A.Romero
Member
Fair and valid points. Though i slightly disagree with supporting a competitors platform. You're correct in the traditional sense of it, but if the option is £70 for one game or £70 quid for a years worth of 100's of games, including day one releases of AAA games, i don't see it as direct as 'supporting the competition'.
MS has more to lose by not offering these games on every platform, VS keeping it behind a gamepass sub
Well, the thing is that if anyone really wants to experience Elder Scrolls or whatever they need to either:
- Pay for Xcloud
- Acquire a Microsoft console and sign up for GP/get the game
- Acquire a gaming PC (with a Windows license) and sign up for GP/get the game
Microsoft I think is betting for those games to be enticing enough to push people towards their platforms. If people can still access that experience from their competitors, they'd be missing a possible hook.
If they sell the games all the same on all platforms (Bethesda's usual), there is no support for their long term strategy. I mean, yes, they'll get the percentage from the game sale but that's missing an opportunity for having someone signing up for their service (with a potential of a long time sub, specially if it requires getting a console). In the long term, it still makes sense to hook people into their ecosystem over simply getting $40,$50 or whatever profit margin they might get from the games themselves.
If Microsoft's objective was making a quick buck, they could have started publishing their games on all platforms a long time ago.