• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kotaku: Next Xbox will require online connection to start games

Interfectum

Member
Really? Come on now. My wife's family lives in a remote town in India and they have stable/reliable DSL internet.

And again... you can't play for a few hours or a few days. Do some other activities. It's not the end of the world if you can't play your Halo or Forza at the exact moment and location you want to ALL the time!

Why should I think about others again? So I can feign outrage?

My connection is fine and my Xbox is connected 100% of the time.

So are a lot of devices in my house, why should a game console be an exception. How useful is an internet browser without internet? It's a new paradigm shift with Durango, it's catching up to the always-connected nature of devices we have all around us.

1245227615_colin_farrel.gif
 

Master_JO

Banned
what if it was like onlive console? Streaming highend graphix from their servers ( Which require internet) And those without internet can still buy games the same old way!? HYBRID :D
 

ElRenoRaven

Member
So it confirms what we already knew. Online required to play games hence online DRM. Well MS can kiss my ass. They'll not be seeing a dime of my next gen money for sure then.
 

Demon Ice

Banned
Every company does. Did everyone abandon Sony after the PSN fiasco? Nope. They took their free game and a glass of Koolaid. Business.

That's a bit different from a guy openly admitting he has no problem allowing MS to dictate when he can and can't play his legally bought single player games.
 

RetroStu

Banned
I swear there are some Microsoft employees posting in here lol.

Anyway i could accept this if Microsoft were releasing 2 skus, one for all this entertainment, shopping and social shite and one just for gaming and Blu Rays that doesn't require the internet and always online etc.
Its pretty obvious to me that the whole point of this is to bombard you with offers and adverts etc, its anti consumer imo and it doesn't make good business to force stuff on consumers, that hardly ever works.
 
Really? Come on now. My wife's family lives in a remote town in India and they have stable/reliable DSL internet.

And again... you can't play for a few hours or a few days. Do some other activities. It's not the end of the world if you can't play your Halo or Forza at the exact moment and location you want to ALL the time!

Corporations have won, the first generation of conditioned and domesticated users are starting to show up
 
Fucking lol. Companies like MS depend on people like you chugging their Kool-Aid.

Except... I'm not getting the next XBOX! Not sure because always online and DRM... it's the lack of new and interesting games. Go through my post history. I have no allegiance to any company.

I just don't see the big deal of this.
 

Bedlam

Member
So are a lot of devices in my house, why should a game console be an exception. How useful is an internet browser without internet? It's a new paradigm shift with Durango, it's catching up to the always-connected nature of devices we have all around us.
A game is not an internet browser and most of them are quite useful without an internet connection.
 
Its not that unfeasible really.

Look at Google's Chromebooks and their requirement for always online, which ties into the general shift towards a cloud-based future. This transition goes hand-in-hand with always online.
 
Really? Come on now. My wife's family lives in a remote town in India and they have stable/reliable DSL internet.

And again... you can't play for a few hours or a few days. Do some other activities. It's not the end of the world if you can't play your Halo or Forza at the exact moment and location you want to ALL the time!

What.....who are you to dictate to others what they should do with their lives? I should be able to play a game I bought with my money, wherever I want, when I want.

And your point is anecdotal. I also have family who play Xbox in Senegal and they don't have reliable internet. We can go round and round.
 
Looking more and more true by the day, and I was told it not being on the front of the XDK summary and Gamestops praises confirmed EDGE was talking bullshit, or just pulled it out f their ass for some hits. Relying on online is not for me, sorry MS.
 

Zoe

Member
BINGO!

I actually believe most people in this thread who said they won't buy an Xbox because they will view this as gaming machine first.

But if MS sells it as DVR/Cable box then some of those people will definitely buy this system just save costs as long as the price hike on their cable bill doesn't go up by too much.

More importantly in the larger market the people who care about TV and movies more than gaming will eat this system up.

Yep. Goes along perfectly with the subsidized pricing rumors.
 
I would be completely fine with this. The only problem is that the cable providers in the United States have monopolies that control entire cities. I can't tell you how many times per week my internet speeds drop below what I'm supposedly paying for or just drop out completely and I live in a decent sized college town. Unfortunately there is only one cable internet provider in my entire city (other than the also unreliable DSL and 3G providers).

If video game companies want "always online" the United States need better high speed internet infrastructure.
 

RetroStu

Banned
It makes perfect business sense even thought it is very consumer unfriendly. Requiring online would mean MS gets money from every game sold. Not just new games. Plus it would basically get rid of piracy.

But they already got their money from the game being sold first, why should they get paid twice of the same game if i buy a used game.

Besides i meant bad business sense by cutting out a large portion of potential customers by requiring an internet connection.
 
So is the curse of the third console striking again? You can even count the Wii U if you consider GC/Wii/Wii U a new trilogy. They are always cluster fucks and/or lose a ton or marketshare. Be aware, MS!
 

Pillville

Member
Every company does. Did everyone abandon Sony after the PSN fiasco? Nope. They took their free game and a glass of Koolaid. Business.


So what exact Koolaid was given? Did they try to convince everyone that PSN being down was awesome?

They didn't do the PSN thing on purpose. When it was over, they apologized and gave everyone free games.
 
Are you serious? "You can't play for a few hours or a few days, do something else." You can't be serious.

Thank you based MS to give me time to do other things than play with your console, it's not like I bought your console to use it whenever I want. Thank you, you're too kind!
 

Hoo-doo

Banned
So are a lot of devices in my house, why should a game console be an exception. How useful is an internet browser without internet? It's a new paradigm shift with Durango, it's catching up to the always-connected nature of devices we have all around us.

Aside from the fact that I have a library of 50+ games installed on my harddrive that will launch with a simple click. No internet required.

..Why am I even responding to this guy.
 

B.O.O.M

Member
This has to be a joke. It just has to.

sadly no. It is funny however, but it wasn't inteded to be

So are a lot of devices in my house, why should a game console be an exception. How useful is an internet browser without internet? It's a new paradigm shift with Durango, it's catching up to the always-connected nature of devices we have all around us.

-_- At this point I'm starting to think you are pulling our leg
 

Demon Ice

Banned
Except... I'm not getting the next XBOX! Not sure because always online and DRM... it's the lack of new and interesting games. Go through my post history. I have no allegiance to any company.

I just don't see the big deal of this.

You don't see the issue with saying "It's not a huge deal when I sometimes can't play my games when I want to play my games" ?
 
seriously... Why does anyone think ms cares about core gamers anyway?

they didn't start making a profit until Kinect sold the 360 to more non gamers...?
 
Interesting that Kotaku breaking news about the PS4 controller's touchpad and share button, breaking news about Doom 4's troubled development cycle, showing video and images from Star Wars: First Assault, breaking news about LucasFilm shuttering LucasArts and canceling their games, showing concept art from the Boba Fett version of Star Wars 1313, telling the story of what really happened to Aliens: Colonial Marines, and many, many more stories just weren't enough to get some NeoGAFfers to trust that maybe we know what we're doing.

But hey, we'll just keep on keeping on. :)

I just don't want to believe man. I just don't want the truth!
 

spirity

Member
Really? Come on now. My wife's family lives in a remote town in India and they have stable/reliable DSL internet.

And again... you can't play for a few hours or a few days. Do some other activities. It's not the end of the world if you can't play your Halo or Forza at the exact moment and location you want to ALL the time!

That's the most short-sighted thing I've ever read here, and I've been here for a while.
 

Ploid 3.0

Member
When was the last time you saw Bing or Youtube down? These services lose money if people can't connect

It don't stop at their service, it'll also mean you can't play your console if you're at a location that don't have internet. People game in a wide range of places, not just in cities that have 24/7 internet. Soldiers in the army love playing consoles for entertainment, but they have limited use of internet depending on where they are.

Always on drm for specific games? Sure, easy to avoid that game.

Always on drm for a whole console? NO WAY!

For the record, I have both Diablo 3 and Sim City 2013. Diablo 3 was my fool me once. For Sim City the deal was too good to pass ($40 for sim city, Dead Space 3, and Need For Speed Most Wanted). I would have paid $20 for the other two games each.
 

Revven

Member
Every company does. Did everyone abandon Sony after the PSN fiasco? Nope. They took their free game and a glass of Koolaid. Business.

Difference is PSN is free while what Microsoft does is not and this, if it's true, probably won't be free either.
 
Man, I know these are just rumors and could be completely wrong, but the more I hear them the more I don't even want to bother with the next Xbox, though I probably wasn't going to get one anyway. But at the same time, I do want to give MS the benefit of the doubt, they could have some great exclusives or amazing new features, but these rumors are making it harder to care.
 
I hope this is true, because Microsoft now is all about family, kinect, movies and others hula-hula. Microsoft deserves make a big mistake and epic fail.

Right just like everyone here predicted Kinect would be an epic fail and ended up looking ridiculous and completely out of touch with reality.

This reminds me of all the talk in 2000/2001 about how Xbox 1 was making a huge mistake not including a dial-up modem like PS2 and Dreamcast and instead expecting everyone who bought Xbox to have broadband connections.

I'm already at the point where if my Internet is down I'm not turning on my Xbox 360. Without Internet access all of the video apps are worthless, no multiplayer, no party chat, no access to my cloud saves which is essential to me because I own multiple Xboxes, no ability to buy content, worry of achievements/saves not syncing, etc. So as far as I'm concerned Xbox 360 is already a system that requires online access to be useable.
 
Its not that unfeasible really.

Look at Google's Chromebooks and their requirement for always online, which ties into the general shift towards a cloud-based future. This transition goes hand-in-hand with always online.

I have a Chromebook and use it offline all the time.

I wouldn't have bought it if I couldn't.
 

eso76

Member
That's a price I'm willing to pay for Avatar in real time 4k.
Not to mention 30$ games with monthly 5$ deals.
Plus Microsoft is giving the console away for free so you can't really complain.
 

enzo_gt

tagged by Blackace
Aside from the fact that I have a library of 50+ games installed on my harddrive that will launch with a simple click. No internet required.

..Why am I even responding to this guy.
People don't understand the difference between always-on/always-connected and always-online which implicates DRM.

If you don't understand why this is an issue and don't really care for anyone other than yourself, you should probably refrain from participating in a discussion about the far reaching problems this creates. Those people are not worth replying to. It's been spelled out a million times now.
 
So what exact Koolaid was given? Did they try to convince everyone that PSN being down was awesome?

They didn't do the PSN thing on purpose. When it was over, they apologized and gave everyone free games.

Did they wait a week to tell me my credit card info was compromised by accident? To stick with any company that does that requires Koolaid to be drunk. I drank it and so did many others. It comes down to how badly you want the product they're selling.
 

Laranja

Member
Every company does. Did everyone abandon Sony after the PSN fiasco? Nope. They took their free game and a glass of Koolaid. Business.

I think the PSN fiasco is not comparable to this. While Sony completely mishandled the whole situation, I was still able to play all my games when that shit went down. I could not use some of the peripheral features of my videogames console, but I could still play games.

I hope that, if something similar were to happen with the next Xbox, barring users from playing their games, things would turn out differently.
 

Mifune

Mehmber
Difference is PSN is free while what Microsoft does is not and this, if it's true, probably won't be free either.

Difference is that the PSN outage was a terrible thing that they apologized for, not a terrible thing that they tried to force down our throats.
 
Every company does. Did everyone abandon Sony after the PSN fiasco? Nope. They took their free game and a glass of Koolaid. Business.

That was a mistake, though... not by design. They apologized for it. They gave away free stuff for it. Listen, if the Next XBox is going to be FREE in exchange for limiting play time, then sure, but otherwise.

I wonder, have you ever had your electricity go out in your house? Like, say, for 3 or 4 days during a storm? Do you see it as "just a time to get back to the basics, no heat, no food" or do you get frustrated as all hell?

..

ALSO, I am not even against always online or always online DRM shit. I just need to know what the benefit is for the consumer. Microsoft: just tell me what the benefit is, then I'll be okay with it.
 

WalkMan

Banned
It don't stop at their service, it'll also mean you can't play your console if you're at a location that don't have internet. People game in a wide range of places, not just in cities that have 24/7 internet. Soldiers in the army love playing consoles for entertainment, but they have limited use of internet depending on where they are.

Always on drm for specific games? Sure, easy to avoid that game.

Always on drm for a whole console? NO WAY!

For the record, I have both Diablo 3 and Sim City 2013. Diablo 3 was my fool me once. For Sim City the deal was too good to pass ($40 for sim city, Dead Space 3, and Need For Speed Most Wanted). I would have paid $20 for the other two games each.

If you are considering the portable aspects of a console, you should consider portable game console. Each console specializes and it just turns out Durango is for an always-connected home. Soldiers unfortunately do not fall under that category due to their inconsistent connection/locale.
 

Demon Ice

Banned
So are a lot of devices in my house, why should a game console be an exception. How useful is an internet browser without internet? It's a new paradigm shift with Durango, it's catching up to the always-connected nature of devices we have all around us.

Durango is an internet browser now? No shit an internet browser needs internet, its sole function is to browse the internet.

Why should a single player game require internet to launch? Hell, even my iphone is able to launch its offline single player apps if there is no internet or cell phone service.

You're okay with not having access to your games in the event of an internet outage (inclement weather, etc) on your end OR MS's end? Really?
 
Top Bottom