Agent_Nobody
Member
LOL my fucking sides
You're view of the threads intentions is incorrect, these are two games often brought up as the best 3D entries in each series and both were the first transitions to 3D for both series. All I'm asking is which did better and that's it, almost every argument are upset fanatics that are making assumptions without information or not liking that I didn't think either game is one of the best games of all time.
This has nothing to do with Sonic itself or making it competitive.
No I just didn't agree with it, and so do most gamers.
Nah one is brought up as the best 3D entry in its series and the other is brought up as the best 3D platformer ever made.You're view of the threads intentions is incorrect, these are two games often brought up as the best 3D entries in each series and both were the first transitions to 3D for both series. All I'm asking is which did better and that's it, almost every argument are upset fanatics that are making assumptions without information or not liking that I didn't think either game is one of the best games of all time.
This has nothing to do with Sonic itself or making it competitive.
Not many people had an N64 this isn't rocket science, and then you have PS1 and PC gamers. It's very unlikely that many people think either game is one of the best games ever, it's most likely those that grew up with the N64.I'm not upset. I just think a competitive premise would be more fun. There's a clear (and completely unsurprising) outcome here.
I'd be interested to see an actual poll about this. You would probably need to lay out a clear definition of "gamer" first. Is it anyone who has ever played a video game? Anyone who owns a game console or PC? Only people who game X number of hours each week/month/year?
This site aggregated a bunch of "best games ever" lists and their average puts Mario 64 at #2 (after Ocarina of Time):
List of video games considered the best
This is a list of video games considered the best or greatest of all time. These are the highest-ranking games that have appeared on various critics' lists and audience polls conducted by different publications and organizations. According to most criteria, the title widely regarded as the...gamicus.fandom.com
But, of course, those lists are from critics/hobbyists/journalists, so it's probably not representative of what a random sample of quote-unquote "gamers" might think.
Still, I think you have the harder case to prove here, given just how often Mario 64 comes up in conversations of the best games of all time.
Maybe in the 90's within a subset of console gamers but that's not really the case now.Nah one is brought up as the best 3D entry in its series and the other is brought up as the best 3D platformer ever made.
just a little different
You have an active imagination, but you might want to check your facts before making a false statement.
Even in this thread your accusation doesn't make sense.
Can't even show the "recent" threads he claims I made because they didn't exist, goes out on a lie.You’re a liar and are now ignored.
Not many people had an N64 this isn't rocket science, and then you have PS1 and PC gamers. It's very unlikely that many people think either game is one of the best games ever, it's most likely those that grew up with the N64.
This is completely bollocks for Super Mario 64. It is an amazing game, a one in a kind achievement and it has no "aging" issues (outside of the fact of course, that the particular artistic achievement is only appreciable if you know the historical context, but even on its own it is still an incredibly well designed game. Sonic Adventure is a good game with some shit elements (Chao, Big, Amy, overworld). It is not even close to the league of Super Mario 64 though.Both haven't aged too well
What the fuck is this thread?
Do you mean Raichu?This thread is like the Pokémon meme with an Kyogre and a Groudon, or something, against a Ratata
Ahh the troll making stuff up again.Nooooo contes........ Tub
We've had arguments about 3D Sonic before but my god I never knew you held them up that high
No I just didn't agree with it being one of the best games of all time. For some reason you guys can't cope with that opinion and make up your own assumptions based off nothing. Or swing the topic to me thinking SA is better without any information to come to that conclusion.OP seems to resent anyone calling Mario 64 the best 3D platformer of all time, painting it as a sort of a dated opinion that most people (or, "gamers") would disagree with. But by any metric that you can actually measure, Mario 64 is very strong.
Just pointing out Mario 64 was the only Mario game on the system. If they had made more Mario mainline games for the system it wouldn't have sold 10 million. Crash 1 did 6 million but franchise sells were split between three mainline games and two spinoffs. If Crash 1 were the only Crash game the whole gen it would have done more than 6 million.This kind of nonsense is exactly what I would expect from the guy who asks what is the best strategy game and doesn't even put Starcraft 1 in the poll LOL.
I'm a HUGE Sonic fan. I got a dreamcast on launch day (at midnight). I played Sonic Adventure 1 for about 200 hours. The jewel case to a '99 copy of the game is sitting on top of my Dreamcast RIGHT NOW.
But this game is nowhere near as timeless, iconic or megaton as Mario 64. Sonic Adventure has many flaws that stand out worse as time goes on, it just doesn't seem fully finished or polished and has massive problems. Mario 64's only real issue is camera.
If you are asking which game is better of the two. Mario 64 is a game I would give anyone to play, Sonic Adventure I would keep to myself just to nerd out with lol.
OP seems to resent anyone calling Mario 64 the best 3D platformer of all time, painting it as a sort of a dated opinion that most people (or, "gamers") would disagree with. But by any metric that you can actually measure, Mario 64 is very strong.
For example, Crash Bandicoot sold 6 million on PSX and Sonic Adventure on DC sold just about 1 million. Mario 64 sold approx. 10 million on N64, a further 10 on DS, and ANOTHER 10 million within the past year as part of the 3D Mario All-Stars. So, even back then, you can't say not that many people got to play it. More people were playing it than any other 3D platform game. It was the most successful 3D platforming game of the decade -suggesting that not too many people played it because of PSX or whatever is silly. It definitely made an impact.
Today there are more "gamers" with bad taste than "real gamers" -kids playing Fortnite, parents playing puzzle games on phones full of ads, tough guys that don't buy anything but COD #30 and FIFA. So if you told me that Mario 64 is no longer the "best 3D platforming game" amongst all modern gamers, I would say who cares?
The fact that we are even arguing over whether Mario 64 is the best one EVER, shows just how totally beyond Sonic Adventure it is. A different league entirely.
No I just didn't agree with it being one of the best games of all time. For some reason you guys can't cope with that opinion and make up your own assumptions based off nothing. Or swing the topic to me thinking SA is better without any information to come to that conclusion.
I will admit without the rapidness of your fanatism you Mario fans wouldn't have barely saved the N64 and Gamecube. Guess you were needed to keep Nintendo alive. If Only Sega fans tried as hard as you guys did.