Support NeoGAF

[Varteras]

That sucks. When I played BO1 on BC there were a lot of gamers playing too. I dont remember any hackers. But maybe it was due to the ratio of clean gamers, and I just missed them all by luck. I never tried out BO2 since I stopped playing in back then.

It was terrible. I watched my step brother actually download hacks on his Xbox. He had cheats that let him do shit like kill the entire lobby instantly. I asked him why the fuck he would do that. He said because it's funny and no one cares because the game was so old.

 

[bitbydeath]

I was thinking the divestiture would be MS has to sell off any UK regional cloud gaming service feature. Like if it's technically possible to sell off one lego block out of a lego cloud tower.

That doesn’t fix the problem though as they could always rebrand and build anew.

 

[Ar¢tos]

Get ready for the next evolution of the windows operating system

Learn about Windows 365 Here

That would require motherboards with BIOSES to come back, no?
Like the old consoles (ps1/ps2) had.

 

[X-Wing]

Get ready for the next evolution of the windows operating system

Learn about Windows 365 Here

“Combine the power and security of the cloud…”

Meanwhile the security of Microsoft’s cloud:

How a cloud flaw gave Chinese spies a key to Microsoft’s kingdom

Hackers stole a cryptographic key that let them forge user identities and slip past defenses.

arstechnica.com

 

[havoc00]

“Combine the power and security of the cloud…”

Meanwhile the security of Microsoft’s cloud:

How a cloud flaw gave Chinese spies a key to Microsoft’s kingdom

Hackers stole a cryptographic key that let them forge user identities and slip past defenses.

arstechnica.com

Those users prob never do a windows update

 

[X-Wing]

Those users prob never do a windows update

Read the article.

 

[havoc00]

Read the article.

it was blocked by windows defender

 

[StreetsofBeige]

Get ready for the next evolution of the windows operating system

Learn about Windows 365 Here

All I know is I have a legit fully downloaded copy of MS Office 2019 from work. I got it for like $20 as one of those employer-employee perks (Home User Program or something).

And I am milking this edition edition for as long as possible! I'll transfer the program to my next PC (I'm assuming I can transfer to another device??? lol)

 

[Sleepwalker]

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Welcome to the next-gen analysis/speculation and rumors thread. Next-generation chatter is exciting but can also be very confusing. I've decided to put all the gossip, and info regarding next-gen consoles into this one thread. That way we can thoroughly discuss and analyze every sort of...

www.neogaf.com

Let's hope this doesn't go that far lol.

Man so much bs in that thread, I remember being so excited for next gen reading it, now 3 years later we are back to 720p and 30fps

 

[Bojanglez]

CMA is getting what they wanted. Cloud divesment, while MS gets the deal.
If MS cant control cloud option, there is no risk for this deal.

What is the difference between a proposed licencing remedy and "divesting cloud"? In the end it's still MS licensing it after the acquisition. Now legally could MS try and distance itself from its cloud lead with that proposal and have MS licensing to in a business they don't own? that's possible but as the CMA said it would likely need a new investigation into the proposal and I'm really not sure the CMAs stance is to get that done by Monday. It might appear like they are circumventing the decision while still having the "divested company" having the advantage.

MS selling the rights to a completely separate legal entity still raises many questions.

- Are these licensing rights sold in perpetuity?
- Are there any agreements to ensure versions of games are created for multi-cloud solutions?
- Are vendors free to use translation players on PC builds to deliver without Windows?
Will Windows licenses be regulated ongoing if not?
- Does it inhibit MS using Windows cloud licenses to manipulate the cloud gaming market? (Like they did by giving Nvidia 'sweetener' Windows licensing deal to sign the cloud agreement)

To me this fudge seems like it raises some of the main issues with MS' stranglehold on cloud and operating systems that are fundamental issues with the deal. The CMA would be them having to constantly monitor that fair play was occurring, which wouldn't be necessary with an independent ABK

 

[GHG]

I read a post on another site which was an analysis of the FTC appeal that speculated they're (as in the FTC) going to attempt to get Microsoft to make more commitments and then tell the judge they're fine with the deal. Now, I have *no idea* if any of that is true because I clearly cannot see the future, but if that does indeed come to pass, then that is activity that should have been done in the initial case; not in the appeals, since they wouldn't be negotiating from a place of strength.

If that's what ends up happening, it would make the current FTC, in my eyes, even more incomprehensibly ill-prepared than I imagined, since you'd--again-- want to negotiate from a place of strength.

Even funnier would be MS agreeing to the conditions, which would also reveal their (possibly significant) level of desperation. Though, you'd imagine they're feeling emboldened after what happened yesterday.

The moment they decided to move forward with Corely when they had other options their fate was sealed. They are clearly not an organisation driven by logic, even when said logic would be in their own best interests. It's like a never ending series of bad decisions to their own detriment.

 

[havoc00]

MS selling the rights to a completely separate legal entity still raises many questions.

- Are these licensing rights sold in perpetuity?
- Are there any agreements to ensure versions of games are created for multi-cloud solutions?
- Are vendors free to use translation players on PC builds to deliver without Windows?
Will Windows licenses be regulated ongoing if not?
- Does it inhibit MS using Windows cloud licenses to manipulate the cloud gaming market? (Like they did by giving Nvidia 'sweetener' Windows licensing deal to sign the cloud agreement)

To me this fudge seems like it raises some of the main issues with MS' stranglehold on cloud and operating systems that are fundamental issues with the deal. The CMA would be them having to constantly monitor that fair play was occurring, which wouldn't be necessary with an independent ABK

They should bring mr wonderful in for royalties

 

[Heisenberg007]

 

[GHG]

These are some stinky admissions by Jez:






Akin to a trust fund kid being bailed out by their parents after flunking school/university.

 

[James Sawyer Ford]

These are some stinky admissions by Jez:






Akin to a trust fund kid being bailed out by their parents after flunking school/university.

Jez is a master strategist with a PhD in Xbox Basketweaving

He knows more than Phil himself

 

[James Sawyer Ford]

These are some stinky admissions by Jez:






Akin to a trust fund kid being bailed out by their parents after flunking school/university.

Usually those bailed out kids continue to fuck up and squander their parents wealth

Doubt that’s any different than this situation either

 

[ChorizoPicozo]

These are some stinky admissions by Jez:






Akin to a trust fund kid being bailed out by their parents after flunking school/university.

this is why this acquisition has been such a big deal for the Xbox fanboys. it feels like the last chance to keep Xbox relevant in this industry.

 

[PaintTinJr]

That doesn’t fix the problem though as they could always rebrand and build anew.

That still isn't the CMA's issue of the SLC. Microsoft would still be a monopoly in the nascent cloud gaming market outside the UK in the rest of the world inhibiting competition from UK start-ups to ever compete internationally because of the merger, killing opportunities for those businesses to innovate and removing any reason for backers to invest in such start-up cloud gaming businesses.

The divestiture of Activision is still the only viable working solution to fix the SLC, and the CMA are just paying Microsoft lip service as legally required to listen to their proposals that still revolve around Microsoft foreclosing the cloud gaming market quickly in the future.

 

[Fabieter]

These are some stinky admissions by Jez:






Akin to a trust fund kid being bailed out by their parents after flunking school/university.

If you need a company almost as big as your competitors to surive than... I dont know maybe there is something deeply wrong with your own company.

 

[Heisenberg007]

These are some stinky admissions by Jez:






Akin to a trust fund kid being bailed out by their parents after flunking school/university.

So why did they acquire Zenimax? Did Zenimax's acquisition not move the needle for them?

And what stops them from using the same justification the next time they want to buy a big publisher?

 

[Heisenberg007]

this is why this acquisition has been such a big deal for the Xbox fanboys. it feels like the last chance to keep Xbox relevant in this industry.

By making PlayStation smaller.

(Not saying this to you of course) but this is such a weird argument/tactic. They're making Xbox relevant by minimizing games on their competitor's platform -- not by improving Xbox or introducing a new tech, feature, or set of games.

 

[James Sawyer Ford]

Apparently Microsoft needs some of that “CoD Money” to start making good exclusive games like Sony is…

Do people even use their brain before typing shit like this?

 

[Banjo64]

These are some stinky admissions by Jez:






Akin to a trust fund kid being bailed out by their parents after flunking school/university.

Jizz forgetting that they have Doom, Fallout and TES?

 

[Heisenberg007]

Apparently Microsoft needs some of that “CoD Money” to start making good exclusive games like Sony is…

Do people even use their brain before typing shit like this?

Such a stupid justification. It's not like Sony owns COD at the moment.

Their customers buy COD (and other games) and then PlayStation gets the same 30%/20% cut as Xbox does. The problem is with Xbox who systematically trained their userbase not to buy games because of their stupid business strategies and their fanbase that makes literal fun of people who prefer buying games.

 

[havoc00]

Jez should be the ms mascot if this passes, maybe Bobby will let him fly in the helicopter with him

 

[James Sawyer Ford]

Such a stupid justification. It's not like Sony owns COD at the moment.

Their customers buy COD (and other games) and then PlayStation gets the same 30%/20% cut as Xbox does. The problem is with Xbox who systematically trained their userbase not to buy games and their fanbase that makes literal fun of people who prefer buying games.

It’s stupid because Microsoft doesn’t need money to make great games. They have $100B to blow on publishers that were just fine being independent. They certainly don’t need the few billion a year in “CoD money” that will somehow magically improve their first party

Microsoft’s problem has never been about money; it’s always been wasted opportunities with a studio culture in disarray. And a Booty that doesn’t know his Dick from his Spencer

This would certainly diminish CoD money on playstation which could adversely affect Sony first party.

So net loss for gamers

 

[havoc00]

It’s stupid because Microsoft doesn’t need money to make great games. They have $100B to blow on publishers that were just fine being independent. They certainly don’t need the few billion a year in “CoD money” that will somehow magically improve their first party

Microsoft’s problem has never been about money; it’s always been wasted opportunities with a studio culture in disarray. And a Booty that doesn’t know his Dick from his Spencer

This would certainly diminish CoD money on playstation which could adversely affect Sony first party.

So net loss for gamers

Wait until ms gets Bobby he’s gonna change the culture

 

[Ginzeen]

That still isn't the CMA's issue of the SLC. Microsoft would still be a monopoly in the nascent cloud gaming market outside the UK in the rest of the world inhibiting competition from UK start-ups to ever compete internationally because of the merger, killing opportunities for those businesses to innovate and removing any reason for backers to invest in such start-up cloud gaming businesses.

The divestiture of Activision is still the only viable working solution to fix the SLC, and the CMA are just paying Microsoft lip service as legally required to listen to their proposals that still revolve around Microsoft foreclosing the cloud gaming market quickly in the future.

The divestiture of Activision is not happening. Plenty of evidence to support that. This is just silly talk

 

[ToadMan]

If all existing shares go to MS, why would Activision care.

ATVI may care if they think they’re worth more now than the price on the table from MS.

To close the transaction both sides have to agree still - it’s not automatic. ATVI could point at the CMA situation on Monday if MS tried to close over them, and refuse to go through with the sale and they have the contractual right to do so. They would still be entitled to their $3bn.

None of us know the mind of Bobby or major ATVI shareholders right now - maybe they just want to close anyway at $95 and walk away.

We’re just speculating that ATVI are worth more today than 18 months ago - significantly more…

What might the idea of more cash, or remaining independent mean to shareholders right now…?

 

[demigod]

ATVI may care if they think they’re worth more now than the price on the table from MS.

To close the transaction both sides have to agree still - it’s not automatic. ATVI could point at the CMA situation on Monday if MS tried to close over them, and refuse to go through with the sale and they have the contractual right to do so. They would still be entitled to their $3bn.

None of us know the mind of Bobby or major ATVI shareholders right now - maybe they just want to close anyway at $95 and walk away.

We’re just speculating that ATVI are worth more today than 18 months ago - significantly more…

What might the idea of more cash, or remaining independent mean to shareholders right now…?

Yup, why agree to close when your share is almost at the buyout price. Better to not close and get the 3bil or ask for an even HIGHER premium.

 

[Unknown Soldier]

Everyone all around the world wants this to end.

Look at how many brothers and sisters who are locked in this thread.

You don't get this many people interacting in 1 thread. It's a like a jail at this moment.

 

[Heisenberg007]

Yup, why agree to close when your share is almost at the buyout price. Better to not close and get the 3bil or ask for an even HIGHER premium.

I think there is a chance (at least more than what it was a week ago) that Activision still stick with Microsoft after July 18.

However, at the very least, they HAVE TO ask for a higher price than $69 billion, no? They'd be in the driving seat. I'd be surprised very much if they don't ask for a higher price.

If Microsoft agrees, they earn more money. If Microsoft refuses, they can walk away with $3 billion. They can have Microsoft by the neck on July 19.

 

[Alex Scott]

I think there is a chance (at least more than what it was a week ago) that Activision still stick with Microsoft after July 18.

However, at the very least, they HAVE TO ask for a higher price than $69 billion, no? They'd be in the driving seat. I'd be surprised very much if they don't ask for a higher price.

If Microsoft agrees, they earn more money. If Microsoft refuses, they can walk away with $3 billion. They can have Microsoft by the neck on July 19.

If CMA agrees and drops their concern then ABK has to oblige. Right? Guess we will know by Firday or Monday.

 

[Mibu no ookami]

Where are @SneakersSO and Mibu no ookami ?? They usually have very good and thorough insight to share on these matters.



LMAO I fucking love AI

What am I commenting on here?

Whether Sony should be looking at GTA6 exclusivity in the wake of the increased likelihood of ABK closing and a shift away from CoD marketing?

I think it would be important to recognize a couple of things. Whatever the marketing deal Sony had with ABK for CoD would come nowhere close to the amount of money it would take for Sony to make GTA6 exclusive. So we're not talking about a 1:1 transaction here. Even if you include the money Sony would make from charging ABK full freight on royalties, it wouldn't be enough.

GTA6 exclusivity would come at an especially high cost and I think the benefits of which would be somewhat limited.

I'm going to pull a number out of my ass here and say 500 million for exclusivity. When you consider that The Last of Us 2 cost ~200 million to develop, you have to ask yourself does 2-3 major AAA titles all of which would be exclusive and likely profitable with the potential for transmedia revenue make more sense than GTA6 exclusivity. If I'm Sony, I'd rather put that 500 million towards buying FromSoftware and having a permanent asset with the potential of generating content that can sell as well as Elden Ring.

I think we're moving into the phase of the cycle where exclusivity deals, especially on Sony's part as the market leader starts to make less and less sense.

The only way I'm paying for GTA6 exclusivity if I'm Sony is if it's in part a strategy to launch a PC launcher and storefront and the exclusivity extends to PC and not just console.

 

[Heisenberg007]

If CMA agrees and drops their concern then ABK has to oblige. Guess we will know Firday or Monday?

If the CMA agrees before July 18, yes, ABK will have to oblige or risk paying a hefty penalty.

If the CMA agrees after July 18, ABK is not obligated to continue until they sign a new contract.

 

[Varteras]

So why did they acquire Zenimax? Did Zenimax's acquisition not move the needle for them?

And what stops them from using the same justification the next time they want to buy a big publisher?

Microsoft's moves the last few years haven't been carefully planned. They've been opportunistic moments. Zenimax wasn't going to shift anything. They needed a lot more than that. They needed a big mobile company. They needed big games to bump sub numbers. They needed a company that was huge in the PC space. ABK is all of that. Their legal troubles tanking their stocks was the perfect opportunity. They wouldn't have sold otherwise.

Not every company is up for sale. CD Projekt has made it clear they don't want to sell. Ubisoft does not want to be owned. Sega has said they're not interested. Even to buy T2 or EA, you'd have to offer their stockholders enough cash to the point where they didn't have confidence for the company to reach that number any time soon. And even companies like Microsoft have limits on what they're willing to spend. That much should be obvious in that they were outbid by Sony for Bungie.

The purchasing company has a value in mind. Microsoft isn't going to offer T2 $50 billion when their market value is only half that. It would be an absolutely boneheaded offer. Also, the more they buy up, the more likely they are to run afoul of regulators. They've already had a hell of a time grabbing ABK. A future purchase of another massive publisher will likely face increased scrutiny compared to what it would have had ABK not been bought. It doesn't guarantee a block, but their previous purchases will be taken into consideration.

It also depends on moves made by other companies. Like it or not, we're in a consolidation phase. There's going to be more purchases. Tencent just made another move. A small one, but a move nonetheless. They already have their claws partially in Ubisoft. Embracer had been buying things up. Sony might as well be shouting from the rooftops that they're going to be spending even more money to own things. Based on their comments as of late.

It might seem shitty, but it's a snowball effect. One thing leads to another, leads to another, leads to another. Each step for one company justified by what the others did before. The upshot to this industry is that it is very resilient to too much being owned by one company. There are a ridiculous number of startups with good funding and a lot of talent popping up these days. Many of them displaced from the very consolidation some fear, with others having formed from the dying husk of companies already owned.

Truthfully, the only way Microsoft runs away with the industry is if everyone else just stands still. That's not going to happen.

 

[Varteras]

What am I commenting on here?

Whether Sony should be looking at GTA6 exclusivity in the wake of the increased likelihood of ABK closing and a shift away from CoD marketing?

I think it would be important to recognize a couple of things. Whatever the marketing deal Sony had with ABK for CoD would come nowhere close to the amount of money it would take for Sony to make GTA6 exclusive. So we're not talking about a 1:1 transaction here. Even if you include the money Sony would make from charging ABK full freight on royalties, it wouldn't be enough.

GTA6 exclusivity would come at an especially high cost and I think the benefits of which would be somewhat limited.

I'm going to pull a number out of my ass here and say 500 million for exclusivity. When you consider that The Last of Us 2 cost ~200 million to develop, you have to ask yourself does 2-3 major AAA titles all of which would be exclusive and likely profitable with the potential for transmedia revenue make more sense than GTA6 exclusivity. If I'm Sony, I'd rather put that 500 million towards buying FromSoftware and having a permanent asset with the potential of generating content that can sell as well as Elden Ring.

I think we're moving into the phase of the cycle where exclusivity deals, especially on Sony's part as the market leader starts to make less and less sense.

The only way I'm paying for GTA6 exclusivity if I'm Sony is if it's in part a strategy to launch a PC launcher and storefront and the exclusivity extends to PC and not just console.

Thoughtful assessment, as usual. At the time, I was referring to the regulator situation as it stood. Obviously, things have already progressed since then. I don't expect you to spend any time on it at this point.

 

[ChorizoPicozo]

By making PlayStation smaller.

(Not saying this to you of course) but this is such a weird argument/tactic. They're making Xbox relevant by minimizing games on their competitor's platform -- not by improving Xbox or introducing a new tech, feature, or set of games.

I really haven't been paying that much attention to the words and deeds of what people are saying. I feel like I have been on the periphery of this discourse. However, I am very aware of the impact of this acquisition has been having on the fandom of each side.

and i see both sides:

The xbox fandom has developed a deep resentment towards Play Station, a lot of it comes from being ignorant towards the meaning and implications of what First Party Studios are.

They believe all these GOTY sony has produced are unfair, that these exclusive have been taken away from xbox.
They perceive the media as being biased towards Sony, giving excessive praise to their games.

For them, this acquisition is the revenge they have been waiting for.

PlayStation fans feel that this acquisition threatens Sony's dominance in an unfair way. Instead of investing in studios, they see the acquisition of these publishers as an effortless and dishonest method of competition.

personally speaking i don't like the hypocrisy of play station fans when they use the "consolidation or game pass bad" arguments.

But I feel sorry for the xbox fan that believes that these acquisition mean that xbox is suddenly going to produce and deliver dormant IP and banger after banger. they are oblivious at the negative effects of big mergers.

my sadistic side smiles at the people suffering due to Starfield's exclusivity as well as the complete shitshow that was Redfall and the metdown from the xbox community.

the point is: Xbox is trying to act as the only benevolent pro-consumer company...when we know that of course is Bullshit of the highest degree, for them and for their fans what seems like and Epic Win with this acquisition is going to be a fucking nightmare, i can guarantee that.

And for Play Station and their fans....what it seems like such a massive threat....is actually the best opportunity to be even more aggressive (especially when they are in such position of power).

i find all the concern about consolidation, Game Pass or Cloud as well as "more options or accesibility to games everywhere for free" nothing more than a charade.

 

[Banjo64]

If the CMA agrees before July 18, yes, ABK will have to oblige or risk paying a hefty penalty.

If the CMA agrees after July 18, ABK is not obligated to continue until they sign a new contract.

MS’s only option is to try and close this deal without the CMA’s consent if they are working towards the 18th. The CMA are only open to a new investigation.

“While the merging parties do not have the opportunity to submit new solutions once a final report has been issued, they can choose to restructure the deal, which could lead to a new merger investigation,” the agency said in a statement today. “The CMA is prepared to engage with them on this basis.”

 

[mckmas8808]

Posted ?

Bobby: "Xbox is 3rd place in the console race compared to Nintendo and Sony..........This deal allows us and MS to compete against these 'entrenched' competitors."





You've gotta be kidding me. So it's completely all about MS "failing" so now they should be allowed to buy the rest of the 3rd party industry as a result? That's their reward for not being more competitive against their main rivals? Just allow them to buy pure ownership of all billions of dollars of content?

Has anybody thought that maybe Microsoft is in last place in the console wars for a reason?

 

[Varteras]

for them and for their fans what seems like and Epic Win with this acquisition is going to be a fucking nightmare, i can guarantee that.

Buddy of mine made the comment that he wouldn't be surprised if Xbox fans, 10 years from now, look back on the purchase as the biggest waste of $70 billion.

 

[Bitmap Frogs]

Bobby: "Xbox is 3rd place in the console race compared to Nintendo and Sony..........This deal allows us and MS to compete against these 'entrenched' competitors."





You've gotta be kidding me. So it's completely all about MS "failing" so now they should be allowed to buy the rest of the 3rd party industry as a result? That's their reward for not being more competitive against their main rivals? Just allow them to buy pure ownership of all billions of dollars of content?

Has anybody thought that maybe Microsoft is in last place in the console wars for a reason?

Ssshhh reminding people of the many failings of Xbox management is taboo. It’s all about the “entrenched” rivals and not about 360s self destructing, then shutting down studios to become a 100% casual Kinect company or the many beautiful IPs like shadowrun they own and do nothing with.

 

[mckmas8808]

Ssshhh reminding people of the many failings of Xbox management is taboo. It’s all about the “entrenched” rivals and not about 360s self destructing, then shutting down studios to become a 100% casual Kinect company or the many beautiful IPs like shadowrun they own and do nothing with.

This is the same company that turned Halo, into just another everyday Live Service game. Freaking Halo man. One of the biggest gaming IPs on Planet Earth, is now a free-to-play live service game. Let that sit for a while........and then wonder what they'll do to Call of Duty and Elder Scrolls.

 

[Bungie]

Go drunk, Bungie. You're home.

Smoke day. Every weed.

 

[Bitmap Frogs]

This is the same company that turned Halo, into just another everyday Live Service game. Freaking Halo man. One of the biggest gaming IPs on Planet Earth, is now a free-to-play live service game. Let that sit for a while........and then wonder what they'll do to Call of Duty and Elder Scrolls.

Oh yes… you are very right.

 

[zapper]

You've gotta be kidding me. So it's completely all about MS "failing" so now they should be allowed to buy the rest of the 3rd party industry as a result? That's their reward for not being more competitive against their main rivals? Just allow them to buy pure ownership of all billions of dollars of content?

yes, but kotick is not needed, the eu, judge usa and others say so. it is good for the market and the consumers. then whether it makes it impossible for others to compete or the entry of new competitors is irrelevant

 

[Topher]

Divestiture of service, Topher

Makes no sense, but if that's what they are calling it then CMA just flat-out caved. Dat "political pressure" Riky talked about.

And so this is why MS wasn't worried about CMA any longer as HeisenbergFX4 said. They already agreed on this prior to the FTC ruling. CMA has been lying the whole time about this possibly leading to a new investigation, if this happens.

New info....CMA hasn't agreed to anything.

 

[mckmas8808]

yes, but kotick is not needed, the eu, judge usa and others say so. it is good for the market and the consumers. then whether it makes it impossible for others to compete or the entry of new competitors is irrelevant

 

[Gudji]

A company with more studios than sony needs activision to compete does Jez think that people are fucking stupid?

 

[GigaBowser]

What am I commenting on here?

Whether Sony should be looking at GTA6 exclusivity in the wake of the increased likelihood of ABK closing and a shift away from CoD marketing?

I think it would be important to recognize a couple of things. Whatever the marketing deal Sony had with ABK for CoD would come nowhere close to the amount of money it would take for Sony to make GTA6 exclusive. So we're not talking about a 1:1 transaction here. Even if you include the money Sony would make from charging ABK full freight on royalties, it wouldn't be enough.

GTA6 exclusivity would come at an especially high cost and I think the benefits of which would be somewhat limited.

I'm going to pull a number out of my ass here and say 500 million for exclusivity. When you consider that The Last of Us 2 cost ~200 million to develop, you have to ask yourself does 2-3 major AAA titles all of which would be exclusive and likely profitable with the potential for transmedia revenue make more sense than GTA6 exclusivity. If I'm Sony, I'd rather put that 500 million towards buying FromSoftware and having a permanent asset with the potential of generating content that can sell as well as Elden Ring.

I think we're moving into the phase of the cycle where exclusivity deals, especially on Sony's part as the market leader starts to make less and less sense.

The only way I'm paying for GTA6 exclusivity if I'm Sony is if it's in part a strategy to launch a PC launcher and storefront and the exclusivity extends to PC and not just console.

What in tarnation 500 millions for GTA exclusivity? GTA solds 120 million