-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Candy Crush dev trademarks the word "Candy," Apple legal goes after infringing games
- Thread starter chubigans
- Start date
Better- a Vowel.
Context- all forms of written works, not limited to online or physical copies.
Stumpokapow
listen to the mad man
They have in many cases (sport team logos).
MrTroubleMaker
Member
wow what a bunch of crap
yup
Goldenmoney
Member
Wtf? You can't just own the word candy.
This is the game GAF should be making instead of Dudebro.
someguyinahat
Member
Disturbing lack of either "Angry" or "Birds."
double jump
you haven't lived until a random little kid ask you "how do you make love".
TOD sounds kinda awesome.
The article says the trademark covers its use in clothing as well.
Edit: looks like its already been pointed out already
FeiRR
Banned
Some companies know no limits http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2409669,00.asp
BronsonLee
Member
Did the dreaded S-Kill from Divekick make that casino slots game?!
BRocknRolla
Member
1.) Apple Legal is not "going after" anyone. Based on this article, they sent an e-mail to companies who have been accused by King.com of having an infringing trademark. They may well feel legally obligated to comply with complaints so that, should a trademark claim be filed successfully, they aren't be seen as actively participating and/or protecting trademark infringers, particularly as they will have received some portion of the profits from said accused infringers. This is the same thing you see with Youtube and their intellectual property complaints. Apple is covering their legal butts, and the idea that their legal department is "complicit" is an angle the writer of this article has invented.
2.) The patent and trademark office approves all kinds of intellectual property. Generic terms are not supposed to be protected, and this would be a likely successful defense in court. (Especially since this appears to be just the word "Candy" and not a matter of additional words or "trade dress".) The the office is overly generous with their allowances. Why? I would guess it's because they're overburdened to a ridiculous degree, and that probably leads to a lack of vigilance when it comes to matters like this. Unfortunately, the courts are likewise intensely overburdened with these kinds of claims. It's a very bad system right now, and very little is being done to reform it.
2.) The patent and trademark office approves all kinds of intellectual property. Generic terms are not supposed to be protected, and this would be a likely successful defense in court. (Especially since this appears to be just the word "Candy" and not a matter of additional words or "trade dress".) The the office is overly generous with their allowances. Why? I would guess it's because they're overburdened to a ridiculous degree, and that probably leads to a lack of vigilance when it comes to matters like this. Unfortunately, the courts are likewise intensely overburdened with these kinds of claims. It's a very bad system right now, and very little is being done to reform it.
Baron von Loathsome
Member
Time trademark Legend, Soul, and their respective plural forms.
Hahahahah I just pictured bill gates chucking rocks at people's windows saying "Trademarked bitch! What are you gonna do?"
Stumpokapow
listen to the mad man
They would be very hard pressed to enforce it against unrelated clothing products. A lot of entertainment trademarks extend to merchandise in this way.
'Game', not 'screenshot'? Odd.
Nymphae
Banned
This. Also, fuck Candy Crush and the developers with a giant splintery stick with nails in it.
Don't forget Origin and Gaiden.
Edit: Also I'm embarrased to share the same country as these devs if this is how low they're willing to go.
BLACK AMERICAN PSYCHO
Junior Member
lol
It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
I'm copyrighting the letter "E" good luck typing anything now lol
SwiftDeath
Member
That's no problm at all. It's as asy as can b.
It's as bad as patents.
D
Deleted member 1235
Unconfirmed Member
they can't in europe, this is an oddity of the US patent system.
^according to my friend who works at the EU patent office, I wouldn't have any clue how to research that myself, nor would I, because it sounds terribly boring to do.
They should be sued solely on how stupid that name is.
This name is obviously keyword spam (to try and get into search results for more popular games), but that's still no excuse for King to apply for (and receive) a trademark on the word 'candy'.
I always thought they were a little evil, but I guess I underestimated.
Well naturally. The article states since it's such a common word it wouldn't be open and shut infringement even when used in games. I as well as others just pointed that out because of your instant dismissal of the idea lingerie or clothing wouldn't be affected.
Osiris
I permanently banned my 6 year old daughter from using the PS4 for mistakenly sending grief reports as it's too hard to watch or talk to her
This.
King are being ridiculous, and I expect an 'Edge' style blowback for them if they proceed.
But the counterpoint to this is the fact that some of the most obvious "passing off" examples on the App Store and Google Play deserve an equal amount of kicking and blowback is also true.
A happy medium will emerge as the market matures, the current no holds barred gold rush, 'no rules apply' aspect of the mobile market has to be curtailed.
But this isn't the way to do it.
FrontalMonk
Banned
Yeah, pretty much. This is the kind of bullshit that normal people wouldn't dream of pulling.
YianGaruga
Banned
I'm gonna call my new game "Candy Scrolls".
ElRenoRaven
Member
Just another example of why our trademark system needs a complete overhaul. Just freaking insane.
Pop-O-Matic
Banned
PGH (Pokemon Growth Hormone).
KillerDark
Member
This... pretty ridiculous that the trademark was even approved in the first place.