PaintTinJr
Member
They wouldn't be limited, they are merely looking out for their own interests in terms of sales and profits, and reducing risk.You'd think that devs would be smart enough not to give up their seat at the table. Which is what happens the very moment you are limited to a single distribution avenue. I'd hope they'd see the value in an open and competitive market, without that, they devalue their own work.
MS's relationship with developers and publishers is stronger than ever at the moment, with a few of the bigger names especially. I think they'll be fine.
What choice do they have to let the cutting edge get away from them? Sony have moved the paradigm to improve gaming, and with that usually comes a reward.
If publishers let their developers produce inferior products to rivals - through lack of time/funding -their games look less appealing and the reputational damage of being unable to leverage the advantages of a powerful/complex platform comes soon enough - as the PS3 showed, when 18months on, all 3rd party games were better on PS3, even DF couldn't remain king maker by acknowledging that.
So a simpler platform like PS5, with impressive middleware already available to utilise the advantages is going to make it hard to hold off the playstation consumer demands for superior products.