• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Digital Foundry: Developers Having Difficult Time Scaling games back to PS4/Xbox One specs

Topfuel

Member
According to Digital Foundry's John Linneman he has talked to multiple developers who have said no one wants to work on the under powered Jaguar CPU's any longer. Says it's a painful process. That was followed up by a post from Liza Shulyayeva who is a programmer and formally worked ad DICE who confirmed it is hard to scale to these older systems.

This also follows reports that Microsoft had cancelled the Xbox Series S or Lockhart early on because this was causing a lot of issues for developers. Source: https://www.thurrott.com/games/208837/microsoft-shifts-xbox-focus-to-anaconda-next-gen-console#

Could this be why we still haven't seen any games running on Xbox Series X?

Seems like I remember other rumors where devs were saying the S SDK was having a lot of problems.



Digital Foundry's John Linneman: Talked to multiple developers who have confirmed it's difficult to scale games to Xbox/PS4 base hardware.

?
 

Smoke6

Member
You do realise that none of what Ms showed apart from Halo will be on the XB1 either though, don’t you? Halo Infinite is literally the only “cross gen” first party game from Ms, and that’s because it is an XB1 game that will be patched with a Series X patch. There is no Series X version of Infinite, just a patched XB1 version.

Fable, Forza, Everwild, Hellblade 2, and whatever else they showed are all Series X exclusives.
Well if that’s true, then why is the game in the shapes it’s in since 343 has experience on these current consoles?

wouldn’t it be just like the gears situation at this point to where it gets a patch? 5 yrs for a current gen game is way too much time
 

godhandiscen

There are millions of whiny 5-year olds on Earth, and I AM THEIR KING.
I am confident that the Xbox Series S isn’t happening. It is a good idea on concept, but the reality is that maintaining so many targets, X1S, X1X, XSX, and XSS is going to be a nightmare for developers.
I bet Microsoft pitched the idea to publishers, but not many committed on making games for it.

It works for PC because the PC doesn’t have a certification partner that will reject your game if it doesn’t meet performance standards. The PC version Q&A is an afterthought for many publishers. Having to maintain 4 consoles when releasing on Xbox and working on certifying your game with Microsoft across all four consoles could be a potential nightmare.
 
Last edited:

MrFunSocks

Banned
Ask them what? Developers are making Series X and PS5 exclusives lol.

You obviously don’t realise that the tweet is about PS4 holding back PS5 games as well lol.

How concerning.
Well if that’s true, then why is the game in the shapes it’s in since 343 has experience on these current consoles?

wouldn’t it be just like the gears situation at this point to where it gets a patch? 5 yrs for a current gen game is way too much time

Infinite is an XB1 game, and they seem to have bitten off more than they can chew by attempting to make a 60fps open world halo on the XB1. Graphically it just can’t compete with even their previous title with the scale they are going for by the looks of it.

Didn’t TLOU2 take 5 years though? RDR2 as well? 5 years is fine for a game as long as it turns out good, and it seems they’ve had big troubles in those 5 years. I honestly don’t think the Series X has anything to do with the problems with infinite’s graphics. They already announced that it would be getting a series X patch like gears 5.
 
Last edited:
The title needs to be changed. The thread creator purposely left out that it is both xbox/ps4 being a problem to create console warring. This is the type of stuff what makes people mad with Fanboys. Stop this nonsense. If a developer chooses to make a game cross gen that is on them. Neither MS or Sony are forcing them.
 
This reminds me of the PS3 launch. Fumbled messaging, trying to come to grips with hardware, no big flagship titles at launch.

Of course it took PS3 half the generation to turn it around and XB can do the same.

The PS3 had the strength of the PS brand, as well as great exclusives, to help keep it afloat. It also helped that the 360 struggled out of the gate, as well, with RROD and coming off the weak sales performance of the OG Xbox.

The Xbox brand, in terms of selling HW, isn't that strong. This gen lost them 30M+ users. And now that they are moving towards streaming and have all their titles on PC, it's even weaker in that aspect. They also have another strong PS console to compete against.

I think we're at the point where a lot of gamers are tired of waiting for that supposed Xbox greatness its fans keep saying is right around the corner.
 

yurinka

Member
Well, for sure having to release a game for XBO, XBO S, XBO X, Series S, Series X and PC must be a pain in the ass. Even without considering possible technical issues from unfinished next gen SDKs, engines, firmwares, drivers, tools and using prototype devkits without final specs and so on, to release a game for a lot of SKUs it's a lot of work.

Make sure that the MS Studios who have to release crossgen games during the first years of Series X won't be happy. And even less the 3rd party devs who will release cross gen multis.
 
Last edited:

Redlight

Member
According to Digital Foundry's John Linneman he has talked to multiple developers who have said no one wants to work on the under powered Jaguar CPU's any longer. Says it's a painful process. That was followed up by a post from Liza Shulyayeva who is a programmer and formally worked ad DICE who confirmed it is hard to scale to these older systems.

This also follows reports that Microsoft had cancelled the Xbox Series S or Lockhart early on because this was causing a lot of issues for developers. Source: https://www.thurrott.com/games/208837/microsoft-shifts-xbox-focus-to-anaconda-next-gen-console#

Could this be why we still haven't seen any games running on Xbox Series X?

Seems like I remember other rumors where devs were saying the S SDK was having a lot of problems.



Digital Foundry: Halo will ALWAYS be held back so long as Xbox One is tied to Xbox Series X.

What the hell is that thread title OP? The info linked mentions both Xbox AND PS4. Why is that not in the thread title?

I wonder.

Not to mention, it seems from what you posted, that developers 'don't like' doing that work, not that they can't or are having 'difficulty' on one console more than the other.

For those people who like to throw the term around, the OP is actually 100% rolled-gold FUD. Now you know what it really looks like.
 
Last edited:

Chromata

Member
Said it before and I'll say it again, MS marketing is mind-boggling. If Halo Infinite is a cross gen F2P title then market it as the most accessible Halo.

Marketing a cross gen title as the definitive reason to buy XSX and hyping it up as mind blowing for your conference is just...I don't even know how any group of professionals can conceptualize that as a good idea. Did nobody look at the gameplay demo before it released? I know it's a ridiculous question to ask but I just can't wrap my head around how you can talk this footage up so hard while knowing what it looks like. You're just asking for blowback.
 

Evangelion Unit-01

Master Chief
Certainly a difficult task. I believe that this cross-gen approach is smart for some games but not all. Clearly some will be able to handle easier than others. Certainly not a one size fits all approach.

I was always perplexed by the "there will not be any One X or PS4 Pro games" statements. One would imagine that it would be easier to implement this ease into generation strategy that devs are going for by making One X/Series X and Pro/PS5 versions of some games rather than trying to hit all 3 hardware iterations.
 

aries_71

Junior Member
Said it before and I'll say it again, MS marketing is mind-boggling. If Halo Infinite is a cross gen F2P title then market it as the most accessible Halo.

Marketing a cross gen title as the definitive reason to buy XSX and hyping it up as mind blowing for your conference is just...I don't even know how any group of professionals can conceptualize that as a good idea. Did nobody look at the gameplay demo before it released? I know it's a ridiculous question to ask but I just can't wrap my head around how you can talk this footage up so hard while knowing what it looks like. You're just asking for blowback.
Problem is that, most probably, the marketing people that designed and approved these messages is not even gamer. They probably saw the Halo Infinity footage and thought it was hot shit. They have no other references.
 
People keep talking like developers have free reign to do what they want without knowing who spoke to DF about this. If a Publisher mandates a developer makes a game cross-gen then they don't have a choice do they? And what about games that have been in development long enough they've always been advertised as coming to current gen such as Cyberpunk 2077?
 

TGO

Hype Train conductor. Works harder than it steams.
What the hell is that thread title OP? The info linked mentions both Xbox AND PS4. Why is that not in the thread title?

I wonder.

Not to mention, it seems from what you posted, that developers 'don't like' doing that work, not that they can't or are having 'difficulty' on one console more than the other.

For those people who like to throw the term around, the OP is actually 100% rolled-gold FUD. Now you know what it really looks like.
I see your point, but nobody is scaling from PS5 to PS4 based hardware remember
Even if it said current gen it would mean Xbox One
You can Sony too™ it but it's still referring to Xbox One
 
Last edited:
I always had the theory on how supporting last gen could be anti-consumer. Glad to see Digital Foundry explain why supporting last gen can be bad for next gen system owners.

Supporting "last-gen" isn't anti-consumer per say but it is more accurate to say it's "anti-progressive". The demands of building a game for the next-gen is multiplied several times over as observed from the transition from the PS3 to this gen. The intention of MS to support current Xbox owners is admirable but the rules are different when you are transitioning to the next-gen.

Originally, the concept of having a mid-range upgrade X1X/PS4PRO is to inform users who are unsatisfied with the performance of that gen to get a nice upgrade but treating your next-gen flagship console in the same way is an incredibly risky tactic that is clearly backfiring.

It is utterly strange they will be banking on next-gen like it's the XB1X2 and this is where SONY's "believe in generations" is slowly becoming the ideal reality that gamers have to face if they want to see new types of experiences and not just a simple bump in upgrades.
 

Chromata

Member
Problem is that, most probably, the marketing people that designed and approved these messages is not even gamer. They probably saw the Halo Infinity footage and thought it was hot shit. They have no other references.

But we know Phil Spencer has been involved with the development of many Xbox projects in the past. He must have at least seen what Gears 5 looks like on X1X, which is significantly more impressive than Halo Infinite.
 

Redlight

Member
I see your point, but nobody is scaling to PS4 based hardware remember
Even if it said current gen it would mean Xbox One
There will be cross-gen games on the PS5/PS4. They'll be plenty or third-party games that will launch for PS5 and also have a PS4 version, there aren't many developers that will turn their back on the PS4 install base in the early days of a new gen.
 

teezzy

Banned
Wow, and I spent all this time arguing the exact opposite.

YOU'VE MADE ME LOOK LIKE A FOOL, PHIL!!! A FOOOLL, PHHIILLLLL!!!!

tenor.gif
 

makaveli60

Member
They were doing so good between 2001 and 2010. Why do they suck so much since then? Rhetorical question of course. It's a shame because I'm not a fanboy of either company, I'll gladly buy both consoles if they are worthy of it, just like I did before. But at the moment it seems Sony will obliterate MS again. And this is not the most optimal thing for us consumers because we need them to have a competition. Gamepass is an amazing thing from a consumer standpoint in the short run but in the long run I'm afraid it will really hurt the industry. You don't have to be a genius to see that.
 

DavidGzz

Member
Just add this to the pile of news potential buyers love to hear in being convinced to upgrade to a potentially 5,6, or 700$ machine.

I never thought in a million years Microsoft would have a poor launch after the Xbox One debacle. Boy was I wrong.

There is zero reason to upgrade. What an embarrassment.


Who bought the Xbox One X and the PS4 Pro? The same enthusiasts that will buy the new consoles. MS is more focused on keeping Game Pass subs. For anyone that just wants the better graphics they have a XSS. You act as if PS5 has a bunch of reasons to upgrade. There will still be plenty of big games within the first two years that are next gen only like RE8. After the first year and a half to two years they will be coming non-stop and this cross gen shit will be nothing but a memory.

Hold back next gen for a while or hold back 100 million customers from playing a new Spiderman. Either way, there is a lot of holding back going on. :p
 
Last edited:

MrFunSocks

Banned
I see your point, but nobody is scaling from PS5 to PS4 based hardware remember
Even if it said current gen it would mean Xbox One
You can Sony too™ it but it's still referring to Xbox One
Have you even read what the tweet says? It literally says devs are having trouble scaling down to XB1/PS4.

You need to get some better comprehension skills. Your attempts to dismiss everything as “SonyToo” when the tweet literally talks about Sony is pathetic.
 

longdi

Banned
Actually this is not a new problem.
Transitional phase between old and new, while the publishers want to maximise sales volume.
Just make games on old consoles and scale up.

A publisher can also just direct their developers to make next gen only games, problem solved.

DF just scraping the barrel. 🤷‍♀️
 
Have you even read what the tweet says? It literally says devs are having trouble scaling down to XB1/PS4.

You need to get some better comprehension skills. Your attempts to dismiss everything as “SonyToo” when the tweet literally talks about Sony is pathetic.

He doesn't say which platform the devs were on, he just says to leave both those behind because they're both the same type of CPU. Like if I made a tweet talking about how partisan the Democrats were acting then said "it's time to leave behind the two party system" and you went A-HA, he has a problem with how Republicans are currently behaving, too!

Either way, the PR around Series X has been that the games will be cross-gen, that being cross-gen won't hold them back. The PR for PS5 has been about believing in generations and not being interested in making games work for PS4. It's beyond clear why people are assuming this is more about one platform than the other.
 

BigLee74

Member
What is this shit?

Tweet claims both Xbox One and PS4 are hard to scale down to as no one wants to work with the old CPUs, with the added bonus comedy that the source for this being the reason why there will be no Lockhart being over a year old!

Cue Internet Sony men-children lining up to pile into MS and Xbox again. Youre an embarrassing lot really, and I'm now only in this to see you all eat crow when the real games get released.
 

onQ123

Member
There is nothing in the OP that suggests that scalability isn't possible, just that it's hard on both systems and that some developers don't like the extra work involved.

Of course it's possible we see it everyday with PC , Smartphones & Tablets.
 

MrFunSocks

Banned
It’s different because he’s talking about first party only games that are already in development for the XB1, not that the entire generation is “scalable” or that every single game will be “scalable”.

I can only hope that you’re intentionally being this dumb and ignorant, because if not, oh boy lol.
 

onQ123

Member
It’s different because he’s talking about first party only games that are already in development for the XB1, not that the entire generation is “scalable” or that every single game will be “scalable”.

I can only hope that you’re intentionally being this dumb and ignorant, because if not, oh boy lol.


The hell? I said if the console maker isn't making exclusives for the console in the 1st few years why would 3rd party publishers jump out the window & make exclusives for the console?
 

MrFunSocks

Banned
He doesn't say which platform the devs were on, he just says to leave both those behind because they're both the same type of CPU. Like if I made a tweet talking about how partisan the Democrats were acting then said "it's time to leave behind the two party system" and you went A-HA, he has a problem with how Republicans are currently behaving, too!

Either way, the PR around Series X has been that the games will be cross-gen, that being cross-gen won't hold them back. The PR for PS5 has been about believing in generations and not being interested in making games work for PS4. It's beyond clear why people are assuming this is more about one platform than the other.
The point is that this thread was made to shit on Xbox and completely left out the part where what the tweet says is about the PS4 as well. Pointing out to people that are shitting on the Xbox and drawing conclusions about the series X that hey, the tweet is about the PS4 doing the same thing to the Ps5 isn’t “SonyToo”. It’s literally telling the people going off half cocked that the OP intentionally mislead them to fuel the fanboy wars.
 
Top Bottom