You've looking at this wrong
PS5 100mhz slower CPU, but that CPU can be pushed to run more heavier code on all cores in parallel, whereas XSX CPU has no contingency for running stuff that will really push it heavy, its devolopment profiler most likely won't let it to avoid XSX crashing (no clever frequency management)
Less TFlops? You're talking THEORITICAL PEAK TFlops, big difference! Please have a read at what lepermessiah posted lately, and many more by the looks you have ignored!
Sorry mate I know you mean well, but we may have to agree on to disagree. Or even better let's just wait till we get real proof before making anymore bold sweeping statements (yes that includes me too)
You're not understanding me, willing or unwillingly. On paper, the Series X is more powerful, no matter how you twist it. In practice however, that power may not translate linearly, and it may actually perform worse than the PS5. These are all assumptions, of course, so let's be objective: based on the released specs so far, the PS5 is the least powerful console, albeit with the fastest GPU and SSD.
These are facts, not opinions.
And I didn't ignore anything, I've been consistent saying that the PS5 is the better piece of hardware and will (arguably, for now) be more efficient than the Xbox, having, if nothing more, some notable pluses on the streaming side.
That said, you seem to be under the impression that while I'm a playstation fan, that I'm somehow trying to defend the Xbox (like that was a bad thing). No. I'm trying to prevent people from spreading BS as facts.
Now, my opinion: while there's a 15 to 20% delta between theoretical GPU numbers, my guess is that real world results in third party games will be around shadow maps / resolution and maybe anti aliasing, at most. As for first party games, Sony will most likely take the cake for best looking games, again.