Public demonstration are generally organized and short.
Now if you think a riot is needed in the PS4 scenario, well, okay.
This part I just don't understand, to be honest. This is exactly how things like this works on Twitter. A small community tries to get others involved to highlight an issue to make it mainstream. In what way is that a riot? I've worked with social media management for international companies, as well as on campaigns that try to make issues public through the use of social media, and there is nothing wrong or weird or "riot" about this. You're just wrong.
Come on.
I just think you are "expressing your opinion" to people that are already well aware of it, and that may even share it. It must simply be plain annoying for them. How the fact that this is via twitter makes it less spamming remains quite mysterious to me.
You're showing muscles, but everybody knows you're still a vocal minority.
It's not at all like workers going on a strike because they boss is disconnected from reality.
In the end the plans of Sony won't change, they have a much broader vision, and you'll only have wasted the time of a few people. Once again, would you like to be the person receiving your messages?
PS : I'm totally okay with hashtags, as they don't target anyone.
edit :
I'm saying the currently angry gamers represent a small percentage of all software/hardware sales in the lifetime of the console. That they buy more games changes nothing to that.
And that isn't even considering most angry gamers right now will still buy the PS4 regardless.
So basically you're saying:
1. Don't talk about this, they already know about it, and since we don't know about Sonys vision we should shut up about it until they tell us what it is like nice little sheep.
2. Don't annoy public company people with our opinions, it doesn't matter that their Twitter accounts is essentially part of their marketing - because it's disrespectful?
3. We're just angry gamers that noone really cares about anyway.
Come on.