• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Bobby Kotick: Competitors' games 'are less than adequate'

Every time this man opens his mouth, the more I want to punch his face in.

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articl...ition-putting-out-less-than-adequate-products

Following Activision Blizzard's earnings announcement, the publisher held its investors call to discuss its results and the industry at large. Chief Executive Bobby Kotick was asked by an analyst about the challenging marketplace this year and why sales have been down at retail.

"You have a very difficult macroeconomic environment, when you look at the things that can generally have an impact on the consumption of entertainment - unemployment data is very concerning, and when you look at the challenges in Europe there are a lot of things that are going to affect the macroeconomic outlook. We are also at the late end of the cycle, and the late end of a console cycle is always going to have its share of difficulties," Kotick began.

He then proceeded to lay some of the blame at the feet of his competitors, which he said are not necessarily doing the industry justice by shipping less than stellar games.

"I also think you've had, unfortunately, a stream of products that are less than adequate from some of our competitors. The demand in the marketplace is for great quality products. If you look at the success we're having it validates that there is an opportunity for great quality products but I think at this stage in the cycle, it's challenging for anything other than great quality products," he said.

Kotick added that other sectors, particularly mobile, are having an impact on how much money consumers are willing to spend. Beyond that, many gamers are happy to keep playing online games for longer stretches of time instead of rushing out to buy new products.

"There's also a lot of competition for entertainment dollars - you look at mobile games and what's happening there and the pricing there that's having an impact," he continued. "And I also think that a lot of the games we make, like Call of Duty, that are multiplayer games offer a lot of replayability, and when you have the opportunity for replayability in an economic environment like this, you're going to spend more time playing the games that you have."

"But I will say that if you look out at the next five years, there's a lot of reason to be hopeful and enthusiastic, but the next few years are going to be challenging," Kotick concluded.

I hate this guy. See if anyone can find the part I found ironic. Hint, I underlined it.

EDIT: Apparently I wanted to bunch him in the face.
 
Every time this man opens his mouth, the more I want to bunch his face in.

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articl...ition-putting-out-less-than-adequate-products



I hate this guy. See if anyone can find the part I found ironic. Hint, I underlined it.

Eh...

many gamers are happy to keep playing online games for longer stretches of time instead of rushing out to buy new products.

Is that why you release a new Call of Duty game every year Mr. Kotick?
 
I've played plenty of games not by Activision that were better in every way and cost way less. Of course, that's not every game, they do have some great games under their belt.
 
cabelas2012.jpg
 
Kinda contradictory statement, he cites the macroeconomic outlook as a reason for low sales but then cites a new hardware cycle as being the solution? Surely if people are struggling to spend money on games they're going to struggle even more with the cost of a new console.
 
Give it time. Call of Duty won't be on top forever.

In fact, I think it feels like it's been popular for longer than it has been just because they release a new on every single year. I give it a year and a half into next gen at most.

It'll either be Quake/Halo type shooters, or another genre entirely that takes hold next. Either that or a simpler transition like Battlefield.
 
Eh...



Is that why you release a new Call of Duty game every year Mr. Kotick?

You could make a perfect product that sells 20million units, or make an imperfect one and promise improvement every year and sell 18 million every year. If you were running a company which would you choose?
 
He is right in a sense. For MMO's anyway. It didnt used to be like this prior to WoW. I remember lots of MMO's coming a long an getting play time from me. But these days not so much. Not since WoW at least. Some pretty fucking mediocre MMO's from some pretty large companies over the last 7 years man.
 
Aside from CoD and Blizzard, Actvision fucking suck as a business. All their games are sub-par to just straight out garbage and sell poorly.
 
Kinda contradictory statement, he cites the macroeconomic outlook as a reason for low sales but then cites a new hardware cycle as being the solution? Surely if people are struggling to spend money on games they're going to struggle even more with the cost of a new console.

Not really. New consoles will invigorate the gaming industry. It always does, despite the economic outlook. People will still spend a shit ton of money. Unfortunately, many spend over their means.
 
Give it time. Call of Duty won't be on top forever.

In fact, I think it feels like it's been popular for longer than it has been just because they release a new on every single year. I give it a year and a half into next gen at most.

People seem to be falling out of love with Call of Duty (myself included) but I doubt its sales are going to slow down soon. Black Ops 2 looks great and probably will be better than the ghost of Infinity Ward's sequels will ever turn out to be.

It is pretty surreal that Infinity Ward now produces the bad sequels and Treyarch produces the goods ones.
 
What are these mythical Activision games that are so much better than their competitors? You might be able to make the argument for Blizzard games, but even that's a maybe at best.
 
People seem to be falling out of love with Call of Duty (myself included) but I doubt its sales are going to slow down soon. Black Ops 2 looks great and probably will be better than the ghost of Infinity Ward's sequels will ever turn out to be.

It is pretty surreal that Infinity Ward now produces the bad sequels and Treyarch produces the goods ones.
I doubt it'll be that soon, but it's bound to happen. Unlike a game like Halo that has its own universe and an image in Master Chief - not to mention a sub genre that's largely untapped - as soon as Call of Duty slips it's going to fall hard.

It is odd that Black Ops is sort of the new Modern Warfare, I never would have expected that when this Call of Duty cycling stuff first started.
 
What are these mythical Activision games that are so much better than their competitors? You might be able to make the argument for Blizzard games, but even that's a maybe at best.

Top 3 best-selling games of the first half... it's an investor call. Higher Sales = Better.

Kinda contradictory statement, he cites the macroeconomic outlook as a reason for low sales but then cites a new hardware cycle as being the solution? Surely if people are struggling to spend money on games they're going to struggle even more with the cost of a new console.

Not at all contradictory. What he's saying is that the cycle is so old that the budgets people have for discretionary income are going to other things (eg iPads, tablets, etc, none of which are struggling to sell) and that a new cycle will bring the new/shiny back to consoles. Come on man, when the last cycle started Hoobastank, Maroon 5, Outkast and Jessica Simpson were at the top of the charts. Stuff's old. New cycle will reinvigorate the market.
 
Ya well your games are pretty shallow as well Mr Kotick.

It is pretty surreal that Infinity Ward now produces the bad sequels and Treyarch produces the goods ones.

Iw is dead. The company who made Cod1, 2, and 4 don't even work for Activision anymore.
 
Kinda contradictory statement, he cites the macroeconomic outlook as a reason for low sales but then cites a new hardware cycle as being the solution? Surely if people are struggling to spend money on games they're going to struggle even more with the cost of a new console.

You don't like new hardware?

kotick0525.jpg
 
I sort of feel he kind of has a point; Activision do have some big sellers, and those big sellers do end up getting a bunch of 'me too' clones from other publishers that aren't always as good.

I saw a shitload of poor quality Tony Hawks style games when that was big.
I see a shitload of poor quality COD style games in the FPS space.
I see a shitload of poor quality WoW clones in the MMO space (less due to the massive costs of making an MMO in the first place however).
I see the beginnings of some 'me too'ing with Skylanders in the kids game space.

Of course, the flipside to that is the number of games Activision release that are 'just like [x] but with the [y] licence'.
 
So that's why D3 and WoW are losing players/subs right? Or is he speaking specifically about Activision games?

Didn't MW3 sell less than previous CoD titles? Swear I read something along those lines.

I sort of feel he kind of has a point; Activision do have some big sellers, and those big sellers do end up getting a bunch of 'me too' clones from other publishers that aren't always as good.

I saw a shitload of poor quality Tony Hawks style games when that was big.
I see a shitload of poor quality COD style games in the FPS space.
I see a shitload of poor quality WoW clones in the MMO space (less due to the massive costs of making an MMO in the first place however).
I see the beginnings of some 'me too'ing with Skylanders in the kids game space.

Of course, the flipside to that is the number of games Activision release that are 'just like [x] but with the [y] licence'.

I can agree with this as well. There are too many "Me too!" games.
 
Dear Bobby Kotick, Borderlands 2 is going to FUCKING OWN! So STFU saying everyone not Activision is doing this industry an injustice.
 
There's nothing wrong with that quote if he's talking strictly about COD, which I have a good feeling he is.

They're the pacesetters in the military shooter market. They've proven that since 2008; the market has backed that up with their dollars; and the industry has shown that they're willing to whore out, in every imaginable way, to chase what they feel people are into and buying.
 
You could make a perfect product that sells 20million units, or make an imperfect one and promise improvement every year and sell 18 million every year. If you were running a company which would you choose?

I'm not saying they're doing a bad decision releasing a CoD every year, seeing how its the most popular franchise these days, i would do the same thing.

But when he says what's in the quote... it seems he forgot his company even release a CoD every year.
 
I also think you've had, unfortunately, a stream of products that are less than adequate from some of our competitors

I think he's right about this part. MOH, Homefront and countless other, at one time, more unique shooter franchises that have "CODified" themselves into becoming lesser imitations of something which isn't really that great to begin with.
 
CoD has decent quality, I am sometimes impressed with what Treyarch does, but no CoD game is true quality gaming. There are always bugs and exploits at launch (due to them not needing beta's I presume), the main story has become a mess of drivel, and it's been using the same engine since 1944.

Battlefield 3, Crysis 2, Killzone 3, Halo Reach... These are games with far more quality. Far more polish. Arguable only in terms of preference, but they ARE quality.
 
He is so successful, anyone who completely dismisses him is being naive. Also, that underlined quote is not ironic in any way.

Cod comes out ever year, people buy it every year, people play it for a year. Hence no other games are bought.
 
I'm not saying they're doing a bad decision releasing a CoD every year, seeing how its the most popular franchise these days, i would do the same thing.

But when he says what's in the quote... it seems he forgot his company even release a CoD every year.

his quote's still valid -- just that instead of customers playing CS 1.6 for 5 years he figured out a way to get them to sign on to yearly updates. Considering the number of games some of us buy, 1 CoD a year is still very close to 'playing the same game for long periods of time.'
 
He's right. People are happy to keep playing FIFA instead of spending £35 on Max Payne 3.
 
Posting lots of pictures of shit activision games doesn't really prove a point. The majority of anything is usually uninspired and crappy, and doesn't diminish he fact that Activison's big AAA titles are generally doing better than EA's.
 
Top Bottom