• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

360 Price: The Industry Reacts

Dave Halverson
Editor-in-chief
Play Magazine

"Anybody wanna buy my Porsche? It's $30k, or you can buy it without wheels for $25K. …Hey, you’ll still be in a Porsche. You can stick spare tires on it and look almost famous! I’m referring of course to Microsoft’s absurd dual price points; one for that poor sap who enters the next generation with wired controllers, no hard drive and standard AV cables (thusly grinding every Microsoft catch phrase under foot) and one for people with fully operational cranial units and 400 expendable bones, sans game.

"Does this make any sense? …No; but does it come as any surprise? Because videogame feuds have become akin to political campaigns in this country, complete with rhetoric and enough speculation and innuendo to make your brain explode. $299 becomes the sound bite price while 399 is the actual article. And what timing: I was just thinking yesterday how the Zelda delay might drive hordes of on-the-fence gamers to the 360 for the next best thing in Kameo, but with this odd packaging I’m sure the majority have now hit the brakes. At least give us wireless and suitable cables for $300. It’s built into the PS3…and tethered chords? That’s the one aspect of next-gen I deem mandatory."

:lol Now that's funny.
 
that article really stresses to me how there are some people in the gaming media who are little more than immature reactionaries. I mean, I understand your'e entitled to have an opinion, but expressing it professionally seems to be way too much to ask for some people.

(of course, I could probably say the same thing about the direction regular American media is going, but still ....)
 
Pretty interesting read, that article. I was hoping someone would come out with an industry perspective bit soon. I was a little surprised to see that it seemed like more than half of the people contacted were positive on the whole thing.
 
Izzy said:
The biggest insult was no ethernet cable in the $299 pack...that must have saved them...<$1 per console. :lol

WTF Izzy? WTF?

With the projected ONE BILLION consoles sold it's a $1B in bank. Dem MS guys are smarter than you probably :)
 
Izzy said:
The biggest insult was no ethernet cable in the $299 pack...that must have saved them...<$1 per console. :lol

why? if your getting the core unit, you likely arent getting on live anyways
 
Ok, one more time.

The 299 core package is wortheless. The 399 premium pack is too expensive for what you get. The 399 package should have a bigger hdd. You can find 60 gb 2.5 sata hdd on newegg for 109. That's retail cost too.
 
I would actually prefer a wired controller. If its usb im sure someone will find a way to make it work on my pc. Not to mention the fact that there is a noticable delay on the wavebird compared to the wired gc controllers. After hours and hours of smash brothers and mario kart nobody will convince me otherwise. Its a fact. I hope that doesnt carry over into next gen.
 
TheDuce22 said:
I would actually prefer a wired controller. If its usb im sure someone will find a way to make it work on my pc. Not to mention the fact that there is a noticable delay on the wavebird compared to the wired gc controllers. After hours and hours of smash brothers and mario kart nobody will convince me otherwise. Its a fact. I hope that doesnt carry over into next gen.

Well you will *need* at least one wireless controller considering Xbox 360 only has 3 usb ports....or you buy a usb splitter.
 
Izzy said:
The biggest insult was no ethernet cable in the $299 pack...that must have saved them...<$1 per console. :lol

Clearly the ethernet cable and chrome face make up the bulk of the cost of the premium edition. There was no way Microsoft could squeeze those into the core system for only $299
 
Mrbob said:
Ok, one more time.

The 299 core package is wortheless. The 399 premium pack is too expensive for what you get.

and one more time for me (the last, i sware);

the 399 is what MS wants to give gamers. people who will be on live. downloading trailers, demos and dlc.

299 is for johnny sports jock, who will pick up madden each year and maybe a few other games. he wont ever get on live, and likely doesnt even have broadband. he may even not have purchased the 360 if it werent for the 299 price. he'll likely never get the hdd or get on live.

whats the fucking problem?

remember, we have known for quite some time that MS had made sure developers cant rely on the hdd to work. we have also known that MS may likely (eventually, we had thought) offer the system without the hdd.

whats the fucking problem?

if your complaining because you know the you'll want the premium system, and 399 is a lot of money... i understand and agree. but thats the way its priced. in hindsight, most of us were kidding ourselves thinking we'd get all of that at 299
 
cyberheater said:
I still can't believe the bitching still going on here.

$299 dollars is a great price for an entry level next gen console.

What's not to like.
The fact most of us aren't being paid by Microsoft or one of its public relations agencies to promote the Xbox 360 on Internet message boards.
 
TheDuce22 said:
I would actually prefer a wired controller. If its usb im sure someone will find a way to make it work on my pc. Not to mention the fact that there is a noticable delay on the wavebird compared to the wired gc controllers. After hours and hours of smash brothers and mario kart nobody will convince me otherwise. Its a fact. I hope that doesnt carry over into next gen.

Logitech's wireless controllers for the PS2 are flawless... FLAWLESS! Of course it took a revision... but hey... ;)
 
The car comparisons are not appropriate. It's not like the $299 SKU is UNUSABLE -- it'll still play pretty much every single Xbox 360 game out of the box. It'll work online (it DOES have an Ethernet port, after all). In other words, it's still a viable console that'll work just fine for the people who choose to buy it.

Now, anyone who wants the "full experience" and chooses to buy the $299 SKU and the other accessories a la carte is nuts. But for folks who want to play Madden or PGR racing and don't care about downloading new content or doing video streaming or other things that WILL require the hard disk, the $299 box is fine.

And Mark Rein is right -- from a developer's standpoint, including 512MB RAM was much more important than having the hard disk always there. That makes games like Oblivion possible much more than the HDD does. And like other developers said, we knew that the HDD wouldn't always be there from the very beginning, and so Oblivion like other games can run without it but will take advantage of it when it is there.
 
First off, +10,000 light side points to CS Weaver.

Second:

ATTN. MICROSOFT.

If you are trying to win the hearts of Japan this time - or at least not look quite so pathetic - then a word of advice.

DO NOT JERK AROUND SQUARE (-ENIX) ON THE MATTER OF STORAGE FORMATS.

This has been attempted in the past.





IT DID NOT WORK SO GOOD.


Edit: I forgot to add - I think at this point it is clear David Perry is utterly disconnected from actual gamers. It'd explain Enter the Matrix. (Please. That isn't intended as a cheap shot. It's just that the old David Perry, he of console gaming, would have NEVER allowed a product like that to ship in that condition with his company's name on it.)
 
current_avatar.jpg


IS THAT A DRAGON EYE!?

Don't TAUNT us Mr. Meister! :p
 
Mrbob said:
*yawn*

You don't need to spin for MS. They pay people to do that sort of thing. :)

*yawn

you dont need to spin damage. if you dont like it, let em know with your money. never buy the fucking thing. i dare you
 
Logitech's wireless controllers for the PS2 are flawless... FLAWLESS! Of course it took a revision... but hey... ;)

People said the same about the wavebird, and they were wrong. I would have to try it for myself before I believe it.
 
SteveMeister said:
The car comparisons are not appropriate. It's not like the $299 SKU is UNUSABLE -- it'll still play pretty much every single Xbox 360 game out of the box. It'll work online (it DOES have an Ethernet port, after all). In other words, it's still a viable console that'll work just fine for the people who choose to buy it.

well, the car comparison would work if Halverson wasn't a complete moron. Of course, instead of commenting how it's like buying a ferrari without power windows / locks / steering etc, he compared it to buying a car without wheels, which doesn't make even come close to making sense.
 
op_ivy said:
and one more time for me (the last, i sware);

the 399 is what MS wants to give gamers. people who will be on live. downloading trailers, demos and dlc.

This I am fine with and despite the few complaining would have been fine too. Maybe dropping the Live headset, remote and component cables and bringing it down to $350 or hey lets use some marketing and say $360 bucks would have been nice

299 is for johnny sports jock, who will pick up madden each year and maybe a few other games. he wont ever get on live, and likely doesnt even have broadband. he may even not have purchased the 360 if it werent for the 299 price. he'll likely never get the hdd or get on live.

whats the fucking problem?

Aha! Here is the problem. Johnny sports jock was the biggest buyer of the original Xbox. He's (or she) was the one that wanted the cool graphics and heard the Xbox was the shiznit. Oh and they always had the best graphics compared to the others. Now you're offering el cheapo consumers the $299.99 package in a next generation, high cost, game console battle.

Now, you have a bunch of cheap ass consumers with HDD-less xboxes. MS around spring says "Oh shit" and maybe drops the 299.99 package all together but too late. They do that and now they have pissed off cheap ass consumers who wanted that package. And now you also have a split market with HDD and without.

You're a developer, like say EA, will you go out of your way to program games to take advantage of that HDD that is only in a percentage of the home market now? Do you honestly think we are going to see the leaps and bounds in more HDD usage with this splintering of the 360 market? Or are we can end up with another glorified Memory Card/HDD like this Gen Xbox? That's the fucking problem.
 
SteveMeister said:
The car comparisons are not appropriate. It's not like the $299 SKU is UNUSABLE -- it'll still play pretty much every single Xbox 360 game out of the box. It'll work online (it DOES have an Ethernet port, after all). In other words, it's still a viable console that'll work just fine for the people who choose to buy it.

Now, anyone who wants the "full experience" and chooses to buy the $299 SKU and the other accessories a la carte is nuts. But for folks who want to play Madden or PGR racing and don't care about downloading new content or doing video streaming or other things that WILL require the hard disk, the $299 box is fine.

And Mark Rein is right -- from a developer's standpoint, including 512MB RAM was much more important than having the hard disk always there. That makes games like Oblivion possible much more than the HDD does. And like other developers said, we knew that the HDD wouldn't always be there from the very beginning, and so Oblivion like other games can run without it but will take advantage of it when it is there.

One simple question:

The PC version WILL use the HDD, right? You didn't optimize it so it won't?
 
Borys said:
One simple question:

The PC version WILL use the HDD, right? You didn't optimize it so it won't?

no offense, but is that supposed to be a joke question or what?
 
Borys said:
One simple question:

The PC version WILL use the HDD, right? You didn't optimize it so it won't?

:lol :lol of course it will :D

Oh yeah, I forgot to mention -- when we found out that Microsoft was upping the Xbox 360's RAM from 256MB to 512MB, we had a party. Seriously, it was a huge deal :)
 
TheDuce22 said:
People said the same about the wavebird, and they were wrong. I would have to try it for myself before I believe it.
You are the only person I have ever heard claim the Wave Bird produces lag.
 
Kaijima said:
I forgot to add - I think at this point it is clear David Perry is utterly disconnected from actual gamers. It'd explain Enter the Matrix. (Please. That isn't intended as a cheap shot. It's just that the old David Perry, he of console gaming, would have NEVER allowed a product like that to ship in that condition with his company's name on it.)

Not that I'm defending him or anything, but from what I understood, the game had to ship the same day as the movie released, no ifs, ands, or buts about it. Of course, it sure as hell doesn't explain what the hell they were doing for the 3 years before it came out that led to what we got in stores.
 
Izzy said:
wired controller = $40
wireless controller = $50


Don't we need to factor in another $10~20 for a USB hub if you use the wired controllers (since there are only 2 USB ports on the front of the box for wired controllers, IIRC)? Although I guess you could plug a controller into the 3rd USB port in the back of the system and lose some cord length.
 
why don't they just include the HDD as standard... drop having the wireless controller coming stock with the system, drop the remote, drope the component cables, drop the network cable, drop the wireless headset, drop xbox live and just have one SKU? Just sell the X360 with the HDD and one wired controller for $299.

then sell the wireless controller, the component cables, xbox live, the wireless headset, the remote control, the network cable, memory cards, larger hard drives, and the wireless ethernet all seperately to help make some money back (lots of it).

nobody would have bitched at all had they done this. the hardcore could buy the accessories they wanted and not feel they were paying for shit they didn't want. not to mention having a standard built in hard-drive for all systems (forever too, not ever taking it out no matter what and announcing as such. informing devs it will always be in every system). everybody would still have "options" and the devs and consumers their HDD. MSFT would make tons of cash on sales of wireless controllers and accesories (btw, they need to price these accesories fairly too).

why the fuck they didn't do this blows my mind. this is how succesful consoles have done it forever now. it's like they wanted to be fucking stupid.

i now understand why all the people who made the Xbox 1 great left... fucktard suits who have no clue are now calling the shots. they think they are making ipods.
 
Mrbob said:
Only if you double dog dare.

are we back to "no buy" status, mrbob?

shpankey said:
i now understand why all the people who made the Xbox 1 great left... fucktard suits who have no clue are now calling the shots. they think they are making ipods.

it sure looks that way.
 
I think not having the harddrive standard (at launch) is a bad idea because it diminishes the potential of many of the services, such as downloadable demos & trailers and xbl arcade. I'm not really concerned over developers supporting it in games.

But really, they could have 100 SKUs for all I care. It is the way they executed. They made the choice to come out and commit to certain standard features (not talking about the hdd in particular). They could've been non-commital and this announcement would've been just fine. Hell, it was always rumored there would be multiple tiers to begin with. Until Microsoft came out and killed those rumors of course.

and the accessory pricing is just a joke. $100 for a wifi adapter that will be standard in every other console? No thanks.
 
Musashi Wins! said:
are we back to "no buy" status, mrbob?



it sure looks that way.


I want the tree sitty to dominate. But I also don't want to be fleeced by MS and this is exactly what they are doing to consumers. So I'm torn. :(
 
SteveMeister said:
:lol :lol of course it will :D

Oh yeah, I forgot to mention -- when we found out that Microsoft was upping the Xbox 360's RAM from 256MB to 512MB, we had a party. Seriously, it was a huge deal :)

We've totally had parties for lesser reasons :P

Beer rocks!
 
SKOPE said:
You are the only person I have ever heard claim the Wave Bird produces lag.

I've never had any lag with it, but I'd often get some kind of signal interference which was extremely annoying. It was like the wavebird was constantly being turned off and on which made it impossible to control and would force me to have to pause the game and wait for things to clear up. Though judging by other people's accounts, I may just have a defective controller. I think it has more to do with something in the area causing some sort of interference (I've already tried changing the dial channel but that hasn't worked).
 
You are the only person I have ever heard claim the Wave Bird produces lag.

Its very slight but its there. Another issue is from time to time the controller will cut out, for instance if you move your knee in front of it.
 
TheDuce22 said:
Its very slight but its there. Another issue is from time to time the controller will cut out, for instance if you move your knee in front of it.

I'm willing to wager that you cannot discern any noticable difference.

RF travels at the speed of light. Converting that RF takes microseconds most likely. You can tell me that you tell microseconds worth of difference?

I think not.
 
I'm willing to wager that you cannot discern any noticable difference.

RF travels at the speed of light. Converting that RF takes microseconds most likely. You can tell me that you tell microseconds worth of difference?

Yes, there is a difference between the wavebird and a wired controller. You can argue all you want, I have experienced it.
 
Top Bottom