• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Don Mattrick: "Fortunately" consumers without a connection can buy Xbox 360

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sethos

Banned
untitled-15zzzd.gif
 

Sean*O

Member
"Just stand your ground boys and they will all come running back soon.. just watch." "Hey, wait, where are you all going..?"
 

spannicus

Member
Serious question guys. So who is this console really designed for? Some of the things Mattrick was saying was very non consumer friendly.
 

Ollie Pooch

In a perfect world, we'd all be homersexual
Every morning I log on here wondering what hilarious, horrible development has been made in the continuing PR clusterfuck of the Xbone. So entertaining. Still no elaboration on what benefits all this online checking has for the person paying them for this thing.

Again, I'm actually shocked that they're happy to completely shed the millions of 360 customers who don't have reliable internet (or internet at all) going into next gen. It's like they hit the reset button.

Dead @ Ron Paul photoshop.
 
Serious question guys. So who is this console really designed for? Some of the things Mattrick was saying was very non consumer friendly.

A pie in the sky fantasy football loving, motion control loving, NSA employee demographic their marketing team in conjunction with some analysts came up with.
 
Stop thinking of it like a last gen console and it makes more sense why I'd compare it to Netflix.

They wanted the system from the ground up to be an online system. Netflix requires internet.. you can bitch that you can't watch Netflix because you have no internet, but it'd be silly. Right? We can agree on that, I hope.

MS wants this console to be online, so everyone is on the same playing field from the ground up. All things (mostly) equal. Everything can be built around that as a known quantity, just like it's known you have 8gb of ram (5gb for games), everyone has a HD, the processor is known, the graphics chip is known.. all known quantities. Think of the online component being just another one of those things.

You can create a feature knowing that every console shares that feature, and it would work for all users of that system.

If you stop thinking of things from the prior gens of consoles, and think of as just another piece of the hardware.

A console analogy I can use is this.. the N64 has quite a few 4 player games. Why is that? Because it had 4 controller ports. Other systems allowed 4 players, but you had to buy a separate peripheral to use the extra controllers, so almost no one bothered to code it in.. because your market was split. Yet, there on the N64 any dev could build in 4 player support and know that EVERY console has that built into it.. users only need more controllers.. which wasn't a big deal. It was an even playing field.

I'm willing to sacrifice certain things for that to happen, and I've said multiple times I feel for those that can't be always online for various reasons.. but in no way, shape or form do I think MS should have held back for another generation to make this switch.

I think the time is right to move in this direction.

What? It'd be silly because Netflix is a streaming service. You can only really compare Netflix to the established examples of cloud power that are the most crucial to game operation. If it truly needs internet access for a feature like the Forza 5 example (something the xbone could not compute by itself), okay, but if it still requires the internet for local content I've already downloaded to my system (and that xbone could execute natively), that is no longer comparable to Netflix. What MS is doing isn't about content delivery or game operation. It requires internet beyond those areas, for DRM reasons, and Netflix has nothing to do with DRM.

If I rent/purchase a game/video from the PSN Store, it goes to my HD first, then I use it. It has a license that causes it to expire after a certain amount of time (or never if purchased), and I do have to be online to transfer it to one of my paired devices, but I still am able to use it offline. If that were to change, and being online would be required to view that content on my HD, that would be a better comparison. Trying to drag Netflix into this to present existing comparison examples doesn't really work.

I don't think anyone minds needing online access to purchase online content, to suggest otherwise would be pretty insulting, but with past examples of cloud gaming features coming off as disingenuous excuses for DRM, you have to expect the sour reception we're seeing regarding going all the way with online systems. In many relevant cases it just isn't necessary for all functionality. It becomes an arbitrary capstone for MS and their vision, and excludes a lot of real customers.

A perfect system doesn’t shoehorn everything into one area, it considers all viable markets. The digital/online standards you seem to want are already well established with existing tech. Forcing online-only on the world might make it seem like you are part of a clean standard, one we’ve been flirting with for years, and now we’ve finally triumphed, etc, but that is all a farce if you had to abandon a significant chunk of the market to get there.
 

Fehyd

Banned
Yeah, going to have to agree with the sentiment. Very strong PS3 launch era Sony here.

At least in Sony's case, the primary issue (the price) was something that dropped as margins improved, and with hardware revisions.

Unless MS reconsiders their stance, I don't think that it'll make a world of difference. The system will still sell, but its hard not to notice so many 360 owners jumping ship.

I wonder if MS managed to secure some sort of exclusive game deal with a few publishers with its DRM stance, and consequently, would risk losing those deals if they changed policy? I mean, there has to be a reason they went through with it, why they didn't reconsider, and come out at E3 and announce that it was going to have the same DRM and requirements that current-gen consoles have.
 

RurouniZel

Asks questions so Ezalc doesn't have to
it really rubs me the wrong way how geoff really goes in hard, raw, and completely without disregard for reggie's feelings as not only a businessman, but above all, a man, a hopeless, lost man. but mattrick gets off pretty easy.

It's evident Geoff's been shilling for Microsoft for a long time now.
 
I understand what their "trying" to do, but im just not seeing it. All this Cloud talk, yet nothing really shown that proves what advantage it brings. Only talk. The price is bumped by Kinect, yet no real Kinect integration is shown that makes it worth it and to top it all off its not as powerful, cant trade in, lend games etc... All this goodness for 100$ more! What a sweet deal.
 
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?

All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.

They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.
 
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?

All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.


They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.

Half of the 360's install base actually.

That's 35 million. That is 5.7% of their 200 million install base aim of this generation.
 
Orth? He technically resigned, he was not fired.
Okay so I wanna know how this works.

"I am sorry dear CEO, I have shamed you and stained your company's honor. I submit my resignation in order that you may still love my worthless being"

?? Or was it more like management called him into office, and gave him a choice to either voluntarily resign, or get fired?
 

Zukuu

Banned
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?

All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.

They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.

Missing the point. It's about your RIGHT and LIMITATION OF CHOICES.


You eat bread daily. It's your choice. What if someone would force you to eat bread daily? It's the same thing you are doing forever, yet it's a vastly different situation. May be a bad analogy, but the point is only very partially about the online connection, it's about something way more fundamentally.
 
Serious question guys. So who is this console really designed for? Some of the things Mattrick was saying was very non consumer friendly.

skyping grannies with $500 to burn :) ...

Yeah, going to have to agree with the sentiment. Very strong PS3 launch era Sony here.

At least in Sony's case, the primary issue (the price) was something that dropped as margins improved, and with hardware revisions...

& at least, in sony's case, i got something i actually wanted (backward compatibility)...
 

jediyoshi

Member
Okay so I wanna know how this works.

"I am sorry dear CEO, I have shamed you and stained your company's honor. I submit my resignation in order that you may still love my worthless being"

?? Or was it more like management called him into office, and gave him a choice to either voluntarily resign, or get fired?

Either way, it looks better for both involved if the employee just resigns.
 

Omega

Banned
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?

maybe some of us aren't selfish? I live in NY and I have FiOS. I don't have to worry about internet but others aren't as fortunate, and Microsoft is pretty much saying "fuck off, we don't want you anyway"

I can't support a company that openly disrespects customers
 

gotoadgo

Member
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?

All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.

They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.
You're missing the point entirely. They are giving a big middle finger to a good amount of their existing, loyal customers and completely ignoring everyone else who's saying they don't want this shit on their console. It's the sheer arrogance and stupidity that's doing this to them. They're completely out of touch with their consumer base and it's showing.
 

Sydle

Member
Love it. MS is all in on their strategy. Now to see if it works out like they plan.

Also really weird to see the most honest, direct, and clear communication out of MS in the past 6 months and GAF hates it. They're not going to change a damn thing. Vote with your wallet, people.
 

Colby

Member
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?

All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.

They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.

This is brought up a lot, but it's not really the point. I don't remember the exact statistic (feel free to correct me on this [it might be half of all owners like Pound said, idk]), but I think it's 30% of all 360 owners never connected to the internet. That's a HUGE number of players. And that's not counting players who only connected a few times for updates or whatever. I can only know how it affects my life, and of the 5 people I know with 360's, including myself, only two were connected at all times.

I do think some posters and people in general are complaining for the sake of complaining, but this is a serious issue, whether it affects the vocal minority on GAF or not. I don't think Earth is ready for an always-online console yet...the internet infrastructure isn't up to snuff yet. Either way, I know they lost one sale -- me.
 
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?

All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.

They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.

My Smartphone and my computer, the two most connected devices ever conceived, continue to function when they are not online. Hell, they both even play games offline! Crazy, I know.

What do I get out of a device that requires an online connection that I don't get from a device that can connect as an option? Microsoft has had weeks to express their reasoning and they have completely failed.
 

Paradicia

Member
People calling that tweet thread worthy when for all we know it was game being run on a dev kit, which isn't unusual for a game still in active development. He didn't say which 'Xbox One' game either.
 
Half of the 360's install base actually.

That's 35 million. That is 5.7% of their 200 million install base aim of this generation.

Source

Missing the point. It's about your RIGHT and LIMITATION OF CHOICES.


You eat bread daily. It's your choice. What if someone would force you to eat bread daily? It's the same thing you are doing forever, yet it's a vastly different situation. May be a bad analogy, but the point is only very partially about the online connection, it's about something way more fundamentally.

They may force you to be online but in reality they dont. There isnt a bigger target group that is so present on the net than the gamer. It is ridicolous to argue over consoles with people that decide which console to buy depending on E3 presentations and how cute their trailers looked.

It isnt bad to be adaptive if its for a good entertainment machine at home.
MS tries to prepare their machine for the internet user of the future.
 
They may force you to be online but in reality they dont. There isnt a bigger target group that is so present on the net than the gamer. It is ridicolous to argue over consoles with people that decide which console to buy depending on E3 presentations and how cute their trailers looked.

It isnt bad to be adaptive if its for a good entertainment machine at home.
MS tries to prepare their machine for the internet user of the future.

Reality? Is our little GAF-bubble all you think matters? I see a lot of MS-humping over their grand online vision, like apologists really believe this isn't about the DRM scheme. MS has sacrificed a chunk of their base for this and they know it. You don't think they would've preferred to avoid that?
 

Zukuu

Banned
Source



They may force you to be online but in reality they dont. There isnt a bigger target group that is so present on the net than the gamer. It is ridicolous to argue over consoles with people that decide which console to buy depending on E3 presentations and how cute their trailers looked.

It isnt bad to be adaptive if its for a good entertainment machine at home.
MS tries to prepare their machine for the internet user of the future.

Thing is, it has virtually no benefit for the customer. You're just giving away your freedom to not log in.
 

Freki

Member
Reality? Is our little GAF-bubble all you think matters? I see a lot of MS-humping over their grand online vision, like apologists really believe this isn't about the DRM scheme. MS has sacrificed a chunk of their base for this and they know it. You don't think they would've preferred to avoid that?

I think they simply underestimated the backlash - they surely knew that there would be unhappy people. The problem is that they thought this would only be fringe cases like the guy in a submarine...
 

Croyles

Member
I love how most of you guys act like you are pissed off they do this...but be real with yourself...how often are you connected to the net day by day?

All you guys on GAF are connected anyways and a big fat number play online anyways.
So MS is basically saying they can do without the pure offline gamer.

They will be able to gauge the exact number of XBox One Live accounts and especially the needs of every gamer and push their products even stronger in that direction.

Wow really? All this argument about who isn't connected 24/7 aside, this is also about internet SPEED. I am a middle class 27 year old male with a full time job that earns enough money. The ONLY internet available to me is something that gives me 300kbps download speeds at MAX. Imagine what this would do to me when I have to download every disc based game I own.
 

Xamdou

Member
Did Don Mattrick himself do another interview relating to the issues? Or any other MS officials in charge of the Xbox one?
 

Sydle

Member
Reality? Is our little GAF-bubble all you think matters? I see a lot of MS-humping over their grand online vision, like apologists really believe this isn't about the DRM scheme. MS has sacrificed a chunk of their base for this and they know it. You don't think they would've preferred to avoid that?

I think they strongly believe they're going to win them back and more once people realize what they're doing. If they really bring amazing games in quantity like they did at E3 every year it's not hard for me to believe it just might work.

They're making a bold bet and standing behind it 100%. It's hard not to give Mattrick respect for it.
 

kurbaan

Banned
Cant believe MS had that video taken down (if they did) thats pretty pathetic.

Also to the people saying they have the always online requirement to make it known quantity for devs thats not true at all. If that was the case the need to be connected wouldn't be every 24 hours, IT would be all ALL the time like Sim City etc.

In terms of online connectivity the Xbone is the exact same as the PS4. Except if you disconnect for more than 24 hours it wont work. The 24 hour thing has nothing to do with games its all about DRM.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom