they should monitor Gaf, or 4chan!
seriouslycan someone explain to me why this is wrong? because it might actually be effective?
I'm saying I don't see what's wrong with it. I'm not pro-anything (besides iOS <3), I'm just anti-shitty logic.
So what? There are corporate shills everywhere on the internet, even here on GAF. This is common practice.
Okay, so how do we know this is not just a fabricated story to provide another argument for use in console wars?
Example:
'I like the Xbone.'
'You are on MS's payroll, I can disregard anything you say.'
Playing the devil's advocate here, but this could easily turn into a witchhunt.
Please don't accuse me of reputation managing D:
What a horrifying time to be a Junior.
Okay, so how do we know this is not just a fabricated story to provide another argument for use in console wars?
Example:
'I like the Xbone.'
'You are on MS's payroll, I can disregard anything you say.'
Playing the devil's advocate here, but this could easily turn into a witchhunt. There is nothing the accused can say to prove they are innocent.
Please don't accuse me of reputation managing D:
So what? There are corporate shills everywhere on the internet, even here on GAF. This is common practice.
Fantasia? I think some of these are satire.
So what? There are corporate shills everywhere on the internet, even here on GAF. This is common practice.
We already had a few GAF juniors doing all that shit, they got banned pretty quickly.
seriouslycan someone explain to me why this is wrong? because it might actually be effective?
So what? There are corporate shills everywhere on the internet, even here on GAF. This is common practice.
So some random Redditor writes a story thats negative so it has to be true huh?
It's misleading. It's like embedding an article in the New York Times supporting something without disclosing that you work for the company you are championing. It's sleazy.
I'm not justifying the act, I agree that it's pretty sleazy. Just saying that it's common practice among most companies and nothing new, not Microsoft being the sole big bad villian.It's misleading. It's like embedding an article in the New York Times supporting something without disclosing that you work for the company you are championing. It's sleazy.