• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

2012 Jan NBA Season |OT2| TAKE IT KONEX. SWALLOW IT ALL.

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you count centers, sure, but PF's? Only PF in history to consistently win was Timmy. There's something about the PF position, where unless you're absolutely unstoppable offensively and defensively, you cant be the number 1 option and win multiple rings.

Dirk did it this year, but he also has bowed out of the first round multiple times when he had a 50+ win team that could contend. Unless I see more success from the PF position as the #1 option, I'm not buying that it's a great position to designate as your franchise guy


Elite Centers > Elite Wings (not named Kobe or MJ) but PF's don't get the job done.

Kobe is amazing.. but even he never did it without a top 5 big..

and these wings you talk about all seem to be sgs which is in short supply... last team powered by a SF to win a ring was?
 
Whats wrong with picking against your team? Its a sign of not being delusional and having to go on a hiatus when they lose like everyone thought.
I'm really high on Austin Rivers the same way I've been high on Rubio since I first saw him play.


Austin Rivers would be horrible as a PG, but as an SG in the league (if he really is 6'5) could really blossom. The 2 guard position really sucks in the league and with Kobe and Wade on the wrong side of 30 and no one else really in position to challenge, dude can become a dominant 2 guard if he has the correct mentality or work ethic.


Sometimes you watch youtube clips and you can tell when someone's got it, Rivers' has it. If they force him to play the point in the NBA though, he'll suck.

He's not strong enough/quick enough/big enough to play SG imo. His shot is decent, but he won't be able to immediately rely on it. There are much better SG prospects already in the NBA and coming out in this year's draft. Very few good SGs just show up anyways. Wade and Kobe both needed the full four years of their rookie contract to establish themselves. Still, they both had the body to survive long enough to realize how to play.

IWMTB is right though. His decision making is bad even at the college level - almost always because he thinks he's a LOT better than he actually is. That's the kind of shit that gets you nailed to a bench early on in the NBA, even on bad teams.

Rivers though... I don't think he'll fall flat on his face, but at the same time I'd never take him over either of the Lamb kids, Beal, or Buford. He should stay in school. He probably will too.
is he like having a coach on the floor?
A bad one, sure.
 
Kobe is amazing.. but even he never did it without a top 5 big..

and these wings you talk about all seem to be sgs which is in short supply... last team powered by a SF to win a ring was?

And Shaq, Kareem, Russell never did it without a top 5 perimeter player. SG's as option 1A have won the championship 9 times in the last 2 decades (Jordan, Kobe 09-10, Wade) That's a pretty insane stat. If you add 2000 - 2002 when Kobe was option 1B and option 1A in crunch time...that number jumps to 12 times in the last 2 decades.

Boston 08. PP was option 1A on that team and he was an SF. Bird won 3. Baylor and West made the finals umpteen times in their day. Lebron can easily get to the finals 6 or 7 times in his career and win 3-4...all SF's that give you continued success


I don't normally count finals appearances, but when you consistently make the finals as option 1A as Baylor did for a while, and as Lebron has, it's saying something.


But I agree, PG, SG, and C are the most important positions to build around for continued success (Finals Berths or rings). PF and SF not as much if history is any indicator.
 
On top just like the Thunder (except last week when they lost to the Wiz and fucked us all)!

New York @ Cleveland
Charlotte @ Washington
New Jersey @ Philadelphia
Miami @ Detroit
Indiana @ Chicago
Milwaukee @ Houston
New Orleans @ Oklahoma City
Atlanta @ San Antonio
Minnesota @ Dallas
Toronto @ Utah
Denver @ Sacramento
Portland @ Golden State
LA Clippers @ LA Lakers
 
posted?
memphis-tams.jpg


Grizz will be wearing these tomorrow on TNT to honor the ABA. (From Gays twitter)
 
And Shaq, Kareem, Russell never did it without a top 5 perimeter player. SG's as option 1A have won the championship 9 times in the last 2 decades (Jordan, Kobe 09-10, Wade) That's a pretty insane stat.

Boston 08. PP was option 1A on that team. Bird won 3. Baylor and West made the finals umpteen times in their day. Lebron can easily get to the finals 6 or 7 times in his career and win 3-4


I don't normally count finals appearances, but when you consistently make the finals as option 1A as Baylor did for a while, and as Lebron has, it's saying something.


But I agree, PG, SG, and C are the most important positions to build around for continued success. PF and SF not as much if history is any indicator.

PP wasn't exactly option 1A on the Celtics.. the big 3 all avg very close to the same ppg.

Kobe and Wade both never won a chip with Shaq/Pau..

Bird was the last SF lead winning team..

and really only MJ has done it without a high or low post player
 
Wade was not a 1A option. Don't let the fraud Finals MVP trophy fool you...

Not true, go back and look at Shaq's stats. Kobe was option 1A from the 2003 season on and Wade was option 1A from his first season with Shaq on. Even Shaq came in and said this is Wade's team.


Shaq was done as being a 1A option that can get you a ring by 2003...his numbers plummeted to low 20's and under in scoring after that season



Shaq averaged 20 points a game in the 05-06 championship season. Wade averaged 27 and he was the absolute go to guy in crunch time. That was Wade's team, they played through Shaq to get the role players open shots, but he wasn't option 1A
 
Not true, go back and look at Shaq's stats. Kobe was option 1A from the 2003 season on and Wade was option 1A from his first season with Shaq on. Even Shaq came in and said this is Wade's team.


Shaq was done as being a 1A option that can get you a ring by 2003...his numbers plummeted to low 20's and under in scoring after that season

Shaq still demanded mad double teams.. shoot he even got doubled in Phx and Bos...
 
PP wasn't exactly option 1A on the Celtics.. the big 3 all avg very close to the same ppg.

Kobe and Wade both never won a chip with Shaq/Pau..

Bird was the last SF lead winning team..

and really only MJ has done it without a high or low post player

But that's a moot point. Hakeem is the only center to win multiple rings without a top tier wing/perimeter player. Jordan is the only wing to win multiple chips without a top tier big.


everyone else in history had a combination of Elite Big and Elite Perimeter. I'm simply arguing about whether or not PF's consistently win as option 1A. I said I think Love can win as option 1B or as option 2...just not as option 1A. it's a very subtle, but i believe important, distinction.
 
Not true, go back and look at Shaq's stats. Kobe was option 1A from the 2003 season on and Wade was option 1A from his first season with Shaq on. Even Shaq came in and said this is Wade's team.


Shaq was done as being a 1A option that can get you a ring by 2003...his numbers plummeted to low 20's and under in scoring after that season

Numbers like ppg won't show you that Shaq was still demanding nearly all of the attention from opposing defenses for over decade.
 
But that's a moot point. Hakeem is the only center to win multiple rings without a top tier wing/perimeter player. Jordan is the only wing to win multiple chips without a top tier big.


everyone else in history had a combination of Elite Big and Elite Perimeter. I'm simply arguing about whether or not PF's consistently win as option 1A. I said I think Love can win as option 1B or as option 2...just not as option 1A. it's a very subtle, but i believe important, distinction.

Love isn't exactly a big... he plays O like a perimeter player.

Also Dream had Clyde for one ring.. Clyde wasn't Trailblazer Clyde but was an elite 2.

Timmy won without a toptier wing..
 
Love isn't exactly a big... he plays O like a perimeter player.

Also Dream had Clyde for one ring.. Clyde wasn't Trailblazer Clyde but was an elite 2.

Timmy won without a toptier wing..

Was just about to hit on the fact that Love can't finish at the rim nearly as well as most would assume.

Surprised reilo hasn't jumped all over that one yet...
 
But that's a moot point. Hakeem is the only center to win multiple rings without a top tier wing/perimeter player. Jordan is the only wing to win multiple chips without a top tier big.


everyone else in history had a combination of Elite Big and Elite Perimeter. I'm simply arguing about whether or not PF's consistently win as option 1A. I said I think Love can win as option 1B or as option 2...just not as option 1A. it's a very subtle, but i believe important, distinction.

Love isnt a good defender either, so thats not exactly following the mold either.

Id say Minny needs an elite center more than they need an elite wing.
 
Was just about to hit on the fact that Love can't finish at the rim nearly as well as most would assume.

Surprised reilo hasn't jumped all over that one yet...

If they gave him another big to play with like Shawn Kemp Jr.. then Minny would be godlen
 
Shaq demanding double teams doesn't make him option 1A. That was Wade's team and he had to put on a ridiculously productive Finals Run to win that ring. Shaq is just huge


Timmy's first chip - him and Robinson were basically equal, plus asterisk season and all that.

He didn't win again till 2003 and had Parker when he was a top 5 PG and Manu when he was a top 6 SG for a couple of them. And again, Timmy is Timmy. Only PF in history to consistently win as option 1A.


Love doesn't play like a traditional PF but I think that actually bolsters my case. The narrative was that Dirk got better as he stopped shooting more 3's and started playing with his back to the basket more.


There's absolutely NO precedent for a PF being option 1A, being a horrible defender, and playing a perimeter oriented game and winning consistently. I would build around an SG or an SF before I would build around a PF in today's NBA even though it's such a loaded position, the favorites to win the ring this year are built around an SF/SG combo, a SF/PG combo, and Derrick Rose lol
 
Shaq demanding double teams doesn't make him option 1A. That was Wade's team and he had to put on a ridiculously productive Finals Run to win that ring. Shaq is just huge

I think this is just Lakers-age still being bitter about Shaq. So w/e...

IN OTHER NOT SHITTING UP THE THREAD NEWS

The bet between Sharp and myself will have the loser wearing an avatar of the winner's choice. In this case though, its probably going to be a female. So, when Sharp loses, I'd like to get some help finding a pic of a hot, yet believable, pic of a 20-ish Korean girl to give him so that he can catch the end of realpicjanuary
 
Was just about to hit on the fact that Love can't finish at the rim nearly as well as most would assume.

Surprised reilo hasn't jumped all over that one yet...

Psht, I have been talking about his terribly at-rim percentage for a couple years now.

I even mentioned it in the chat last night.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom