Serious question guys. So who is this console really designed for? Some of the things Mattrick was saying was very non consumer friendly.
Serious question guys. So who is this console really designed for? Some of the things Mattrick was saying was very non consumer friendly.
Stop thinking of it like a last gen console and it makes more sense why I'd compare it to Netflix.
They wanted the system from the ground up to be an online system. Netflix requires internet.. you can bitch that you can't watch Netflix because you have no internet, but it'd be silly. Right? We can agree on that, I hope.
MS wants this console to be online, so everyone is on the same playing field from the ground up. All things (mostly) equal. Everything can be built around that as a known quantity, just like it's known you have 8gb of ram (5gb for games), everyone has a HD, the processor is known, the graphics chip is known.. all known quantities. Think of the online component being just another one of those things.
You can create a feature knowing that every console shares that feature, and it would work for all users of that system.
If you stop thinking of things from the prior gens of consoles, and think of as just another piece of the hardware.
A console analogy I can use is this.. the N64 has quite a few 4 player games. Why is that? Because it had 4 controller ports. Other systems allowed 4 players, but you had to buy a separate peripheral to use the extra controllers, so almost no one bothered to code it in.. because your market was split. Yet, there on the N64 any dev could build in 4 player support and know that EVERY console has that built into it.. users only need more controllers.. which wasn't a big deal. It was an even playing field.
I'm willing to sacrifice certain things for that to happen, and I've said multiple times I feel for those that can't be always online for various reasons.. but in no way, shape or form do I think MS should have held back for another generation to make this switch.
I think the time is right to move in this direction.
it really rubs me the wrong way how geoff really goes in hard, raw, and completely without disregard for reggie's feelings as not only a businessman, but above all, a man, a hopeless, lost man. but mattrick gets off pretty easy.
I'm surprised they didn't fire this guy. The guy compairing it to electricity got fired.
7 years later.....Don Mattrick is the new Ken Kutaragi. Minus the pimp suit, of course.
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?
All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.
They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.
Okay so I wanna know how this works.Orth? He technically resigned, he was not fired.
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?
All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.
They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.
Serious question guys. So who is this console really designed for? Some of the things Mattrick was saying was very non consumer friendly.
Yeah, going to have to agree with the sentiment. Very strong PS3 launch era Sony here.
At least in Sony's case, the primary issue (the price) was something that dropped as margins improved, and with hardware revisions...
Okay so I wanna know how this works.
"I am sorry dear CEO, I have shamed you and stained your company's honor. I submit my resignation in order that you may still love my worthless being"
?? Or was it more like management called him into office, and gave him a choice to either voluntarily resign, or get fired?
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?
How did MS get so arrogant? The X360 was definitely NOT a Ps2 in terms of success.
holy shit lol if true.
You're missing the point entirely. They are giving a big middle finger to a good amount of their existing, loyal customers and completely ignoring everyone else who's saying they don't want this shit on their console. It's the sheer arrogance and stupidity that's doing this to them. They're completely out of touch with their consumer base and it's showing.I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?
All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.
They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?
All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.
They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?
All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.
They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.
holy shit lol if true.
not even windows 8 err?
Half of the 360's install base actually.
That's 35 million. That is 5.7% of their 200 million install base aim of this generation.
Missing the point. It's about your RIGHT and LIMITATION OF CHOICES.
You eat bread daily. It's your choice. What if someone would force you to eat bread daily? It's the same thing you are doing forever, yet it's a vastly different situation. May be a bad analogy, but the point is only very partially about the online connection, it's about something way more fundamentally.
holy shit lol if true.
not even windows 8 err?
Not surprising, but might be thread worthy. Would be good to know which game he played and if they claim to play it on the console.
I deem this thread worthy.
They may force you to be online but in reality they dont. There isnt a bigger target group that is so present on the net than the gamer. It is ridicolous to argue over consoles with people that decide which console to buy depending on E3 presentations and how cute their trailers looked.
It isnt bad to be adaptive if its for a good entertainment machine at home.
MS tries to prepare their machine for the internet user of the future.
Source
They may force you to be online but in reality they dont. There isnt a bigger target group that is so present on the net than the gamer. It is ridicolous to argue over consoles with people that decide which console to buy depending on E3 presentations and how cute their trailers looked.
It isnt bad to be adaptive if its for a good entertainment machine at home.
MS tries to prepare their machine for the internet user of the future.
as crazy as the statement is, I find the statement quite BOSS actually.
Reality? Is our little GAF-bubble all you think matters? I see a lot of MS-humping over their grand online vision, like apologists really believe this isn't about the DRM scheme. MS has sacrificed a chunk of their base for this and they know it. You don't think they would've preferred to avoid that?
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?
All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.
They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.
Reality? Is our little GAF-bubble all you think matters? I see a lot of MS-humping over their grand online vision, like apologists really believe this isn't about the DRM scheme. MS has sacrificed a chunk of their base for this and they know it. You don't think they would've preferred to avoid that?