Big M is making them profits. But I bet you Uncharted 4 is more profitable then the entirely of gamepass’s existence.
You can adjust whatever numbers you want again, but the basic underlying concepts you are forgetting:

1. Gamepass is a much better value than PS Now, in terms of games and $1 deal which many of us did. So whether MS is maxing out revenue or subsidizing it for gamers who cares. Do you want to pay $60 for Spiderman? Or pay $1? If you want to pay $60 go ahead.

2. Sub plan revenue (GP or PS Now) is annual. Your game is one game, and the typical big seller like Spiderman comes out once every 3-4 years. Sony has multiple studios so there is always going to be 1 or 2 big sellers per year which is fine

3. Who knows how much MS games sell, but your assumption is every MS game sells zero copies

Who cares if UC4 is super profitable. MS's relatively new division (Cloud) makes more profit than Sony as an entire company. And Sony chose MS for Azure cloud over anyone. More profits for MS. MS will likely gouge them a bit too as a competitor.

Sony stock was about $125 in 1999. Its now $63. -50%. MS stock was $60 in 1999 (split adjusted), pays dividends including a special $3/share dividend way back, and is now $184. Tripled.

See list wars are fun aren't they?
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
You can adjust whatever numbers you want again, but the basic underlying concepts you are forgetting:

1. Gamepass is a much better value than PS Now, in terms of games and $1 deal which many of us did. So whether MS is maxing out revenue or subsidizing it for gamers who cares. Do you want to pay $60 for Spiderman? Or pay $1? If you want to pay $60 go ahead.

2. Sub plan revenue (GP or PS Now) is annual. Your game is one game, and the typical big seller like Spiderman comes out once every 3-4 years. Sony has multiple studios so there is always going to be 1 or 2 big sellers per year which is fine

3. Who knows how much MS games sell, but your assumption is every MS game sells zero copies

Who cares if UC4 is super profitable. MS's relatively new division (Cloud) makes more profit than Sony as an entire company. And Sony chose MS for Azure cloud over anyone. More profits for MS. MS will likely gouge them a bit too as a competitor.

Sony stock was about $125 in 1999. Its now $63. -50%. MS stock was $60 in 1999 (split adjusted), pays dividends including a special $3/share dividend way back, and is now $184. Tripled.


See list wars are fun aren't they?

The bolded is silly talk in a video game forum though. Like the question that's underlined. What do you mean "who cares if UC4 is super profitable"? And I doubt MS will gouge Sony in pricing for their servers considering MS isn't the only ones out here with them.
 
Its sponsored content. i.e marketing in disguise.

Which is fine if that's what you want to read, but its still a pretty scummy, deceptive tactic.

If you've been following this stuff for as long as I have, its entirely unsurprising given that MS has been astroturfing since the OG Xbox, but its still a bit of a lame way of promoting their business.

At the end of the day GamePass isn't elevating hardware sales, which is kind of a big deal as you need Xbox hardware to get the most out of the service. This in turn means its not drawing eyeballs away from Sony and Nintendo, leaving Xbox languishing third in a field of three as per usual.
Yeah, Sony or Nintendo don't market this way. /s
 
Top Bottom