~Devil Trigger~
In favor of setting Muslim women on fire
why would Will Smith "hurt" anything??RubxQub said:Out of curiosity, what do black people think of Will Smith?
Does he help bridge this gap or hurt it or what?
why would Will Smith "hurt" anything??RubxQub said:Out of curiosity, what do black people think of Will Smith?
Does he help bridge this gap or hurt it or what?
My Dad actually looks like a lot like Bill Cosby except he's Arab and he has an epic mustache.bdizzle said::lol holy shit how can i forget about the coz crazy ass. He looks horrible now. He's like a millions yrs old though so I guess it's normal. I still love watch the reruns on TV![]()
I have it in my head that there are black people who think Will Smith is "too white", which sounds like they are saying that black people having a unique identity is a good thing, and Will Smith is only successful because he's taken on too many characteristics of white people instead of being a proud black man...~Devil Trigger~ said:why would Will Smith "hurt" anything??
RubxQub said:Out of curiosity, what do black people think of Will Smith?
Does he help bridge this gap or hurt it or what?
RubxQub said:I have it in my head that there are black people who think Will Smith is "too white", which sounds like they are saying that black people having a unique identity is a good thing, and Will Smith is only successful because he's taken on too many characteristics of white people instead of being a proud black man...
...or something.
I can't rationalize the weird issues people have over this stuff, so I was hoping for some perspective from others.
JGS said:I like him and think he helped even while being goofy on Fresh Prince.He's even married to a black woman! To me, he has a similar quality as Bill Cosby & Denzel Washington where his qualities transcends stereotypes, but without compromising on their upbringing or culture.
In all honesty, I would say the same thing about Tyler Perry whose films I'm largely indifferent to. However, the characters in them, with the main exception being Madea, are pretty solid and represented a very diverse groups of black people. Further he is a successfulblack person that controls his own empire and keeps other blacks employed. I don't really care too much if that isolates him from white audiences because they have 95% of the movie market so it's OK if their feelings are hurt a little since I don't think isolation is Perry's intent.(gay?)
I guess the problem is that black people unify around their blackness within different organizations, but there is no comparable "white organizations" that white people actively participate in strictly because there are white issues we need to address. You're obviously right that black people don't speak in one voice, but they appear to try to with these organizations and that's confusing. I think I did a horrible job of explaining all that.teddyboi said::lol It's funny when non black people try to understand us.
No offense, but that sounded crazy.
I don't really know how all black people think, because we aren't just some programmed robots who think alike and talk alike.
But the general consensus I think we have on Will Smith: Corny, cheesy rapper. Good and well-liked actor, and a role model. Black women love him because he's married to a sister.
140.85 said:Are they really trying to suggest that blacks in America are victims of Green Mile and Driving Miss Daisy? In what way have they been victimized? And how does it manifest itself in their daily lives?
RubxQub said:I guess the problem is that black people unify around their blackness within different organizations, but there is no comparable "white organizations" that white people actively participate in strictly because there are white issues we need to address. You're obviously right that black people don't speak in one voice, but they appear to try to with these organizations and that's confusing. I think I did a horrible job of explaining all that.
What's frustrating for white folks is that what one black person considers racist, another black person may not. Some words aren't proper to use with some folks...others are. There's no clear set of "what's OK and what isn't OK"
Seems like a weird side effect of being so close in history to when blacks got their proper equal treatment legally in America, and it's taking society time for people to actually adjust to being equal. I imagine in 200 years all this racism talk will be non-existent...or hope it is, rather.
RubxQub said:I guess the problem is that black people unify around their blackness within different organizations, but there is no comparable "white organizations" that white people actively participate in strictly because there are white issues we need to address. You're obviously right that black people don't speak in one voice, but they appear to try to with these organizations and that's confusing. I think I did a horrible job of explaining all that.
What's frustrating for white folks is that what one black person considers racist, another black person may not. Some words aren't proper to use with some folks...others are. There's no clear set of "what's OK and what isn't OK"
Seems like a weird side effect of being so close in history to when blacks got their proper equal treatment legally in America, and it's taking society time for people to actually adjust to being equal. I imagine in 200 years all this racism talk will be non-existent...or hope it is, rather.
I'm getting more to the general issue, but I was talking about having things like BET, Ebony magazine, NAACP (not that this doesn't serve a valid purpose)...etc...where the sole purpose is to speak to/for black people.teddyboi said:What organizations? I thought we were talking about movies.
RubxQub said:I'm getting more to the general issue, but I was talking about having things like BET, Ebony magazine, NAACP (not that this doesn't serve a valid purpose)...etc...where the sole purpose is to speak to/for black people.
It creates this image within society that black people are separate than white people, and presumably they embrace this separation.
Again, I know this doesn't mean all black people love ebony magazine or watch BET...but to white people (me) it does create this weird "black world" that I'm not a part of and am not invited.
Right or wrong, that's what I feel.
I hear you.teddyboi said:I see what you mean. But it's just a product of our society. Even though not officially segregated, the US is very much segregated. (Schools, neighborhoods, cities, nightclubs, music) There is a by-and-large American black culture and then there's a white America culture.
I honestly don't know why you think it's weird. This country is divided. And really, it is so divided that many white people don't really know who black people are except through entertainment, casual observation and brief communication with a small group of us.
It works vica versa as well. The product of this seperation is our "black world." But you must realize, that there are many complexities within this world. But you're right, the world is real.
shuri said:But The Toy is a remake of a french movie... There was no racist overtones in it. The original character was a regular joe who worked for a newspaper after being jobless for a long time. From what I recall, Pryor saw the movie and loved it, and thats how it ended up being made.
Are you a character who does nothing but come up with witty puns?Count Dookkake said:I am in pre-production on a film about a 'magical negro.' It is kind of a response to the cliche, but not really a parody. I wonder what GAF will think of it.
Wrath2X said:Are you a character who does nothing but come up with whitey puns?
Must watch!Count Dookkake said:fixed
Count Dookkake said:fixed
Alfarif said:When Bebe Kids came out, I was pretty young. I remember thinking there was something "wrong" about the film. My parents never outright said "Warren, this stuff isn't what we're about," but I remember just thinking "These are not the black people I know at all." Looking back at it now, that movie was utter trash.
RubxQub said:I'm getting more to the general issue, but I was talking about having things like BET, Ebony magazine, NAACP (not that this doesn't serve a valid purpose)...etc...where the sole purpose is to speak to/for black people.
It creates this image within society that black people are separate than white people, and presumably they embrace this separation.
Again, I know this doesn't mean all black people love ebony magazine or watch BET...but to white people (me) it does create this weird "black world" that I'm not a part of and am not invited.
Right or wrong, that's what I feel.
JGS said:Well, these aren't really seperation issues (One could make an argument for NAACP I guess). I look at it more that black people are always a part of general society but no one notices.:lol
When others do notice, it's to see that they have a seperate channel or magazine or speak of a seemingly unimportant agenda, but the truth is blacks also have to purchase "non-black" stuff. White people (or other minorities) in general can live just find without involving themselves in the black community. That doesn't work the other way.
How many black mags are there and how many magazines would be discussing issues revolving around black people if not for them?
Any white person can pick up black magazines. Ebony should not make you feel uncomfortable. If anything, it's an opportunity to see how the "other side" lives. Most articles (with the exception of editorials) are not started with an "us" or a "we".
They are simply articles discussing black issues. They are necessary because Time & Newsweek don't have the time or space to address them other than in connection to race relations rather than just living it. That doesn't make them racist, just more concerning with generalities.
BET is the same way.
I personally don't read them because the writing is not quite up to snuff. They remind me of People magazine articles, which I don't read either. However, their recipe sections are top notch if you like cooking.
Magazine in general are extremely segment though. The only ones that don't have their own section is white supremacists.
DY_nasty said:I don't have a problem with Will Smith. I do however get very pissed when black people try and say that he's right behind Denzel (who's also overrated like hell) as a the best black actor.
-COOLIO- said:i agree wtih rubx
stuff like ebony and BET just increase the racial divide. black people grow up feeling like they are suppose to watch BET. these are things that should be associated with a culture, not a race.
RubxQub said:Out of curiosity, what do black people think of Will Smith?
Does he help bridge this gap or hurt it or what?
-COOLIO- said:i agree wtih rubx
stuff like ebony and BET just increase the racial divide. black people grow up feeling like they are suppose to watch BET. these are things that should be associated with a culture, not a race.
Goddamn, I was just thinking the same thing, only in the opposite order. Forest is still the de facto black actor in American films and (having watched The Hurt Locker for the first time over the weekend) Anthony Mackie is the second. Will Smith is probably in the top 10, but not top 5 for sure. The problem with Hollywood, though, is that I can ramble off a top 25 best white actors in under a minute. Can't do that for any other race though. :|teddyboi said:The guy from the Hurt Locker currently is. And Forest Whitaker.
I have many issues with BET, but I don't think it prepetuates the racial divide at all. White people don't get electrically shocked when they turn BET on. Just like I don't get eletrically shocked when I turn Telemundo on.
-COOLIO- said:i agree wtih rubx
stuff like ebony and BET just increase the racial divide. black people grow up feeling like they are suppose to watch BET. these are things that should be associated with a culture, not a race.
harSon said:It's a decent movie but it's basically a film for soccer moms to make themselves feel better, not the Michael Oher story they advertised it as. I couldn't help but roll my eyes when Sandra Bullock's character, come the fuck on :lolwalks into a Memphis project and tells off a gang banger
complete BSRubxQub said:I have it in my head that there are black people who think Will Smith is "too white", which sounds like they are saying that black people having a unique identity is a good thing, and Will Smith is only successful because he's taken on too many characteristics of white people instead of being a proud black man...
...or something.
I can't rationalize the weird issues people have over this stuff, so I was hoping for some perspective from others.
ymmv said:Ridiculous list. I don't see at all how movies like Cleopatra, The Green Mile, Driving Miss Daisy or Song of the South hurt black America. Gone with the South could be construed that because of that crazy young black maid but on the other hand it also featured Hattie McDaniel in an Oscar winning role that was not "cringe worthy" at all but really a great performance.
Most of the bad rep Song of the South gets is from people who haven't actually seen the movie. There's not a trace of racism in it at all, there are no references to slavery. Uncle Remus is portrayed very positively. In fact, you can make a better case that this movie is anti-racist since it has white and black children living and playing together in a time period when this wasn't done at all, especially in the south where the movie takes place. Uncle Remus is actually telling old anansi stories so this is the first movie where black folk tales feature prominently.
harSon said:I'm not going to deny the fact that the movie is entertaining but to say there's no traces of racism is reaching. It helps perpetuate the "Uncle Tom" stereotype popular within American films from the early to mid 1900s, basically the loyal black worker content with his position in society, or to put it simply, what many Americans considered to be the ideal representation of a Black American. And the Tar Baby? :lol
Gone with the Wind suffers from the same issues, although Hattie McDaniel's portrayal of the "Mammy" is a lot more assertive and demanding than what's typically found within that stereotype.
harSon said:I'm not going to deny the fact that the movie is entertaining but to say there's no traces of racism is reaching. It helps perpetuate the "Uncle Tom" stereotype popular within American films from the early to mid 1900s, basically the loyal black worker content with his position in society, or to put it simply, what many Americans considered to be the ideal representation of a Black American. And the Tar Baby? :lol
Gone with the Wind suffers from the same issues, although Hattie McDaniel's portrayal of the "Mammy" is a lot more assertive and demanding than what's typically found within that stereotype.
let me guess, that's normal, non-racially focused tv? GOOD.JGS said:That's not true. Black grow up to thinking they have to watch the same things white kids do. Mags and channels like BET were created to counter that for better or worse depending on the program/magazine/movie.
The whole point of this thread is to argue how limited entertainment choices are for black people (This I agree with) and the ones that are available perpetuate a negative stereotype (This I don't necessarily agree with).
Once again, this has more to do with a white person being uncomfortable with black oriented things. The good news is they don't have to worry about it.:lol
Step by Step, Full House, Growing Pains, etc. = normal, non-racially focused-COOLIO- said:let me guess, that's normal, non-racially focused tv? GOOD.
im sorry but choices in movies and tv arent limited for black people. they are allowed to watch stuff starring any race or promoting any culture.
harSon said:I'm not to fond of them but black centric stuff, while often divisive, is a necessary evil. While a lot of it is perpetuating stereotypes, they're providing jobs to minorities within these industries that would otherwise fail to find one. There will come a day when it's no longer needed, but I still think there a rather profound gap that needs tightening.
RubxQub said:I have it in my head that there are black people who think Will Smith is "too white", which sounds like they are saying that black people having a unique identity is a good thing, and Will Smith is only successful because he's taken on too many characteristics of white people instead of being a proud black man...
...or something.
I can't rationalize the weird issues people have over this stuff, so I was hoping for some perspective from others.
Oh I agree, don't get me wrong.-COOLIO- said:there is nothing i hate more in the english language than terms like "too black", or "too white", or "too race x". you do not act like a race, a race is nothing more than common physical characteristics. anyone can be anyone they want to be.
ymmv said:Make Uncle Remus white and you'd still have the same movie. The role of Uncle Remus in the movie is not to portray a docile black worker, he acts as a father figure to the kids, both black and white. If he had been white, would you feel Uncle Remus portrays the loyal and content white worker, the ideal of wealthy American plutocrats and industrialists?
That tar baby already figures in the anansi stories black slaves took with them from Africa. See for instance http://www.sacred-texts.com/afr/jas/jas021.htm It has nothing to do with a racist cartoon portrayal of blacks. If there's any racism, it's only in the eye of the observer who wants to be offended so he can use the racism card.
RubxQub said:Oh I agree, don't get me wrong.
I think the problem is that the media machine (movies, tv, news) makes me think that every black person is a person who is very sensitive to their race and racial identity.
Just look at the "Obama is too white" stories that ran all over the place. It makes the casual reader think that the majority of black people think some guy is too white for them...so they reject them..."he's not one of us, he's one of them".
Perhaps my perspective is a bit jaded, as I live just outside of Philadelphia and the inner-city folk aren't the best examples of black people.
I live in the middle of white suburbia and black inner-city (I call them this because the population to the left of me is predominately white and full of green while the population to the right of me is predominantly black and full of cement and buildings). I shop at a grocery store that is considered on the side of the black people (white people generally avoid it, just about all the employees and customers are black) and there's a very strange atmosphere in there as a white person. You get looks from people and it makes you uncomfortable...I'm just shopping at the most convenient location, but the feeling of not being welcome would push away most people (and probably has).
Just frustrating.
Tim the Wiz said:Of course, it has been widely believed for quite some time that her line of ancestry to Ptolemy was wholly inbred, but recently there's been a lot of doubt put on that supposition. There's a good chance she was partly African. Which makes sense: The "pure bloodline" party line (that would be exceedingly hard to maintain over so many centuries) was probably a royal fiction.
RubxQub said:I live in the middle of white suburbia and black inner-city (I call them this because the population to the left of me is predominately white and full of green while the population to the right of me is predominantly black and full of cement and buildings). I shop at a grocery store that is considered on the side of the black people (white people generally avoid it, just about all the employees and customers are black) and there's a very strange atmosphere in there as a white person. You get looks from people and it makes you uncomfortable...I'm just shopping at the most convenient location, but the feeling of not being welcome would push away most people (and probably has).
Enosh said:it's sad to see you feel that way
joke post?