• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

4 years later-Was Blu Ray in the PS3 a good idea?

mr stroke

Member
Four years ago(E3 May 2005) Sony announced the PS3 and that it would include a Blu Ray player, was this a good idea for Sony as a whole? It Ultimately won them the format war, but did it harpoon their gaming devision for good(high price of PS3) or will winning the next generation disc format be a bigger victory for the company in the long run?
 
Yes and no.

I have a much better audio/visual experience playing PS3 exclusives over 360 exclusives (uncompressed sound ftmfw). So it's great for gaming and anyone who loves games. Also it was a selling point (not so much anymore, though). But no doubt it cost a lot of sales, and possibly 2nd place in the console wars, due to the higher price of including blu-ray.
 
Yes. It's a great format, it's caused people who wouldn't buy a gaming system to buy a PS3 just because of Blu-Ray, and it's prevented piracy of PS3 games.
 
They had to establish themselves now, before the 5-D nanomachine onslaught of the future arrives:

A team of researchers at the Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne, Australia, used nanotechnology to boost the storage potential nearly 10,000-fold compared to standard DVDs, according to a study published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature.

"We were able to show how nanostructured material can be incorporated onto a disc in order to increase data capacity, without increasing the physical size of the disc," said Min Gu, who lead the team.

Discs currently have three spatial dimensions. By using gold nanorods Gu and colleagues were able to add two additional dimensions, one based on the colour spectrum, and the other on polarization.

Because nanoparticles react to light depending on their shape, it was possible to record information in a range of different colour's wavelengths at the same physical location on the disc.

Current DVDs record in a single colour wavelength using a laser.

The fifth dimension was made possible by polarisation. When light waves were projected onto the disc, the direction of the electric field within the waves aligned with the gold nanorods.

"The polarisation can be rotated 360 degrees," explained co-author James Chon.

"We were, for example, able to record at zero degree polarisation. Then on top of that, were able to record another layer of information at 90 degrees polarisation, without them interfering with each other," he said in a statement.

The researchers are still working out the speed at which the discs can be written on, and say that commercial production is at least five years off.

They have signed an agreement with Korea-based Samsung, one of the world's largest electronics manufacturers.

Last month, US technology giant General Electric said its researchers had developed a holographic disc which can store the equivalent of 100 standard DVDs.

Dual-layer Blu-ray discs hold the equivalent of 10 standard DVDs
.
 
I think so, you have to start somewhere.

Only problem with bluray now is slow read speed at x1

all they have to do for the next system is give it x2/x4 read times and everyone will stop complaining about forced installs.

I'm happy with it either way

*hugs bluray collection*
 
Yep. Good idea for me. I'm now buying BR movies and players for my family which is what they want.
 
No it wasnt, but im pretty much sure that it was a decision taken outside of SCEI.
 
mr stroke said:
but good for the entire Sony corp?


Like I give a fuck about them as a corporation.......

I feel like it's a great bonus for owning a current gen system. I love the medium and enjoy watching/listening to movies in HD. That's all the matters to me personally.
 
A bad idea for Sony's game division and its bottom line? Definitely.

A bad idea for me? Hell no, I'm loving Blu-ray movies.

A bad idea for Sony as a whole? No way, it's the reason Blu-ray is the HD movie standard right now and in the forthcoming years it will pay Sony back in SPADES.

Also as others have mentioned it's also the reason the PS3 is the only platform that piracy isn't running rampant on right now.
 
I like the fact that I'll be able to play FF games on a single disc, but I don't think it was a good idea for Sony in retrospect. Unless they're somehow making crazy profit on blu ray sales I'm not aware of.

I would have rather the same exact ps3 but with dvd instead, while ps4 could use blu ray when it was cheap. Or if there would be no blu ray then (with the ps3 not using it), then use whatever higher capacity disc available at the time.
 
Been good for me, I imagine results somewhat mixed, but their gaming division can recover, losing the format war would have been a bigger loss.
 
It might have been a bad idea for Sony's bottom line currently but in the long run it will ultimately pay off. Sony putting Blu-Ray in PS3 won them the HD format war and as Blu-Ray picks up more and more steam that will only help there profits even if PS3 flounders.
 
I would have not enjoyed MGS4 as much as I did if I had to swap discs at each chapter. So yeah, it was a good idea. :P
 
Purely from the perspective of the health of the playstation business and the PS3's penetration, no, it wasn't. I think purely adopting that POV, if SCE could go back in time and swap Blu-ray for..say.. a $299 launch of PS3, they would. PS2 style success wouldn't have been guaranteed even in that scenario - Wii was independently building significant buzz - but undoubtedly the platform would have benefited.

From Sony's perspective more broadly..I dunno if it was worth it. We'll see I suppose.

From a personal POV as a consumer, I very much appreciate the decision, and the closure it brought to the HD wars. I'm personally very happy to have blu-ray in my PS3, but I can see what it did in terms of bringing the system out of reach of others for longer.
 
GQman2121 said:
Like I give a fuck about them as a corporation.......

I feel like it's a great bonus for owning a current gen system. I love the medium and enjoy watching/listening to movies in HD. That's all the matters to me personally.


Sooooooo true. The Dark Knight on Blu-ray is quite the eye candy. Its hard to buy dvds now.
 
There is no easy answer, it is yes and no, it was great for Sony's corporate interests but it was ultimately a bad move for their gaming business which has suffered because of the high cost that Blu-Ray saddled with the PS3.
 
Maybe in the loooooong run (like 10 years from now) when Bluray has taken of and has become the new media standard, it might.

But as of right now, and especially for Sony gaming devision, I say no. Just look at what the PS1 en PS2 where, and what the PS3 is. It's amazing how a console manufacturer can fall so hard in just one generation. And that's all because of 599 US DOLLARS, which was because of bluray I assume.
 
TTP said:
I would have not enjoyed MGS4 as much as I did if I had to swap discs at each chapter. So yeah, it was a good idea. :P
813042629936805_4823a9fd39.jpg
 
I'm not sure to be honest...individual replacement blu-ray lens for the PS3 are only $30...I know because I bought one :P Something else in the machine is driving up the price.
 
It's the reason why PS3 has lost to the the 360, but it's also the reason that Blu-ray was successful. Which one is more important?
 
I think it was a waste but I realize why it was done. But there are better ways to allow for larger games IMO. Since every system has a hard drive I think it would've been a better idea to ship the system with 3.5" hard drives (more storage) and just let you dump DVD(s) with the game data to the hard drive and use a disc as a key.
 
It was a good idea. It gave me a chance to buy blu-rays as well as games. Would never even thought of getting a blu-ray player.
 
Top Bottom