• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Covid 19 Thread: [no bitching about masks of Fauci edition]

CAB_Life

Member
I agree with this stance - it’s perfectly feasible young people might not see Covid as a risk for them and will get vaccinated only due to annoyance related to e.g. activities requiring vaccination or a negative test.

Are you talking about France? Because we are nowhere near herd immunity, even in the two highest age groups 65-75 and 75+ we are at approx. 80% totally vaccinated.

As for vaccinating children - what part of how herd immunity works don’t you understand?
Children are already showing an antibody response in 60% of all voluntary reports. It's unnecessary to vaccinate people producing antibodies. They are herd immune.
 

thefool

Member
I agree with this stance - it’s perfectly feasible young people might not see Covid as a risk for them and will get vaccinated only due to annoyance related to e.g. activities requiring vaccination or a negative test.

Are you talking about France? Because we are nowhere near herd immunity, even in the two highest age groups 65-75 and 75+ we are at approx. 80% totally vaccinated.

As for vaccinating children - what part of how herd immunity works don’t you understand?

Vaccination trials in children are pretty indicative that the placebo control group showed better results. Data showed no difference in hospitalizations and deaths, while the vaccinated group displayed statistically relevant adverse reactions namely fatigue, headaches, chills, pains, fever, along allergy reactions.

As for using children to achieve herd immunity, considering they need to be put into risk by being administered a vaccine that didn't show any positive outcome against the disease vs non-vaccinated, that most likely goes against United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Article 3 that states that " In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. ".
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
Hang on… on the one hand you say Covid isn’t risky to young people, so why would they get the vaccine? But on the other, people are all motivated by self interest.

If it’s in self interest, then covid must be dangerous to young people - blowing your opinion on that out of the water.

Alternatively, Covid is not dangerous to young people, and therefore they are not getting jabbed out of self interest… blowing your opinion on that out of the water.

So which thing are you wrong about?

This isn't hard. People who feel it's a danger to them personally will line up to get vaccinated. There are of course other reasons that will drive people to get vaccinated, but a personal risk assessment is almost certainly the primary one.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
what part of how herd immunity works don’t you understand?

That it does not. Or at least, it is not induced with these COVID vaccines. Just take a look at 100% vaccinated Gibraltar.

And even if it were somehow possible with these vaccines (it's clearly not by this point), you can forget injecting children simply for the greater good. That is not a door I ever want to see opened.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
Play stupid Facebook anti-vaxxer conspiracy games, win stupid prizes.



I wonder what they tell the vaccinated people who die anyway? "You can rest easy knowing you died of natural causes and not COVID"?

Meanwhile, the 7-day average of daily deaths in Alabama is at 7 as of yesterday. It was 24 on July 20, 2020.

 

Raven117

Member
I wonder what they tell the vaccinated people who die anyway? "You can rest easy knowing you died of natural causes and not COVID"?

Meanwhile, the 7-day average of daily deaths in Alabama is at 7 as of yesterday. It was 24 on July 20, 2020.

Well, Im locking down. Don't know about you.
 

12Goblins

Lil’ Gobbie
Jesus Christ. Where the hell do you live?

What kind of fucked up, nasty little dystopia are you in that you think people only act on pure self interest?

The vast majority of young people are getting the covid vaccine, even though it's not of much risk to them, because they recognise its danger to others.
I mean, pretty much every human behavior can be boiled down to self interest...luckily helping and protecting others them is also a function of our self interest. unfortunately that circle of "others" for some people is quite small ...


which brings me to my favorite quote ( ͡ ͜ ʖ ͡͡

A human being is a part of the whole called by us universe, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feeling as something separated from the rest, a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty. -einstein
 

Shai-Tan

Banned
I'd argue that trust is never rational. Trust is a feeling, basically one of the irreducible qualia that furnish our conscious experience. You can rationalize it post-hoc, but really if you are honest a state of trust is never arrived at by a deliberative or deductive process, the foundation is almost always experiential. The argument about global warming is low quality, there are obvious parallels between distrust of medical authority caused by bad experiences with family or friends getting addicted to prescribed painkillers, and distrust of the same medical authority regarding vaccines now. The unfortunate reality is you cannot create trust as easily as you can destroy it.


is correlated with vaccine hesitancy you wanted to say? Well I agree with the conclusion of that article at least:


but note that this is about vaccine hesitancy regarding tried-and-tested vaccines for kids. Not about our current situation, which is different. Still, the article points the finger at the right people.

Don't have time right now to watch this, but seems interesting, I might watch it later and comment. I'd say that most political protests are motivated by anger and thus carry within them a version of 'chaos-seeking', nihilistic, destructive tendencies. Although it's never pretty, it sometimes is necessary to 'sway' the powers that be.

this last article is also about vaccine hesitancy regarding tried and tested vaccines for kids, and thus the findings should not be extrapolated to the current situation. Other than that, it also represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the problem:


Trust is not built through education. Trust is built through trustworthy behaviour. Pharmaceutical companies and medical professionals have fallen woefully short of this yardstick in recent times, and are thus reaping the bitter fruits of their own shenanigans. Fix it by publicly apologizing and paying reperations for missteps like the opioid crisis, not by calling people idiots for not trusting you.

First, to get it out of the way, many vaccine skeptics aren’t (explicitly) against vaccines in general. Although looking into details they often do have generalized concern that they don’t share because they know it isn’t a particularly defensible position (it tend to rely on “alternative” medical beliefs, and ideas about naturalness). The vaccine causes autism dude Andrew Wakefield was promoting other vaccines. What matters is the details. Like for example there being vaccines that aren’t MRNA based — nevermind that your objection hangs on the false notion that MRNA tech is new and completely unproven, that there are errors in a cost benefit calculation that doesn’t include the high likelihood of getting COVID, or significantly underestimates the risks of COVID relative to the vaccines.

re trust, you’re not getting it. Imagine a scale from 1 to 10. This could be multiple scales but won’t be for the sake of simplicity here. One one end of the scale is solipsistic skepticism that places the most trust in ones own judgements, seeks out others to validate pre existing beliefs, and is resistant to contrary information because they view it as hostile, and have been poisoned against it by others who are like minded

The other end of the scale could be humility through skepticism that knows its own limits, why understanding criticism is necessary to counteract systematic error, and participate in or look to sources of information and reasoning that are less prone to error.

The former often poses as the latter. If these are ideal categories any person or community could fall somewhere on that number line on any one topic, but in practice there are clusters. Loosely defined vaccine skeptical online communities have a high degree of similarity in reasoning and behavior despite the notion that there's something peculiar about this particular case, and people who are persuaded disproportionately have an epistemic stance more like the former. There are many unreflective people who accept reasoning behind vaccines without looking into it - however they aren't posing a public health problem. There may be some other topic in which their views come into question (as per the previous post the controversy is typically where political or social values and beliefs conflict with science)
 
Last edited:

ManaByte

Gold Member


Series Two: Cattle
Jeremy Clarkson Smile GIF by DriveTribe
 
Man....you read all of that stuff in the aggregate...sure feels like some folks are angling for lockdowns again....I don't know...

You read posts on social media and there are all the people pretending to be concerned but it becomes pretty obvious that they're rooting for more spikes so they can work from home or go back on unemployment.
 

Cyberpunkd

Member
News from France - in true French fashion the government backed down somewhat, creating even more confusion:

1. Need for vaccination / negative PCR test for 12-18 years old has been pushed from September 1st to October 1st. Note this doesn't apply to school - you will still not be required to present any form of (called here) 'pass sanitaire' to attend school
2. Fines for businesses not controlling 'pass sanitaire' reduced from 9 000 to 1 500 EUR
3. Businesses will control 'pass sanitaire' but not your ID making sure it matches - I just tried it and was able to correctly scan the QR code of my wife for my own use...whops!

Other data: 22 000 positive cases in the last 24 hours ; 6 869 people hospitalized, including 859 in ICU, almost 818k vaccine injections realized in the last 24 hours.
 
Last edited:

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
You read posts on social media and there are all the people pretending to be concerned but it becomes pretty obvious that they're rooting for more spikes so they can work from home or go back on unemployment.
You can also read posts on Twitter about how the earth is flat and the president is a reptile.


Doesn't mean you should put any faith into what they are saying.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
He is right about this.

Yeah... hard to argue with that approach, to be honest. If you want to encourage people to get vaccinated, just clearly demonstrate the benefits and don't try to shame or berate them into getting it.
 

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
He is right about this.

Yeah... hard to argue with that approach, to be honest. If you want to encourage people to get vaccinated, just clearly demonstrate the benefits and don't try to shame or berate them into getting it.

If someone is so stubborn and petulant that they won't try to save their own life out of spite then that is just plain stupid.
 

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
As they say. Can't fix stupid.
If the stories are any indication then imminent death or extreme suffering does in fact fix this kind of stupid.


The problem is that it shouldn't have to.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
Florida is ranked 25 out of 50 states in terms of vaccination rates at 47.7% and basically tied with Illinois. Illinois's positivity rate is currently ranked 35th of 50 states at 2.5% while Florida's 3rd of all 50 states at 12.6%. Same vaccination rates, wildly different outcomes.
 
Florida is ranked 25 out of 50 states in terms of vaccination rates at 47.7% and basically tied with Illinois. Illinois's positivity rate is currently ranked 35th of 50 states at 2.5% while Florida's 3rd of all 50 states at 12.6%. Same vaccination rates, wildly different outcomes.

Florida's amazing. I left NY during the pandemic and moved down here.
 

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Florida is ranked 25 out of 50 states in terms of vaccination rates at 47.7% and basically tied with Illinois. Illinois's positivity rate is currently ranked 35th of 50 states at 2.5% while Florida's 3rd of all 50 states at 12.6%. Same vaccination rates, wildly different outcomes.
I meant the fact that Florida is known for its stupidity in general. Not for covid specifically.


Ever hear of "Florida man"?
 

QSD

Member
I'm not sure I fully get what you are trying to say in this post, though I do appreciate you writing a detailed answer...

First, to get it out of the way, many vaccine skeptics aren’t (explicitly) against vaccines in general. Although looking into details they often do have generalized concern that they don’t share because they know it isn’t a particularly defensible position (it tend to rely on “alternative” medical beliefs, and ideas about naturalness). The vaccine causes autism dude Andrew Wakefield was promoting other vaccines. What matters is the details. Like for example there being vaccines that aren’t MRNA based — nevermind that your objection hangs on the false notion that MRNA tech is new and completely unproven, that there are errors in a cost benefit calculation that doesn’t include the high likelihood of getting COVID, or significantly underestimates the risks of COVID relative to the vaccines.
I know there are vaccines that aren't MNRA based, I've had one. My objection is not that MNRA is completely unproven (that's a minor straw man), it's that they're less proven than other non-MNRA vaccines. Whether they are proven enough remains to be seen in the long term. It's looking good so far, but it's still early days seems to me.
re trust, you’re not getting it. Imagine a scale from 1 to 10. This could be multiple scales but won’t be for the sake of simplicity here. One one end of the scale is solipsistic skepticism that places the most trust in ones own judgements, seeks out others to validate pre existing beliefs, and is resistant to contrary information because they view it as hostile, and have been poisoned against it by others who are like minded

The other end of the scale could be humility through skepticism that knows its own limits, why understanding criticism is necessary to counteract systematic error, and participate in or look to sources of information and reasoning that are less prone to error.
How do you know which sources of information are less prone to error? That seems to me to be one of the core problems here. There are no sources of information that are 100% guaranteed spin free.
The former often poses as the latter. If these are ideal categories any person or community could fall somewhere on that number line on any one topic, but in practice there are clusters. Loosely defined vaccine skeptical online communities have a high degree of similarity in reasoning and behavior despite the notion that there's something peculiar about this particular case, and people who are persuaded disproportionately have an epistemic stance more like the former. There are many unreflective people who accept reasoning behind vaccines without looking into it - however they aren't posing a public health problem. There may be some other topic in which their views come into question (as per the previous post the controversy is typically where political or social values and beliefs conflict with science)
It feels to me like we are talking past one another here. There are certainly people who mask a whole set of regressive and luddite beliefs with a veil of mild but nagging skepticism. But that doesn't mean you can just dismiss arguments about the medical establishment having acted in a way that fundamentally undermines trust. Are we simply supposed to disregard that now because it inconveniences the effort to get everyone vaccinated?

Here's an article tweeted out by David Fuller (of Rebel Wisdom) that might give you pause:
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/07/0...esearch-is-fraudulent-until-proved-otherwise/

Research fraud is often viewed as a problem of “bad apples,” but Barbara K Redman, who spoke at the webinar insists that it is not a problem of bad apples but bad barrels if not, she said, of rotten forests or orchards. In her book Research Misconduct Policy in Biomedicine: Beyond the Bad-Apple Approach she argues that research misconduct is a systems problem—the system provides incentives to publish fraudulent research and does not have adequate regulatory processes. Researchers progress by publishing research, and because the publication system is built on trust and peer review is not designed to detect fraud it is easy to publish fraudulent research. The business model of journals and publishers depends on publishing, preferably lots of studies as cheaply as possible. They have little incentive to check for fraud and a positive disincentive to experience reputational damage—and possibly legal risk—from retracting studies. Funders, universities, and other research institutions similarly have incentives to fund and publish studies and disincentives to make a fuss about fraudulent research they may have funded or had undertaken in their institution—perhaps by one of their star researchers. Regulators often lack the legal standing and the resources to respond to what is clearly extensive fraud, recognising that proving a study to be fraudulent (as opposed to suspecting it of being fraudulent) is a skilled, complex, and time consuming process. Another problem is that research is increasingly international with participants from many institutions in many countries: who then takes on the unenviable task of investigating fraud? Science really needs global governance.
 
Last edited:

12Goblins

Lil’ Gobbie
News from France - in true French fashion the government backed down somewhat, creating even more confusion:

1. Need for vaccination / negative PCR test for 12-18 years old has been pushed from September 1st to October 1st. Note this doesn't apply to school - you will still not be required to present any form of (called here) 'pass sanitaire' to attend school
2. Fines for businesses not controlling 'pass sanitaire' reduced from 9 000 to 1 500 EUR
3. Businesses will control 'pass sanitaire' but not your ID making sure it matches - I just tried it and was able to correctly scan the QR code of my wife for my own use...whops!

Other data: 22 000 positive cases in the last 24 hours ; 6 869 people hospitalized, including 859 in ICU, almost 818k vaccine injections realized in the last 24 hours.
do you know how it will work for foreigners? will they be given a QR code?
 
I meant the fact that Florida is known for its stupidity in general. Not for covid specifically.


Ever hear of "Florida man"?

Yes. One of the toughest parts about moving down here was parting ways with all those stable folks from up north. :sarcasm:

Crazy exists in all states. I guess if you want to see a guy with a mullet wrestle an alligator come down here. If you want to see a guy in designer clothes defecating in a trash can at 2 in the afternoon you can go to NY or Cali.
 
Last edited:

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Yes. One of the toughest parts about moving down here was parting ways with all those stable folks from up north. :sarcasm:

Crazy exists in all states. I guess if you want to see a guy with a mullet wrestle an alligator come down here. If you want to see a guy in designer clothes defecating in a trash can at 2 in the afternoon you can go to NY or Cali.
Yeah okay lol
 
Yeah okay lol

People love to hate on Florida especially now. When you point out that Florida's numbers are middle of the pack despite having the most lax restrictions and a huge at risk demographic of old people they have a brain aneurysm. "Hurr durr, Florida man."

There's a reason why people flocked here.

"Oh what a shame, the tiki bar is open and people are having fun."
 
Source?

But even if it’s correct, that’s a great figure! 😂 Especially as the rollout for that age group hasn’t been going on for that long.

Sorry, but young people by and large are more than happy to get vaccinated, and are not falling for all the anti-vax bullshit being chucked about 😂

Interesting how you constantly accuse people of being uneducated and believing whatever they read from random internet sources with heavy political biases and then post a number that was clearly bullshit. It's almost like you're on the other furthest end of the political spectrum 🤔
 
People love to hate on Florida especially now.

Yeah pretty lame, northerners have been feeding off the superiority of winning the war for quite long enough. The white southerner is fair game to call an incestuous inbred dipshit. Nobody likes arrogant dicks who won't let that shit go. Liberal elites in our big cities really act like they're some bourgeoisie upper party pricks, and they're just so smug about it.

 

TheContact

Member
Yeah. Statistically this just isn’t significant. The amount of healthy people under 30 dying of covid is extraordinarily low. Long covid is an amalgamation of random, self reported symptoms. How much of it is real and how much of it is psychosomatic is yet to be determined. Until we have actual scientific explanation for how and why covid could be causing these wide variety of problems in various people, I’m not going to take it especially seriously and neither is anyone else. The list of 200 symptoms is just laughably broad and ridiculous.

if you want to talk statistics, then getting the vaccine is vastly superior to the consequences of covid compared to any side effects from the vaccine
 

Izumar

Banned
Just curious, but who do you think are the stupid people not getting the vaccine?
If it is like where I live, it is a huge minority problem. This is what Biden was referring to with his Tuskegee airman junk.

The comments of not giving them treatment when they show up sick makes me laugh in this day and age. Imagine all these black and hispanic people left to die for being "stupid".
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
if you want to talk statistics, then getting the vaccine is vastly superior to the consequences of covid compared to any side effects from the vaccine

Just to lay out some actual numbers to help the conversation...

- Out of approximately 127,000,000 people in the United States under the age of 30, there have been fewer than 3,000 deaths with COVID since January 1st, 2020 to July 7th, 2021.
- Out of approximately 75,000,000 people in the United States 60 years of age or older, there have been more than 500,000 deaths with COVID since January 1st, 2020 to July 7th, 2021.

So while one group has seen 0.66666667% of its population die with COVID, the other has seen 0.00236220%. Put a different way, people aged 60 years or older are dying with COVID at over 282 times the rate of those under the age of 30, and obviously that increases with age.
 
Top Bottom